Search

Background With advancing age the brain becomes more sensitive to centrally acting drugs thus increasing the risk of cognitive side-effects. The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare developed indicators to measure and follow quality in older people's drug therapy, one being “Potentially Inappropriate Medications risking Cognitive impairment (PIMcogn)”. Associations between anticholinergics and cognitive impairment are described, especially in persons with Alzheimer's disease or Lewy Body Dementia/Parkinson's disease dementia, due to degenerated cholinergic pathways. Objectives To examine the prevalence of PIMcogn and if it differed between nursing home residents with and without a dementia diagnosis and between residents with different dementia aetiologias. Methods Descriptive cross-sectional study, based on residents ≥65 years in nursing home dementia units in Malmo, Sweden, in 2012–2013 (N = 574). Results The study population consisted of 76% women, the mean age was 86 years and a dementia diagnosis was registered in 92%. A total of 74% were prescribed at least one PIMcogn. Benzodiazepines were prevalent in 59%, opioids in 27%, antipsychotics in 20% and anticholinergics in 13%. Opioids used regularly and antiepileptics were more common in residents without a dementia diagnosis. The lowest proportion of anticholinergics was seen in the oldest age group, 11.0%. There was no difference seen in anticholinergics between dementia types with considerable cholinergic deficit and other dementia diagnoses. Conclusions Treatment with at least one PIMcogn was common. Usage of benzodiazepines and antipsychotics was, despite the knowledge of alarming side-effects, high. An awareness of the inappropriateness in prescribing anticholinergics to the oldest old seems to be apparent, but not to persons with cholinergic deficit.

Background: With growing demand for medical information and health applications in pregnancy, the potential of electronic health (eHealth) and mobile health (mHealth) solutions in clinical care is increasingly unfolding. However, we still do not know how pregnant women engage with mobile apps, how such apps impact routine medical care, and whether benefit expectations are met. Whereas recent research has raised the subject of user distribution and analyzed the content of pregnancy applications, there is still a significant knowledge gap regarding what pregnant women like and dislike about pregnancy tools, along with how such interventions could be improved. Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the perceptions and expectations of mobile and Web-based patient-engagement pregnancy applications. We assessed usability requirements, general acceptance of eHealth, and the impact of eHealth and mHealth pregnancy applications on the doctor-patient interaction and daily clinical routine. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted at the maternity department of a major German university hospital. The sample included 30 women with low- to medium-risk pregnancies. Half of the patients were seen during outpatient care and half were hospitalized for several days. The extent and frequency of Web- and mobile phone app usage were assessed. Semistructured interviews were conducted and analyzed using systematic thematic analysis. Results: Patients had a high demand for Web-based pregnancy applications. Study findings suggested a strong request for personalization, monitoring, and accessibility for frequent use as main themes derived from the interviews. Fostering patient empowerment in the doctor-patient relationship was also highly valued for a pregnancy app. Participants favored further integration of medical apps in their daily routine and pregnancy care. However, concerns were raised about content quality, trustworthiness of Web sources, and individual data security. Conclusions: eHealth and mHealth applications are a highly frequented source of information. Expectations and usability requirements for those applications are also high, thus posing a challenge to interdisciplinary service providers. Patients’ attitude toward integrating apps in routine care settings was positive with a favorable influence on patient empowerment. Health care professionals should guide pregnant women toward a successful integration of these educational tools in pregnancy care. [JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017;5(5):e73]

Purpose The aims of this study were to identify demographic and socio-economic predictors of non-participation in cervical screening in Denmark, and to evaluate the influence of health care use on screening participation. Methods A population based register study was undertaken using data from the Central Population Register, the national Patobank, and Statistics Denmark. The study included women aged 25–54 years on 1st of January 2002, living in Denmark during the next 5 years, and without a history of total hysterectomy, N =1,052,447. Independent variables included age, civil status, nationality, level of education, and use of health care. Associations with non-participation in screening were determined with logistic regression. Results Main predictors of non-participation were limited or no contact with dental services (odds ratio (OR)=2.36), general practitioners (OR=1.75), and high age (OR=1.98). Other important factors for non-participation were primary school education only (OR=1.53), not being married (OR=1.49), and foreign nationality (OR=1.32). Conclusion A 2–1.5-fold difference in non-participation in cervical screening in Denmark was found across various population sub-groups. Increased screening compliance among women with primary school education only, and limited or no use of primary health care services in general could potentially diminish the current social inequalities in cervical cancer incidence, and thus decrease the overall high incidence of this disease in Denmark.