Search

The role of color in the visual perception of mirror-symmetry is controversial. Some reports support the existence of color-selective mirror-symmetry channels, others that mirror-symmetry perception is merely sensitive to color-correlations across the symmetry axis. Here we test between the two ideas. Stimuli consisted of colored Gaussian-blobs arranged either mirror-symmetrically or quasi-randomly. We used four arrangements: (1) ‘segregated’ – symmetric blobs were of one color, random blobs of the other color(s); (2) ‘random-segregated’ – as above but with the symmetric color randomly selected on each trial; (3) ‘non-segregated’ – symmetric blobs were of all colors in equal proportions, as were the random blobs; (4) ‘anti-symmetric’ – symmetric blobs were of opposite-color across the symmetry axis. We found: (a) near-chance levels for the anti-symmetric condition, suggesting that symmetry perception is sensitive to color-correlations across the symmetry axis; (b) similar performance for random-segregated and non-segregated conditions, giving no support to the idea that mirror-symmetry is color selective; (c) highest performance for the color-segregated condition, but only when the observer knew beforehand the symmetry color, suggesting that symmetry detection benefits from color-based attention. We conclude that mirror-symmetry detection mechanisms, while sensitive to color-correlations across the symmetry axis and subject to the benefits of attention-to-color, are not color selective.

In the ultimate stage of the Adelson-Bergen motion energy model [Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2, 284-299], motion is derived from the difference between directionally opponent energies E(L) and E(R). However, Georgeson and Scott-Samuel [Georgeson, M. A., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (1999). Motion contrast: A new metric for direction discrimination. Vision Research, 39, 4393-4402] demonstrated that motion contrast-a metric that normalizes opponent motion energy (E(L)-E(R)) by flicker energy (E(L)+E(R))-is a better descriptor of human direction discrimination. In a previous study [Rainville, S. J. M., Makous, W. L., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2002). The spatial properties of opponent-motion normalization. Vision Research, 42, 1727-1738], we used a lateral masking paradigm to show that opponent-motion normalization is selective for flicker position, orientation, and spatial-frequency. In the present study, we used a superposition masking paradigm and compared results to lateral masking data, as the two masking types activate local and remote normalization mechanisms differentially. Although selectivity for flicker orientation and spatial frequency varied across observers, bandwidths were similar across lateral and superimposed masking conditions. Additional experiments demonstrated that normalization signals are pooled over a spatial region whose aspect ratio and size are consistent with those of local motion detectors. Together, results show no evidence of remote normalization signals predicted by broadband inhibitory models [(e.g.) Heeger, D. J. (1992). Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 9, 181-197; Foley, J. M. (1994). Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: Masking experiments require a new model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics and Image Science, 11, 1710-1719] but support a local normalization process whose spatial properties are inherited from low-level motion detectors.

It is well established that the visual system is sensitive to the global structure––or “form”––of objects defined exclusively by spatial or motion cues, but it remains unclear how form perception combines spatial and motion cues if these are presented concurrently. In the present study, we introduce a novel class of stimuli where spatial-form and motion-form can be superimposed and manipulated independently. In both the spatial and motion domains, global structure consisted of radial-frequency (RF) contours defined by a virtual circle of Gabor elements whose positions and/or drift speeds were sinusoidally modulated at a specified frequency of polar angle. The first two experiments revealed that observers encode the global structure of spatial-RF and motion-RF contours presented in isolation. In a third experiment, observers detected a spatial-RF modulation superimposed on a motion-RF pedestal of identical radial frequency: results showed little facilitation at low pedestal amplitudes but significant masking at higher pedestal amplitudes, especially if the RF modulations of test and pedestal were in anti-phase. Additional experiments demonstrated that masking of the spatial-RF test is abolished if the global structure of the motion-RF pedestal is altered or destroyed while local motion cues are preserved. We argue these results cannot be explained by local neural interactions between spatial and motion cues and propose instead that data reflect higher-level interactions between separate visual pathways encoding spatial-form and motion-form.

We have investigated the apparent collapse of stereopsis obtained with random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance. Contrast thresholds for both depth and form discrimination of targets in random-dot- and figural stereograms were measured at a number of disparities, using both isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli. All contrast thresholds for stereoscopic tasks were normalised to contrast thresholds for detecting the appropriate stimulus. We found that at isoluminance contrast thresholds for depth judgements were no higher for random-dot compared to figural stereograms, even when normalised to the same thresholds obtained with isochromatic stimuli. On the other hand contrast thresholds for three-dimensional form judgements were much higher than those for depth judgements in isoluminant, compared to isochromatic random-dot-stereograms. This specific impairment of stereoscopic form (as opposed to depth) processing at isoluminance was confirmed in a further experiment in which subjects were required to judge the presence and orientation of depth corrugations in a disparity-modulated random-dot-stereogram.

Contrast thresholds for sine-wave gratings are raised when the gratings are compressively sampled into a set of narrow bright bars on a dark background, even though this method of sampling preserves the mean luminance and contrast of the grating. Burr et al. [(1985). Vision Research, 25, 717-727] suggested threshold elevation was due to localized luminance adaptation to the sample bars, whose average peak luminance necessarily increased when fewer bars per cycle were present. Previously, we reported results using decrement-bar compressively sampled gratings (CSGs), which consist of dark sample bars on a bright background, which favoured the local luminance adaptation hypothesis (Kingdom & Rainville, 1995). Here we report experiments that suggest that this hypothesis is untenable. Using increment-bar CSGs (bright sample bars on a dark background) we found that raising background luminance while holding sample bar luminance constant reduced thresholds by as much as a factor of ten. This suggests that it is the contrast of the bars, rather than their luminance, which determines thresholds. Further experiments showed that CSG detection was facilitated by unsampled grating pedestals, and thresholds were elevated when the fundamental was physically cancelled. This implied that CSGs were detected by the same mechanisms as the unsampled gratings from which they are derived. Finally, we provide evidence for the involvement of a dynamic gain control component for increment-bar CSG detection. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd

Previous work has shown an advantage of middle spatial frequencies (SFs) in face recognition. However, a few recent studies have suggested that this advantage is reduced when comparison and test stimuli are spatially filtered in a similar way. In the present study, we used standard psychophysical methods, in combination with a match-to-sample task, to determine the SF thresholds for face matching under conditions in which: (1) comparison stimuli were unfiltered and (2) comparison stimuli were spatially filtered in the same way as test stimuli. In two experiments, we show that SFs closer to the middle band are sought out more in the former case than in the latter. These results are compatible with the idea that a middle band of SFs will be most useful for any visual task and that the breadth of this optimal middle band will vary depending on task characteristics.

The final stage of the Adelson-Bergen model [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2 (1985) 284] computes net motion as the difference between directionally opposite energies E(L) and E(R). However, Georgeson and Scott-Samuel [Vis. Res. 39 (1999) 4393] found that human direction discrimination is better described by motion contrast (C(m))--a metric where opponent energy (E(L)-E(R)) is divided by flicker energy (E(L)+E(R)). In the present paper, we used a lateral masking paradigm to investigate the spatial properties of flicker energy involved in the normalization of opponent energy. Observers discriminated between left and right motion while viewing a checkerboard in which half of the checks contained a drifting sinusoid and the other half contained flicker (i.e. a counterphasing sinusoid). The relative luminance contrasts of flicker and motion checks determined the checkerboard's overall motion contrast C(m). We obtained selectivity functions for opponent-motion normalization by measuring C(m) thresholds whilst varying the orientation, spatial frequency, or size of flicker checks. In all conditions, performance (percent correct) decayed lawfully as we decreased motion contrast, validating the C(m) metric for our stimuli. Thresholds decreased with check size and also improved as we increased either the orientation or spatial-frequency difference between motion and flicker checks. Our data are inconsistent with Heeger-type normalization models [Vis. Neurosci. 9 (1992) 181] in which excitatory inputs are normalized by a non-selective pooling of inhibitory inputs, but data are consistent with the implicit assumption in Georgeson and Scott-Samuel's model that flicker normalization is localized in orientation, scale, and space. However, our lateral masking paradigm leaves open the possibility that the spatial properties of flicker normalization would be different if opponent and flicker energies spatially overlapped. Further characterization of motion contrast will require models of the spatial, temporal, and joint space-time properties of mechanisms mediating opponent-motion and flicker normalization.

Scale invariance refers to aspects of visual perception that remain constant with changes in viewing distance. Previously, Dakin and Herbert [Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 265 (1397) (1998) 659] reported that the spatial integration region (IR) for mirror symmetry in bandpass noise is scale invariant because its dimensions scale with the inverse of peak spatial frequency. In bandpass noise, however, peak spatial frequency covaries with stimulus numerosity (i.e. the total number of information samples) and density (i.e. the total number of information samples per unit area). In this study, we report four experiments that decoupled properties of the retinal image affected by viewing distance––spatial frequency, numerosity, size, and density––and measured their effect on IR size. Stimuli consisted of bandpass microelements with vertically mirror-symmetric but otherwise random positions, and we measured observer resistance to random jitter imposed on microelement position. Results show that jitter resistance and IR size vary with the inverse of stimulus density but are unaffected by changes in stimulus spatial frequency, numerosity, or size. We found the IR has a 2:1 heightto-width aspect ratio and integrates information from � 18 microelements regardless of their spatial separation. Our results reveal that stimulus density plays a central role in the visual system’s implementation of scale invariance. Using an ideal-observer, we demonstrate that scale invariance reflects genuine neural scale selection rather than a physical limitation on the stimulus’ information content. Our findings that jitter resistance and IR size vary with the inverse of density challenge current models of spatial vision but can be reconciled with a model that compares the output of bandpass non-Fourier mechanisms to select spatial scales that match stimulus density. � 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

We investigated human sensitivity to vertical mirror symmetry in noise patterns filtered for narrow bands of variable orientations. Sensitivity is defined here as the amount of spatial phase randomization corresponding to 75% correct performance in a 2AFC detection task. In Experiment 1, sensitivity was found to be high for tests patterns of all orientations except those parallel to the axis of symmetry. This implies that corresponding mirror-orientations (e.g. 45 and 45°) are combined prior to symmetry detection. In Experiment 2, observers detected symmetry in tests of variable orientation in the presence of either non-symmetric or symmetric masks filtered for orientations either parallel or perpendicular to the axis. Observers were found to be primarily affected by masks of the same orientation as the test, thus suggesting that symmetry is computed separately in distinct mirror-orientation channels. In Experiment 3, observers detected a symmetric test of variable height and width embedded in random noise. Data revealed that mirror symmetry is computed over a spatial integration region (IR) that remains approximately constant in area but whose height-to-width aspect ratio changes from 20:1 to 2:1 as orientation is varied from parallel to perpendicular to the axis. We compare human data against that of an ideal observer to identify key factors that limit visual performance and discuss the implications for the functional architecture of symmetry perception. We also propose a multi-channel model of symmetry detection that combines the output of oriented spatial filters in a simple and physiologically plausible manner. Particular emphasis is placed on the notion that changes in the shape of the IR with orientation compensate for changes in information density and partially equate performance across orientations. © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

We investigated how the detection of mirror symmetry depends on the distribution of contrast energy across spatial scales. Stimuli consisted of vertically symmetric noise patterns with fractal power spectra defined by 1/f beta slopes (-2or = betaor = 5). While overall rms contrast remained fixed at 25%, symmetry-detection thresholds were obtained by corrupting the signal with variable amounts of noise with identical spectral characteristics. A first experiment measured thresholds as a function of spectral slope, and performance was found to be substantially facilitated in images with power spectra that characterize natural scenes (1.2or = betaor = 3.2). In a second experiment, symmetry was removed from randomly chosen octave bands and replaced by noise with the same spectral profile. Results revealed that only in images with 1/f2 spectra does performance decrease by constant amounts across all frequency bands. Together, the results imply that symmetry mechanisms extract equal amounts of information from constant-octave frequency bands but lack the ability to whiten stimuli whose spectral slopes differ from those of natural scenes. Results are qualitatively well predicted by a multichannel model that (1) relies on spatial filters with equal-volume point-spread functions and constant-octave frequency bandwidths and (2) restricts the computation of symmetry to spatial regions whose dimensions are proportional to the filters' spatial scale. These findings are also consistent with the notion that mechanisms that mediate the perception of form exploit the ability of early vision to reduce second-order redundancy in natural scenes.

Contrast thresholds for sine-wave gratings are increased when the gratings are compressively sampled into a set of narrow bright bars on a dark background, even though the mean luminance and contrast of the grating are unchanged by this sampling method. Burr, Ross and Morrone, who first demonstrated this phenomenon, suggested this was due to local luminance adaptation to the sample bars, whose average peak luminance necessarily increases with the degree of compressive sapling. However, the results could also be explained on the basis of either a luminance compressive non-linearity, or a local contrast-based non-linearity. Previously we reported results with decrement CSGs, which consist of dark sample bars on a bright background, which favored the local luminance adaptation hypothesis. However here we show that this hypothesis is untenable. Using increment CSGs (bright bars on a dark background) we found that raising background luminance while holding average peak sample bar luminance constant reduced thresholds by as much as a factor of ten. This demonstrates that it is the contrast of the bars, rather than their peak luminance, which is the important feature determining thresholds, at least with increment CSGs. We also provide evidence for the involvement of a gain control mechanism which serves to partially reduce the deleterious effects of the contrast-based non-linearity on CSG thresholds. Finally we show that CSG thresholds can be reduced by the presence of a low-contrast unsampled grating mask. This suggests that although local contrast processing is initially involved in CSG detection, the cortical mechanisms which ultimately detect CSGs are the same as those which detect the unsampled gratings from which they are derived.© (1996) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.