Search

Background Automation in HIV clinical flow cytometry when appropriately applied brings considerable standardisation benefits. The Canadian Immunology Quality Assessment Program (CIQAP) detected situations where operators did not manually override automated software in the event of improper output on the Epics XL and FC500 CD4 immunophenotyping platforms. The automated gating algorithm identifies lymphocytes using a double gate strategy based on CD45 × side scatter (SS) gating and a light scatter FS × SS gate known to fail with sub optimal specimens. Method To generate correct interpretation and results CIQAP introduced a simple protocol modification, bypassing the light scatter gate to include all cells characterized by the CD45 gate. Seventeen problem cases were reanalysed for both absolute and relative T-cell subsets accuracy and compared to the CIQAP group mean values. Results were found to be associated with the percentage of lymphocytes excluded by the automated light scatter gate. Results The modified manual protocol resolved poor performance in 14 instances out of 17 problem cases. It was found to improve accuracy when the light scatter gate excluded greater than 5% of the cells. The remaining three cases had a lymphocyte recovery of greater than 94.6% in the original automated analysis. Conclusion There is a risk in relying solely on automated gating procedures when using the Epics XL and FC500 CD4 immunophenotyping platforms. Laboratory managers have the responsibility to intervene when required. EQA providers are equally responsible to alert the clinical laboratories of the need to update operator training to deal with stressed specimens. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Objective: The HIV pandemic remains a significant global health concern. Accurate determination of CD4+ T-cells in patient samples relies on reliable CD4 enumeration. The Quality Assessment and Standardization programme for Immunological measures relevant to HIV/AIDS (QASI) programme of the Public Health Agency of Canada provides clinical laboratories from resource-limited countries with a mechanism to evaluate the quality of CD4 testing and develop the implementation of an independent national External Quality Assessment (EQA) programme. This study describes how QASI helped develop the capacity for managing a sustainable national CD4 EQA programme in India.Design: Supported by the Public Health Agency of Canada and Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative, QASI engaged with the National AIDS Control Organization and the Indian National AIDS Research Institute to assist in technology transfer in preparation for the implementation/ management of an independent CD4 EQA programme. Technology transfer training was provided to support corrective actions and to improve the quality of CD4 testing. Inter- laboratory variation of EQA surveys between pre- and post-skill development was compared.Results: Prior to training, coefficient of variation values were 14.7% (mid-level CD4 count controls) and 39.0% (low-level). Following training, variation was reduced to 10.3% for mid- level controls and 20.0% for low-level controls.Conclusion: This training assisted the National AIDS Control Organization and the Indian National AIDS Research Institute in identifying the information necessary for management of an EQA programme, and developed the foundation for India to provide corrective actions for sites with challenges in achieving reliable results for CD4 enumeration. This led to a demonstrable improvement in CD4 testing quality and illustrates how country-specific training significantly improved CD4 enumeration performance for better clinical management of HIV care in India.

Background The global HIV/AIDS pandemic and guidelines for initiating anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and opportunistic infection prophylaxis demand affordable, reliable, and accurate CD4 testing. A simple innovative approach applicable to existing technology that has been successfully applied in resource-challenged settings, PanLeukogated CD4 (PLG), could offer solutions for cost saving and improved precision. Methods Day-old whole blood from 99 HIV+ donors was simultaneously studied in five North-American laboratories to compare the performance of their predicate methods with the dual-platform PLG method. The predicate technology included varying 4-color CD45/CD3/CD4/CD8 protocols on different flow cytometers. Each laboratory also assayed eight replicate specimens of day-old blood from 10 to 14 local donors. Bias and precision of predicate and PLG methods was studied between- and within-participating laboratories. Results Significantly (P < 0.0001) improved between-laboratory precision/coefficient of variation (CV%) was noted using the PLG method (overall median 9.3% vs. predicate median CV 13.1%). Within-laboratory precision was also significantly (P < 0.0001) better overall using PLG (median 4.6% vs. predicate median CV 6.2%) and in 3 of the 5 laboratories. PLG counts tended to be 11% smaller than predicate methods (P < 0.0001) for shipped (median of predicate—PLG = 31) and local specimens (median of predicate—PLG = 23), both overall and in 4 of 5 laboratories (median decreases of 4, 16, 20, and 21% in shipped specimens); the other laboratory had a median increase of 5%. Conclusion Laboratories using predicate CD4 methods similar to those in this study could improve their between-laboratory and their within-laboratory precision, and reduce costs, by switching to the PLG method after adequate training, if a change (usually, a decrease) in CD4 counts is acceptable to their health systems. © 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society

Background The global struggle with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the battle to develop affordable CD4 T-cell counting technology are both unfulfilled goals in 2008. The need for such instrumentation is more critical now as implementation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is in progress in many resource limited regions. Major scaling-up efforts in rural situations are difficult to implement without laboratory infrastructure. CD4 T-cell counting is especially critical when trying to reach individuals with HIV to have them enrolled in ART as soon as they qualify for treatment based on CD4 count. Method This review covers both the chronological evolution and the scientific milestones of technological development of affordable immunophenotyping. It is more focused on flow cytometry but does consider the potential contribution by digital image cytometry. Results Thus far flow cytometry offered only modest progress toward affordable immunophenotyping. A list with desirable features is offered for side by side comparison. Digital image cytometry has yet to show its enormous affordable market potential. Conclusions It is possible to develop truly affordable, portable flow cytometry but it is not here yet. There are some hopeful signs as there are innovative and practical technical components appearing at regular intervals. However, so far the technical breakthroughs have been fragmented efforts without any attempts to consider intercorporate collaboration to optimize critical mass and synergy. The smaller players in the industry have made some progress toward meeting the monumental needs in Africa and Asia. Digital image cytometry may well be the ultimate winner in the affordable technology race. © 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society

Background: Exceptionally robust cell preparations are needed for quality assessment programs (QAPs) such as the International Program for Quality Assessment and Standardization for Immunological Measures (QASI) relevant to HIV/AIDS. A suitable product must withstand environmental stress related to transportation for a minimum of 6 days. The two objectives of this study are (1) to evaluate the performance of various commercial preparations with multicenter participation and (2) to evaluate the robustness of stabilized blood cell products. Methods: Phase 1: The performance of stabilized blood cell products was evaluated in a multicenter QAP utilizing various staining procedures and flow cytometers. Absolute cell enumeration was achieved using single-platform T-cell subset methodology. Phase 2: The robustness of stabilized blood cell products was evaluated by monitoring T-cell subset values from samples stored at 4°C, 22°C, and 37°C for up to 10 days. Results: The largest interlaboratory variation in both absolute and relative T-cell values was 16% in samples with CD4 levels >400 cells per microliter and 21% in samples with CD4 levels

Measurements of CD4 T-cell levels are essential for the assessment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease course, clinical staging, epidemiological studies, and decisions regarding prophylactic therapies against opportunistic infection. Until now, only in the industrialized countries was T-cell subset monitoring considered a practical option to assess disease progression. The Quality Assessment and Standardization for Immunological Measures Relevant to HIV/AIDS (QASI) program was established in 1997 to meet performance assessment for immunophenotyping laboratories in countries where such service is not available. The QASI program is provided at no cost to any laboratory in a resource-poor setting that wishes to participate. This report describes the beneficial impact of participation in the QASI program. Carefully selected commercial stabilized whole blood preparations were sent regularly to participating laboratories. Participants reported the T-cell subset values they obtained by flow cytometry. Once the aggregate mean values for the T-cell subsets were established for the shipment, a comprehensive and confidential report was sent to each laboratory. The results from five consecutive shipments were analyzed. The coefficient of variation decreased from 7.2% to 4.7% and from 14.2% to 8.8% for percent and absolute CD4 T-cell counts, respectively. With the implementation of the QASI program using commercial stabilized whole blood specimens, it is possible to reduce interlaboratory error. This study illustrates that a quality assessment program can improve the overall performance of laboratories. Reducing interlaboratory variation can enhance significantly the effectiveness of multicenter HIV vaccine or drug trial evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care (POC) CD4 testing can improve access to treatment by enabling decentralization and reducing patient loss-to-follow-up. As new POC CD4 technologies become available, their performance should be assessed before widespread deployment. This study reports the findings of five independent evaluations of the PointCare NOW CD4 system. MATERIALS/METHODS: Evaluations were conducted in Southern Africa (Mozambique, South Africa) and North America (Canada, USA). 492 blood samples (55 from HIV-negative blood donors and 437 from HIV-infected patients, including 20 children aged between 12 and 59 months) were tested with both the PointCare NOW and reference flow cytometry instruments. Assessment of bias, precision and levels of clinical misclassification for absolute and percent CD4 count was conducted. RESULTS: PointCare NOW significantly overestimated CD4 absolute counts with a mean relative bias of +35.0%. Bias was greater in samples with CD4 counts below ≤ 350 cells/µl (+51.3%) than in the CD4 >350 cells/µl stratum (15.1%). Bias in CD4% had a similar trend with an overall relative mean bias of +25.6% and a larger bias for low CD4 stratum (+40.2%) than the higher CD4 stratum (+5.8%). Relative bias for CD4% in children was -6.8%. In terms of repeatability, PointCare NOW had a coefficient of variation of 11%. Using a threshold of 350 cells/µl, only 47% of patients who qualified for antiretroviral therapy with reference CD4 testing, would have been eligible for treatment with PointCare NOW test results. This was 39% using a 200 cells/µl threshold. Agreement with infant samples was higher, with 90% qualifying at a 25% eligibility threshold. CONCLUSION: The performance of the PointCare NOW instrument for absolute and percent CD4 enumeration was inadequate for HIV clinical management in adults. In children, the small sample size was not large enough to draw a conclusion. This study also highlights the importance of independent evaluation of new diagnostic technology platforms before deployment.

