Search

Background It is rare for 2 primary tumors to occur simultaneously in a patient. Management of cervical dumbbell schwannomas (CDSs) with concurrent tumors (CTs) requires a specific neurosurgical strategy. The primary objective of this study is to investigate surgical strategies for CDSs with CTs while preserving as much of the mechanically relevant bone structures as possible. Methods Twelve patients with concurrent CTs and CDSs were identified from 3 medical centers. Surgical strategies for CDSs were based on accurate preoperative images and subsequent treatment considerations for CTs. All patients received surgical treatment for CDSs and CTs. Clinical features, surgical considerations for a transforaminal approach (TA), and ultimate outcome were studied retrospectively. Results Gross total resection of CDSs was achieved with endoscopic and microscopic assistance in 9 cases, and subtotal resection was achieved in 3 cases after the head and neck surgeons exposed and removed the extraforaminal anatomy. One patient required an additional hemilaminectomy for the resection of the intraspinal segment. After wound healing, patients were transferred to the appropriate surgical department for surgery on CTs with cervical spine stabilization after a transforaminal approach. Conclusions In most patients, the stability of the cervical spine can be preserved with low invasive microsurgical or endoscopic transforaminal resection. CTs could be surgically treated sequentially after microscopic- and endoscopic-assisted resection of CDSs.

Objective Treating Class II subdivision malocclusion with asymmetry has been a challenge for orthodontists because of the complicated characteristics of asymmetry. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of dental and skeletal asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion, and to assess the relationship between the condyle-glenoid fossa and first molar. Methods Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 32 patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion were three-dimensionally reconstructed using the Mimics software. Forty-five anatomic landmarks on the reconstructed structures were selected and 27 linear and angular measurements were performed. Paired-samples t-tests were used to compare the average differences between the Class I and Class II sides; Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used for analyzing the linear association. Results The faciolingual crown angulation of the mandibular first molar (p < 0.05), sagittal position of the maxillary and mandibular first molars (p < 0.01), condylar head height (p < 0.01), condylar process height (p < 0.05), and angle of the posterior wall of the articular tubercle and coronal position of the glenoid fossa (p < 0.01) were significantly different between the two sides. The morphology and position of the condyle-glenoid fossa significantly correlated with the three-dimensional changes in the first molar. Conclusions Asymmetry in the sagittal position of the maxillary and mandibular first molars between the two sides and significant lingual inclination of the mandibular first molar on the Class II side were the dental characteristics of Class II subdivision malocclusion. Condylar morphology and glenoid fossa position asymmetries were the major components of skeletal asymmetry and were well correlated with the three-dimensional position of the first molar.