Search

Purpose:FGFR1 amplification (FGFR1amp) is recurrent in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and is associated with resistance to endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is). Multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKIs) and selective pan-FGFR inhibitors (FGFRis) are being developed for FGFR1amp breast cancer. High-level FGFR amplification and protein expression by IHC have identified breast cancer responders to FGFRis or MTKIs, respectively.Experimental Design:Here, we used preclinical models and patient samples to identify predictive biomarkers to these drugs. We evaluated the antitumor activity of an FGFRi and an MTKI in a collection of 17 breast cancer patient–derived xenografts (PDXs) harboring amplification in FGFR1/2/3/4 and in 10 patients receiving either an FGFRi/MTKI. mRNA levels were measured on FFPE tumor samples using two commercial strategies. Proliferation and angiogenesis were evaluated by detecting Ki-67 and CD31 in viable areas by immunofluorescence.Results:High FGFR1–4 mRNA levels but not copy-number alteration (CNA) is associated with FGFRi response. Treatment with MTKIs showed higher response rates than with FGFRis (86% vs. 53%), regardless of the FGFR1–4 mRNA levels. FGFR-addicted PDXs exhibited an antiproliferative response to either FGFRis or MTKIs, and PDXs exclusively sensitive to MTKI exhibited an additional antiangiogenic response. Consistently, the clinical benefit of MTKIs was not associated with high FGFR1–4 mRNA levels and was observed in patients previously treated with antiangiogenic drugs.Conclusions:Tailored therapy with FGFRis in molecularly selected MBC based on high FGFR1–4 mRNA levels warrants prospective validation in patients with CDK4/6i-resistant luminal breast cancer and in patients with TNBC without targeted therapeutic options.

Patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) have a poor prognosis. Blocking the PD-1–PD-L1 axis has shown promising activity in this patient population. We assessed the safety and antitumor activity of PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with refractory advanced CSCC. This was a prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with advanced CSCC who enrolled in an open-label, phase II clinical trial for pembrolizumab in patients with refractory rare cancers during 2016–2018. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 21 days until progressive disease, unacceptable adverse event, or completion of 24 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was nonprogression rate (NPR) at 27 weeks; secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR) per irRECIST, clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Twenty patients with refractory CSCC enrolled; 19 were evaluable for efficacy. Median follow-up time was 44.1 months. The NPR at 27 weeks was 37% (95% CI 0.16–0.62). Three patients had a complete response (CR), three had a partial response, and one had stable disease, for an ORR of 32% and a CBR of 37%; median duration of response was 27.3 months. All three patients with a CR remained free of recurrence at the time of writing. Severe treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥ 3) occurred in 10% of patients (2/20). PD-L1 expression was not correlated with response to pembrolizumab. A long-term follow-up confirms pembrolizumab’s antitumor activity and safety profile in patients with refractory CSCC. Patients with a CR may experience cure. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02721732, Registered March 29, 2016.

Purpose: PROCLAIM-CX-2029 is a phase I first-in-human study of CX-2029, a Probody–drug conjugate targeting CD71 (transferrin receptor 1) in adults with advanced solid tumors. Although the transferrin receptor is highly expressed across multiple tumor types, it has not been considered a target for antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) due to its broad expression on normal cells. CX-2029 is a masked form of a proprietary anti-CD71 antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E, designed to be unmasked in the tumor microenvironment by tumor-associated proteases, therefore limiting off-tumor toxicity and creating a therapeutic window for this previously undruggable target. Patients and Methods: This was a dose-escalation, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of CX-2029. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). CX-2029 was administered i.v. every 3 weeks. Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled in eight dose levels. No DLTs were reported in the dose escalation through 4 mg/kg. At 5 mg/kg, there were two DLTs (febrile neutropenia and pancytopenia). Following expansion of the 4 mg/kg dose to six patients, two additional DLTs were observed (infusion-related reaction and neutropenia/anemia). Both the 4 and 5 mg/kg doses were declared above the maximum tolerated dose. The recommended phase II dose is 3 mg/kg. The most common dose-dependent hematologic toxicities were anemia and neutropenia. Confirmed partial responses were observed in three patients, all with squamous histologies. Conclusions: The Probody therapeutic platform enables targeting CD71, a previously undruggable ADC target, at tolerable doses associated with clinical activity. See related commentary by Oberoi and Garralda, p. 4459

Introduction For maximum utility of molecular characterization by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and better understanding of tumor microenvironment with immune correlates analysis, biopsy specimens must yield adequate tumor tissue, and sequential biopsy specimens should sample a consistent site. We developed a web-based lesion selection tool (LST) that enables management and tracking of the biopsy specimen collections. Methods Of 145 patients, the LST was used for 88 patients; the other 57 served as controls. We evaluated consistency of the lesion biopsied in longitudinal collections, number of cores obtained, and cores with adequate tumor cellularity for NGS. The Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to identify differences between the groups. Results The analysis included 30 of 88 (34%) patients in the LST group and 52 of 57 (91%) in the control group. The LST workflow ensured 100% consistency in the lesions biopsied compared with 75% in the control group in longitudinal collections and increased the proportion of patients in whom at least five cores were collected per biopsy. Conclusions The novel LST platform facilitates coordination, performance, and management of longitudinal biopsy specimens. Use of the LST enables sampling of the designated lesion consistently, which is likely to accurately inform us the effect of the treatment on tumor microenvironment and evolution of resistant pathways. Such studies are important translational component of any clinical trials and research as they guide the development of next line of therapy, which has significant effect on clinical utility. However, validation of this approach in a larger study is warranted.

Background Reliable predictive imaging markers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors are needed. Purpose To develop and validate a pretreatment CT-based radiomics signature to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, a radiomics signature was developed in patients with advanced solid tumors (including breast, cervix, gastrointestinal) treated with anti-programmed cell death-1 or programmed cell death ligand-1 monotherapy from August 2012 to May 2018 (cohort 1). This was tested in patients with bladder and lung cancer (cohorts 2 and 3). Radiomics variables were extracted from all metastases delineated at pretreatment CT and selected by using an elastic-net model. A regression model combined radiomics and clinical variables with response as the end point. Biologic validation of the radiomics score with RNA profiling of cytotoxic cells (cohort 4) was assessed with Mann-Whitney analysis. Results The radiomics signature was developed in 85 patients (cohort 1: mean age, 58 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 43 men) and tested on 46 patients (cohort 2: mean age, 70 years ± 12; 37 men) and 47 patients (cohort 3: mean age, 64 years ± 11; 40 men). Biologic validation was performed in a further cohort of 20 patients (cohort 4: mean age, 60 years ± 13; 14 men). The radiomics signature was associated with clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (area under the curve [AUC], 0.70; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.77

Purpose: As hypoxia can mediate resistance to immunotherapy, we investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combining evofosfamide, a prodrug that alleviates hypoxia, with ipilimumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in immunologically “cold” cancers, which are intrinsically insensitive to immunotherapy, as well as in “hot/warm” metastatic cancers that are, atypical of such cancers, resistant to immunotherapy. Patients and Methods: In a phase I, 3+3 dose-escalation trial (NCT03098160), evofosfamide (400–640 mg/m2) and ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) were administered in four 3-week cycles. The former was administered on days 1 and 8 of cycles 1–2, while the latter was administered on day 8 of cycles 1–4. Response was assessed using immune-related RECIST and retreatment was allowed, if deemed beneficial, after completion of cycle 4 or at progression. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled, of whom 21 were evaluable, encompassing castration-resistant prostate cancer (n = 11), pancreatic cancer (n = 7), immunotherapy-resistant melanoma (n = 2), and human papillomavirus–negative head and neck cancer (n = 1). Drug-related hematologic toxicities, rash, fever, nausea, vomiting, and elevation of liver enzymes were observed in > 10% of patients. The most common drug-related grade 3 adverse event was alanine aminotransferase elevation (33.3%). Two patients discontinued ipilimumab and 4 required evofosfamide deescalation due to toxicity. Of 18 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 3 (16.7%) achieved partial response and 12 (66.7%) achieved stable disease. The best responses were observed at 560 mg/m2 evofosfamide. Preexisting immune gene signatures predicted response to therapy, while hypermetabolic tumors predicted progression. Responders also showed improved peripheral T-cell proliferation and increased intratumoral T-cell infiltration into hypoxia. Conclusions: No new or unexpected safety signals were observed from combining evofosfamide and ipilimumab, and evidence of therapeutic activity was noted.

Background ABTL0812 is an autophagy inducer that promotes cancer cell death by activation of cytotoxic autophagy selectively in tumour cells. ABTL0812 induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and blocks the Akt-mTOR axis; both actions converge to activate a robust and sustained autophagy leading to cancer cell death. Preclinical data supported the initiation of clinical trials in patients with cancer. Patients and methods This first-in-human trial consisted of an escalation phase (3 + 3 design), followed by an expansion phase, to assess safety and tolerability of ABTL0812. Secondary objectives were determining the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), clinical antitumour activity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Results A total of 29 patients were enrolled and treated; fifteen patients were treated in four escalation dosing cohorts (ranging from 500 mg once a day to 2000 mg twice a day) and fourteen in the expansion phase (dosed with 1300 mg three times a day). No maximum tolerated dose was attained, and RP2D was determined by PK/PD modelling. Most drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal grade I–II. Correlation between drug levels and pAkt/Akt ratio was found. Two cases of long-term (>1 year) stable disease were observed. Conclusions ABTL0812 is safe and has an acceptable tolerability profile, allowing a long-term oral dosing. RP2D of 1300 mg three times a day was determined according to PK/PD modelling, and preliminary antitumour efficacy was observed. Clinical trial registration number NCT02201823.

Background Crenigacestat is a potent Notch inhibitor that decreases Notch signaling and its downstream biological effects. Here, we report the results from Part F of study 16F-MC-JJCA designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of crenigacestat with prednisone in advanced or metastatic cancer. The combination was planned to mitigate gastrointestinal toxicities. Methods Eligible patients (Study Part F) received crenigacestat loading dose (75 mg, escalating to 150 mg) administered thrice weekly (TIW) (F1) or twice weekly (BIW) (F2) for 2 weeks during Cycle 1, followed by 50 mg TIW from week 3 onwards. Prednisone was co-administered for 2 weeks in Cycle 1. Results Twenty-eight patients were enrolled; 11 in F1 (median age, 63 years), 17 in F2 (median age, 50 years). Dose-limiting toxicities were Grade 3 increased serum amylase and Grade 2 fatigue in F1, and Grade 4 hypophosphatemia and Grade 3 rash maculo-papular in F2. The maximum tolerated dose was 75 mg in F1 and 100 mg in F2. Best overall response was stable disease (F1, 6 [54.5%] patients; F2, 11 [64.7%] patients). Pharmacokinetic was dose proportional. Prednisone did not modify PK of crenigacestat, and both F1 and F2 achieved pharmacodynamics effects on evaluable tumor tissue samples. Conclusions This study demonstrated the potential use of prednisone to reduce gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities of a Notch inhibitor without affecting its PK. The safety profile observed was consistent with Notch pathway inhibitors, and the maximum tolerated dose was 75 mg TIW and 100 mg BIW in F1 and F2, respectively. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01695005.

Purpose: GDC-0084 is an oral, brain-penetrant small-molecule inhibitor of PI3K and mTOR. A first-in-human, phase I study was conducted in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Patients and Methods: GDC-0084 was administered orally, once daily, to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and activity. Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET) was performed to measure metabolic responses. Results: Forty-seven heavily pretreated patients enrolled in eight cohorts (2–65 mg). Dose-limiting toxicities included 1 case of grade 2 bradycardia and grade 3 myocardial ischemia (15 mg), grade 3 stomatitis (45 mg), and 2 cases of grade 3 mucosal inflammation (65 mg); the MTD was 45 mg/day. GDC-0084 demonstrated linear and dose-proportional PK, with a half-life (∼19 hours) supportive of once-daily dosing. At 45 mg/day, steady-state concentrations exceeded preclinical target concentrations producing antitumor activity in xenograft models. FDG-PET in 7 of 27 patients (26%) showed metabolic partial response. At doses ≥45 mg/day, a trend toward decreased median standardized uptake value in normal brain was observed, suggesting central nervous system penetration of drug. In two resection specimens, GDC-0084 was detected at similar levels in tumor and brain tissue, with a brain tissue/tumor-to-plasma ratio of >1 and >0.5 for total and free drug, respectively. Best overall response was stable disease in 19 patients (40%) and progressive disease in 26 patients (55%); 2 patients (4%) were nonevaluable. Conclusions: GDC-0084 demonstrated classic PI3K/mTOR–inhibitor related toxicities. FDG-PET and concentration data from brain tumor tissue suggest that GDC-0084 crossed the blood–brain barrier.

PURPOSE Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an effective therapeutic target in breast and gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers. However, less is known about the prevalence of ERBB2 ( HER2) amplification and the efficacy of HER2-targeted treatment in other tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed HER2 amplification status among 5,002 patients with advanced disease (excluding breast cancer) who underwent next-generation sequencing. We evaluated the clinical benefit of HER2-targeted therapy by measuring the time-dependent overall survival (OS) from the genomic testing results, progression-free survival (PFS), and PFS during HER2-targeted therapy (PFS2) compared with PFS during prior therapy (PFS1). RESULTS Overall, 122 patients (2.4%) had HER2 amplification, including patients with endometrial (5.3%), bladder (5.2%), biliary or gallbladder (4.9%), salivary (4.7%), and colorectal cancer (3.6%). Forty patients (38%) with nongastric, nongastroesophageal junction, or nonesophageal cancers received at least one line of HER2-targeted therapy. Patients receiving HER2-targeted therapy had a median OS of 18.6 months, compared with 10.9 months for patients who did not receive HER2-targeted therapy ( P = .070). On multivariable analysis, HER2-targeted therapy was significantly associated with increased OS (hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.93; P = .029), regardless of sex, age, or number of prior lines of treatment. The PFS2-to-PFS1 ratio was 1.3 or greater in 21 (57%) of 37 patients who received HER2-targeted therapy not in the first line of systemic treatment, and the median PFS2 and PFS1 times were 24 and 13 weeks, respectively ( P < .001). CONCLUSION HER2 amplifications using next-generation sequencing can be identified in a variety of tumor types. HER2-targeted therapy may confer clinical benefit in tumor types other than those for which HER2 inhibitors are approved.

Acquired resistance to molecular targeted therapy is a significant challenge of the precision medicine era. The ability to understand these mechanisms of resistance may improve patient selection and allow for the development of rationally designed next-line or combination treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. AKT is a critical effector of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling cascade, one of the most commonly activated pathways in human cancer. Deregulation of signaling pathways, such as RAF/MEK/ERK are previously described mechanisms of resistance to AKT/PI3K inhibitors. Mutations in the mTOR gene, however, are exceedingly rare. We present a case of acquired mTOR resistance, following targeted AKT inhibition, and subsequent response to mTOR1/2 inhibitor in a patient with metastatic endometrial cancer, the first documented response to ATP-competitive mTOR inhibition in this setting. This case supports mTOR mutation as a mechanism of resistance, and underscores the importance of tumor molecular profiling, exemplifying precision medicine in action.

Purpose: Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare aggressive subtype that responds poorly to cytotoxics. Median survival is approximately 8 months for metastatic disease. We report results for advanced MpBC treated with ipilimumab + nivolumab, a cohort of S1609 for rare cancers (DART: NCT02834013). Patients and Methods: Prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II (two-stage) trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg i.v. every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg i.v. every 2 weeks) for advanced MpBC. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: Overall, 17 evaluable patients enrolled. Median age was 60 years (26–85); median number of prior therapy lines was 2 (0–5). ORR was 18%; 3 of 17 patients achieved objective responses (1 complete, 2 partial responses; 2 spindle cell, 1 chondromyxoid histology), which are ongoing at 28+, 33+, and 34+ months, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 2 and 12 months, respectively. Altogether, 11 patients (65%) experienced adverse events (AE), including one grade 5 AE. Eight patients (47%) developed an immune-related AE (irAE), with adrenal insufficiency observed in all 3 responders. Responses occurred in tumors with low tumor mutational burden, low PD-L1, and absent tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: The ipilimumab and nivolumab combination showed no new safety signals and met its primary endpoint with 18% ORR in advanced, chemotherapy-refractory MpBC. All responses are ongoing at >2 to almost 3 years later. The effect of ipilimumab and nivolumab was associated with exceptional responses in a subset of patients versus no activity. This combination warrants further investigation in MpBC, with special attention to understanding mechanism of action, and carefully designed to weigh against the significant risks of irAEs.

Immunotherapy; Phase 1 trials; Prognostic model Inmunoterapia; Ensayos de fase 1; Modelo pronóstico Immunoteràpia; Assajos de fase 1; Model pronòstic Purpose Patient selection in phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1t) continues to be a challenge. The aim of this study was to develop a user-friendly prognostic calculator for predicting overall survival (OS) outcomes in patients to be included in Ph1t with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or targeted agents (TAs) based on clinical parameters assessed at baseline. Methods Using a training cohort with consecutive patients from the VHIO phase 1 unit, we constructed a prognostic model to predict median OS (mOS) as a primary endpoint and 3-month (3m) OS rate as a secondary endpoint. The model was validated in an internal cohort after temporal data splitting and represented as a web application. Results We recruited 799 patients (training and validation sets, 558 and 241, respectively). Median follow-up was 21.2 months (m), mOS was 10.2 m (95% CI, 9.3–12.7) for ICIs cohort and 7.7 m (95% CI, 6.6–8.6) for TAs cohort. In the multivariable analysis, six prognostic variables were independently associated with OS – ECOG, number of metastatic sites, presence of liver metastases, derived neutrophils/(leukocytes minus neutrophils) ratio [dNLR], albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. The phase 1 prognostic online (PIPO) calculator showed adequate discrimination and calibration performance for OS, with C-statistics of 0.71 (95% CI 0.64–0.78) in the validation set. The overall accuracy of the model for 3m OS prediction was 87.2% (95% CI 85%–90%). Conclusions PIPO is a user-friendly objective and interactive tool to calculate specific survival probabilities for each patient before enrolment in a Ph1t. The tool is available at https://pipo.vhio.net/. The research leading to these results has received funding from “la Caixa” Foundation (LCF/PR/CE07/50610001). Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and equipment. This work was supported by the Accelerator Award (UpSMART) from Fundacion Científica – Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (FC -AECC)/ Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) /Cancer Research United Kingdom (CRUK).

