Search

BackgroundIncreasing application of vancomycin due to the high prevalence of MRSA infections has led to the emergence of vancomycin intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA). Consequently, the need for alternative therapies that target MRSA has become evident.ObjectivesTo evaluate the synergy between (lipo)glycopeptides (LGP/GPs) (vancomycin, teicoplanin, telavancin, dalbavancin and oritavancin) and β-lactams (ceftaroline, cefepime, cefazolin and oxacillin) against MRSA, hVISA, VISA and daptomycin non-susceptible (DNS) phenotypes.MethodsTwenty randomly selected clinical MRSA strains (i.e. 5 MRSA, 5 hVISA, 5 VISA and 5 DNS) were assessed versus LGP/GPs alone and LGP/GPs in combination with β-lactams for MICs. Although verification of antibiotic potency against bacterial strains is assessed by the microbroth dilution (MBD) MIC method recommended by the CLSI, some antibiotics need modified assay conditions in order to demonstrate their optimal activity.ResultsAddition of β-lactams reduced MIC values of LGP/GPs against all strains (up to 160-fold reduction). In general, LGPs (dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin) were more active (significant differences in MIC values, up to 8-fold) compared with vancomycin and teicoplanin. The majority of these combinations were bactericidal and superior to any single agent.ConclusionsThis report has examined the susceptibility patterns of LGP/GPs and their combination with β-lactams. Of interest, the impact of susceptibility tests (in terms of MIC plates and their surface area) on the synergistic activity in 24 h time–kill experiments was apparent for LGPs. Further clinical research is required to investigate synergy with LGP/GPs and β-lactams against these Staphylococcus strains.

Acinetobacter baumannii is currently classified as one of six pathogens that contribute to increased patient mortality. Thus, exploratory studies navigating alternative treatment strategies are of supreme interest. Herein, we completed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing, and time-kill analyses (TKA) on 50 carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacterbaumannii isolates including 28 colistin-resistant isolates. Upon testing of MEM or TGC in the presence of sub-inhibitory COL against the 50 isolates, there was a median 2-fold reduction in MEM and TGC MICs. In the TKAs, the COL+MEM combination was synergistic in 45 (90%) isolates and bactericidal in 43 (86%) isolates at 24 hours, whereas the COL+TGC combination TKAs demonstrated synergy in 32 (64%) isolates and bactericidal activity was shown in 28 (56%) isolates. Additionally, sulbactam (SUL) and TGC were added to the COL+MEM dual therapy regimen to assess the possible utility of a triple therapy regimen against five non-responsive isolates. The COL+MEM+SUL and COL+MEM+TGC regimens effectively restored synergy in (5/5) 100% of the isolates. The results of this study demonstrate the potential utility of COL combinations in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant isolates.

This study aimed to test the efficacy of bacteriophage-antibiotic combinations (BACs) in vitro in 24-h time-kill settings and in ex vivo simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models for 96 h. BACs prevented the development of bacteriophage resistance, while some bacteriophage resistance emerged in bacteriophage-alone treatments. In addition, BACs resulted in an enhancement of bacterial eradication in SEV models. Our findings support the potential activity of BAC therapy for combating serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.

Objectives: Among viridans group streptococcal infective endocarditis (IE), the Streptococcus mitis group is the most common aetiological organism. Treatment of IE caused by the S. mitis group is challenging due to the high frequency of β-lactam resistance, drug allergy and intolerability of mainstay antimicrobial agents such as vancomycin or gentamicin. Daptomycin has been suggested as an alternative therapeutic option in these scenarios based on its excellent susceptibility profile against S. mitis group strains. However, the propensity of many S. mitis group strains to rapidly evolve stable, high-level daptomycin resistance potentially limits this approach. Methods: We evaluated the activity of 6 mg/kg/day daptomycin alone or in combination with gentamicin, ceftriaxone or ceftaroline against two daptomycin-susceptible S. mitis group strains over 96 h in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of simulated endocardial vegetations. Results: Daptomycin alone was not bactericidal and high-level daptomycin resistance evolved at 96 h in both organisms. Combinations of daptomycin + ceftriaxone and daptomycin + ceftaroline demonstrated enhanced killing activity compared with each antibiotic alone and prevented emergence of daptomycin resistance at 96 h. Use of gentamicin as an adjunctive agent neither improved the efficacy of daptomycin nor prevented the development of daptomycin resistance. Conclusions: Addition of ceftriaxone or ceftaroline to daptomycin improves the bactericidal activity against S. mitis group strains and prevents daptomycin resistance emergence. Further investigation with combinations of daptomycin and β-lactams in a large number of strains is warranted to fully elucidate the clinical implications of such combinations for treatment of S. mitis group IE.

Background The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, has resulted in the use of previously discarded antibiotics, such as the polymyxins (polymyxin B and colistin (COL)). Consequently, the polymyxins are continually characterized by the cytotoxicity associated with their use. SPR206 is a polymyxin analogue, however the N-terminal lipophilic side chain has been extensively modified, decreasing the potential for adverse events. SPR206 has reduced minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) MIC50 and MIC90 in P. aeruginosa strains when compared to COL. The objective of this study was to compare the in-vitro activity of SPR206 to COL both alone and in combination with other antimicrobials against MDR P. aeruginosa. Methods MIC susceptibility testing was performed against 15 carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa strains via broth microdilution. SPR206, COL, aztreonam (AZT) and ceftazidime/ avibactam (CAZ/AVI) were evaluated against the P. aeruginosa strains. Dual therapy and triple therapy combinations, either COL or SPR206-based, were tested against four representative strains in 24h time-kill experiments (TKE). Each antibiotic was tested at both 0.5 and 1x the MIC. A >2 log10 and a >3log10 reduction in CFU/ml were defined as synergistic and bactericidal activity, respectively. Results The MIC testing revealed a lower range of MIC values for SPR206 compared to all agents tested, including COL, for the 15 MDR P. aeruginosa strains. A mean 2-fold reduction in MIC values was observed when comparing the activity of SPR206 to COL. Neither the SPR206 nor COL+CAZ/AVI combinations presented with synergistic activity in the TKEs. SPR206 or COL + CAZ/AVI +AZT, showed synergistic activity against each strain, irrespective of COL or SPR206 base and the tested concentration. At 0.5x MIC bactericidal activity was observed in two of the strains with either COL or SPR206 + AZT. However, at 1xMIC the SPR206+AZT combination exhibited bactericidal activity, equal to that of the triple therapy regimens, against each strain. Conclusion The combination of SPR206 with other antibiotic agents showed promise in eradicating MDR P. aeruginosa. Further research is warranted to solidify the role of SPR206 in the current antibiotic armamentarium. Disclosures Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek (Grant/Research Support)

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative organisms are a major health concern due to lack of effective therapy. Emergence of resistance to newer agents like ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) further magnifies the problem. In this context, combination therapy of CZA with other antimicrobials may have potential in treating these pathogens. Unfortunately, there are limited data regarding these combinations. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate CZA in combination with amikacin (AMK), aztreonam (AZT), colistin (COL), fosfomycin (FOS), and meropenem (MEM) against 21 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and 21 MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. The potential for synergy was evaluated via MIC combination evaluation and time-kill assays. All strains were further characterized by whole-genome sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR, and SDS-PAGE analysis to determine potential mechanisms of resistance. Compared to CZA alone, we observed a 4-fold decrease in CZA MICs for a majority of K. pneumoniae strains and at least a 2-fold decrease for most P. aeruginosa isolates in the majority of combinations tested. In both P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae strains, CZA in combination with AMK or AZT was synergistic (≥2.15-log(10) CFU/ml decrease). CZA-MEM was effective against P. aeruginosa and CZA-FOS was effective against K. pneumoniae. Time-kill analysis also revealed that the synergy of CZA with MEM or AZT may be due to the previously reported restoration of MEM or AZT activity against these organisms. Our findings show that CZA in combination with these antibiotics has potential for therapeutic options in difficult to treat pathogens. Further evaluation of these combinations is warranted.

Glycopeptides such as vancomycin have been used as the first-line therapy against MRSA infections for over half a century. Reduced susceptibility and emergence of resistance to first-generation glycopeptides has led to development of second-generation lipoglycopeptide derivatives such as dalbavancin which hold broader ranges of activity and enhanced pharmacokinetic properties. We evaluated the MIC values for a total of 100 isolates, including 25 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 25 heterogeneus vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, 25 daptomycin nonsusceptible (DNS), and 25 vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strains against dalbavancin, ceftaroline, and vancomycin alone and in combination. Dalbavancin was highly active against hVISA, DNS, and MRSA strains, achieving 96 to 100% susceptibility and 72% susceptibility against VISA strains. The combination of dalbavancin plus ceftaroline reduced dalbavancin MICs 62.5-fold and demonstrated enhanced killing against all four phenotypes in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models. Four strains of the aforementioned phenotypes were randomly chosen for pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic simulation models. Of interest, while both dalbavancin and vancomycin in combination with ceftaroline demonstrated significant improvement in glycopeptide fAUC/MIC values against these four phenotypes, the dalbavancin-ceftaroline combinations exhibited a 44- to 11,270-fold higher fAUC/MIC value in comparison to vancomycin-ceftaroline combinations. In addition, the time to detection limit was reduced for this combination (24 to 32 h) versus the vancomycin-ceftaroline combination (24 to 72h). To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study of dalbavancin and vancomycin combinations with ceftaroline. These data provide a novel approach for combating recalcitrant MRSA infections.

Background Enterococcus faecium infections are difficult to treat and there is a growing concern regarding the rising occurrence of daptomycin resistance. We have previously demonstrated that only daptomycin plus ampicillin combination was effective against DAP-R E. faecium R497. The efficacy and systematic screening DAP plus β-lactams and DAP plus other combinations against daptomycin-resistant strains of E. faecium has not been investigated. Here, we evaluated 40 selected single, dual and triple combinations of antibacterial regimens against two clinical isolates of DAP-R E. faecium (R497 and R496 (with daptomycin MIC of 16 and 32 µg/ml, respectively). Methods E.faecium R497 and R496 were tested against an array of antibacterial agents including daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid, ertapenem, ceftaroline and ceftriaxone using MIC susceptibility tests and 24h time-kill curves (TKC). All susceptibility tests and TKCs were performed in MHB broth containing 50 mg/L calcium. TKCs were performed at half MIC or free peak concentration of each antibacterial (whichever was lower). Synergy was defined as >2 log10 CFU/ml decrease compared to the most potent antibacterial agent. Results Susceptibility tests demonstrated resistance to all listed β-lactams for both organisms. TKCs demonstrated that combination of daptomycin-ertapenem, daptomycin-ceftriaxone and daptomycin-ceftaroline was not effective against R497. However, addition of ceftriaxone or linezolid to either daptomycin-ertapenem or daptomycin-ceftaroline combinations resulted in synergy against this organism. Combinations of daptomycin-ertapenem and daptomycin-ceftaroline were synergistic against R496. Addition of linezolid, ceftriaxone or tigecycline to either daptomycin-ceftaroline or daptomycin-ertapenem combination did not increase killing activity against R496. Conclusion Differential affinity of β-lactams to specific PBP isotypes seems to be a key parameter for the success of daptomycin- β-lactam combinations against multi-drug resistant E. faecium . The optimized use of double β-lactam therapy in addition to daptomycin can potentially lead to improved patient outcomes and preserving antibiotic therapy for serious enterococcus infections. Disclosures Cesar A. Arias, MD, MSc, PhD, FIDSA, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)MeMed (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support) Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek (Grant/Research Support)

Background Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii continue to pose a serious public health threat. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a new parental siderophore cephalosporin that has displayed potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria, more specifically non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, including A. baumannii. Although uncommon, elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to CFDC have been reported, when tested against A. baumannii isolates, in-vitro. The addition of beta-lactamase inhibitors has been shown to be successful in decreasing elevated CFDC MICs. The evaluation of sulbactam (SUL), tazobactam (TAZO), or clavulanic acid (CLAV) in addition to CFDC against A. baumannii isolates with elevated CFDC MICs, has yet to be reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of several beta-lactamase inhibitors in combination with CFDC against A. baumannii strains with high CFDC MICs. Methods One hundred and fifty carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains were selected from the Anti-infective Research Laboratory. MIC susceptibility testing was performed for all of the strains via broth microdilution (BMD). Seven strains that exhibited elevated CFDC MICs,16-32 mg/L, were assessed via BMD, with the addition of the following beta-lactamase inhibitors: TAZO, SUL, AVI, and CLAV to CFDC. All in-vitro testing for CFDC was completed with the use of iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth to ensure the induction of bacterial iron transporters per manufacturer standards. Results A decline in elevated CFDC MIC values was observed in six of the seven A. baumannii strains, with the addition of each beta-lactamase inhibitor. AVI showed the most potent activity when added to CFDC, with an average 28- fold reduction in MIC values observed. SUL and CLAV produced similar fold reductions in the MIC values with an average 20-fold reduction observed with the addition of either agent to FDC. The addition of TAZO to CFDC also presented with a decline in MIC values, with an average 7-fold-reduction observed. Cefiderocol (CFDC) strains with MICs of 16-32 mg/l plus Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Conclusion The addition of several beta-lactamase inhibitors to CFDC has shown promise in decreasing elevated CFDC MICs. Further research is warranted to determine the role of BLIs on CFDC activity. Disclosures Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek (Grant/Research Support)

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major pathogen responsible for health care-associated infections, and treatment options are limited. Tedizolid (TZD) is a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic with activity against MRSA. Previously, daptomycin (DAP) has demonstrated synergy with other antibiotics against MRSA. We sought to determine the efficacy of the combination of TZD and DAP against MRSA in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations (SEVs). TZD simulations of 200 mg once daily and DAP simulations of 6 mg/kg of body weight and 10 mg/kg once daily were tested alone and in the combinations TZD plus DAP at 6 mg/kg or DAP at 10 mg/kg against two clinical strains of MRSA, 494 and 67. These regimens were tested in SEV models over 8 days to determine the antibacterial activity of the regimens and whether synergy or antagonism might be present between the agents. Against both strains 494 and 67 and at both DAP dose regimens, the combination of TZD and DAP was antagonistic at 192 h. In all cases, DAP alone was statistically superior to DAP plus TZD. When the combination was stopped after 96 h, transitioning to DAP at 6 mg/kg or DAP at 10 mg/kg alone resulted in better antibacterial activity than either of the TZD-plus-DAP combinations, further demonstrating antagonistic effects. Against MRSA, we demonstrated that TZD and DAP have antagonistic activity that hinders their overall antimicrobial efficacy. The exact nature of this antagonistic relationship is still undetermined, but its presence warrants further study of the potentially harmful grouping of the two antibiotics in clinical use.

Background Glycopeptides and lipopeptides, more specifically vancomycin (VAN) and daptomycin (DAP) have been principally utilized in treating MRSA infections. Due to continued use, MRSA strains have developed resistance to these antibiotics including vancomycin intermediate susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and daptomycin non-susceptible strains (DNS). Lipoglycopeptides; notably dalbavancin (DAL), have been employed due to their ease of administration and enhanced activity against highly resistant S. aureus. As previously demonstrated, the use of β-lactams, specifically cefazolin (CFZ) in combination with anti-MRSA drug therapy has been effective in eradicating S. aureus complicated by increased resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of DAL, VAN, and DAP, alone and in combination with CFZ in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Methods The well-characterized DNS-VISA strain, D712, was evaluated in eight different regimens in duplicate via a one-compartment 7-day PK/PD model. The experimental regimens were as follows: D712 growth control, DAL 1500 mg given on day 1, VAN 2 g given every 12 hours, DAP 10 mg/kg once-daily, CFZ 2 g given every 8 hours and DAL, DAP, and VAN in combination with CFZ. Results The combinations of DAL+CFZ, VAN+CFZ, and DAP+CFZ demonstrated a significant log10 CFU/mL reduction (more than 5 log 10 CFU/mL and up to detection limit), compared with each drug used as monotherapy (P < 0.001). Neither DAP nor VAN demonstrated sustained bactericidal activity, (represented by a >3-log10 CFU/mL reduction from baseline) and resulted in significant regrowth, when administered alone. However, the DAP +CFZ, and VAN+CFZ combination models demonstrated bactericidal activity at 4 hours and 24 hours, respectively. While DAL alone did demonstrate bactericidal activity, the DAL+CFZ combination was more rapidly bactericidal, achieving a > 3-log reduction from baseline in 8 hours vs. 48 hours (P < 0.05). Conclusion The combination of DAL, VAN, or DAP with CFZ demonstrated significantly improved activity against this multiple drug-resistant S. aureus strain. Further research is warranted, both in vivo and in vitro, to explore the synergistic capabilities of anti-MRSA drug therapy in combination with β-lactams. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Acinetobacter baumannii possess inherent and acquired antibiotic resistance mechanisms that have rendered most antibiotics, including carbapenems, inactive. Colistin (COL) has risen as salvage therapy against these organisms due to its retained activity against A. baumannii. However, COL monotherapy is often met with suboptimal outcomes. Recently, combination therapy with COL and meropenem (MEM) or tigecycline (TGC) has been shown to be effective in eradicating multi-drug-resistant A. baumannii infections. The objective of this study was to further evaluate the efficacy of COL in combination with MEM or TGC against 50 multi-drug-resistant A. baumannii strains. Methods Fifty carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains were evaluated using combination minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing and time-kill analysis (TKA). Single-drug MIC testing was performed for each strain by broth microdilution. Combination MIC testing was performed for COL+MEM and COL+TGC. Each strain was evaluated via 24-hour TKA to assess the synergistic capabilities of COL+MEM, and COL+TGC. Synergy was defined as a ≥ 2-log reduction CFU/mL in either combination from the most active single agent, while bactericidal activity was defined as a ≥ 3-log reduction CFU/mL of either combination from the initial inoculum. Results All 50 strains were resistant to MEM and TGC with MICs ≥ 64 µg/mL and ≥ 4 µg/mL respectively; while 3 strains were resistant to COL, MICs ≥ 2 µg/mL. MEM and TGC MIC values were reduced as much as 128-fold (median 2-fold) and 32-fold (median 2-fold),, respectively, in the presence of subinhibitory COL. COL MIC values were reduced as much as 512-fold (median 4-fold) from baseline in the presence of subinhibitory MEM, and as high as 16-fold (median 2-fold) in the presence of TGC. In TKAs, COL+MEM was synergistic in 45/50 (90%) strains and bactericidal against 43/50 (86%) strains. COL+TGC TKAs revealed synergy in 32/50 (64%) strains, and bactericidal activity against 28/50 (56%) strains. Conclusion The combinations of COL+MEM and COL+TGC demonstrate promise in combating highly resistant A. baumannii. Further research is mandated to explore other combinations that are capable of eradicating multi-drug-resistant A. baumannii. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Daptomycin (DAP) is one of the mainstay treatments for Enterococcus faecium infections. However, development of resistance threatens its continued viability as a treatment option. Although the mechanisms of DAP resistance in enterococci are not fully comprehended, they are associated with alterations in cell envelope phospholipids assembly which leads to repulsion of the drug from cell exterior and diversion from the cell septum. Previous data suggest that combination of DAP with β-lactams has the potential to improve patient outcomes. In this investigation, we sought to evaluate combinations of DAP with ampicillin (AMP), ceftaroline (CPT), and ertapenem (ERT). Methods E. faecium R497 harboring liaSFR mutations (DAP MIC of 16 mg/L) was evaluated in a simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model over 336 hours at a starting inoculum of 109 log10 CFU/g of SEV. DAP alone at 10 mg/kg/day or DAP (6, 8, 10 mg/kg/day) in combination with AMP (2 g continuous infusion), CPT 600 mg q12h or ERT 1 g q24h were evaluated. The emergence of DAP resistance was determined daily over the course of the 14-day experiment. Results DAP alone was not bactericidal and high-level DAP resistance was observed (MIC increase from 16 to 256 µg/mL) for all DAP alone regimens. Combination of DAP+AMP offered a significant reduction in log10CFU/g amounts (up to 7 log10 CFU/g and to detection limits) in 24 hours in DAP10+AMP model with no further emergence of DAP resistance. Even in DAP 6 mg/kg/day with AMP (2 g), dramatic killing with no further emergence of resistance was observed. Neither CPT nor ERT in combination with DAP was effective against this strain. At higher doses of DAP (14 mg/kg/day) + CPT or ERT, a temporary (0–48 hours) CFU/g reduction was observed followed by regrowth and the further emergence of DAP resistance. Conclusion Combination of DAP + AMP offered the most encouraging results against E. faecium R497. A DAP dose sparring effect was noted with DAP + AMP but not with CPT or ERT. The reason for the discrepancy is unknown and is under further investigation. Further evaluation of DAP plus β-lactam therapy is warranted to discover the most optimized DAP and β-lactam therapy to improve patient outcome and prevent the emergence of resistance. Disclosures B. Murray, Paratek pharmaceuticals: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium; Forest/Actavis: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; Cubist/Merck: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. C. Arias, Merck & Co., Inc.: Grant Investigator, Research support; MeMed: Grant Investigator, Research support; Allergan: Grant Investigator, Research support; M. J. Rybak, Allergan: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant and Research support; Achaogen: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Bayer: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Melinta: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Merck: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Theravance: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Sunovian: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Zavante: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; NIAID: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support

Background We have previously demonstrated that daptomycin (DAP) combinations with β-lactams offer enhanced bactericidal activity and prevent the emergence of resistance in Enterococcus faecium infections. Although the mechanisms of DAP resistance in enterococci are not fully comprehended, they are associated with alterations in cell envelope phospholipids assembly which leads to either repulsion of the drug from cell exterior or diversion from the cell septum. In this context, we sought to evaluate combinations of DAP with a panel of β-lactams including ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin (AMX), ceftaroline (CPT), ceftriaxone (CRO) and ertapenem (ERT). Methods E. faecium R497 harboring liaSFR mutations (DAP MIC of 16 mg/L) was evaluated in a simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model over 336 h at a starting inoculum of 109 log10 CFU/g. DAP 10 mg/kg/day combinations with AMP, AMX (2 g continuous infusion), CPT 600 mg q 12 h, CRO 2g q 24 h or ERT 1 g q 24 h were evaluated. The emergence of DAP resistance was determined daily over the course of treatment. Results DAP alone was not bactericidal and high-level DAP resistance was observed (MIC increase from 16 to 64 µg/mL). Combination of DAP+AMP offered a significant reduction in log10CFU/g amounts (Up to 7 log10 CFU/g and to detection limits) in 24h in with no emergence of DAP resistance. DAP 10+ AMX caused 6–6.5 log10 CFU/g reduction and counts were maintained around the detection limit while demonstrating no increased resistance. Dose de-escalation with AMP indicated that even DAP 4 mg/kg/d with AMP (2g) combination, reached detection limit at 168 h with no further resistance. None of the CPT, CRO or ERT regimens in combination with DAP was effective against R497 and elevated DAP MICs (>64 µg/mL) was observed during the 14-day model. Conclusion Combination of DAP+AMP offered the most encouraging results against E. faecium R497, while DAP+AMX caused enhanced reduction. The reason for this discrepancy in various β-lactam activity may be related to diverse β-lactam targeting or affinity toward PBP proteins. Further dissection of our observations is warranted to understand the optimized DAP-β-lactam combination and consequently improve patient outcomes and prevention of resistance. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background The viridans group streptococci (VGS) are a heterogeneous group of microorganisms that form portion of the normal oral flora of humans. Among the VGS, S. mitis-oralis is the most common cause of infective endocarditis in the developing world, as well as the leading cause of the “toxic Strep syndrome” in neutropenic cancer patients. Therapeutic options are often limited by frequent β-lactam resistance, as well as vancomycin tolerance. Daptomycin (DAP) has been suggested as an alternative therapeutic option for invasive S. mitis-oralis infections. However, the ability of these strains to rapidly evolve high-level and durable DAP-resistance (DAP-R) is problematic. Recent data have suggested the potential for combined DAP +β-lactam therapy to circumvent this issue. Methods Using human-simulated dosing, the activities of DAP (6, 8,10 or 12 mg/kg/day × 4 days) alone vs. DAP (6 mg/kg/day) +(CRO) (500 mg daily × 4 days or 500 mg, given once on day one) were assessed against two DAP-susceptible (DAP-S) S. mitis-oralisstrains (SF100; 351) employing a PK-PD model of simulated endocardial vegetations (SEVs). Results DAP alone was not bactericidal at any dose-regimen, and regrowth of high-level DAP-R isolates was observed in both strains (MIC increase from 0.5 to >64 µg/mL). Combinations of DAP +CRO at either dose-regimen yielded significant reductions in log10CFU/g amounts within SEVs for both strains (~6 log10 CFU/g and to detection limits) within 24 hours. In addition, no DAP-R strains were detected in either DAP+ CRO combination regimens over the 96-hour exposure period. Conclusion Combinations of DAP+ low-dose CRO (even single dosing) showed promise to forestall the emergence of DAP-R in S. mitis-oralis strains. Such regimens can potentially lead to optimizing treatment outcomes with DAP therapy, with minimal β-lactam exposures. Further research in relevant in vivo models and clinically is warranted to determine the most optimized DAP+ CRO dose-regimens for the prevention of emergence of DAP-R among S. mitis-oralis strains. Disclosures J. M. Miro, Abbvie: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant; Genentech: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant; Medtronic: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant; Novartis: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant; Gilead Sciences: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant; Pfizer: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant; ViiV Healthcare: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. C. Arias, Merck & Co., Inc.: Grant Investigator, Research support; MeMed: Grant Investigator, Research support; Allergan: Grant Investigator, Research support. A. Bayer, Trellis: grant recipient, Grant recipient; Contrafect: grant recipient, Grant recipient; Theravance: grant recipient, Grant recipient. M. J. Rybak, Allergan: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant and Research support; Achaogen: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Bayer: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Melinta: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Merck: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Theravance: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Sunovian: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; Zavante: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; NIAID: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support.

Background Biofilms are sophisticated communities of matrix-encased and surface-attached bacteria that exhibit a distinct and specific resistant/tolerant phenotype to almost all antibacterial agents, with activity reduced 10- to 1,000-fold. Interestingly, this augmented resistance rapidly reverts when bacteria detach from the biofilm and return to a planktonic state. However, in this in vitro pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model we are able to expose biofilms to shear rates that are consistent with human interface and mimic antibiotic penetration and diffusion pathways from serum antibiotic concentration in humans. Methods Methicillin-susceptible ATCC 29213 and MRSA 494 strains were evaluated. Initial susceptibility tests were performed by broth microdilution method. Time kill studies were performed to identify synergy patterns for liposomal and commercial antibiotics. Biofilm eradication was investigated using antibiotics vancomycin (VAN) (commercial) vs. liposomal VAN (VAN-L) (Patent#17-1460) and also combination of VAN- cefazolin (commercial) vs. liposomal vancomycin and liposomal cefazolin (CFZ-L) (Patent# 17-1460) in biofilms for strain MRSA 494. Biofilms were generated overnight using the BioFlux Microfluidic system (Fluxion BioSciences) at constant and continuous shear rates to optimize biofilm attachment and creation. Perfusion of antibiotic solutions (free peak concentration) was applied over a 24 h time period. Time lapse pictures were recorded to determine antibiotic biofilm eradication rates over 18h of incubation and pictures were analyzed using Bioflux Montage software. Results MIC values demonstrated a 2-fold reduction for liposomal vancomycin vs. commercial vancomycin. Also, combination of liposomal VAN MIC in presence of CFZ-L showed a 15.87-fold reduction in comparison to commercial VAN for 494. Overall, our biofilm results demonstrated a 43.6% improved eradication using VAN-L and CFZ-L combination in comparison to commercial VAN-CFZ combination. We also observed 5.7% improved eradication using VAN-L vs. commercial VAN. Conclusion Liposomal form of VAN and CFZ combinations are a promising approach to improved efficacy and reduced VAN resistance in S. aureus biofilms. Disclosures M. J. Rybak, Allergan: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant and Research support. Achaogen: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Bayer: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Melinta: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Merck: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Theravance: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Sunovian: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Zavante: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. NIAID: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support.