1. A novel recurrent neural network approach in forecasting short term solar irradiance
- Author
-
Frank Gyan Okyere, Fawad Khan, Hyeon Tae Kim, Thavisak Sihalath, Deog Hyun Lee, Jihoon Park, Anil Bhujel, Mustafa Jaihuni, and Jayanta Kumar Basak
- Subjects
0209 industrial biotechnology ,Memory, Long-Term ,Mean squared error ,Computer science ,02 engineering and technology ,Machine learning ,computer.software_genre ,Solar irradiance ,Cross-validation ,020901 industrial engineering & automation ,Robustness (computer science) ,Republic of Korea ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,Instrumentation ,business.industry ,Applied Mathematics ,020208 electrical & electronic engineering ,Computer Science Applications ,Temporal database ,Term (time) ,Recurrent neural network ,Control and Systems Engineering ,Neural Networks, Computer ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,computer ,Predictive modelling ,Forecasting - Abstract
Forecasting solar irradiance is of utmost importance in supplying renewable energy efficiently and timely. This paper aims to experiment five variants of recurrent neural networks (RNN), and develop effective and reliable 5-minute short term solar irradiance prediction models. The 5 RNN classes are long-short term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), Simple RNN, bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and bidirectional GRU (Bi-GRU); the first 3 classes are unidirectional and the last two are bidirectional RNN models. The 26 months data under consideration, exhibits extremely volatile weather conditions in Jinju city, South Korea. Therefore, after different experimental processes, 5 hyper-parameters were selected for each model cautiously. In each model, different levels of depth and width were tested; moreover, a 9-fold cross validation was applied to distinguish them against high variability in the seasonal time-series dataset. Generally the deeper architectures of the aforementioned models had significant outcomes; meanwhile, the Bi-LSTM and Bi-GRU provided more accurate predictions as compared to the unidirectional ones. The Bi-GRU model provided the lowest RMSE and highest R2 values of 46.1 and 0.958; additionally, it required 5.25*10-5 seconds per trainable parameter per epoch, the lowest incurred computational cost among the mentioned models. All 5 models performed differently over the four seasons in the 9-fold cross validation test. On average, the bidirectional RNNs and the simple RNN model showed high robustness with less data and high temporal data variability; although, the stronger architectures of the bidirectional models, deems their results more reliable.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF