1. Comparison of Hospitalization Trends and Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients With Versus Without Opioid Use Disorder
- Author
-
Brianna Stack, Tarun Dalia, Sagar Ranka, Prakash Acharya, Uzair Mahmood, Zubair Shah, Suveenkrishna Pothuru, Kamal Gupta, and Siva Sagar Taduru
- Subjects
Male ,Cardiac Catheterization ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Myocardial Infarction ,Shock, Cardiogenic ,Comorbidity ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Revascularization ,Medical care ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,Myocardial Revascularization ,Prevalence ,medicine ,Humans ,Hospital Mortality ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,Coronary Artery Bypass ,Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction ,Aged ,Cardiac catheterization ,business.industry ,Opioid abuse ,Drug-Eluting Stents ,Opioid use disorder ,Acute Kidney Injury ,Middle Aged ,Opioid-Related Disorders ,medicine.disease ,United States ,Hospitalization ,Logistic Models ,Concomitant ,Multivariate Analysis ,Propensity score matching ,Cardiology ,ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Discrepancies in medical care are well known to adversely affect patients with opioid abuse disorders (OUD), including management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with OUD. We used the National Inpatient Sample was queried from January 2006 to September 2015 to identify all patients ≥18 years admitted with a primary diagnosis of AMI (weighted N = 13,030; unweighted N = 2,670) and concomitant OUD. Patients using other nonopiate illicit drugs were excluded. Propensity matching (1:1) yielded 2,253 well-matched pairs in which intergroup comparison of invasive revascularization strategies and cardiac outcomes were performed. The prevalence of OUD patients with AMI over the last decade has doubled, from 163 (2006) to 326 cases (2015) per 100,000 admissions for AMI. The OUD group underwent less cardiac catheterization (63.2% vs 72.2%; p0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (37.0% vs 48.5%; p0.001) and drug-eluting stent placement (32.3% vs 19.5%; p0.001) compared with non-OUD. No differences in in-hospital mortality/cardiogenic shock were noted. Among subgroup of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients (26.2% of overall cohort), the OUD patients were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (67.9% vs 75.5%; p = 0.002), drug-eluting stent (31.4% vs 47.9%; p0.001) with a significantly higher mortality (7.4% vs 4.3%), and cardiogenic shock (11.7% vs 7.9%). No differences in the frequency of coronary bypass grafting were noted in AMI or its subgroups. In conclusion, OUD patients presenting with AMI receive less invasive treatment compared with those without OUD. OUD patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction have worse in-hospital outcomes with increased mortality and cardiogenic shock.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF