1. Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-phase II: rupture risk assessment
- Author
-
Anderson Chun On Tsang, Saba Elias, Sylvia Saalfeld, Hui Meng, Yu An Wu, György Paál, Oliver Beuing, Senol Piskin, Prasanth Velvaluri, Samuel Voß, Gábor Janiga, Mehdi Najafi, Leonid Goubergrits, S. V. Sindeev, Tin Lok Chiu, Felicitas J. Detmer, Masaaki Shojima, Hiroyuki Takao, Nikhil Paliwal, Bong Jae Chung, Sergey Frolov, Gábor Závodszky, Andreas Spuler, Gabriele Copelli, Philipp Berg, Sreenivas Venguru, David F. Kallmes, Nicole M. Cancelliere, Aslak W. Bergersen, Kent D. Carlson, Dan Dragomir-Daescu, Vitor Mendes Pereira, David A. Steinman, Santhosh Seshadhri, Juan R. Cebral, Kristian Valen-Sendstad, Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz, Christof Karmonik, Soichiro Fujimura, Jan Bruening, Benjamin Csippa, Mariya S. Pravdivtseva, Ender A. Finol, Yi Qian, and Computational Science Lab (IVI, FNWI)
- Subjects
Multivariate analysis ,Research groups ,Biomedical Engineering ,Hemodynamics ,Health Informatics ,Aneurysm, Ruptured ,Risk Assessment ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Aneurysm ,Risk Factors ,Medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Rupture risk ,Multiple aneurysms ,Radiation treatment planning ,business.industry ,Models, Cardiovascular ,Computational Biology ,Intracranial Aneurysm ,General Medicine ,Blood flow ,Anatomy ,medicine.disease ,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design ,Computer Science Applications ,Cerebral Angiography ,Cerebrovascular Circulation ,Surgery ,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
PurposeAssessing the rupture probability of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains challenging. Therefore, hemodynamic simulations are increasingly applied toward supporting physicians during treatment planning. However, due to several assumptions, the clinical acceptance of these methods remains limited.MethodsTo provide an overview of state-of-the-art blood flow simulation capabilities, the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH) was conducted. Seventeen research groups from all over the world performed segmentations and hemodynamic simulations to identify the ruptured aneurysm in a patient harboring five IAs. Although simulation setups revealed good similarity, clear differences exist with respect to the analysis of aneurysm shape and blood flow results. Most groups (12/71%) included morphological and hemodynamic parameters in their analysis, with aspect ratio and wall shear stress as the most popular candidates, respectively.ResultsThe majority of groups (7/41%) selected the largest aneurysm as being the ruptured one. Four (24%) of the participating groups were able to correctly select the ruptured aneurysm, while three groups (18%) ranked the ruptured aneurysm as the second most probable. Successful selections were based on the integration of clinically relevant information such as the aneurysm site, as well as advanced rupture probability models considering multiple parameters. Additionally, flow characteristics such as the quantification of inflow jets and the identification of multiple vortices led to correct predictions.ConclusionsMATCH compares state-of-the-art image-based blood flow simulation approaches to assess the rupture risk of IAs. Furthermore, this challenge highlights the importance of multivariate analyses by combining clinically relevant metadata with advanced morphological and hemodynamic quantification.
- Published
- 2019