Introduction. Clinical observations of cancer patients treated with selinexor have reported high incidence of nausea and anorexia. The study objective was to investigate the adoption of prophylactic olanzapine for the prevention of nausea, vomiting and anorexia in cancer patients receiving selinexor and standard chemotherapy. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed supportive care interventions in patients receiving selinexor and recorded frequency of adverse events (NCI-CTAE). Association between categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact tests; repeated measures analysis was performed to assess weight changes over time. Results. Of 124 evaluable patients, 83 (66.9%) were female, 93 were white (75.0%), and the most common cancer was ovarian (N = 30, 24.2%). One hundred and four patients (83.9%) received olanzapine, of which 93 (89.4%) were prophylactically treated, the majority (86.5%) receiving low 2.5 mg daily dose. Other anti-emetics included ondansetron in 90 patients (72.6%), dexamethasone prescribed in 50 patients (40.3%) and metoclopramide in 49 patients (39.5%), while aprepitant/fosaprepitant (N = 2, 1.6%) were prescribed infrequently. Cancer patients receiving prophylactic olanzapine (N = 93) compared to patients who never received olanzapine (N = 20) had more Grade 1 + anorexia (31.2% vs 20.0%), less nausea (53.8% vs 70.0%), less vomiting (33.3% vs 40.0%), and increased hyperglycemia (29.0% vs 10.0%), but differences were non-statistically significant. In addition, there was minimal weight loss over time in both groups and no statistically significant differences in weight loss between groups. Conclusion. Prophylactic olanzapine decreased nausea, vomiting and maintained weight over 3 months but did not prevent anorexia in patients receiving selinexor and chemotherapy. Low dose olanzapine was well tolerated but associated with hyperglycemia.

BACKGROUND Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) and adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (adeno-NOS), are rare salivary gland cancers. Data on the efficacy of systemic therapy for these diseases are limited. METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from patients seen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center during 1990 to 2020. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression model was performed to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS The analysis included 200 patients (110 with SDC and 90 with adeno-NOS); 77% had androgen-receptor-positive tumors and 47% had HER2-positive (2+-3+) tumors. Most patients without metastasis at diagnosis underwent surgery (98%) and postoperative radiotherapy (87%). Recurrence rate was 55%, and the median RFS was 2 years. Nodal involvement and positive surgical margins were associated with recurrence (P < .005). Among patients with stage IVA-B disease, addition of systemic therapy to local therapy increased OS (P = .049). The most-used palliative-systemic-therapy regimen was platinum doublet ± trastuzumab. For first-line therapy, the ORR and median PFS were 33% and 5.76 months, respectively, and for second-line therapy the ORR and median PFS were 25% and 5.3 months, respectively. ORR and PFS were higher with HER2-targeting agents. Median OS was 5 years overall and 2 years for metastatic disease. Older age and higher stage were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION Adding systemic therapy to local therapy may improve outcomes of patients with locoregionally advanced SDC or adeno-NOS. Except for HER2-targeted therapy, response to palliative systemic therapy is limited. These findings may be used as a benchmark for future drug development.

BackgroundUnderstanding the determinants of long-term immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and the concurrent impact of vaccination and emerging variants of concern will guide optimal strategies to achieve global protection against the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA prospective cohort of 332 COVID-19 patients was followed beyond one year. Plasma neutralizing activity was evaluated using HIV-based reporter pseudoviruses expressing different SARS-CoV-2 spikes and was longitudinally analyzed using mixed-effects models.FindingsLong-term neutralizing activity was stable beyond one year after infection in mild/asymptomatic and hospitalized participants. However, longitudinal models suggest that hospitalized individuals generate both short- and long-lived memory B cells, while outpatient responses were dominated by long-lived B cells. In both groups, vaccination boosted responses to natural infection, although viral variants, mainly B.1.351, reduced the efficacy of neutralization. Importantly, despite showing higher neutralization titers, hospitalized patients showed lower cross-neutralization of B.1.351 variant compared to outpatients. Multivariate analysis identified severity of primary infection as the factor that independently determines both the magnitude and the inferior cross-neutralization activity of long-term neutralizing responses.ConclusionsNeutralizing response induced by SARS-CoV-2 is heterogeneous in magnitude but stable beyond one year after infection. Vaccination boosts these long-lasting natural neutralizing responses, counteracting the significant resistance to neutralization of new viral variants. Severity of primary infection determines higher magnitude but poorer quality of long-term neutralizing responses.

The need to identify biomarkers to predict immunotherapy response for rare cancers has been long overdue. We aimed to study this in our paper, ‘Radiomics analysis for predicting pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancers’. In this response to the Letter to the Editor by Cunha et al, we explain and discuss the reasons behind choosing LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) and XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) with LOOCV (Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation) as the feature selection and classifier method, respectively for our radiomics models. Also, we highlight what care was taken to avoid any overfitting on the models. Further, we checked for the multicollinearity of the features. Additionally, we performed 10-fold cross-validation instead of LOOCV to see the predictive performance of our radiomics models.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors benefit a proportion of patients with cancer, but not all patients nor all histologies will respond to immunotherapy. Therefore, predictive biomarkers are needed. In this review, we outline the ways that lead to hypermutated tumors as well as the potential predictive role of tumor mutational burden (TMB). Findings in selected cancer types suggest that TMB may predict clinical response to immunotherapy, and recently even a prognostic role has been suggested for TMB. An association between high mutational load and clinical benefit was observed in various tumor types; however, it is unclear whether TMB is a strong predictive marker of clinical benefit across all cancers. For that reason, there are still several questions regarding the role of TMB as an immunotherapy biomarker, such as the best measurement technique, the most adequate cutoff, or even whether TMB will be useful for any kind of cancer. We have performed an extensive bibliography research using PubMed with keys words: immunotherapy, tumor mutational load, TMB, immunotherapy biomarkers, and immunotherapy response. In conclusion, TMB has been demonstrated to be a useful biomarker for immunotherapy selection across some cancer types; however, further validation studies are required.

Background Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy without good treatment options. There are limited data about the use of immunotherapy in ACC. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic ACC. Methods This is a pre-specified cohort of a single-center, investigator-initiated, phase II clinical trial using pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with rare malignancies. Patients must have had prior treatment fail in the past 6 months before study enrollment. Patients were enrolled from August 2016 to October 2018. Follow-up data were updated as of March 26, 2019. Patients received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks without concomitant oncologic therapy. The primary endpoint was non-progression rate (NPR) at 27 weeks. Other endpoints included adverse events, tumor responses measured independently by objective radiologic criteria, and select immunological markers. Results Sixteen patients with ACC (including eight women [50%]) were included in this cohort. Ten patients (63%) had evidence of hormonal overproduction (seven had cortisol-producing ACC). Non-progression rate at 27 weeks was evaluable in 14 patients, one patient was lost to follow-up, and one patient left the study because of an adverse event. Five of 14 patients were alive and progression-free at 27 weeks (non-progression rate at 27 weeks was 36, 95% confidence interval 13–65%). Of the 14 patients evaluable for imaging response by immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, two had a partial response (including one with cortisol-producing ACC), seven had stable disease (including three with cortisol-producing ACC), and five had progressive disease, representing an objective response rate of 14% (95% confidence interval 2–43%). Of those who had stable disease, six had disease stabilization that lasted ≥4 months. Severe treatment-related adverse events (≥grade 3) were seen in 2 of 16 patients (13%) and resulted in one patient discontinuing study participation. All studied tumor specimens (14/14) were negative for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression. Thirteen of 14 tumor specimens (93%) were microsatellite-stable. Eight of 14 patients (57%) had a high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte score on immunohistochemistry staining. Conclusions Single-agent pembrolizumab has modest efficacy as a salvage therapy in ACC regardless of the tumor’s hormonal function, microsatellite instability status, or programmed cell death ligand-1 status. Treatment was well tolerated in most study participants, with a low rate of severe adverse events. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02721732, Registered March 29, 2016.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive brain tumor with poor prognosis to most patients. Immunotherapy of GBM is a potentially beneficial treatment option, whose optimal implementation may depend on familiarity with tumor specific antigens, presented as HLA peptides by the GBM cells. Furthermore, early detection of GBM, such as by a routine blood test, may improve survival, even with the current treatment modalities. This study includes large-scale analyses of the HLA peptidome (immunopeptidome) of the plasma-soluble HLA molecules (sHLA) of 142 plasma samples, and the membranal HLA of GBM tumors of 10 of these patients' tumor samples. Tumor samples were fresh-frozen immediately after surgery and the plasma samples were collected before, and at multiple visits after surgery. In total, this HLA peptidome analysis involved 52 different HLA allotypes and resulted in the identification of more than 35,000 different HLA peptides. Strong correlations were observed in the signal intensities and in the repertoires of identified peptides between the tumors and plasma-soluble HLA peptidomes of the individual patients, whereas low correlations were observed between these HLA peptidomes and the tumors' proteomes. HLA peptides derived from Cancer/Testis Antigens (CTAs) were selected based on their presence among the HLA peptidomes of the patients and absence of expression of their source genes from any healthy and essential human tissues, except from immune-privileged sites. Additionally, peptides were selected as potential biomarkers if their levels in the plasma-sHLA peptidome were significantly reduced after the removal of tumor mass. The CTAs identified among the analyzed HLA peptidomes provide new opportunities for personalized immunotherapy and for early diagnosis of GBM.

