Search

Background: A cross-linking agent commonly used for cancer chemotherapy is a platinum compound such as cisplatin. However, with the acquisition of cellular drug resistance and adverse side effects, the potency of cisplatin is, therefore, often tempered. To overcome these issues, the present study has established the use of cathepsin k (CTSK) inhibitor as a potent chemosensitizer. Methods: The cytotoxic effect of cisplatin and odanacatib (ODN) on two different breast cancer patient- derived cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, was assessed by MTT-based colorimetric assay. The drug interaction coefficient CDI was used to evaluate the synergistically inhibitory impact of the drug combination and immunoblot was used to examine the expression of certain proteins responsible for cell survival and the mechanism of apoptosis. Results: In this study, we found that IC50 of ODN in combination with cisplatin (half of IC25) induced a synergistic cytotoxic effect in different breast cancer cells. Diminished expression of Bcl-2 and increased expression of Bax aroused the cytochrome release, that triggered caspase-9 and -3 activation in the combinatorial group. ODN with a lower dose of cisplatin significantly inhibited the protein expression of novel chemoresistant factors such as STAT3, NFκB and IL-6. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential effects of the combination of ODN with a reduced dose of cisplatin on improving the growth inhibition and apoptosis-inducing effect on breast cancer cells via combined inhibition of NF-κB-induced IL-6 and STAT3 activation. The study result suggests that the further development of this novel inhibitor in combination with a low dose of standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy may contribute to an alternative treatment option for certain cancers.

To develop a framework for evaluating the resorption effects of Cathepsin K (CatK) inhibitors and to inform dose regimen selection, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for odanacatib (ODN) was developed based upon data from Phase 1 studies. Pooled PK/PD data from 11 studies (N = 249) were fit reasonably to a population inhibitory sigmoid Emax model. Body weight on E0 (baseline uNTx/Cr, urinary N-terminal telopeptide normalized by creatinine) and age on Emax (fractional inhibition of the biomarker response) were significant covariates for biomarker response. Simulations of typical osteoporosis patients (by age, sex and weight) indicated minimal differences between sexes in concentration-uNTx/Cr relationship. There was no evidence that regimen (daily vs. weekly dosing) influenced the PK/PD relationship of resorption inhibition for odanacatib. PK/PD models based on data from odanacatib (ODN) Phase 1 studies demonstrated that uNTx/Cr was an appropriate bone resorption biomarker for assessment of the effects of a CatK inhibitor. The models also identified the determinants of response in the PK/PD relationship for ODN (body weight on E0 and age on Emax).

Odanacatib (ODN), a selective oral inhibitor of cathepsin K, was an investigational agent previously in development for the treatment of osteoporosis. In this analysis, the effects of ODN on bone remodeling/modeling and structure were examined in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven, Phase 3, Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT; NCT00529373) and planned double-blind extension in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A total of 386 transilial bone biopsies, obtained from consenting patients at baseline (ODN n = 17, placebo n = 23), month 24 (ODN n = 112, placebo n = 104), month 36 (ODN n = 42, placebo n = 41), and month 60 (ODN n = 27, placebo n = 20) were assessed by dynamic and static bone histomorphometry. Patient characteristics at baseline and BMD changes over 5 years for this subset were comparable to the overall LOFT population. Qualitative assessment of biopsies revealed no abnormalities. Consistent with the mechanism of ODN, osteoclast number was higher with ODN versus placebo over time. Regarding bone remodeling, dynamic bone formation indices in trabecular, intracortical, and endocortical surfaces were generally similar in ODN-treated versus placebo-treated patients after 2 years of treatment. Regarding periosteal modeling, the proportion of patients with periosteal double labels and the bone formation indices increased over time in the ODN-treated patients compared with placebo. This finding supported the observed numerical increase in cortical thickness at month 60 versus placebo. In conclusion, ODN treatment for 5 years did not reduce bone remodeling and increased the proportion of patients with periosteal bone formation. These results are consistent with the mechanism of action of ODN, and are associated with continued BMD increases and reduced risk of fractures compared with placebo in the LOFT Phase 3 fracture trial. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Osteoclast research has an exciting history and a challenging future. More than 3 decades ago, it became evident that bone-resorbing osteoclasts are of hematopoietic origin and are ultimately linked to the "basic multicellular unit," where they team up with the other cell types, including bone-forming osteoblasts. Since 2 decades, we have learned about the signaling pathways controlling genes relevant for osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. It took another decade until the hypothesized "osteoclast differentiation" factor was discovered and was translated into an approved pharmacologic strategy. Here, the focus is on another molecular target, cathepsin K, a cysteine protease being released by the osteoclast into the resorption compartment. Genetic deletion and pharmacological blocking of cathepsin K reduces bone resorption but with ongoing bone formation. This observation not only holds great promise to become a new pharmacologic strategy, but it also provides new insights into the coordinated work of cells in the "basic multicellular unit" and thus, bridges the history and future of osteoclast research. This article is a short primer on osteoclast biology for readers of the special issue on odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor., Die Erforschung der Osteoklasten hat eine interessante Historie und eine herausfordernde Zukunft. Vor mehr als drei Jahrzehnten wurde deutlich, dass die Osteoklasten hämatopoetischen Ursprungs sind und sich gemeinsam mit den anderen Zelltypen, einschließlich der knochenbildenden Osteoblasten, in der „Basic Multicellular Unit“, befinden. Seit zwei Jahrzehnten verdichtet sich das Wissen über die Signalwege zur Kontrolle der Osteoklastogenese und der Knochenresorption. Es dauerte ein weiteres Jahrzehnt bis der hypothetische „Osteoklasten-Differenzierungsfaktor“ entdeckt wurde der, in Folge, die Grundlage für eine zugelassene pharmakologische Strategie bildete. Ein anderes molekulares Ziel ist Cathepsin K, einem Cystein-Protease die vom Osteoklasten währen der Resorption freigesetzt wird. Genetische Deletion und pharmakologische Blockierung von Cathepsin K reduzieren die Knochenresorption, ohne Unterbrechung der Knochenneubildung. Dieses Prinzip hat das Potential eine neue pharmakologische Strategie zu werden und bietet neue Einblicke in die koordinierte Arbeit der Zellen in der „Basic Multicellular Unit“. Dieses Prinzip verbindet auch die Historie und Zukunft der Erforschung der Osteoklasten. Dieser Artikel ist ein kurzer Abriss der Osteoklastenbiologie für die Leser der Sonderausgabe zum Thema Odanacatib, einem Cathepsin-K-Inhibitor.

The surrogate threshold effect (STE) is defined as the minimum treatment effect on a surrogate that is reliably predictive of a treatment effect on the clinical outcome. It provides a framework for implementing a clinical trial with a surrogate endpoint. The aim of this study was to update our previous analysis by validating the STE for change in total hip (TH) BMD as a surrogate for fracture risk reduction; the novelty of this study was this validation. To do so, we used individual patient data from 61,415 participants in 16 RCTs that evaluated bisphosphonates (nine trials), selective estrogen receptor modulators (four trials), denosumab (one trial), odanacatib (one trial), and teriparatide (one trial) to estimate trial-specific treatment effects on TH BMD and all, vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures. We then conducted a random effects meta-regression of the log relative fracture risk reduction against 24-month change in TH BMD, and computed the STE as the intersection of the upper 95% prediction limit of this regression with the line of no fracture reduction. We validated the STE by checking whether the number of fractures in each trial provided 80% power and determining what proportion of trials with BMD changes ≥ STE reported significant reductions in fracture risk. We applied this analysis to (i) the trials on which we estimated the STE; and (ii) trials on which we did not estimate the STE. We found that the STEs for all, vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures were 1.83%, 1.42%, 3.18%, and 2.13%, respectively. Among trials used to estimate STE, 27 of 28 were adequately powered, showed BMD effects exceeding the STE, and showed significant reductions in fracture risk. Among the validation set of 11 trials, 10 met these criteria. Thus STE differs by fracture type and has been validated in trials not used to develop the approach. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Osteoporosis and cardiovascular (CV) disease share common risk factors and pathophysiology. Low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures appear to increase the risk for multiple CV diseases. Equally, prevalent CV disease appears to predispose to bone loss and increase fracture rates. This relationship has naturally provoked the hypothesis that stopping bone loss may result in some CV benefit. Secondary analyses of safety and adverse event data from many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have attempted to clarify this putative association. Recently, the discontinuation of odanacatib (anti‐cathepsin K monoclonal antibody) over stroke concerns and the imbalance in ischemic events in romosozumab‐treated (anti‐sclerostin monoclonal antibody) women compared to bisphosphonate‐treated women, has provided further justification to better characterize potential CV benefits and harms of osteoporosis medications. This review delves into the seminal, and other major RCTs of osteoporosis medications and, using both published data and additional information provided on trial registration pages, examines the evidence for CV safety and harms of these medications. Accepted and emerging “off‐target” effects are explored for validity, biological plausibility, and clinical importance. A brief research agenda is provided to stimulate the next wave of clinical development and CV understanding of osteoporosis medications. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

We prospectively assessed, with predefined criteria, the location and rates of all femur fractures (hip, subtrochanteric/femoral shaft [ST/FS], including atypical [AFF] and distal fractures) in women at increased fracture risk during treatment with the cathepsin K inhibitor, odanacatib (ODN), or placebo over 5 years in the Long-Term ODN Fracture Trial (LOFT and LOFT Extension [NCT00529373, EudraCT 2007-002693-66]). ODN was an investigational antiresorptive agent previously in development as an osteoporosis treatment that, unlike bisphosphonates, reduces bone formation only transiently. Women aged >= 65 years with a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score

Odanacatib (ODN) was investigated as an osteoporosis treatment in 292 men. Compared with placebo, odanacatib improved bone mineral density and led to sustained bone resorption decreases while producing relatively little bone formation reduction that leveled off with time. However, increased risk of stroke in another study stopped further odanacatib development.INTRODUCTION: ODN, a selective oral cathepsin K inhibitor, was in development for osteoporosis treatment. This phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 24-month study investigated ODN safety and efficacy in men with osteoporosis.METHODS: Men with idiopathic osteoporosis or osteoporosis due to hypogonadism and a lumbar spine or hip (total hip [TH], femoral neck [FN], or trochanter) bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of ≤ - 2.5 to ≥ - 4.0 without prior vertebral fracture or ≤ - 1.5 to ≥ - 4.0 with one prior vertebral fracture were randomized (1:1) to once-weekly ODN 50 mg or placebo. All received 5600 IU vitamin D3 weekly and calcium supplementation as needed (≥ 1200 mg daily). The primary efficacy outcome was changed from baseline in lumbar spine BMD versus placebo.RESULTS: Overall, 292 men, mean age 68.8 years, were randomly assigned to ODN or placebo. Versus placebo, ODN increased BMD from baseline at the lumbar spine, TH, FN, and trochanter by 5.6%, 2.0%, 1.7%, and 2.1%, respectively (all p CONCLUSION: Though a promising osteoporosis therapy for men, ODN development was discontinued due to increased risk of stroke in the LOFT phase 3 trial.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01120600 (registered May 11, 2010).

Cathepsin K (CatK) is one of the most potent proteases in lysosomal cysteine proteases family, of which main function is to mediate bone resorption. Currently, CatK is among the most attractive targets for anti-osteoporosis drug development. Although many pharmaceutical companies are working on the development of selective inhibitors for CatK, there is no FDA approved drug till now. Odanacatib (ODN) developed by Merck & Co. is the only CatK inhibitor candidate which demonstrated high therapeutic efficacy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis in Phase III clinical trials. Unfortunately, the development of ODN was finally terminated due to the cardio-cerebrovascular adverse effects. Therefore, it arouses concerns on the undesirable CatK inhibition in non-bone sites. It is known that CatK has far-reaching actions throughout various organs besides bone. Many studies have also demonstrated the involvement of CatK in various diseases beyond the musculoskeletal system. This review not only summarized the functional roles of CatK in bone and beyond bone, but also discussed the potential relevance of the CatK action beyond bone to the adverse effects of inhibiting CatK in non-bone sites.

Treatment with zoledronic acid 5 mg maintained bone turnover markers in the premenopausal range, increased lumbar spine bone mineral density, and maintained hip bone mineral density in women previously treated with odanacatib 50 mg weekly.INTRODUCTION: The development of odanacatib (ODN), a cathepsin K inhibitor, for treatment of osteoporosis was discontinued due to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. As the treatment is considered reversible, participants from the LOFT trial in Aarhus, Denmark, were offered treatment with zoledronic acid (ZOL).METHODS: Sixty-seven postmenopausal women were treated with ZOL 5 mg and followed for 12 months. Of these, 39 had received ODN for 7 years and 28 had received placebo for 5 years and ODN for 2 years. Bone turnover markers (BTM) were measured 3, 6, and 12 months after ZOL, and DXA of spine and hip were performed at time of ZOL treatment and after 12 months.RESULTS: Within the entire study population, BMD at the lumbar spine increased by 2.8 ± 0.9% (mean ± SEM) (p CONCLUSION: Treatment with ZOL 5 mg maintained BTMs in the premenopausal range and prevented bone loss in women previously treated with ODN.