Background: Efforts to improve alternative CD4 T-cell counting methods are critical to accelerate the implementation of HIV antiretroviral therapy in resources limited regions. Substituting liquid format reagents to eliminate cold-chain transportation and refrigerated storage with dry format reagents contributes to higher efficiency supply management solution especially for laboratories at remote locations. ReaMetrix has developed dry format reagent kits compatible with the FACSCount system, a dedicated flow cytometer for T-cell subset enumeration widely used in resource limited settings. A dual site collaborative study was designed to compare T-cell subsets using both the new dry format ReaMetrix reagent and the original BD Biosciences liquid reagents. Method: A total of 167 HIV positive samples prepared with Rea T Count (ReaMetrix) and FACSCount (BD Biosciences) reagents were analyzed using FACSCount Systems. To compare both methods, Bland-Altman, Pollock, Scott % similarity and correlation coefficient statistical analysis was applied. Immuno-Trol served as an assay processing control and quality indicator of interlaboratory and intralaboratory variation. Results: The mean bias and limits of agreement for CD4 T-cell measurements between Rea T Count and FACSCount reagents were −16 cells/μl (−4.6%) and −74 to +43, respectively. The correlation obtained was 0.988 with a similarity of 97.9%. Between laboratory variation data was very good with %CV below 10%. Conclusion: The introduction of dry reagents permits the elimination of cold-chain transportation and the on-site refrigerated storage without compromise to assay quality. The substitution of dry reagents facilitates easier supply management practice that will assure wider access to quality HIV treatment. © 2009 Clinical Cytometry Society

Background: A significant worldwide mobilization effort to treat people with HIV disease began in 2003. Most guidelines for initiating antiretroviral therapy require reliable and reproducible CD4 T-cell counting. Therefore, any effort that improves global availability of quality managed assessment schemes for CD4 T-cell enumeration is a positive achievement for the clinical management of AIDS on a worldwide scale. Methods: The Canadian QASI-Quality Management System (QMS) has been in operation for over a decade. More recently, QMS has fine-tuned its strategy to optimize its global impact in the fight against the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Three modifications were implemented: (1) introduction of skills and knowledge transfer workshops pertaining to the initiation of national quality management programs for CD4 counting, (2) introduction of a road map to establish domestic EQAP for countries that are ready, and (3) introduction of a statistical analysis package which permits continuous monitoring of global impact of the QASI-QMS. Results: Based on QASI-QMS distribution of specimens over four consecutive participation cycles, there was decreased interlaboratory variation for both low and medium CD4 T-cell levels. After three cycles of consecutive participation, there is an average of 38 and 26% error reduction reported for the mid and low CD4 levels, respectively. Conclusion: The program improvements mentioned earlier appear to have had a profound effect with regard to enhancing the performance of laboratories participating in the QASI-QMS. Specifically, there is a significant reduction in interlaboratory variability of CD4 T-cell counts resulting from continuous participation in the QASI-QMS. © 2009 Clinical Cytometry Society

Background CD4 T cell enumeration is the most widely used prognostic marker for management of HIV disease. Internal quality control and external quality assessment (EQA) programs are critical to ensure reliability of clinical measurements. The utility of stabilized whole blood products (SWBP) as a test reagent for EQA programs such as Quality Assessment and Standardization for Immunological measures relevant to HIV/AIDS (QASI) program have been demonstrated previously. Since then, several new commercial SWBPs and alternative CD4 enumeration technologies have become available. Seven SWBPs were evaluated on seven different enumeration platforms to determine which product(s) are most suitable for EQA programs that support multiple analytical technologies. Method Assessment of SWBPs was based on two criteria: (1) accuracy of CD4 T cell measurements and; (2) stability under sub optimal storage conditions. Results Three SWBPs (Multi-Check, StatusFlow and CD4 Count) showed accurate CD4 T-cell absolute count and percentage values across six of the enumeration platforms. All products retain stability up to 18 days at 21–23°C with the exception of Multi-Check-high on FacsCount and Multi-Check-Low and StatusFlow-Low on Pima. One of the products (CD4 Count) retained stability for three days on all platforms tested when stored at 37°C. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the characteristics of commercially available SWBPs vary across multiple CD4 platforms. The compatibility of testing panels for EQA programs with multiple analytical platforms needs to be carefully considered, especially in large multiplatform CD4 EQA programs. The selection of a suitable cross-platform SWBP is an increasing challenge as more reagents and platforms are introduced for CD4 T-cell enumeration.