Search

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is generally less than open cholecystectomy; however, the postoperative shoulder and abdominal pain experienced by patients still causes preventable distress. Intraperitoneal irrigation of the diaphragmatic surface and gallbladder fossa using normal saline, bupivacaine, or lignocaine may effectively control visceral abdominal pain after an LC. Two hundred patients with similar demographics undergoing elective LC were randomized to one of four groups of 50 patients each, including Group A placebo control, Group B with isotonic saline irrigation, Group C with bupivacaine irrigation, and Group D with lignocaine irrigation. All patients received preperitoneal abdominal wall infiltration with 0.25 per cent bupivacaine to control parietal (somatic) abdominal pain. The visual analogue and verbal rating pain scores at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours for both shoulder and abdominal pain were recorded in a prospective double-blind fashion at four points during the first 24 postoperative hours. Analgesia requirements, vital signs, blood glucose, and incidence of nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Patients in each group demonstrated a significant difference in visual analogue and verbal rating pain scores and analgesic consumption when compared with controls. Lignocaine controlled pain significantly better than saline or bupivacaine. Bowel function recovery was similar in all patients, and there were no significant complications. We conclude that intraperitoneal irrigation with either saline, bupivacaine, or lignocaine can significantly reduce visceral abdominal pain after LC. Lignocaine was the most efficacious local anesthetic in this trial and has a high safety profile when used at recommended doses.

Background: Recurrent and complex bilateral inguinal hernias are associated with a high recurrence rate. This study evaluates prospectively the efficacy and safety of giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac (GPRVS) in a group of patients at high risk for recurrence. Methods: Sixty-four patients with 124 inguinal hernias (60 bilateral and 4 unilateral) underwent repair using a large polyester mesh based on Stoppa’s preperitoneal technique. Mean age was 61 years (63 men and 1 woman), and 69% had one or more comorbid medical conditions. Results: Factors predicating a high risk for recurrence included large hernia size (≥5 cm; 31%, 20 of 64), failure of one or more previous repairs (39%, 25 of 64), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28%, 18 of 64). Mean operative time was 115 minutes (range 45 to 235). Mean length of stay was 3 ± 3 days. There were 2 major and 15 minor complications, no mesh infections, and no death. Follow-up was obtained in 95% (61 of 64). After a mean follow-up of 24 months, the recurrence rate was 1% (1 of 124) per inguinal hernia repaired or 2% (1 of 64) per patient. Conclusion: GPRVS is a safe and effective addition to the surgeon’s armamentarium to treat selected patients with recurrent or complex bilateral inguinal hernias.

Desmoid tumors are benign mesenchymal tumors with a strong tendency for local recurrence after surgery. Radiotherapy improves local control following incomplete resection, but nearby organs at risk may limit the dose to the target volume. The patient in this report presented with a recurrent desmoid tumor of the right flank and underwent surgery with microscopically positive margins. Particular problems presented in this case included that the tumor bed was situated in close proximity to the liver and the right kidney and that the right kidney was responsible for 65% of the patient’s renal function. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans delivering 54 Gy necessarily exposed the right kidney to a V18 of 98% and the liver to a V30 of 55%. Proton therapy plans significantly reduced the right kidney V18 to 32% and the liver V30 to 28%. In light of this, the proton plan was utilized for treatment of this patient. Proton therapy was tolerated without gastrointestinal discomfort or other complaints. Twenty-four months after initiation of proton therapy, the patient is without clinical or radiographic evidence of disease recurrence. In this setting, the improved dose distribution associated with proton therapy allowed for curative treatment of a patient who arguably could not have been safely treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or other methods of conventional radiotherapy.

Near the beginning of this century, the aggressive surgical procedure of radical mastectomy to treat breast cancer was proposed by William S. Halsted. Today, the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer and her surgeon have significantly more varied treatment options. Radical surgical resection has been supplanted by breast conservation therapy. Biopsy methods and the actual surgical techniques continue to be refined. Further developments have emerged in the debates over the efficacy of axillary dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Diverse differences are seen in breast cancer of younger patients due to some fundamental distinctions in their disease. As we approach the next millenium it is clear that breast cancer is curable in a large percentage of women. While attention is turning to the investigation of the biologic and genetic factors involved with this disease, surgical regimens maintain a preeminent role in the overall quest for cure.