Since the first generation of small molecules was included in the armamentarium of treatment of solid tumors (imatinib, erlotinib, etc.), there has been an expansion of anticancer small molecules, mostly kinase inhibitors, in development. Some of these drugs may not be a real breakthrough but may be similar in pharmacologic properties and marginal benefit over previously existing agents for the same indication (i.e., me-too drugs). Other drugs, however, have been specifically designed to solve an unmet medical need. Overcoming the problems of the blood–brain barrier and brain metastasis, emerging resistance mutations (such as gatekeeper mutations), or increasing selectivity/potency can be addressed with modern drug design. In this article, we discuss the advancements in the field of drug discovery, drug development, and clinical development that have enabled solving some of these issues. The evolution of the different generations of EGFR and anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors exemplifies recent advancements in pharmacology that are driving the field of anticancer small molecules as a whole.

Precision medicine focuses on DNA abnormalities, but not all tumors have tractable genomic alterations. The WINTHER trial ( NCT01856296 ) navigated patients to therapy on the basis of fresh biopsy-derived DNA sequencing (arm A; 236 gene panel) or RNA expression (arm B; comparing tumor to normal). The clinical management committee (investigators from five countries) recommended therapies, prioritizing genomic matches; physicians determined the therapy given. Matching scores were calculated post-hoc for each patient, according to drugs received: for DNA, the number of alterations matched divided by the total alteration number; for RNA, expression-matched drug ranks. Overall, 303 patients consented; 107 (35%; 69 in arm A and 38 in arm B) were evaluable for therapy. The median number of previous therapies was three. The most common diagnoses were colon, head and neck, and lung cancers. Among the 107 patients, the rate of stable disease ≥6 months and partial or complete response was 26.2% (arm A: 23.2%; arm B: 31.6% (P = 0.37)). The patient proportion with WINTHER versus previous therapy progression-free survival ratio of >1.5 was 22.4%, which did not meet the pre-specified primary end point. Fewer previous therapies, better performance status and higher matching score correlated with longer progression-free survival (all P

Background: Metastatic breast cancer is the second leading cause of death among women globally. A better understanding of tumor biology, and the availability of high-throughput technologies, have enabled the emergence of precision medicine bringing new expectations and giving rise to molecular screening programs (MSP). SOLTI, as a collaborative Spanish network, designed AGATA, the first multi-institutional MSP ever implemented in this country. Here, we report both the primary and some of the secondary results of the pilot study. Methods: A total of 10 sites within SOLTI network in Spain participated. DNA-sequencing of 56 cancer related genes was performed using FFPE tumor samples (primary or metastatic). Each clinical case was reviewed by a multidisciplinary advisory board (MAB), which recommended, in a prospective manner, potential experimental treatments, mainly in the context of clinical trials. The primary objective was to determine the success rate of matching a DNA alteration to an experimental drug or drug class. Secondary objectives included a comprehensive molecular characterization of tumor samples by PAM50 subtyping and quantification of protein expression levels by MASS-SPEC (70 proteins panel). Results: 305 patients (pts) were screened from September 2014 to July 2017 and 260 (85.3%) were finally evaluated by the MAB. Pts characteristics were: mean age 54 years (29-80), ER+/HER2- (n=192; 74%), HER2+ (n=30; 11.5%) and TNBC (n=38; 14.5%). 163 primary tumors and 97 metastatic samples were profiled. Regarding the primary objective, 116 pts (45%) presented at least one mutation (range 1-6) that could be matched to a drug or drug class. Of these, 13 pts (11.2%) received therapy matched to their molecular profile according to the MAB recommendation and their follow-up is still on-going. No mutation was detected in 97 (37%) pts (WT), and 47 patients (18.1%) presented a mutation but no match was possible. The most common mutations were PIK3CA (34%), TP53 (22%), AKT1 (5%), ESR1 (3%) and ERBB2 (3%). Intrinsic subtype distribution in 177 samples was as follows: 34% Luminal A (n=60); 21% Luminal B (n=36); 13% HER2E (n=22); 19% Basal-like (n=34) and 13% Normal-like (n=23). Compared to primary tumors (n=110), the proportion of HER2-enriched disease in metastatic tumors (n=63) was significantly higher (6% vs 20%; p=0.005). Protein expression analysis was performed in 146 samples (94 primary and 57 metastasis). In 19 cases (13%), the outlier expression of some targetable proteins (FGFR1 [n=4, 2.7%], IGF1R [n=4, 2.7%], EGFR [n=1, 0.7%], CEACAM5 [n=6, 4.1%], IDO1 [n=2, 1.37%], TROP2 [n=2, 1.37%]) were identified. Of note, HER2 overexpression (>740 amol/μg) was observed in 4 HER2- cases. Finally, among WT tumors, 21% presented a potential drug-matched protein target. Conclusions: Nationwide molecular screening in Spain is feasible. Nearly half of patients had tumors with mutation(s), mostly PIK3CA, that could be matched to a potential drug or drug class. PAM50 profile might be helpful to navigate towards a therapeutic decision making, although the MAB could not make any targeted-driven recommendation yet with this data. More clinical evidence is needed to use MASS-SPEC as a diagnostic tool. Citation Format: Pernas S, Villagrasa P, Nuciforo PG, Vivancos A, Scaltriti M, Rodón J, Burgués O, Canes J, Dueñas M, Cecchi F, Vidal M, Lluch A, Perelló A, Llombart A, Dorca J, Montaño A, Oliveira M, Ribas G, Rapado I, Paré L, Prat A, Ciruelos E. Primary and secondary results of the first nationwide molecular screening program in Spain for patients with advanced breast cancer (AGATA SOLTI-1301 study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-02.

Purpose BRAFV600 mutations are frequently found in several glioma subtypes, including pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) and ganglioglioma and much less commonly in glioblastoma. We sought to determine the activity of vemurafenib, a selective inhibitor of BRAFV600, in patients with gliomas that harbor this mutation. Patients and Methods The VE-BASKET study was an open-label, nonrandomized, multicohort study for BRAFV600-mutant nonmelanoma cancers. Patients with BRAFV600-mutant glioma received vemurafenib 960 mg twice per day continuously until disease progression, withdrawal, or intolerable adverse effects. Key end points included confirmed objective response rate by RECIST version 1.1, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Results Twenty-four patients (median age, 32 years; 18 female and six male patients) with glioma, including malignant diffuse glioma (n = 11; six glioblastoma and five anaplastic astrocytoma), PXA (n = 7), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n = 3), pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 2), and high-grade glioma, not otherwise specified (n = 1), were treated. Confirmed objective response rate was 25% (95% CI, 10% to 47%) and median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 9.6 months). In malignant diffuse glioma, best response included one partial response and five patients with stable disease, two of whom had disease stabilization that lasted more than 1 year. In PXA, best response included one complete response, two partial responses, and three patients with stable disease. Additional partial responses were observed in patients with pilocytic astrocytoma and anaplastic ganglioglioma (one each). The safety profile of vemurafenib was generally consistent with that of previously published studies. Conclusion Vemurafenib demonstrated evidence of durable antitumor activity in some patients with BRAFV600-mutant gliomas, although efficacy seemed to vary qualitatively by histologic subtype. Additional study is needed to determine the optimal use of vemurafenib in patients with primary brain tumors and to identify the mechanisms driving differential responses across histologic subsets.

BackgroundWe present a radiomics-based model for predicting response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced rare cancers.MethodsThe study included 57 patients with advanced rare cancers who were enrolled in our phase II clinical trial of pembrolizumab. Tumor response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST). Patients were categorized as 20 “controlled disease” (stable disease, partial response, or complete response) or 37 progressive disease). We used 3D-slicer to segment target lesions on standard-of-care, pretreatment contrast enhanced CT scans. We extracted 610 features (10 histogram-based features and 600 second-order texture features) from each volume of interest. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was used to detect the most discriminatory features. Selected features were used to create a classification model, using XGBoost, for the prediction of tumor response to pembrolizumab. Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to assess model performance.FindingsThe 10 most relevant radiomics features were selected; XGBoost-based classification successfully differentiated between controlled disease (complete response, partial response, stable disease) and progressive disease with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in patients assessed by RECIST (94.7%, 97.3%, and 90%, respectively; pConclusionOur radiomics-based signature identified imaging differences that predicted pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancer.InterpretationOur radiomics-based signature identified imaging differences that predicted pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancer.