We performed a study to identify potential causes and risk factors of vertebral fracture cascade. Vertebral fracture cascade is a severe clinical event in patients with bone fragility. Only half of patients have an identified cause of secondary osteoporosis. Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common osteoporotic fracture, and a strong risk factor of subsequent VFs leading to VF cascade (VFC). We prompted a study to identify potential causes and risk factors of VFC. VFC observations were collected retrospectively between January 2016 and April 2017. VFC was defined as an occurrence of at least three VFs within 1 year. We included in 10 centers a total of 113 patients with VFC (79.6% of women, median age 73, median number of VFs in the cascade, 5). We observed 40.5% and 30.9% of patients with previous major fractures and a previous VF, respectively, and 68.6% with densitometric osteoporosis; 18.9% of patients were currently receiving oral glucocorticoids and 37.1% in the past. VFC was attributed by the physician to postmenopausal osteoporosis in 54% of patients. A secondary osteoporosis associated with the VFC was diagnosed in 52 patients: glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (25.7%), non-malignant hemopathies (6.2%), alcoholism (4.4%), use of aromatase inhibitors (3.6%), primary hyperparathyroidism (2.7%), hypercorticism (2.7%), anorexia nervosa (2.7%), and pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (1.8%). A total of 11.8% of cases were reported following a vertebroplasty procedure. A total of 31.5% patients previously received an anti-osteoporotic treatment. In six patients, VFC occurred early after discontinuation of an anti-osteoporotic treatment, in the year after the last dose effect was depleted: five after denosumab and one after odanacatib. The results of this retrospective study showed that only half of VFC occurred in patients with a secondary cause of osteoporosis. Prospective studies are needed to further explore the determinants of this severe complication of osteoporosis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitecture in femurs and maxillary bones of ovariectomized (OVX) rats treated or not treated with alendronate (ALD) or odanacatib (ODN).Twenty rats were divided into groups: SHAM, OVX, OVX/ALD, and OVX/ODN. After 12 weeks, the femurs and maxillae were removed and subjected to 3-dimensional analysis by micro-computed tomography. Results were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).OVX decreased maxillary and femoral BMD and altered femoral microarchitecture (P .05). The drugs increased BMD of both types of bones, but only ALD maintained the phenotype similar to the SHAM group. The action of ALD was limited to the femoral trabecular separation (Tb.Sp). OVX and the drugs had no effect on the microarchitecture of the maxilla (P .05).ALD and ODN therapy increased BMD in both bones after ovariectomy. ALD was more successful than ODN in preserving the morphology of bone similar to the SHAM group. ALD maintained the phenotype for Tb.Sp in the femur, but ODN did not. In the maxillae, neither ovariectomy nor the 2 antiresorptive drugs had significant effects on microarchitecture.

Case reports of women sustaining multiple vertebral fractures (VF) soon afterdenosumab discontinuation are accumulating. We report a woman with five new vertebral fractures in ~8 months following discontinuation of long-term odanacatib (ODN), an experimental cathepsin K inhibitor. DXA examination demonstrated an ~12% decline in bone mineral density (BMD) and ~9% decline in trabecular bone score (TBS) since ODN discontinuation. Laboratory evaluation did not reveal a secondary cause of bone loss. This case mimics observations following denosumab discontinuation, but, to our knowledge, is the first reported with ODN and the first documenting substantial decline in TBS. While not directly clinically relevant as ODN is no longer being developed, this case raises the possibility that a syndrome of multiple vertebral fractures could follow discontinuation of various potent osteoporosis therapies that produce major BMD increases but do not have persisting bone effects (i.e., all non-bisphosphonates). Use of antiresorptive therapies to prevent rapid bone loss following discontinuation of potent bone active agents seems appropriate. Identification of those patients who could be at risk for the multiple VF syndrome is needed.

There is a need for the development of new drugs to prevent osteoporosis-related fractures. Fractures are projected to increase and the present drugs have modest efficacy, significant side-effects and poor compliance. To illustrate the difficulties in the development of new drugs, the author reviews the fate of several drugs that have failed to gain regulatory approval. These drugs include arzoxifene, lasofoxifene, MK-5442, roncalceret and odanacatib. Romosozumab and abaloparatide are the only new drugs presently in phase-3 development. It is anticipated that ongoing studies of the mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in the regulation of bone remodeling will open up new opportunities for targeted pharmacological interventions to increase bone strength. However, the perfect drug is still a long way off and will face many obstacles before approval.

Summary Background The validation of bone mineral density (BMD) as a surrogate outcome for fracture would allow the size of future randomised controlled osteoporosis registration trials to be reduced. We aimed to determine the association between treatment-related changes in BMD, assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and fracture outcomes, including the proportion of treatment effect explained by BMD changes. Methods We did a pooled analysis of individual patient data from multiple randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials. We included data from multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of osteoporosis medications that included women and men at increased osteoporotic fracture risk. Using individual patient data for each trial we calculated mean 24-month BMD percent change together with fracture reductions and did a meta-regression of the association between treatment-related differences in BMD changes (percentage difference, active minus placebo) and fracture risk reduction. We also used individual patient data to determine the proportion of anti-fracture treatment effect explained by BMD changes and the BMD change needed in future trials to ensure fracture reduction efficacy. Findings Individual patient data from 91 779 participants of 23 randomised, placebo-controlled trials were included. The trials had 1–9 years of follow-up and included 12 trials of bisphosphonate, one of odanacatib, two of hormone therapy (one of conjugated equine oestrogen and one of conjugated equine oestrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate), three of PTH receptor agonists, one of denosumab, and four of selective oestrogen receptor modulator trials. The meta-regression revealed significant associations between treatment-related changes in hip, femoral neck, and spine BMD and reductions in vertebral (r2 0·73, p Interpretation Treatment-related BMD changes are strongly associated with fracture reductions across randomised trials of osteoporosis therapies with differing mechanisms of action. These analyses support BMD as a surrogate outcome for fracture outcomes in future randomised trials of new osteoporosis therapies and provide an important demonstration of the value of public access to individual patient data from multiple trials. Funding Foundation for National Institutes of Health.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are injuries which can commonly be prevented with proper screening and treatment. Many different medications are currently used to treat osteoporosis, and several procedures have been developed to address subsequent compression fractures. While these medications and techniques have reduced patient morbidity and mortality, there is substantial room for improvement. This chapter describes some of the latest screening tests, medications, and devices which will likely be used in the management of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Background: Odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor, reduces bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. Previous work has shown that odanacatib increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of odanacatib to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods: The Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT) was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven study at 388 outpatient clinics in 40 countries. Eligible participants were women aged at least 65 years who were postmenopausal for 5 years or more, with a femoral neck or total hip bone mineral density T-score between −2·5 and −4·0 if no previous radiographic vertebral fracture, or between −1·5 and −4·0 with a previous vertebral fracture. Women with a previous hip fracture, more than one vertebral fracture, or a T-score of less than −4·0 at the total hip or femoral neck were not eligible unless they were unable or unwilling to use approved osteoporosis treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oral odanacatib (50 mg once per week) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done using an interactive voice recognition system after stratification for previous radiographic vertebral fracture, and treatment was masked to study participants, investigators and their staff, and sponsor personnel. If the study completed before 5 years of double-blind treatment, consenting participants could enrol in a double-blind extension study (LOFT Extension), continuing their original treatment assignment for up to 5 years from randomisation. Primary endpoints were incidence of vertebral fractures as assessed using radiographs collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months, yearly, and at final study visit in participants for whom evaluable radiograph images were available at baseline and at least one other timepoint, and hip and non-vertebral fractures adjudicated as being a result of osteoporosis as assessed by clinical history and radiograph. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The adjudicated cardiovascular safety endpoints were a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter. Individual cardiovascular endpoints and death were also assessed. LOFT and LOFT Extension are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00529373) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT number 2007-002693-66). Findings: Between Sept 14, 2007, and Nov 17, 2009, we randomly assigned 16 071 evaluable patients to treatment: 8043 to odanacatib and 8028 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 36·5 months (IQR 34·43–40·15) 4297 women assigned to odanacatib and 3960 assigned to placebo enrolled in LOFT Extension (total median follow-up 47·6 months, IQR 35·45–60·06). In LOFT, cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 3·7% (251/6770) versus 7·8% (542/6910), hazard ratio (HR) 0·46, 95% CI 0·40–0·53; hip fractures 0·8% (65/8043) versus 1·6% (125/8028), 0·53, 0·39–0·71; non-vertebral fractures 5·1% (412/8043) versus 6·7% (541/8028), 0·77, 0·68–0·87; all p

Commentary

This analysis developed a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for odanacatib, characterized demographic and concomitant medication covariates effect, and provided odanacatib exposure estimates for subjects in phase 2/3 studies. Data from multiple phase 1 (P005, P025, and P014), phase 2b (P004 and P022), and phase 3 (Long-Term Odanacatib Fracture Trial; P018) studies were pooled to create a data set of 1280 postmenopausal women aged 45 to 91 years (102 from phase 1, 514 from phase 2b, and 664 from phase 3) who received weekly oral odanacatib doses ranging from 3 to 100 mg. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption, dose-dependent relative bioavailability (F1), and first-order elimination best described odanacatib PK. F1 decreased from the 100% reference bioavailability for a 3-mg oral dose to 24.5% for a 100-mg dose. Eight statistically significant covariates were included in the final PK model: body weight, age, race, and concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A inhibitors on apparent clearance; body weight on apparent central volume of distribution; and concomitant hydrochlorothiazide, high-fat breakfast, and a study effect on F1. All fixed- and random-effects parameters were estimated with good precision (%standard error of the mean ≤29.5%). This population PK analysis provides insights into intrinsic- and extrinsic-factor effects on odanacatib exposure in postmenopausal and elderly women with osteoporosis. The magnitude of the intrinsic-factor effects was generally modest (odanacatib exposure geometric mean ratios, 0.80-1.21) even in subjects aged >80 years, or in subsets with multiple combinations of factors.

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease that is characterized by heightened state of bone resorption accompanied by diminished bone formation, leading to a reduction of bone mineral density (BMD) and deterioration of bone quality, thus increasing the risk of developing fractures. Molecular insight into bone biology identified cathepsin K (CatK) as a novel therapeutic target. CatK is a lysosomal cysteine protease secreted by activated osteoclasts during bone resorption, whose primary substrate is type I collagen, the major component of organic bone matrix. Available anti-resorptive drugs affect osteoclast survival and influence both resorption and formation of bone. CatK inhibitors are distinct from the existing anti-resorptives as they only target the resorption process itself without impairing osteoclast differentiation and do not interfere with bone formation. An inhibitor of CatK, odanacatib, robustly increased both trabecular and cortical BMD in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. The phase III fracture prevention trial with odanacatib ended early due to good efficacy and a favorable benefit/risk profile, thus, enhancing the opportunity for CatK as a pharmacological target for osteoporosis. So far, all the inhibitors that reached to the stage of clinical trial targeted active site of CatK to abrogate the entire proteolytic activity of the enzyme in addition to the desired blockage of excessive elastin and collagen degradation, and could thus pose safety concerns with long term use. Identification of selective exosite inhibitors that inhibit CatK's elastase and/or collagenase activity but do not affect the hydrolysis of other physiologically relevant substrates of CatK would be an improved strategy to inhibit this enzyme.

This open-label 2-period study assessed the effect of multiple-dose administration of rifampin, a strong cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and P-glycoprotein inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor. In period 1, 12 healthy male subjects (mean age, 30 years) received a single dose of odanacatib 50 mg on day 1, followed by a 28-day washout. In period 2, subjects received rifampin 600 mg/day for 28 days; odanacatib 50 mg was coadministered on day 14. Blood samples for odanacatib pharmacokinetics were collected at predose and on day 1 of period 1 and day 14 of period 2. Coadministration of odanacatib and rifampin significantly reduced odanacatib exposure. The odanacatib AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of odanacatib + rifampin/odanacatib alone was 0.13 (0.11-0.16). The harmonic mean ± jackknife standard deviation apparent terminal half-life (t½ ) was 71.6 ± 10.2 hours for odanacatib alone and 16.0 ± 3.4 hours for odanacatib + rifampin, indicating greater odanacatib clearance following coadministration with rifampin. Samples were collected in period 2 during rifampin dosing (days 1, 14, and 28) and after rifampin discontinuation (days 35, 42, and 56) to evaluate the ratio of plasma 4β-hydroxycholesterol to total serum cholesterol as a CYP3A4 induction biomarker; the ratio increased ∼5-fold over 28 days of daily dosing with 600 mg rifampin, demonstrating sensitivity to CYP3A4 induction.

A stable-label i.v./oral study design was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of odanacatib. Healthy, postmenopausal women received oral doses of unlabeled odanacatib administered simultaneously with a reference of 1 mg i.v. stable (13)C-labeled odanacatib. The absolute bioavailability of odanacatib was 30% at 50 mg (the phase 3 dose) and 70% at 10 mg, which is consistent with solubility-limited absorption. Odanacatib exposure (area under the curve from zero to infinity) increased by 15% and 63% when 50 mg was administered with low-fat and high-fat meals, respectively. This magnitude of the food effect is unlikely to be clinically important. The volume of distribution was ∼100 liters. The clearance was ∼0.8 l/h (13 ml/min), supporting that odanacatib is a low-extraction ratio drug. Population PK modeling indicated that 88% of individuals had completed absorption of >80% bioavailable drug within 24 hours, with modest additional absorption after 24 hours and periodic fluctuations in plasma concentrations contributing to late values for time to Cmax in some subjects.

Osteoporosis is a progressive systemic skeletal disease characterizedby reduced bone mass/density and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. It is a “silent disease” as there are no symptoms prior to a fracture.The prevalence of osteoporosis increases markedly with age.DEXA is regarded as the gold standard technique for diagnosis of osteoporosis.Treatment for osteoporosis should include lifestyle measures including nutrition, exercise and measures to reduce falls. Adequate calcium intake and vitamin D should be provided.Effective pharmacological management strategies should always be implemented where necessary including bisphosphonate asAlendronate, Etidronate, Risedronate, andraloxifene, strontium ranelate and teriparatide. Postmenopausal osteoporosis may be treated with a bisphosphonate. If bisphosphonates are unsuitable then calcitriol may be considered.Estrogen should only be considered if there is significant risk for osteoporosis and other drugs are not suitable.New biologics agents, Denosumab and Odanacatib are approved for treatment of osteoporosis. Both target osteoclasts to rebalance bone loss and bone building.The prevention of osteoporosis should be considered in early life and should be continued by regular physical activity and a balanced diet.Birdem Med J 2015; 5(1): 30-36

The article presents review of literature dedicated to the contemporary view on the cellular-molecular mechanisms of the bone remodeling and pathogenesis of the osteoporosis. The discovery of the cytokine RANKL-RANK-OPG system and significant role of the cathepsin K in process bone remodeling has made progress in understanding the mechanisms development disease and possible to development drugs of the new generation – denosumab, a fully human RANKL monoclonal antibody and inhibitor cathepsin K odanacatib that inhibits of the bone resorption.

Osteoporosis is a chronic, skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength and increased risk of fractures, affecting up to 50% of postmenopausal women worldwide. Over the past 2 decades there have been consistent developments in the pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis with the availability of potent inhibitors of bone resorption (bisphosphonates, and denosumab) or stimulators of bone formation (PTH analogs) with substantial improvements over calcitonin or estrogen replacement.In this review we summarize the effects of existing treatment options for postmenopausal osteoporosis along with the unmet clinical needs and we discuss about the potential benefits of new compounds under development.Despite the recent progresses, there are still limitations and unmeet needs with all the available drugs, mainly concerning treatment adherence, efficacy on the prevention of nonvertebral fractures and the long-term adverse events of antiresorptive regimens. Moreover, PTH analogs are the only available compounds able to stimulate bone formation, but with a restricted anabolic window of no more than 2 years. Of interest, the more recent advances in bone biology identified new targets for the development of drugs with a more potent and selective activity on either osteoclasts or osteoblasts, thus making possible to uncouple bone formation from bone resorption.

The osteoporosis market reached a value of more than $11 billion in 2015. Current treatments remain mostly antiresorptive and comprise of bisphosphonates, the anti-RANKL antibody, denusomab, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). The most promising novel antiresorptives are cathepsin K inhibitors, which selectively target the bone matrix, degrading protease without interfering with osteoclast viability or formation as all other antiresorptives do.This review analyses the current status of cathepsin K inhibitor development, its side effects, and compares the phenotypes of mouse and human cathepsin K deficiencies with drug treatment outcomes.Several selective cathepsin K inhibitors have been developed and evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies. Although all compounds were effective in reducing bone resorption markers, the development of some compounds was terminated either due to side effects or market competition. The most advanced compound is odanacatib, which significantly reduced bone fracture rates in a 5-year trial but still exhibits safety concerns. The analysis of mouse and human catK deficiencies sheds some light on the consequences of a cathepsin K inhibitor treatment. How predictive the knockout phenotypes are regarding long-term cathepsin K treatment remains unclear. Clearly, more studies are needed to understand the mechanism of the observed side effects and novel approaches are needed to make CatK inhibitors either osteoclast-specific or selective for the inhibition of the collagen matrix without affecting the other activities of the protease.

The efficacy and safety of weekly oral odanacatib (ODN) 50 mg for up to 8 years were assessed in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD). Treatment with ODN for up to 8 years resulted in continued or maintained increases in BMD at multiple sites and was well tolerated. ODN is a selective inhibitor of cathepsin K. In a 2-year phase 2b study (3/10/25/50 mg ODN once weekly [QW] or placebo) and extensions (50 mg ODN QW or placebo), ODN treatment for 5 years progressively increased BMD and decreased bone resorption markers in postmenopausal women with low BMD ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00112437). In this prespecified interim analysis at year 8 of an additional 5-year extension (years 6 to 10), patients (n = 117) received open-label ODN 50 mg QW plus weekly vitamin D3 (5600 IU) and calcium supplementation as needed. Primary end points were lumbar spine BMD and safety. Patients were grouped by ODN exposure duration. Mean (95 % confidence interval [CI]) lumbar spine BMD changes from baseline were 4.6 % (2.4, 6.7; 3-year continuous ODN exposure), 12.9 % (8.1, 17.7; 5 years), 12.8 % (10.0, 15.7; 6 years), and 14.8 % (11.0, 18.6; 8 years). Similar patterns of results were observed for BMD of trochanter, femoral neck, and total hip versus baseline. Geometric mean changes from baseline to year 8 for bone resorption markers were approximately −50 % (uNTx/Cr) and −45 % (sCTx), respectively (all groups); bone formation markers remained near baseline levels. No osteonecrosis of the jaw, delayed fracture union, or morphea-like skin reactions were reported. Treatment with ODN for up to 8 years resulted in gains in BMD at multiple sites. Bone resorption markers remained reduced, with no significant change observed in bone formation markers. Treatment with ODN for up to 8 years was well tolerated.

The ageing population and an increase in both the incidence and prevalence of cancer pose a healthcare challenge, some of which is borne by the orthopaedic community in the form of osteoporotic fractures and metastatic bone disease. In recent years there has been an increasing understanding of the pathways involved in bone metabolism relevant to osteoporosis and metastases in bone. Newer therapies may aid the management of these problems. One group of drugs, the antibody mediated anti-resorptive therapies (AMARTs) use antibodies to block bone resorption pathways. This review seeks to present a synopsis of the guidelines, pharmacology and potential pathophysiology of AMARTs and other new anti-resorptive drugs. We evaluate the literature relating to AMARTs and new anti-resorptives with special attention on those approved for use in clinical practice. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against Receptor Activator for Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand. It is the first AMART approved by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the US Food and Drug Administration. Other novel anti-resorptives awaiting approval for clinical use include Odanacatib. Denosumab is indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of the complications of bone metastases. Recent evidence suggests, however, that denosumab may have an adverse event profile similar to bisphosphonates, including atypical femoral fractures. It is, therefore, essential that orthopaedic surgeons are conversant with these medications and their safe usage. Take home message: Denosumab has important orthopaedic indications and has been shown to significantly reduce patient morbidity in osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:160–5.

Breast cancer bone metastasis causes severe morbidity and is commonly encountered in daily clinical practice. It causes pain, pathologic fractures, spinal cord and other nerve compression syndromes and life-threatening hypercalcemia. Breast cancer metastasizes to the bone through a complicated process that involves numerous molecules. Metastatic cells disrupt normal bone turnover and create a vicious cycle. All treatment effort is directed to breaking this vicious cycle. Bisphosphonates have been used safely for more than two decades. As a group, bisphosphonates delay the time to the first skeletal-related event and reduce pain. However, they do not prevent the development of bone metastasis in patients with no bone metastasis and do not prolong survival. The receptor activator for nuclear factor κB ligand inhibitor denosumab also delays the time to the first skeletal-related event and reduces the skeletal morbidity rate. Radionuclides are another treatment option for bone pain.

Assessing risk for QTc interval prolongation in a thorough QTc study is a standard recommendation when evaluating new chemical entities. As part of the clinical development program for odanacatib, an oral selective inhibitor of cathepsin K previously in development for the treatment of osteoporosis, 2 clinical studies in healthy subjects assessed pharmacokinetics and overall safety (including potential for delayed ventricular repolarization) of a supratherapeutic dose. In study 1, subjects received a supratherapeutic dose regimen of odanacatib (300 mg on day 1, then daily multiple doses of 25 mg to day 21) or placebo. In study 2 (days 1-4), subjects received the odanacatib supratherapeutic dose regimen or moxifloxacin (positive control, single 400-mg dose on day 4; matching placebo for odanacatib/moxifloxacin) or placebo. All doses were administered with a high-fat meal. In study 1 (N = 12), the supratherapeutic dosing regimen achieved exposure ∼3.5-fold of the proposed therapeutic dose (50 mg once weekly) and was sufficiently well tolerated to permit assessment in the thorough QTc study (study 2). In study 2 (N = 116), the primary objective was placebo-corrected change from baseline in QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction), assessed by replicate electrocardiograms (12-lead Holter recordings; days -1 through 7). Supratherapeutic odanacatib dosing was not associated with increased risk of prolonged QT interval, unlike moxifloxacin (confirming assay sensitivity). Pooled safety data across both studies suggested that the safety profile of odanacatib at high exposures was similar to placebo, with a small clustering of oral cavity adverse events. Odanacatib was not associated with increased risk of prolonged QT interval.

Similar efficacy of the cathepsin K inhibitor odanacatib (ODN) and the bisphosphonate alendronate (ALN) in reducing bone turnover markers and increasing bone mineral density in spine and hip were previously demonstrated in ovariectomized (OVX)-monkeys treated for 20 months in prevention mode. Here, we profiled RNA from tibial metaphysis and diaphysis of the same study using Affymetrix microarrays, and selected 204 probe sets (p < 0.001, three-group ANOVA) that were differentially regulated by ODN or ALN versus vehicle. Both drugs produced strikingly different effects on known bone-related genes and pathways at the transcriptional level. Although ALN either reduced or had neutral effects on bone resorption-related genes, ODN significantly increased the expression of osteoclast genes (eg, APC5, TNFRSF11A, CTSK, ITGB3, and CALCR), consistent with previous findings on the effects of this agent in enhancing the number of nonresorbing osteoclasts. Conversely, ALN reduced the expression of known bone formation-related genes (eg, TGFBR1, SPP1, RUNX2, and PTH1R), whereas ODN either increased or had neutral effects on their expression. These differential effects of ODN versus ALN on bone resorption and formation were highly correlative to the changes in bone turnover markers, cathepsin K (Catk) target engagement marker serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide (1-CTP) and osteoclast marker tartrate resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRAP5b) in the same monkeys. Overall, the molecular profiling results are consistent with the known pharmacological actions of these agents on bone remodeling and clearly differentiate the molecular mechanisms of ODN from the bisphosphonates.

La osteoporosis es una patología que afecta el sistema esquelético y se caracteriza por una baja densidad mineral ósea y un deterioro estructural del tejido óseo. Esta enfermedad está asociada con un alto riesgo de fracturas que comprometen seriamente la calidad de vida. La incidencia de osteoporosis es actualmente mayor debido al aumento de la esperanza de vida en el mundo. Numerosas investigaciones con respecto a nuevas estrategias de tratamiento han sido desarrolladas y tienen como objetivo inhibir la resorción ósea excesiva o aumentar la formación de hueso. Entre los tratamientos más prometedores están denosumab, un anticuerpo monoclonal que ejerce su acción contra el activador del receptor del ligando NF-kappa B, una citoquina clave de los osteoclastos; odanacatib, un inhibidor específico de la proteasa catepsina K de los osteoclastos; y anticuerpos monoclonales contra las proteínas antiesclerostina, la glucógeno sintasa quinasa-3b y dickkopf-1, dos inhibidores endógenos de la formación de hueso. En esta revisión se analizan y se revisan los conceptos actuales de las nuevas terapias. Osteoporosis is a skeletal system pathology characterised by low bone mineral density and tissue structural deterioration. This condition is associated with high fracture risk that severely compromises quality of life. Osteoporosis incidence is becoming more significant with increasing lifespan worldwide. Novel treatment strategies have been developed that aim to inhibit excessive bone resorption and/or increase bone formation. The most promising novel treatments include: denosumab, a monoclonal antibody for receptor activator of NF-kB ligand, a key osteoclast cytokine; odanacatib, a specific inhibitor of the osteoclast protease cathepsin K; and antibodies against the proteins sclerostin, GKS-3b and dickkopf-1, two endogenous inhibitors of bone formation. This review discusses these new therapies.

Aims and Objectives: Through a comprehensive literature review, this article provides an overview of the potential role of odanacatib (ODN) in reducing bone loss due to endodontic disease. Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed in PubMed Central, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO databases. The articles identified included those published between 2002 and 2016. Based on the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, out of 237 articles found, 50 were selected for this review. Results: Cathepsin K (CstK), which is indispensible to the immune system, also plays an important role in osteoclastic bone resorption. ODN, which is an orally active, selective, and effective inhibitor of CstK, decreases bone resorption by selectively inhibiting proteolysis of matrix proteins by CstK, without affecting other osteoclastic activity or osteoblast viability. Conclusion: The goal of endodontic treatment is to achieve a clinically asymptomatic state along with formation of reparative bone. This process could take 6 months or longer, hence, an earlier reversal of the resorption process could lead to faster healing and resolution of the periapical lesion. Use of ODN can be of help in achieving this goal.

Resumen La osteoporosis es una patologia que afecta el sistema esqueletico y se caracteriza por una baja densidad mineral osea y un deterioro estructural del tejido oseo. Esta enfermedad esta asociada con un alto riesgo de fracturas que comprometen seriamente la calidad de vida. La incidencia de osteoporosis es actualmente mayor debido al aumento de la esperanza de vida en el mundo. Numerosas investigaciones con respecto a nuevas estrategias de tratamiento han sido desarrolladas y tienen como objetivo inhibir la resorcion osea excesiva o aumentar la formacion de hueso. Entre los tratamientos mas prometedores estan denosumab, un anticuerpo monoclonal que ejerce su accion contra el activador del receptor del ligando NF-kappa B, una citoquina clave de los osteoclastos; odanacatib, un inhibidor especifico de la proteasa catepsina K de los osteoclastos; y anticuerpos monoclonales contra las proteinas antiesclerostina, la glucogeno sintasa quinasa-3b y dickkopf-1, dos inhibidores endogenos de la formacion de hueso. En esta revision se analizan y se revisan los conceptos actuales de las nuevas terapias.

The effects of the cathepsin K inhibitor odanacatib (ODN) on fracture healing were monitored for ∼6 and 15 weeks post-fracture in two separate studies using the unilateral transverse mid-ulnar osteotomy model in skeletally mature female rabbits. Rabbits were pre-treated for 3–4 weeks with vehicle (Veh), ODN (2 mg/kg, po, daily), or alendronate (ALN) (0.3 mg/kg, sc, twice-weekly) prior to osteotomy. In Study 1, the animals were maintained on the same respective treatment for ∼6 weeks. In Study 2, the animals were also continued on the same therapy or switched from Veh to ODN or ODN to Veh for 15 weeks. No treatment-related impairment of fracture union was seen by qualitative histological assessments in the first study. Cartilage retention was detected in the calluses of ALN-treated rabbits at week-6, while calluses in the ODN and Veh groups contained bony tissue with significantly less residual cartilage. ODN treatment also markedly increased the number of cathepsin K-(+) osteoclasts in the callus, indicating enhanced callus remodeling. From the second study, ex vivo DXA and pQCT confirmed that ODN treatment pre- and post-osteotomy increased callus bone mineral content and bone mineral density (BMD) versus Veh (p

Drugs that inhibit bone resorption ('anti-resorptives') continue to dominate the therapy of bone diseases characterized by enhanced bone destruction, including Paget's disease, osteoporosis and cancers. The historic use of oestrogens for osteoporosis led on to SERMs (Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, e.g. raloxifene and bazedoxifene). Currently the mainstay of treatment worldwide is still with bisphosphonates, as used clinically for over 40 years. The more recently introduced anti-RANK-ligand antibody, denosumab, is also very effective in reducing vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures. Odanacatib is the only cathepsin K inhibitor likely to be registered for clinical use. The pharmacological basis for the action of each of these drug classes is different, enabling choices to be made to ensure their optimal use in clinical practice.

Odanacatib is a cathepsin K inhibitor developed for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. It is a bone resorption inhibitor, but which preserves bone formation to some extent. It can be administered once a week, in tablets also containing vitamin D. In a large clinical development program, it has been shown that odanacatib reduces bone resorption, with a reduction of about 60–70% in biochemical markers of resorption, while bone formation decreases to a lesser magnitude. Odanacatib continuously increases bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and lumbar spine over 5 years. Once it is stopped, a complete resolution of effect is observed, with declining BMD and increased bone turnover. Bone microarchitecture and bone strength have also been improved in clinical trials using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the lumbar spine and hip, and high resolution peripheral QCT at the distal radius and tibia. In a phase III trial involving 16,713 postmenopausal women ⩾65 years of age with low BMD, the risk of fragility fracture was significantly reduced at the spine, hip and other nonvertebral sites compared with the placebo group. Odanacatib has been generally well tolerated, with no observation of osteonecrosis of the jaw so far, but with exceptional observations of subtrochanteric atypical fracture and morphea-like lesions. Odanacatib appears a useful new option in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Joint Bone Spine - In Press.Proof corrected by the author Available online since mercredi 24 fevrier 2016

Cathepsin K ist eine Cysteinproteinase und somit ein essentielles Enzym in der Degradation von Kollagen Typ I. Es wird fast ausschlieslich in Osteoklasten exprimiert. Aufgrund des physiologischen Mechanismus stellt diese Protease einen pharmakologischen Angriffspunkt fur die Entwicklung neuer Medikamente in der Osteologie dar. In den letzten Jahrzehnten wurde intensiv daran geforscht, hochwirksame, selektive und oral einnehmbare Cathepsin K-Inhibitoren zu entwickeln. Im Gegensatz zu Balicatib und Relacatib, deren Weiterentwicklung wegen kutaner Nebenwirkungen bei relativ geringer Spezifitat eingestellt wurde, wendete sich die Forschung den spezifischeren Cathepsin K-Inhibitoren Odanacatib (ODN) und ONO-5334 zu. So hebt Odanacatib bei postmenopausalen Frauen sehr deutlich die Knochenmineraldichte und hemmt die Knochenresorption. Als Voraussetzung fur die Weiterentwicklung konnte in einer Langzeituntersuchung die Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit des Medikaments bestatigt werden. Jedoch nehmen nach dessen Absetzen Knochenresorption und Knochenmasseverlust wieder zu. Eine Phase III Frakturpraventionsstudie an postmenopausalen Frauen mit Osteoporose befindet sich derzeit in der Endphase.

Odanacatib (ODN), an oral selective inhibitor of cathepsin K, was an investigational agent previously in development for the treatment of osteoporosis. In this phase 1 open-label study, 12 healthy Chinese postmenopausal women received single-dose ODN 50 mg on day 1 and multiple-dose ODN 50 mg once weekly on days 15, 22, 29, and 36 under fasted conditions. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were evaluated on days 1 and 36. Multiple-dose area under the concentration-time profile (AUC0-168h ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) were compared with historical data from 9 non-Chinese postmenopausal women who also received ODN 50 mg once weekly for 4 weeks. Median time to Cmax (tmax ) was 3 and 4 hours following single- and multiple-dose administration, respectively. The arithmetic mean ± SD terminal half-life was 81.0 ± 14.0 and 106.7 ± 14.4 hours following single- and multiple-dose administration, respectively. Comparison of multiple-dose PK parameters showed that the geometric mean ratios (Chinese/non-Chinese) and 95%CIs for AUC0-168h and Cmax were 0.81 (0.55-1.19) and 0.87 (0.69-1.11), respectively. All adverse events were mild, none were serious, and none led to discontinuation. Single- and multiple-dose PKs of ODN 50 mg in Chinese postmenopausal women were generally similar to those previously reported in non-Chinese postmenopausal women.

Odanacatib, a selective cathepsin K inhibitor, increases areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the spine and hip of postmenopausal women. To gain additional insight into the effects on trabecular and cortical bone, we analyzed quantitative computed tomography (QCT) data of postmenopausal women treated with odanacatib using Medical Image Analysis Framework (MIAF; Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany). This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year, phase 3 trial enrolled 214 postmenopausal women (mean age 64 years) with low aBMD. Subjects were randomized to odanacatib 50 mg weekly (ODN) or placebo (PBO); all participants received calcium and vitamin D. Hip QCT scans at 24 months were available for 158 women (ODN: n = 78 women; PBO: n = 80 women). There were consistent and significant differential treatment effects (ODN-PBO) for total hip integral (5.4%), trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) (12.2%), and cortical vBMD (2.5%) at 24 months. There was no significant differential treatment effect on integral bone volume. Results for bone mineral content (BMC) closely matched those for vBMD for integral and trabecular compartments. However, with small but mostly significant differential increases in cortical volume (1.0% to 1.3%) and thickness (1.4% to 1.9%), the percentage cortical BMC increases were numerically larger than those of vBMD. With a total hip BMC differential treatment effect (ODN-PBO) of nearly 1000 mg, the proportions of BMC attributed to cortical gain were 45%, 44%, 52%, and 40% for the total, neck, trochanter, and intertrochanter subregions, respectively. In postmenopausal women treated for 2 years, odanacatib improved integral, trabecular, and cortical vBMD and BMC at all femur regions relative to placebo when assessed by MIAF. Cortical volume and thickness increased significantly in all regions except the femoral neck. The increase in cortical volume and BMC paralleled the increase in cortical vBMD, demonstrating a consistent effect of ODN on cortical bone. Approximately one-half of the absolute BMC gain occurred in cortical bone. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Odanacatib, a selective cathepsin K inhibitor, decreases bone resorption, whereas osteoclast number increases and bone formation is maintained, perhaps even increased on some cortical surfaces. In a phase 2 clinical trial, post-menopausal women receiving odanacatib presented a sustained reduction of bone resorption markers, whereas procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide returned to normal. In turn areal bone mineral density increased continuously at both spine and hip for up to 5 years. Blosozumab and romosozumab are sclerostin neutralizing antibodies that exert potent anabolic effects on both trabecular and cortical compartments. A phase 2 clinical trial has reported areal bone mineral density gains at spine and hip that were greater with romosozumab compared with placebo, but also with teriparatide. It also showed that antagonizing sclerostin results in a transient stimulation of bone formation but progressive inhibition of bone resorption. Other new medical entities that are promising for the treatment of osteoporosis include abaloparatide, a parathyroid hormone-related analogue with improved bone formation-resorption ratio.

The cathepsin K inhibitor odanacatib (ODN), currently in phase 3 development for postmenopausal osteoporosis, has a novel mechanism of action that reduces bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. In phase 2 studies, odanacatib increased areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip progressively over 5 years. To determine the effects of ODN on cortical and trabecular bone and estimate changes in bone strength, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, using both quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and high-resolution peripheral (HR-p)QCT. In previously published results, odanacatib was superior to placebo with respect to increases in trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) and estimated compressive strength at the spine, and integral and trabecular vBMD and estimated strength at the hip. Here, we report the results of HR-pQCT assessment. A total of 214 postmenopausal women (mean age 64.0 ± 6.8 years and baseline lumbar spine T-score –1.81 ± 0.83) were randomized to oral ODN 50 mg or placebo, weekly for 2 years. With ODN, significant increases from baseline in total vBMD occurred at the distal radius and tibia. Treatment differences from placebo were also significant (3.84% and 2.63% for radius and tibia, respectively). At both sites, significant differences from placebo were also found in trabecular vBMD, cortical vBMD, cortical thickness, cortical area, and strength (failure load) estimated using finite element analysis of HR-pQCT scans (treatment differences at radius and tibia = 2.64% and 2.66%). At the distal radius, odanacatib significantly improved trabecular thickness and bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) versus placebo. At a more proximal radial site, odanacatib attenuated the increase in cortical porosity found with placebo (treatment difference = –7.7%, p = 0.066). At the distal tibia, odanacatib significantly improved trabecular number, separation, and BV/TV versus placebo. Safety and tolerability were similar between treatment groups. In conclusion, odanacatib increased cortical and trabecular density, cortical thickness, aspects of trabecular microarchitecture, and estimated strength at the distal radius and distal tibia compared with placebo. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of odanacatib (ODN) for the treatment of osteoporosis, using data in studies reported in the literature. We performed a literature search to compare the outcomes of applications of once-weekly ODN 50 mg and control. The outcomes of osteoporosis evaluated include primary outcome as bone mineral density (BMD) at different skeletal sites, and secondary outcomes, including adverse events (AEs), such as incidence of skin AEs, fracture, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Four trials were included. Mean difference (95 % CI) of lumbar spine BMD was 3.41 (1.57–5.24) at 12 months and 4.89 (2.72–7.05) at 24 months; mean difference (95 % CI) of femoral neck BMD was 1.90 (0.73–3.08) at 12 months and 3.85 (2.55–5.15) at 24 months; mean difference (95 % CI) of total hip BMD was 2.65 (1.20–4.09) at 12 months and 3.70 (1.76–5.64) at 24 months; risk ratio (95 % CI) of AEs was 0.98 (0.91–1.07); risk ratio (95 % CI) of SAEs was 1.11 (0.72–1.72); risk ratio (95 % CI) of skin AEs was 0.92 (0.63–1.35); and risk ratio (95 % CI) of fracture was 0.34 (0.16–0.70). In this study, application of 50 mg ODN produced significantly greater BMD increases and lower fracture incidence than that of the control. In addition, ODN was generally well tolerated.

Currently available drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis can still be improved in terms of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and management. New approaches for the development of innovative drugs are possible thanks to our increasing understanding of the bone tissue biology and the cellular and molecular processes that regulate it. One of the new anti-bone resorption agents, odanacatib, a selective cathepsin-K inhibitor, is in late phase III clinical research. Among new bone anabolic drugs, those that have an action on the Wnt signaling pathway appear to be particularly promising. The development of new compounds for the treatment of osteoporosis represents an excellent example of translational medicine efforts aimed to extend the range of treatment options for osteoporosis, a very common disease with a high social and economic impact, particularly when causing fractures.

Die Osteoporose als eine systemische Skeletterkrankung ist bereits heute aufgrund der zunehmenden Alterung der Bevolkerung und Veranderung der Lifestylefaktoren eine unterschatzte, zu selten diagnostizierte und behandelte Volkskrankheit. Praventive Masnahmen liegen primar in der Fuhrung eines angemessenen Lebensstils und sekundar in einer ausreichenden Zufuhr von Kalzium und Vitamin D. Eine Osteoporoseabklarung wird landerubergreifend bei Fraktur nach Bagatelltrauma, relevanten Risikofaktoren und entsprechenden Komorbiditaten empfohlen. Eine spezifische Pharmakotherapie ist nach osteoporotischen Frakturen und bei erhohtem absolutem Frakturrisiko angezeigt. Die Indikationsstellung bei Patienten ohne klinisch apparente Fraktur anhand des individuellen Frakturrisikos ist gleichsam konsensfahig, wobei das Mas zur Bestimmung dieses individuellen Risikos kontrovers diskutiert wird. Mit den beschriebenen medikamentosen Therapieprinzipien stehen mehrere Substanzen zur Verfugung, fur die aufgrund prospektiver, kontrollierter Studien uber 3 – 10 Jahre Daten zur Fraktursenkung, Sicherheit und Vertraglichkeit vorliegen. Zur Verlaufskontrolle und auch zur Verifizierung der klinischen Compliance bei erhohtem Frakturrisiko wird eine klinische Kontrolle der Therapie nach 3, 6 und 12 Monaten empfohlen.

Introduction: The metabolic bone disease osteoporosis is a growing health and health-economic problem worldwide. Bisphosphonates are the most widely used antiresorptive medication and the de facto gold standard in fracture prophylaxis all over the world, in conjunction with calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Several new medications for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis are in the pipeline. Areas covered: The authors present the most recent studies on new and current antiresorptive as well as anabolic drugs. Specifically, the authors present the current knowledge on drugs directed against cathepsin K and sclerostin as well as the new pathways of interest from preclinical studies. Expert opinion: New scientific results have identified novel signaling pathways as potential targets for future development of anti-osteoporotic drugs. The treatments close to marketing at the moment are odanacatib and romosozumab and these are both promising new medications based on bone mineral density results, safety profile and administration. Theoretically, romosozumab may hold the potential to be a drug to 'cure' even advanced stages of osteoporosis with short-term treatment. However, safety, fracture data and cost are key elements that will determine the extent of use.

The market of anti-osteoporosis drugs has been declining in recent years, possibly in part due to the publicity around adverse events observed with bisphosphonates. Also, the proportion of patients with clinical fracture who receive adequate treatment remains low. So there are still unmet needs in this field. Odanacatib is a cathepsin K inhibitor currently being developed for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis that could be an advance in this context.Odanacatib is a bone resorption inhibitor, but it preserves some degree of bone formation, which differentiates this new family of drugs from existing therapies. Odanacatib increases bone mineral density at the spine and hip, improves estimated bone strength using finite element analysis at the spine and hip as well as at the distal tibia and radius. The safety profile has been satisfactory so far. A robust antifracture efficacy has been announced when the Phase III pivotal trial was terminated after interim analysis, but we do not yet have access to the complete results.Odanacatib may have an important role in future guidelines if it provides a substantial advantage compared to the effective and inexpensive current generic drugs, in terms of antifracture efficacy or safety.

Cathepsin K inhibitors, such as ONO-5334, are being developed for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, their relative effects on bone resorption and formation, and how quickly the effects resolve after treatment cessation, are uncertain. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of 24-month treatment with ONO-5334 and to assess the effect of treatment cessation over 2 months. We studied 197 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia with one fragility fracture. Patients were randomized to ONO-5334 50 mg twice daily, 100 mg or 300 mg once daily, alendronate 70 mg once weekly (positive control), or placebo for 24 months. After 24 months, all ONO-5334 doses were associated with increased bone mineral density (BMD) for lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck (p