1. Non-invasive tools beyond lung function before and after specific inhalation challenges for diagnosing occupational asthma
- Author
-
Olaf Hagemeyer, Vitali Gering, Vera van Kampen, Rolf Merget, Thomas Brüning, Julia Engel, and Monika Raulf
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Nitric Oxide ,Gastroenterology ,Leukocyte Count ,03 medical and health sciences ,Specific inhalation challenge ,0302 clinical medicine ,stomatognathic system ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Asthma, Occupational ,Aged ,Inhalation ,business.industry ,Sputum ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Gold standard (test) ,Allergens ,Middle Aged ,respiratory system ,medicine.disease ,030210 environmental & occupational health ,respiratory tract diseases ,Eosinophils ,Breath Tests ,Exhalation ,Bronchial hyperresponsiveness ,Exhaled nitric oxide ,Female ,Methacholine ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Occupational asthma ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Increases of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), sputum eosinophils, and methacholine responsiveness have been described after specific inhalation challenges (SIC) with occupational allergens, but limited information is available about their comparative performance. It was the aim of the study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these non-invasive tests before and after SIC for the diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA). A total of 122 subjects with work-related shortness of breath were included. The ‘gold standard’ was defined as airway obstruction (pulmonary responders) and/or an increase of FeNO of at least 13 ppb after SIC. The results were compared with those obtained using the pulmonary responder status alone as ‘gold standard’. If the pulmonary responder status and/or an increase of FeNO was used as ‘gold standard’ for SIC, 28 out of 39 positives (72%), but also 20 out of 83 negatives (24%) showed an increase of sputum eosinophils and/or bronchial hyperresponsiveness after SIC. If the pulmonary responder status alone was used as ‘gold standard’, an increase of FeNO with a sensitivity of 0.57 and a specificity of 0.82 showed a higher accuracy than increases of sputum eosinophils (0.52/0.75) or bronchial hyperresponsiveness (0.43/0.87). Individual case analyses suggest that a few cases of OA may be detected by increases of sputum eosinophils or bronchial hyperresponsiveness alone, but probably false-positive tests dominate. It is recommended to use both lung function and increase of FeNO as primary effect parameters of SIC. Changes of sputum eosinophils and bronchial hyperresponsiveness after SIC have a low additional diagnostic value, but may be useful in individual cases.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF