Search

Objectives Stapedotomy is performed to address conductive hearing deficits. While hearing thresholds reliably improve at low frequencies (LF), conductive outcomes at high frequencies (HF) are less reliable and have not been well described. Herein, we evaluate post‐operative HF air‐bone gap (ABG) changes and measure HF air conduction (AC) thresholds changes as a function of frequency. Methods Retrospective review of patients who underwent primary stapedotomy with incus wire piston prosthesis between January 2016 and May 2020. Pre‐ and postoperative audiograms were evaluated. LF ABG was calculated as the mean ABG of thresholds at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz. HF ABG was calculated at 4 kHz. Results Forty‐six cases met criteria. Mean age at surgery was 54.0 ± 11.7 years. The LF mean preoperative ABG was 36.9 ± 11.0 dB and postoperatively this significantly reduced to 9.35 ± 6.76 dB, (P

Purpose The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score is used to risk stratify outpatients with febrile neutropenia (FN). However, it is rarely used in hospital settings. We aimed to describe management, use of MASCC score, and outcomes among hospitalized patients with FN. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer and FN. We collected patient demographics, cancer characteristics, microbiological profile, MASCC score, utilization of critical care therapies, documentation of goals of care (GOC), and inpatient deaths. Outcomes associated with low- (≥ 21) versus high-risk (< 21) MASCC scores are presented as absolute differences. Results Of 193 patients, few (2%, n = 3) had MASCC scores documented, but when calculated, 52% (n = 101) had a high-risk score (< 21). GOC were discussed in 12% (n = 24) of patients. Twenty one percent (n = 40) required intermediate/ICU level of care, and 12% (n = 23) died in the hospital. Those with a low-risk score were 33% less likely to require intermediate/ICU care (95% CI 23 to 44%) and 19% less likely to die in the hospital (95% CI 10% to 27%) compared to those with high-risk score. Conclusions MASCC score was rarely used for hospitalized patients with FN, but high-risk score was associated with worse outcomes. Education efforts to incorporate MASCC score into the workflow may help identify patients at high risk for complications and help clinicians admit these patients to a higher level of care (e.g., intermediate/ICU care) or guide them to initiate earlier GOC discussions.

Objective To examine predictors of spirometry use at a tertiary academic health system and association between receipt of spirometry and outcomes. Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with an ICD-9 CM diagnostic code for asthma and a 2014 outpatient visit in either a community health center or private practice associated with a tertiary academic medical center. The main outcome was receipt of spirometry during a 2007-2015 "exposure period." We secondarily examined future hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits during a follow-up period (2016-2019). Results In a sample of 394 patients, the majority were white (48%; n=188) and female (72%; n=284). Mean (SD) age was 52 years. Approximately half (185, 47%) of the patients received spirometry and 25% (n=97) saw a specialist during the exposure period. Nearly, 88% (n=85) of patients who saw a specialist received spirometry. More than half of the cohort (220/394, 56%) had an ED visit or admission during the follow-up period. Of these, 168 (76.4%) had not seen a specialist and 111 (50.5%) had not received spirometry within the exposure period. We saw no association between spirometry in the exposure window and future ED visit or hospitalization. Conclusion In a cohort of patients at a tertiary medical center, spirometry was underused. We observed a strong association between seeing a specialist and use of spirometry, suggesting a need to better incorporate spirometry into routine primary care for patients with asthma. Among 220 patients who had an asthma-related hospitalization or ED visit in 2016-2019, the majority had no record of receiving spirometry and no documentation indicating a prior specialist visit.

Introduction: Otolaryngology (ORL) applicants face challenges finding information about residency programs. Due to COVID-19, the Society of University Otolaryngologists released suggestions for students to avoid away rotations and look for programs to expand and update their web presence. However, information on program websites is not always standardized or easily accessible. Many applicants use the American Medical Association's Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA), a designated, standardized resource of basic and detailed information on residency programs. However, the availability of information within FREIDA is unclear. Herein, we analyze available data within FREIDA on all 124 ORL residency programs to understand the completeness of the FREIDA database. Method: Data from all 124 otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency programs within FREIDA was abstracted in early December 2020 and organized into 2 sections: basic information and detailed information (program details, educational features, and occupational benefits). The number of contributing programs in both sections was evaluated. Results: More than half of the programs (n = 65, 52.4%) did not provide any detailed information within FREIDA. While all 124 programs had their address, contact email, and the names of program directors available, slightly fewer had direct links to their website available (n = 113, 91.1%). Most programs (70.2%) did not include a brief 1-paragraph program description. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that FREIDA provides basic information for nearly all ORL programs, but it does not offer detailed information for most programs. As COVID-19 has negatively impacted the ability of ORL applicants to learn about programs, FREIDA is a helpful, centralized resource but is currently incomplete.

Age-related hearing loss (presbycusis) is a prevalent condition attributed primarily to inner ear dysfunction. Little is known about age-related changes in the ossicular joints or their contribution to presbycusis. Herein, we performed a histopathologic analysis of the incudomalleolar joint (IMJ) in specimens from the National Temporal Bone Registry with audiometrically confirmed presbycusis but without histologically observed sensory, neural, strial or mixed features. Twenty-two ‘indeterminate’ presbycusis (IP) cases and thirteen young, normal hearing ears were examined. The age for the IP group was 76.3 ± 10.9 and 32.1 ± 9.5 for the young group (p < 0.05). The joint space between the two ossicles was 22% wider in the IP group (138 ± 58.0 μm) compared to young ears (113 ± 49.0 μm) (p < 0.05). We report that IP ears have a wider IMJ than young ears. Findings have implications for understanding a potential source of presbycusis in indeterminate cases.

Nasopharyngeal swabs are commonly done in the medical field for a multitude of reasons, and they recently have been an essential component of widespread testing to control the spread of COVID-19. Although rare, improper technique when performing nasopharyngeal swabs has the potential to lead to injury or misleading test results. We present a case of uncontrolled epistaxis requiring hospitalization following a routine nasopharyngeal swab in a healthy patient. Both the complexity and variability of the anatomy of the nasopharynx can contribute to poor swabbing technique. Otolaryngologists should be encouraged to educate and support other healthcare workers to improve the yield and reduce the risk of harm due to nasopharyngeal swabs. Increased comfort levels with performing nasopharyngeal swabs will also improve the sensitivity of screening tests for common respiratory viruses such as influenza, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), or bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus.