1. Metrics and definitions used in the assessment of cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review
- Author
-
Melanie Anderson, Victoria Lee-Kim, Lesley Ruttan, Marvin J. Fritzler, Dorcas E. Beaton, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Robin Green, Kathleen Bingham, Patricia P. Katz, May Y. Choi, Zahi Touma, Moe Zandy, Kimberley Yuen, and Joan E. Wither
- Subjects
Adult ,Ovid medline ,Screening test ,PsycINFO ,Neuropsychological Tests ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Rheumatology ,medicine ,Humans ,Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic ,Cognitive Dysfunction ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Neuropsychological assessment ,skin and connective tissue diseases ,Cognitive impairment ,030203 arthritis & rheumatology ,Systemic lupus erythematosus ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Neuropsychological battery ,medicine.disease ,Benchmarking ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,business ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Objective To review: 1) degree of conformity to the American College of Rheumatology neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB) among studies that used a NB, 2) review definitions of cognitive impairment (CI) from studies that used a NB, and 3) characterize measurement tools used to assess CI in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods The literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO for articles on CI in adult SLE patients. We reviewed studies that used a NB and compared their tests to the ACR-NB to assess the degree of conformity. Definitions of CI from studies that used a NB were reviewed when sufficient information was available. We reviewed and categorized CI measurement tools into four broad categories: NB, screening, incomplete/mixed batteries, and computerized batteries. Results Of 8727 references, 118 were selected for detailed review and 97 were included in the final analysis. Of 43 studies that used a NB, none of the studies used the ACR-NB exactly as published. Many studies supplemented with other tests. Overall, there was inconsistent use of ACR-NB tests. Definitions for CI varied, with cut-offs ranging from 1 to 3 standard deviations below normative values on domains/tests varying in type and number. The most frequently used measurement tool for assessing CI in SLE was a NB. Use of screening tests and computerized batteries have also increased over the last decade. Conclusion The assessment and definition of CI in SLE remains heterogeneous. A consensus meeting to address existing inconsistencies should be considered to harmonize the field of CI in SLE.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF