1. Are Level 3 Fair Value Remeasurements Useful? Evidence from ASC 820 Rollforward Disclosures
- Author
-
Zoltán Novotny-Farkas, Annelies Renders, Peter Fiechter, Accounting & Information Management, and RS: GSBE MORSE
- Subjects
VALUE-RELEVANCE ,COMPREHENSIVE-INCOME ,Economics and Econometrics ,INVESTMENT SECURITIES ,Actuarial science ,Mark-to-market accounting ,other comprehensive income (OCI) ,IMPACT ,RECOGNITION ,fair value accounting ,FAS 157 ,return relevance ,Accounting ,Fair value ,ASC 820 ,fair value disclosures ,MARKET VALUATION ,COMMERCIAL-BANKS ,Business ,Level 3 ,LOSSES ,GAINS ,Finance - Abstract
Exploiting detailed disclosures mandated by Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 820, we provide evidence for the return relevance of Level 3 fair value remeasurements for a comprehensive sample of U.S. listed banks. We find that Level 3 remeasurements recognized in earnings are more return relevant than those recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI). Our results suggest that Level 3 remeasurements in OCI partially reflect transitory illiquidity discounts that are less relevant when banks have the ability to hold the underlying assets. The regulatory capital treatment of OCI also affects the return relevance of Level 3 remeasurements in OCI. Importantly, we find no differences in the return relevance of realized versus unrealized Level 3 remeasurements in earnings, allaying concerns that investors perceive unrealized Level 3 remeasurements of lesser quality. Overall, our findings support the usefulness of the segregated disclosures of Level 3 fair value remeasurements. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF