1. Efficacy of an internet-based exposure treatment for flying phobia (NO-FEAR Airlines) with and without therapist guidance: a randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Cristina Botella, Sonia Mor, Juana Bretón-López, Adriana Mira, Diana Castilla, Soledad Quero, Rosa M. Baños, and Daniel Campos
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,lcsh:RC435-571 ,Health Behavior ,Psychological intervention ,Self-help ,Flying Phobia ,law.invention ,Treatment and control groups ,Fear of flying ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Patient Education as Topic ,law ,Intervention (counseling) ,lcsh:Psychiatry ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,therapist guidance ,medicine ,Safety behaviors ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,flying phobia ,Flying phobia ,self-help ,Internet ,Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ,business.industry ,internet-based exposure ,Fear ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,030227 psychiatry ,Self Care ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Treatment Outcome ,Therapist guidance ,Phobic Disorders ,Therapy, Computer-Assisted ,randomized controlled trial ,Physical therapy ,The Internet ,Female ,Internet-based exposure ,business ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Internet-based treatments appear to be a promising way to enhance the in vivo exposure approach, specifically in terms of acceptability and access to treatment. However, the literature on specific phobias is scarce, and, as far as we know, there are no studies on Flying Phobia (FP). This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of an Internet-based exposure treatment for FP (NO-FEAR Airlines) that includes exposure scenarios composed of images and sounds, versus a waiting-list control group. A secondary aim is to explore two ways of delivering NO-FEAR Airlines, with and without therapist guidance. Methods A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in which 69 participants were allocated to: 1) NO-FEAR Airlines totally self-applied, 2) NO-FEAR Airlines with therapist guidance, 3) a waiting-list control group. Primary outcome measures were the Fear of Flying Questionnaire-II and the Fear of Flying Scale. Secondary outcomes included the Fear and Avoidance Scales, Clinician Severity Scale, and Patient’s Improvement scale. Behavioral outcomes (post-treatment flights and safety behaviors) were also included. Mixed-model analyses with no ad hoc imputations were conducted for primary and secondary outcome measures. Results NO-FEAR Airlines (with and without therapist guidance) was significantly effective, compared to the waiting list control group, on all primary and secondary outcomes (all ps
- Published
- 2019