There is an urgent need to identify therapeutics for the treatment of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although different antivirals are given for the clinical management of SARS-CoV-2 infection, their efficacy is still under evaluation. Here, we have screened existing drugs approved for human use in a variety of diseases, to compare how they counteract SARS-CoV-2-induced cytopathic effect and viral replication in vitro. Among the potential 72 antivirals tested herein that were previously proposed to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection, only 18 % had an IC50 below 25 µM or 102 IU/ml. These included plitidepsin, novel cathepsin inhibitors, nelfinavir mesylate hydrate, interferon 2-alpha, interferon-gamma, fenofibrate, camostat along the well-known remdesivir and chloroquine derivatives. Plitidepsin was the only clinically approved drug displaying nanomolar efficacy. Four of these families, including novel cathepsin inhibitors, blocked viral entry in a cell—type specific manner. Since the most effective antivirals usually combine therapies that tackle the virus at different steps of infection, we also assessed several drug combinations. Although no particular synergy was found, inhibitory combinations did not reduce their antiviral activity. Thus, these combinations could decrease the potential emergence of resistant viruses. Antivirals prioritized herein identify novel compounds and their mode of action, while independently replicating the activity of a reduced proportion of drugs which are mostly approved for clinical use. Combinations of these drugs should be tested in animal models to inform the design of fast track clinical trials. We are grateful to patients at the Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol that donated their samples for research. For his excellent assistance and advice, we thank Jordi Puig from Fundació Lluita contra la SIDA. We are most grateful to Lidia Ruiz and the Clinical Sample Management Team of IrsiCaixa for their outstanding sample processing and management, and to M. Pilar Armengol and the translational genomics platform team at the Institut de Recerca Germans Trias i Pujol. We truly thank B. Trinité for generating the Spike expression plasmid construct used in this study. We thank Pharma Mar, Rubió Laboratories, Janssen and Drs. Cabrera and Ballana form IrsiCaixa; Pascual-Figal, Lax and Asensio-Lopez MC from “Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IMIB-Arrixaca” of Murcia; and Fernández-Real and Barretina from the “Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr Josep Trueta” for providing some of the reagents tested. Peer Reviewed "Article signat per 18 autors/es: Jordi Rodon, Jordana Muñoz-Basagoiti, Daniel Perez-Zsolt, Marc Noguera-Julian, Roger Paredes, Lourdes Mateu, Carles Quiñones, Carles Perez, Itziar Erkizia, Ignacio Blanco, Alfonso Valencia, Víctor Guallar, Jorge Carrillo, Julià Blanco, Joaquim Segalés, Bonaventura Clotet, Júlia Vergara-Alert, Nuria Izquierdo-Useros"

Background Understanding mid-term kinetics of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is the cornerstone for public health control of the pandemic and vaccine development. However, current evidence is rather based on limited measurements, losing sight of the temporal pattern of these changes. Methods We conducted a longitudinal analysis on a prospective cohort of COVID-19 patients followed up for >6 months. Neutralizing activity was evaluated using HIV reporter pseudoviruses expressing SARS-CoV-2 S protein. IgG antibody titer was evaluated by ELISA against the S2 subunit, the receptor binding domain (RBD), and the nucleoprotein (NP). Statistical analyses were carried out using mixed-effects models. Findings We found that individuals with mild or asymptomatic infection experienced an insignificant decay in neutralizing activity, which persisted 6 months after symptom onset or diagnosis. Hospitalized individuals showed higher neutralizing titers, which decreased following a 2-phase pattern, with an initial rapid decline that significantly slowed after day 80. Despite this initial decay, neutralizing activity at 6 months remained higher among hospitalized individuals compared to mild symptomatic. The slow decline in neutralizing activity at mid-term contrasted with the steep slope of anti-RBD, S2, or NP antibody titers, all of them showing a constant decline over the follow-up period. Conclusions Our results reinforce the hypothesis that the quality of the neutralizing immune response against SARS-CoV-2 evolves over the post-convalescent stage. Funding This study was funded by 10.13039/501100016387Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (grant nos. SLD016 to J.B. and SLD015 to J.C.), the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III (grant nos. PI17/01518 and PI18/01332 to J.C.), CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya2017 SGR 252, and the crowdfunding initiatives #joemcorono, BonPreu/Esclat, and Correos. The funders had no role in the study design, the data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. E.P. was supported by a doctoral grant from the National Agency for Research and Development of Chile (ANID; 72180406). C.A.-N. was supported by a doctoral grant from Generalitat de Catalunya and Fons Social Europeu (FI). S.P.-Y. was supported by 10.13039/501100011850Fundación Canaria Doctor Manuel Morales and 10.13039/100015528Universidad de La Laguna., Graphical Abstract, Context and significance Assessing the durability of neutralizing responses against SARS-CoV-2 is crucial to predict the level of protection in post-convalescent COVID-19 patients. We monitored for >6 months a cohort of 210 SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals with a wide range of symptoms (from asymptomatic infection to severe disease). Our results indicate that neutralizing antibodies are stable for at least 6 months after infection. However, individuals with mild or asymptomatic infection developed lower titers of neutralizing antibodies and could be at higher risk of reinfection. Despite the maintenance of neutralizing antibodies, total antibody titers slowly but gradually declined over time without apparent stabilization. This observation requires further analysis to evaluate the potential role of viral persistence or viral re-exposure in maintaining neutralization titers., Pradenas et al. describe the kinetics of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrate their association with clinical severity and their stability for at least 6 months, despite constant decay of IgG titers. These findings help us to understand the mid-term immune response and the impact on herd immunity.

BackgroundSUMOylation is a post-translational modification that serves as an important modulator of immune responses via its role in constraining the type I interferon (IFN-1) response. TAK-981 is a small molecule that inhibits SUMOylation and increases IFN-1-dependent innate immune responses with the potential to enhance adaptive immunity. Here, we report dose-escalation data from a TAK-981 Phase 1/2 clinical study (NCT03648372), the first clinical data for a SUMOylation inhibitor.MethodsAdults with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or relapsed/refractory lymphomas received TAK-981 IV twice-weekly (BIW; days 1, 4, 8, 11) or once-weekly (QW; days 1, 8) in 21-day cycles. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model (BLRM) with overdose control, plus available pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data. Phase 1 objectives were to determine TAK-981 safety/tolerability and establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D).ResultsSeventy-six patients received TAK-981 at 10 dose levels (3–40 mg BIW; 60–120 mg QW/BIW). Median age was 61 years (range, 38–79); 42 (55.3%) patients were female. Four dose-limiting toxicities were seen in 62 evaluable patients (transient grade 3 ALT/AST elevation, 60 mg BIW; grade 3 pneumonitis, 90 mg BIW; grade 3 stomatitis and grade 3 cognitive disturbance, 120 mg BIW). Per BLRM, 120 mg BIW was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose. At data cut-off, median treatment duration was 2 cycles (range, 1–12); 13 (17.1%) patients were ongoing. table 1 summarizes TAK-981 safety. The most common (≥20%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue (42.1%), nausea (39.5%), headache (31.6%), diarrhea (28.9%), pyrexia (27.6%), vomiting (23.7%), decreased appetite (22.4%). Common (≥5%) grade ≥3 TEAEs were hypokalemia (9.2%), anemia (7.9%), lymphocyte count decreased (6.6%), abdominal pain (5.3%). Grade 2 cytokine release syndrome was reported in 4 (5.2%) patients; symptoms resolved within 12–24 hours with supportive oxygen and/or IV fluids. One partial response was observed at 40 mg TAK-981 BIW in a patient with relapsed/refractory HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. TAK-981 exhibited linear PK, with approximately dose-proportional exposure and a mean terminal half-life of 3.8–10.8 hours at ≥60 mg. Evidence of dose-dependent target engagement (figure 1), and PD (figures 2–4) in blood were observed. The single-agent TAK-981 RP2D was 90 mg BIW.Abstract 476 Table 1Summary of TAK-981 safety profileAbstract 476 Figure 1PD in patients receiving TAK-981 on the BIW schedule: target engagement.Blood samples were collected on Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple timepoints after TAK-981 administration. Target engagement in T cells was detected by flow cytometry with an antibody recognizing the TAK-981-SUMO adduct formed during the inhibition of the SUMO-activating enzyme by TAK-981; Cycle 1 Day 1 signal increased at 1 hour post-end-of-infusion compared to the background level observed pre-dose.Abstract 476 Figure 2PD in patients receiving TAK-981 on the BIW schedule: SUMOylation.SUMOylation in T cells, detected by flow cytometry with an antibody recognizing SUMO2/3, decreased at 1 hour post-end-of-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 compared to pre-dose, indicating that fewer SUMO2/3 chains are formed when the SUMO-activating enzyme is inhibited.Abstract 476 Figure 3PD in patients receiving TAK-981 on the BIW schedule: upregulation of CXCL10 expression.Upregulation of mRNA levels of CXCL10, an IFN-I-regulated gene, in peripheral blood. Gene expression was measured using Nanostring nCounter at Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at several timepoints post-dose. Data for maximum increase at 8 or 24 hours, relative to pre-dose, is shown.Abstract 476 Figure 4PD in patients receiving TAK-981 on the BIW schedule: NK cell activation.NK cell activation in peripheral blood measured by flow cytometry. Percentage of CD69-positive NK cells at Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at 24 hours post-end-of-infusion is shown by patient for each dose.ConclusionsThe data generated in this study support continued TAK-981 development for treatment of solid tumors and lymphoma. The Phase 2 study expansion is ongoing in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung, cervical, and colorectal cancer, and in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Trial RegistrationClinical Trial identification: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT03648372Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board or Institutional Ethics Committee of all participating institutions

BACKGROUND: Treatment of recurrent, unresectable granulosa cell tumor (GCT) of the ovary can be challenging. Given the rarity of the tumor, alternative therapies have been difficult to evaluate in large prospective clinical trials. Currently, to our knowledge, there are no reports of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in GCT patients. Here, we present a case series of GCT patients treated with pembrolizumab who were enrolled in a phase II basket trial in advanced, rare solid tumors (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02721732). CASES: We identified 5 patients with recurrent GCT (4 adult and 1 juvenile type); they had an extensive history of systemic therapy at study enrollment (range, 3–10), with most regimens resulting in less than 12 months of disease control. Pembrolizumab was administered in these patients, as per trial protocol. Although there were no objective responses according to the irRECIST guidelines, 2 patients with adult-type GCT experienced disease control for ≥ 12 months (565 and 453 days). In one, pembrolizumab represented the longest duration of disease control compared to prior lines of systemic therapy (565 days vs 13 months). In the other, pembrolizumab was the second longest systemic therapy associated with disease control (453 days vs 22 months) compared to prior lines of therapy. In this patient, pembrolizumab was discontinued following withdrawal of consent. PD-L1 expression was not observed in any baseline tumor samples. Pembrolizumab was well tolerated, with no grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Although our results do not support the routine use of pembrolizumab monotherapy in unselected GCT patients, some patients with adult-type GCT may derive a clinical benefit, with a low risk of toxicity. Future studies should investigate the role of immunotherapy and predictors of clinical benefit in this patient population.

The protective effect of neutralizing antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals is not yet well defined. To address this issue, we have analyzed the kinetics of neutralizing antibody responses and their association with disease severity. Between March and May 2020, the prospective KING study enrolled 72 COVID-19+ participants grouped according to disease severity. SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed by serological and virological tests. Plasma neutralizing responses were assessed against replicative virus and pseudoviral particles. Multiple regression and non-parametric tests were used to analyze dependence of parameters. The magnitude of neutralizing titers significantly increased with disease severity. Hospitalized individuals developed higher titers compared to mild-symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, which together showed titers below the detection limit in 50% of cases. Longitudinal analysis confirmed the strong differences in neutralizing titers between non-hospitalized and hospitalized participants and showed rapid kinetics of appearance of neutralizing antibodies (50% and 80% of maximal activity reached after 11 and 17 days after symptoms onset, respectively) in hospitalized patients. No significant impact of age, gender or treatment on the neutralizing titers was observed in this limited cohort. These data identify a clear association of humoral immunity with disease severity and point to immune mechanisms other than antibodies as relevant players in COVID-19 protection. This work was partially funded by Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (Grant DSL0016 to JB and Grant DSL015 to JC), the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III (Grant PI17/01518 and PI18/01332 to JC) and the crowdfunding initiatives #joemcorono, BonPreu/Esclat and Correos. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. EP was supported by a doctoral grant from National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)—Formation of Advanced Human Capital Program, Becas Chile: Grant 72180406. We are deeply grateful to all participant and to the technical staff of IrsiCaixa for sample processing. We also thank Daniel Pérez-Zsolt and Jordana Muñoz-Basagoiti for assistance with ACE-2 expressing 293T cell culture. Peer Reviewed "Article signat per 26 autors/es: Benjamin Trinité, Ferran Tarrés-Freixas, Jordi Rodon, Edwards Pradenas, Víctor Urrea, Silvia Marfil, María Luisa Rodríguez de la Concepción, Carlos Ávila-Nieto, Carmen Aguilar-Gurrieri, Ana Barajas, Raquel Ortiz, Roger Paredes, Lourdes Mateu, Alfonso Valencia, Víctor Guallar, Lidia Ruiz, Eulàlia Grau, Marta Massanella, Jordi Puig, Anna Chamorro, Nuria Izquierdo-Useros, Joaquim Segalés, Bonaventura Clotet, Jorge Carrillo, Júlia Vergara-Alert & Julià Blanco"

SummaryPurpose Galunisertib, a TGF-β inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor effects in preclinical and radiographic responses in some patients with malignant glioma. This Phase 1b/2a trial investigated the clinical benefit of combining galunisertib with temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy (TMZ/RTX) in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma (NCT01220271). Methods This is an open-label, 2-arm Phase 1b/2a study (N = 56) of galunisertib (intermittent dosing: 14 days on/14 days off per cycle of 28 days) in combination with TMZ/RTX (n = 40), versus a control arm (TMZ/RTX, n = 16). The primary objective of Phase 1b was to determine the safe and tolerable Phase 2 dose of galunisertib. The primary objective of Phase 2a was to confirm the tolerability and pharmacodynamic profile of galunisertib with TMZ/RTX, and the secondary objectives included determining the efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of galunisertib with TMZ/RTX in patients with glioblastoma. This study also characterized the changes in the major T-cell subsets during TMZ/RTX plus galunisertib treatment. Results In the Phase 2a study, efficacy results for patients treated with galunisertib plus TMZ/RTX or TMZ/RTX were: median overall survival (18.2 vs 17.9 months), median progression-free survival (7.6 vs 11.5 months), and disease control rate (80% [32/40] vs 56% [9/16] patients) respectively. PK profile of galunisertib plus TMZ/RTX regimen was consistent with previously published PK data of galunisertib. The overall safety profile across treatment arms was comparable. Conclusion No differences in efficacy, safety or pharmacokinetic variables were observed between the two treatment arms.

info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion

Background The aim of this review is to elucidate the type and frequency of ocular adverse events associated with selinexor with a goal to quantify the occurrence of these events in our investigator-initiated trial. Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 174 patients treated with at least one dose of selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents between July 2015 and July 2020 at a comprehensive cancer center in the U.S. All reported ocular adverse events were assessed. Results A total of 174 patient medical records were reviewed. All patients received at least one dose of selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents in our cohort of patients with advanced malignancies. A total of 34 (19.54%) patients experienced 37 ocular adverse events. The most frequently reported ocular symptom was blurred vision, which was reported in 22 (12.64%) patients. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event was dry eye syndrome reported in 21 (12.1%) patients, and 19 (10.9%) of them were diagnosed with mild dry eye. The second most common treatment-related adverse event was the progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis (cataract) reported in 7 (4.0%) patients. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation. Conclusion Our findings highlight that ocular adverse events associated with oral selinexor were mild. The most frequently reported ocular treatment-related adverse events were mild dry eye and progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation. Implications for Practice Patients receiving selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents were reviewed, with a total of 34 patients experiencing 37 ocular adverse events. Findings highlight that ocular adverse events associated with oral selinexor were mild. The most frequently reported ocular treatment-related adverse events were mild dry eye and progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation.

PURPOSE A first-in-human study was performed with MP0250, a DARPin drug candidate. MP0250 specifically inhibits both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) with the aim of disrupting the tumor microenvironment. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter, open-label, repeated-dose, phase I study was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MP0250 in 45 patients with advanced solid tumors. In the dose-escalation part, 24 patients received MP0250 as a 3-hour infusion once every 2 weeks at five different dose levels (0.5-12 mg/kg). Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established, 21 patients were treated with a 1-hour infusion (n = 13, 8 mg/kg, once every 2 weeks and n = 8, 12 mg/kg, once every 3 weeks) of MP0250 in the dose confirmation cohorts. RESULTS In the dose-escalation cohort, patients treated with 12 mg/kg MP0250 once every 2 weeks experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Therefore, MTD was 8 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or 12 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The most common adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (69%), proteinuria (51%), and diarrhea and nausea (both 36%); hypoalbuminemia was reported in 24% of patients. Most AEs were consistent with inhibition of the VEGF and HGF pathways. Exposure was dose-proportional and sustained throughout the dosing period for all patients (up to 15 months). The half-life was about 2 weeks. Signs of single-agent antitumor activity were observed: 1 unconfirmed partial response with a time to progression of 23 weeks and 24 patients with stable disease, with the longest duration of 72 weeks and a median duration of 18 weeks. CONCLUSION MP0250 is a first-in-class DARPin drug candidate with suitable tolerability and appropriate pharmacokinetic properties for further development in combination with other anticancer therapies.

Estudi d'escalada de dosis; Fase I; Tumors sòlids Estudio de escalada de dosis; Fase I; Tumores sólidos Dose escalation study; Phase I; Solid tumours Background Genetic alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signalling are observed in various tumours. We report a first-in-human phase I/IIa trial evaluating tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumour activity of ODM-203, a novel FGFR and VEGFR inhibitor. Methods Open-label, non-randomised, multicentre, phase I/IIa dose escalation and expansion study in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours. Results Overall, 84 patients received treatment; optimal tablet dose was found to be 400 mg/day with food. All patients experienced at least one adverse event; the majority (89.2%) were grade 1 or 2% and 70.4% were considered treatment related. The most commonly reported events were bilirubin increase-related events (75%) and diarrhoea (50%). Overall response rate was 9.2% and median progression-free survival was 16.1 and 12.4 weeks for patients with aberrant or non-aberrant FGFR tumours. Median time on treatment was 10.1 weeks for all patients and 14.5 weeks for patients who received 400 mg tablets. Conclusion This study suggests ODM-203 400 mg/day results in sufficient plasma concentrations and acceptable tolerability in most patients. Preliminary signs of therapeutic activity of ODM-203 in patients with solid tumours was observed. The study was sponsored by Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma, Espoo, Finland.

Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) provides substantial clinical benefits to cancer patients, but a large proportion of cancers do not respond to ICT. To date, the genomic underpinnings of primary resistance to ICT remain elusive. Here, we performed immunogenomic analysis of data from TCGA and clinical trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, with a particular focus on homozygous deletion of 9p21.3 (9p21 loss), one of the most frequent genomic defects occurring in ~13% of all cancers. We demonstrate that 9p21 loss confers “cold” tumor-immune phenotypes, characterized by reduced abundance of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs), particularly, T/B/NK cells, altered spatial TILs patterns, diminished immune cell trafficking/activation, decreased rate of PD-L1 positivity, along with activation of immunosuppressive signaling. Notably, patients with 9p21 loss exhibited significantly lower response rates to ICT and worse outcomes, which were corroborated in eight ICT trials of >1,000 patients. Further, 9p21 loss synergizes with PD-L1/TMB for patient stratification. A “response score” was derived by incorporating 9p21 loss, PD-L1 expression and TMB levels in pre-treatment tumors, which outperforms PD-L1, TMB, and their combination in identifying patients with high likelihood of achieving sustained response from otherwise non-responders. Moreover, we describe potential druggable targets in 9p21-loss tumors, which could be exploited to design rational therapeutic interventions., The molecular mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint therapy remain elusive. Here, the authors perform immunogenomic analysis of TCGA data and data from clinical trials for antiPD-1/PD-L1 therapy and highlight the association of 9p21 loss with a cold tumor microenvironment and resistance to therapy.

Understanding mid-term kinetics of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is the cornerstone for public health control of the pandemic and vaccine development. However, current evidence is rather based on limited measurements, thus losing sight of the temporal pattern of these changes1–6. In this longitudinal analysis, conducted on a prospective cohort of COVID-19 patients followed up to 242 days, we found that individuals with mild or asymptomatic infection experienced an insignificant decay in neutralizing activity that persisted six months after symptom onset or diagnosis. Hospitalized individuals showed higher neutralizing titers, which decreased following a two-phase pattern, with an initial rapid decline that significantly slowed after day 80. Despite this initial decay, neutralizing activity at six months remained higher among hospitalized individuals. The slow decline in neutralizing activity at mid-term contrasted with the steep slope of antibody titers change, reinforcing the hypothesis that the quality of immune response evolves over the post-convalescent stage4,5.

BackgroundThe current standard for COVID-19 diagnosis, RT-qPCR, has important drawbacks for its use as a tool for epidemiological control, including the need of laboratory-processing, high cost, and long turnaround from sampling to results release. Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) provide a promising alternative for this purpose.MethodsWe assessed the analytical and clinical performance of the Ag-RDT Panbio COVID-19 Ag Test (Abbott), using RT-qPCR as a reference test. The clinical performance was assessed using nasopharyngeal swabs, collected in routine practice for case confirmation and contact tracing, and nasal mid-turbinate swabs, collected in preventive screenings of asymptomatic individuals. Fresh samples were analysed by RT-q-PCR, stored at -80 °C, and analysed using the Ag-RDT according to the manufacturer instructions.FindingsThe Ag-RDT had a limit of detection of 6·5×105 copies/reaction. The clinical performance was assessed on 1,406 frozen swabs with a PCR result available: 951 (67·7%) positive and 455 (32·4%) negative. The Ag-RDT identified the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in 872 of 951 PCR-positive samples (91·7%; 95% CI 89·8-93·4 and ruled out its presence in 450 of 455 PCR-negative samples (specificity 98·9%; 95% CI 97·5– 99·6). Sensitivity increased in samples with lower Ct values (Ct InterpretationThe Panbio COVID-19 Ag-RDT has high sensitivity for detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal or nasopharyngeal swabs of both, symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. The diagnostic performance of the test is particularly good in samples with viral loads associated with high risk of viral transmission (Ct FundingBlueberry diagnostics, Fundació Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, and #YoMeCorono.org crowfunding campaing.Research in contextEvidence before this studyOn October 6, 2020, we searched PubMed for articles containing “Antigen”, “test”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “COVID-19” and “performance” in either the title or the abstract. We found five studies that showed the accuracy of point-of-care tests in identifying SARS-CoV-2 antigens for confirmation of clinically suspected COVID-19. We found high variability in the diagnostic accuracy of Ag-RDT. Most tests showed high specificity (i.e., 99% or higher), whereas sensitivity ranged from 11% to 92%; only one test reported sensitivity higher than 60%. We found no studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Test. We found no studies that assessed the performance of Ag-RDT for population-level screening of asymptomatic individuals.Added value of this studyOur analysis provides information regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Test when tested on 1,406 frozen samples of nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs collected in routine practice for diagnostic confirmation of symptomatic individuals with suspected COVID-19 or contacts exposed to a positive case, and preventive screenings of unexposed asymptomatic individuals. Compared with RT-qPCR as reference test, the Ag-RDT showed a sensitivity and specificity of 91·7% and 98·9%. Test sensitivity increased in samples with viral load associated with high risk of transmission (Ct Implications of all the available evidenceAvailable evidence show variability in the diagnostic performance of marketed Ag-RDT. Our results provide substantial evidence that the point-of-care Panbio COVID-19 Ag Test can accurately identify SARS-CoV-2 antigens in people with suspected clinical COVID-19 as well as in asymptomatic people with high viral load and therefore, associated with higher risk of transmission. This finding represents a potentially useful advance for mass screening of asymptomatic people at the point-of-care.

BackgroundTreatment options for triple-negative breast cancer remain limited. Activation of the PI3K pathway via loss ofPTENand/orINPP4Bis common. Buparlisib is an orally bioavailable, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of buparlisib in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.MethodsThis was a single-arm phase 2 study enrolling patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated with buparlisib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months, per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. A subset of patients underwent pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue biopsies for correlative studies.ResultsFifty patients were enrolled. Median number of cycles was 2 (range 1–10). The clinical benefit rate was 12% (6 patients, all SD ≥ 4 months). Median PFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–2.3). Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.2–25). The most frequent adverse events were fatigue (58% all grades, 8% grade 3), nausea (34% all grades, none grade 3), hyperglycemia (34% all grades, 4% grade 3), and anorexia (30% all grades, 2% grade 3). Eighteen percent of patients experienced depression (12% grade 1, 6% grade 2) and anxiety (10% grade 1, 8% grade 2). Alterations inPIK3CA/AKT1/PTENwere present in 6/27 patients with available targeted DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACT), 3 of whom achieved SD as best overall response though none with clinical benefit ≥ 4 months. Of five patients with paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies, reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) analysis demonstrated reduction of S6 phosphorylation in 2 of 3 patients who achieved SD, and in none of the patients with progressive disease.ConclusionsBuparlisib was associated with prolonged SD in a very small subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer; however, no confirmed objective responses were observed. Downmodulation of key nodes in the PI3K pathway was observed in patients who achieved SD. PI3K pathway inhibition alone may be insufficient as a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer.Trial registrationNCT01790932. Registered on 13 February 2013;NCT01629615. Registered on 27 June 2012.

Background MRx0518 is a novel, human gut microbiome-derived, single-strain, live biotherapeutic in clinical development for treatment of solid tumours. Preclinically, MRx0518 induced broad immunostimulatory activity and demonstrated anti-tumorigenic effects in a range of murine tumor models. MRx0518 increased CD4+ and CD8+ T cell and NK cell tumor infiltration and decreased Tregs. Activation of tumour TLR5 was observed and linked to the bacterial flagellin moiety, which was shown to strongly induce NFκB, cytokine responses and IFNγ+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Methods Heavily pre-treated patients refractory to ICIs were enrolled from March 2019 to March 2020. Patients had experienced at least SD from previous ICI (monotherapy or combination) but eventually progressed as confirmed by two radiological scans ≥4 weeks apart in the absence of rapid clinical progression and within 12 weeks of last dose of ICI. Patients were treated with 1 capsule of MRx0518 (1 × 1010 to 1 × 1011 CFU) BID and pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) for up to 35 cycles or disease progression. Tumour response was assessed every 9 weeks per RECIST 1.1. The primary objective was to evaluate safety of the combination by monitoring toxicities in the first cycle of treatment. Secondary objectives were to evaluate efficacy via ORR, DOR, DCR and PFS. Results In Part A, patients with mRCC (n=9) and mNSCLC (n=3) were recruited. At data cut-off (21 Aug 20), 5 patients remain on study treatment. 83% of patients were male and 17% were female. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3. 10 patients received nivolumab previously (83%), one received avelumab (8%) and one received pembrolizumab and nivolumab (8%). 83% of patients had experienced SD as best response to prior ICI and 17% had PR as best response. Of 6 patients with available PD-L1 results, 5 had a positive CPS/TPS (≥1) and 1 negative ( Conclusions This data represents first-in-class proof of concept for a live biotherapeutic in an oncology setting. The combination was tolerable and there were preliminary signals of efficacy. Part B (phase II) in NSCLC, RCC and bladder cancer is ongoing. Trial Registration www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03637803 Ethics Approval This study was approved by University of Texas MD Anderson’s Institutional Review Board; approval ref. 2018-0290

Background We evaluated immune correlates of avelumab in combination with PF-04518600 (OX40 agonist) in a phase I/II study (NCT03217747) in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods Eligible patients received intravenous avelumab 10 mg/kg and PF04518600 100 mg every 2 weeks in a 4-week cycle. Initially, patients received avelumab from cycle3 day1 (C3D1), later from cycle1 day15 (C1D15). Response was assessed per RECIST 1.1 and irRECIST. Peripheral blood and tumor tissue were obtained from patients at pre-treatment, post-OX40, and post-combo for correlative studies. Translational assays include immunohistochemistry (IHC: PD-L1, OX40 and CD139), multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF: PD-L1/P-1 axis and T-cell activation/regulatory panels), and Nanostring (panCancer Immune Panel) for tumor tissues, and flow cytometry performed on peripheral blood. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare response between the two treatment schedules. Log-rank test was performed to test the difference in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between groups. Linear mixed-effect model was used to estimate the effect of schedule and treatment (time) effects on flow and IHC mIF biomarkers. Results Twenty-eight patients were treated, 12 received avelumab from C3D1 and 16 from C1D15. Patient characteristics are summarized in table 1 and response data in table 2. The median follow-up time was 17.8 months. The median OS was 7.9 months and PFS was 3.2 months. Patients on C3D1 schedule had superior PFS than patients on C1D15 schedule (4.6 months vs 2.5 months; P=0.032). The biomarkers associated with survival were investigated in the C3D1 group. Patients with following baseline biomarker characteristics had superior PFS (table 3): lower density of total cells expressing CD137 (6.0 vs 3.2 months, P=0.047) and lower percentage of malignant cells expressing OX40+ (5.8 vs 3.2 months, P=0.024). Patients with superior OS had higher frequencies of CD86+HLA-DR+CD141 dendritic cells and CD3+ cells in circulation at baseline (17.2 vs 7.9 months, P=0.012) (table 4). This combination was not found to expand circulating T regulatory cells. Early data suggests that while higher neutrophil score correlates with PD, higher exhausted CD8+ T cell score correlates with SD. More translational data will be presented at the conference. Conclusions With limited data, there is evidence that patients receiving avelumab from C3D1 in combination with PF-04518600 have better response. Antigen presentation machinery showed changes but remained overall intact within the tumor with baseline circulating CD141+CD86+HLA-DR+ DCs positively correlating with OS. Additional studies to evaluate the effect of T-cell agonist on their receptors on malignant cells are needed. Trial Registration NCT03217747 Ethics Approval The study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (FWA #: 00000363).

IntroductionImmunotherapies have revolutionized the treatment of various cancers, but little is known about their symptomatic toxicity. Assessing these symptoms is best accomplished by asking the patients themselves. However, such reports are subjective and may face challenges as bonafide scientific data. Demonstrating the validity of symptom assessment tools, mainly through the reduction of measurement errors, has the potential to improve patient care if these tools are widely adopted. To that end, we present herein the psychometric properties of the Immunotherapy for Early-Phase Trials module of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-Immunotherapy EPT) in patients receiving various immunotherapies in early phase trials at a major cancer center.MethodsOne hundred forty-five patients completed the inventory at baseline, with 85 of them also doing so after 9 weeks of treatment. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 57.0±12.9 years. Also, 56% of the patients were women, 79% identified as white, and 49% had at least some college education.ResultsThe internal consistency reliability of the MDASI-Immunotherapy EPT was excellent, as the Cronbach’s alphas for all of its subscales were at least 0.88 (range 0.88–0.95). Known-group validity based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status groupings was excellent at 9 weeks after the start of an immunotherapy trial for the MDASI-Immunotherapy EPT severity (effect size, 0.96) and interference (effect size, 0.82) subscales. We found substantial changes in the symptom items difficulty remembering (effect size, −0.85), fever and/or chills (effect size, −0.63), disturbed sleep (effect size, −0.52), diarrhea (effect size, −0.42), and swelling of hands, legs, or feet (effect size, −0.39).ConclusionsIn conclusion, the MDASI-Immunotherapy EPT is a valid, reliable, and sensitive tool for measuring symptomatic toxicity.

BKM120; Buparlisib; Glioblastoma BKM120; Buparlisib; Blioblastoma BKM120; Buparlisib; Glioblastoma Background Most glioblastoma tumours exhibit intrinsic phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo models suggest that buparlisib (an oral pan-PI3K inhibitor) can have an effect on glioblastoma directly and by enhancing the activity of radiation and of temozolomide. Methods This was a phase I, two-stage, multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation study of buparlisib in combination with temozolomide and radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. In stage I, patients who completed the concomitant phase of combination of temozolomide and radiation prior to study entry received buparlisib in combination with temozolomide. In stage II, patients received buparlisib in combination with temozolomide and radiotherapy in the concomitant phase and temozolomide in the adjuvant treatment phase. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of buparlisib when combined with the approved first-line treatment of temozolomide and radiotherapy. Results The MTD of buparlisib in combination with temozolomide at stage I (adjuvant phase only) was 80 mg/day, which was used as the starting dose in stage II. The MTD of buparlisib in combination with temozolomide and radiotherapy in stage II (concomitant + adjuvant phase) was not determined due to the observed dose-limitingtoxicities and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). In stage I, the most commonly reported AEs were nausea (72.7%) and fatigue (59.1%). In stage II, the most commonly reported AEs were fatigue and nausea (56.3% each). No on-treatment deaths were reported during the study. Conclusion Considering that the primary objective of estimating the MTD was not achieved in addition to the observed challenging safety profile of buparlisib in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide, Novartis decided not to pursue the development of buparlisib in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The study was initiated, funded and sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. The study was designed by the investigators and the sponsor. Design and conduct of the study was undertaken by the sponsor in collaboration with investigators. The study investigators and their respective research teams collected the data; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation compiled the data for summation and analysis. All authors were responsible for data interpretation. Professor Wen prepared the article in conjunction with all the authors, including employees of the sponsor. The corresponding author had final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Purpose Genomic analysis of individual patients is now affordable, and therapies targeting specific molecular aberrations are being tested in clinical trials. Genomically-informed therapy is relevant to many clinical domains, but is particularly applicable to cancer treatment. However, even specialized clinicians need help to interpret genomic data, to navigate the complicated space of clinical trials, and to keep up with the rapidly expanding biomedical literature. To quantitate the cognitive load on treating clinicians, we attempt to quantitate the rate of change in potential treatment options for patients considering genomically-relevant and genomically-selected therapy for cancer. Materials and methods To this end, we analyzed patient-specific reports generated by a precision oncology decision support team (PODS) at a large academic cancer center. Two types of potential treatment options were analyzed: FDA-approved genomically-relevant and genomically-selected therapies and therapies available via clinical trials. We focused on two clinically-actionable alterations: ERBB2 (Her2/neu; amplified vs. non-amplified) and BRAF mutation (V600 vs. non-V600). To determine changes in available treatment options, we grouped patients into similar groups by disease site (ERBB2: breast, gastric and “other”; BRAF: melanoma, non-melanoma). Results A total of 2927 reports for 2366 unique patients were generated 8/2016-12/2018. Reports included 9902 gene variants and 150 disease classifications. BRAF mutation and ERBB2 amplification were annotated with therapeutic options in 270 reports (225 unique patients). The median survival time of a therapeutic option was nine months. Conclusion When compared to “traditional” clinical practice guideline recommendations, treatment options for personalized cancer therapy change seven times more rapidly; partly due to change in knowledge and partly due to logistics such as clinical trial availability.

Background This is the first-in-human study of novel anti-angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) monoclonal antibody LY3127804 as monotherapy and in combination with ramucirumab in advanced solid tumours. Methods Patients received intravenous LY3127804 monotherapy (4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 27 mg/kg) in part A; LY3127804 (8, 12, 16, 20 and 27 mg/kg) with 8 mg/kg ramucirumab in part B; and LY3127804 (20 mg/kg) with 12 mg/kg ramucirumab in part C. Treatments were administered every 2 weeks (Q2W) during 28-day cycles. Dose-escalation was based on cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Results Sixty-two patients were treated in part A (n = 20), part B (n = 35) and part C (n = 7). Constipation, diarrhoea and fatigue were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in part A; hypertension and peripheral oedema were the most frequent TEAE in parts B and C. No DLT was observed and maximum tolerated dose for LY3127804 was not reached. Four patients achieved partial response with combination therapy (clear cell endometrial carcinoma, cervix squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma), 29 achieved stable disease, and 24 had progressive disease. Conclusions LY3127804 monotherapy and its combination with ramucirumab are well tolerated. LY3127804 20 mg/kg was the recommended Phase 2 dose.

Oncologia de precisió; Assaigs clínics; Preselecció molecular Oncología de precisión; Ensayos clínicos; Preselección molecular Precision oncology; Clinical Trials; Molecular prescreening Most academic precision oncology programs have been designed to facilitate enrollment of patients in early clinical trials with matched targeted agents. Over the last decade, major changes were seen both in the targetable molecular alteration landscape and in drug development trends. In this article, we describe how the Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology molecular prescreening program adapted to a dynamic model of biomarker-drug codevelopment. We started with a tumor-agnostic hotspot mutation panel plus in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry of selected markers and subsequently transitioned to tumor-specific amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests together with custom copy number, fusion, and outlier gene expression panels. All assays are optimized for archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues without matched germline sequencing. In parallel, biomarker-matched trials evolved from a scenario of few targets and large populations (such as PI3K inhibitors in PIK3CA mutants) to a complex situation with many targets and small populations (such as multiple targetable fusion events). Recruitment rates in clinical trials with mandatory biomarkers decreased over the last 3 years. Molecular tumor board meetings proved critical to guide oncologists on emerging biomarkers for clinical testing and interpretation of NGS results. The substantial increase of immunotherapy trials had a major impact in target prioritization and guided clinical implementation of new markers, such as tumor mutational burden, with larger exon-based NGS assays and gene expression signatures to capture microenvironment infiltration patterns. This new multiomics era of precision oncology is expected to increase the opportunities for early clinical trial matching.