1. Expression of kisspeptin and KISS1 receptor in pituitary neuroendocrine tumours — an immunohistochemical study
- Author
-
Tatjana Vukotic, Tijana Janev, Tatjana Terzic, Ivan Soldatovic, Milena Mihajlovic, Sanja Cirovic, Marko Stojanovic, Sandra Pekic, Vera Popovic, Mirjana Doknic, Milica Skender-Gazibara, Dragana Miljic, Savo Raicevic, and Emilija Manojlovic-Gacic
- Subjects
Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Somatotropic cell ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,Prolactin cell ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endocrinology ,Kisspeptin ,Anterior pituitary ,Pituitary adenoma ,medicine ,Humans ,Pituitary Neoplasms ,Kisspeptins ,Tissue microarray ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,3. Good health ,Neuroendocrine Tumors ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Pituitary Gland ,Immunohistochemistry ,Corticotropic cell ,business ,hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists ,Receptors, Kisspeptin-1 - Abstract
Introduction: Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs), traditionally designated as pituitary adenomas, show elatively frequent invasive growth with exceptional metastatic potential, the causes of which are not entirely elucidated. Kisspeptins, which perform their activity through KISS1 receptor (KISS1R), are recognised as metastatic suppressors in many malignant tumours. This study aimed to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of kisspeptin and KISS1R in different types of PitNETs and to compare it with the expression in the normal anterior pituitary, using tissue microarray. Material and methods: The experimental group consisted of 101 patients with PitNETs, with 45 (37.3%) being of gonadotroph, 40 (33.9%) somatotroph, 4 (3.4%) corticotroph, 4 (3.4%) thyrotroph, 3 (2.5%) lactotroph, and 6 (5.1%) null-cell type. The control group consisted of anterior pituitary tissue accidentally removed during the surgery for PitNETs in 17 patients. Results: Kisspeptin expression was observed in both experimental and control groups, without statistically significant differences in the staining intensity. Negative kisspeptin staining was detected in 10 (9.9%), weak in 79 (78.2%), and moderate in 12 tumours (11.9%); none of the tumours had strong staining intensity. The weak staining intensity was predominant in all PitNET types except thyrotroph tumours. Significant statistical difference in terms of kisspeptin expression between types of PitNET and the control group was not observed. Immunohistochemical expression of KISS1R was not observed in the control group or in the experimental group. Conclusions: We conclude that immunohistochemistry, as a method, cannot confirm the involvement of kisspeptin in tumourigenesis and aggressiveness of PitNETs, but potentially supports its antimetastatic role. The absence of KISS1R immunohistochemical expression in all anterior pituitaries and PitNETs in our cohort needs verification through the use of different procedures designed for the detection of the presence and localisation of proteins in the cell.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF