1. Disrupting the Fellowship Match: COVID-19 and the Applicant Arms Race
- Author
-
R. Ellen Jones, Thane A. Blinman, Robert A. Swendiman, and Thomas M. Krummel
- Subjects
Virtual process ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Process (engineering) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Arms race ,Subspecialty ,Education ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Selection (linguistics) ,Humans ,Conversation ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Fellowships and Scholarships ,Child ,Personnel Selection ,Pandemics ,media_common ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,Rank (computer programming) ,COVID-19 ,Internship and Residency ,Public relations ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Surgery ,business ,Psychology - Abstract
Resident and fellow selection carried out via "the Match" has historically relied upon in-person interviews to evaluate and rank candidates. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has required fellowship matches and the upcoming Main Residency Match® to become wholly virtual. The 2020 pediatric surgery match offers a unique case study in the benefits and shortcomings of a virtual process and begins a much-needed conversation regarding opportunities for innovation in candidate selection. For many candidates, the application cycle imposes considerable costs - financial, professional, and personal - which have only escalated over time. We draw on our experience from the most recent match cycle to discuss limitations of the traditional Match® and suggest potential solutions to improve the subspecialty interview process moving forward.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF