Search

OBJECTIVE: To determine if clinical evaluations of post-stroke arm function correspond to everyday motor performance indexed by arm accelerometers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study analyzing baseline data from a larger trial (NCT02665052). SETTING: Outpatient research center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty community-dwelling adults with chronic arm motor deficits (stroke≥6mo). INTERVENTION: 72-hours of home wrist-worn accelerometry during normal routine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical evaluations included the Fugl-Meyer (FM), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and two self-assessments: the Motor Activity Log (MAL) and hand motor subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Accelerometer-derived variables included quantifications of movement intensity (magnitude) and duration of arm use. RESULTS: Participants had moderate arm impairment (FM 36.1 ± 9.4). The accelerometer-derived mean magnitude ratio correlated significantly with the FM (ρ = 0.60, p < 0.01), WMFT functional score (ρ = 0.59, p < 0.01), and ARAT (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.05). The hours of use ratio correlated with the MAL amount of use (ρ = 0.58, p < 0.01) and quality of movement (ρ = 0.61, p < 0.01). Total paretic hours did not correlate with the FM, WMFT or ARAT, and intensity variables did not correlate with the MAL or SIS. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with higher baseline function had greater intensity of paretic arm movement at home; similarly, those who perceived they had less disability used their paretic arm more relative to their non-paretic arm. However, some participants with higher clinical scores did not exhibit greater arm use in everyday life, possibly due to neglect and learned non-use. Therefore, individualized home accelerometry profiles could provide valuable insight to better tailor post-stroke rehabilitation.

Background Physical rehabilitation services are an important component of treatment for persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) to improve and maintain physical mobility. However, PwMS often have significant barriers to outpatient physical therapy (PT) services including mobility deficits and lack of transportation. The integration of exercise gaming (exergaming) and telehealth into clinical PT practices may overcome these barriers. The overarching purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the acceptability and effects of an individualized telePT intervention using exergaming. Methods Ten individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) completed a 12-week exergaming (Jintronix®) telerehabilitation intervention. In order to measure the acceptability of the telerehabilitation intervention, adherence was measured through the tablet-based rehabilitation software and each participant completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Clinical outcome measures were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. To evaluate the efficacy of this intervention, the following measures of physical function and fatigue were included; the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 25-Foot Walk (25FW), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS), and the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT). Clinical outcomes were analyzed using the Sign test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. All other data were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results After the intervention, participants demonstrated significant improvements in ambulation speed during the 25FW (p = 0.04) and ambulation distance during the 2MWT (p = 0.002). Statistically significant increases of SPPB total score (p = .04) and sub-scores were also found. Participants did not demonstrate significant changes in the MFIS (p = 0.31) or MSWS-12 (p = 0.06) after the intervention. Participants had a 58.3% adherence rate during the intervention and performed their exercise program an average of 2.5 times per week. All participants reported that they were either ‘satisfied or ‘very satisfied’ with their telerehabilitation experience, would use telerehabilitation again, and would recommend telerehabilitation to others. Conclusion This individualized telerehabilitation intervention which integrates exergaming and clinical video teleconferencing is acceptable to patients and may offer a viable alternative to traditional PT for PwMS. Trial registration NCT03655431, retrospectively registered on August 31st, 2018.

Patient portals (PPs) foster engagement and self-management of chronic disease and are emerging as extensions of the care continuum. Utilisation from a health service delivery perspective is growing; however, it is a relatively new model of care in the field of rehabilitation. This pilot, within a larger randomised controlled stroke rehabilitation trial, explored the feasibility and acceptance of secure messaging using an established nationwide PP system for e-visits. Fifteen participants with stroke-related arm disability were randomised to 6 weeks of home arm telerehabilitation. All were over the age of 60 and 73% lived with a spouse or significant other. Mean intervention time was 6.8 weeks, and participants sent 2.3 ± 1.4 messages per week to complete 15.1 h of reported therapy (prescribed therapy = 18 h). Portal use improved therapist efficiency and resulted in a 1:6 therapist to patient exercise time ratio compared with the conventional 1:1 ratio for in-person therapy. Low initial electronic health literacy, self-efficacy or cognitive scores did not prohibit utilisation, and satisfaction with secure messaging for patient–therapist communication was 3.5 ± 1.2 out of 5. Overall, PP-supported e-visits were a feasible and acceptable telerehabilitation care delivery method for this chronic stroke population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02665052. Registered 27 January 2016. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02665052

Background: Stroke-related ankle dysfunction due to hemiparesis has a profound negative impact on gait biomechanics and walking. Task-oriented treadmill training improves gait velocity but does not lead to restitution of ankle function. Advances in robotic technology have led to the development of an adaptive ankle robot that can be integrated into treadmill walking and provide precisely timed graded assistance consistent with motor learning approaches. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a 6-week treadmill-integrated adaptive ankle robot (TMR) training to 6-weeks of treadmill training (TM) alone on improved paretic ankle motor control and gait performance. Methods: This was a single-blind (evaluator-blinded) randomized controlled trial. 45 participants received either TMR or TM training 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Primary outcomes were improved peak paretic ankle dorsiflexion (DF) angle at swing, improved DF angle at foot strike (weight acceptance), and increased gait velocity during self-selected over-ground walking. The primary analysis was based on intention-to-treat using a longitudinal regression model. An additional sub-set analysis of subjects with biomechanically defined foot drop was performed. Results: There were no significant post-training ankle dorsiflexion or gait velocity differences between groups. Six-week post-training mean peak paretic DF swing angle was (4.84 ± 6.83; 4.2 ± 6.83 p=0.63) and DF angle at foot strike was (-0.70 ± 6.55; -0.46 ± 5.70 p=0.84) respectively for TMR and TM. Gait velocity gains were similar and TMR had a mean increase of 0.54 m/s ± 0.24 and TM increased 0.56 m/s ±0.32. p=0.48 post-training.Conclusion: Integrating adaptive ankle robotics into task-specific locomotor training was not significantly better than treadmill training alone. Both interventions improved gait velocity. Promising results in ankle motor control were seen in a subset of subjects with biomechanically defined foot drop that warrants further investigation. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical trials.gov id: NCT02483676. Registered June 29, 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02483676

Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of algorithmic prediction using a model of baseline arm movement, genetic factors, demographic characteristics, and multimodal assessment of the structure and function of motor pathways. To identify prognostic factors and the biological substrate for reductions in arm impairment in response to repetitive task practice. Design: This prospective single-group interventional study seeks to predict response to a repetitive task practice program using an intent-to-treat paradigm. Response is measured as a change of ≥5 points on the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer from baseline to final evaluation (at the end of training). Setting: General community. Participants: Anticipated enrollment of community-dwelling adults with chronic stroke (N=96; onset≥6mo) and moderate to severe residual hemiparesis of the upper limb as defined by a score of 10-45 points on the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer. Intervention: The intervention is a form of repetitive task practice using a combination of robot-assisted therapy coupled with functional arm use in real-world tasks administered over 12 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (primary outcome), Wolf Motor Function Test, Action Research Arm Test, Stroke Impact Scale, questionnaires on pain and expectancy, magnetic resonance imaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation, arm kinematics, accelerometry, and a saliva sample for genetic testing. Results: Methods for this trial are outlined, and an illustration of interindividual variability is provided by example of 2 participants who present similarly at baseline but achieve markedly different outcomes. Conclusion: This article presents the design, methodology, and rationale of an ongoing study to develop a predictive model of response to a standardized therapy for stroke survivors with chronic hemiparesis. Applying concepts from precision medicine to neurorehabilitation is practicable and needed to establish realistic rehabilitation goals and to effectively allocate resources. Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging, Prognosis, Rehabilitation, Stroke, Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Background. Robot-assisted therapy provides high-intensity arm rehabilitation that can significantly reduce stroke-related upper extremity (UE) deficits. Motor improvement has been shown at the joints trained, but generalization to real-world function has not been profound. Objective. To investigate the efficacy of robot-assisted therapy combined with therapist-assisted task training versus robot-assisted therapy alone on motor outcomes and use in participants with moderate to severe chronic stroke-related arm disability. Methods. This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial of two 12-week robot-assisted interventions; 45 participants were stratified by Fugl-Meyer (FMA) impairment (mean 21 ± 1.36) to 60 minutes of robot therapy (RT; n = 22) or 45 minutes of RT combined with 15 minutes therapist-assisted transition-to-task training (TTT; n = 23). The primary outcome was the mean FMA change at week 12 using a linear mixed-model analysis. A subanalysis included the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), with significance P

Introduction Physical rehabilitation is one of the few non-pharmaceutical therapies for maintaining or improving walking ability for patients with multiple sclerosis. However, travel distance to rehabilitation clinics, neurological disability and insurance coverage often limit access to specialised rehabilitation services. To address these issues, we utilised a web-based system to support a home-based self-directed exercise programme. Methods Patients ( n = 24) were randomised to either routine home rehabilitation or to the multiple sclerosis home automated tele-management system for a six-month period. The study group had a mean age of 50.4 years, 56% of patients were male, and 67% had progressive multiple sclerosis with an overall mean Patient Determined Disease Steps score of 4.4 (cane or crutch required for walking). Key outcomes included the timed 25-foot-walk, six-minute-walk and the Berg Balance Scale. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the change of the primary walking outcome measure, timed 25-foot-walk, at six months between the home automated tele-management intervention and control groups ( p = 0.44). Similarly, change scores for the six-minute-walk were not significantly different between the home automated tele-management or control groups at six months. Discussion Maintaining overall gait abilities in this group of predominantly progressive multiple sclerosis patients is notable. Exercise adherence was positively associated with higher multiple sclerosis disability and self-reported walking ability. Study engagement and participation in routine home-based exercise for the entire study period was challenging. Further research using clinical video telerehabilitation techniques that optimise patient involvement warrants further study.

BACKGROUND: Robots designed for rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke facilitate high rates of repetition during practice of movements and record precise kinematic data, providing a method to investigate motor recovery profiles over time.OBJECTIVE: To determine how motor recovery profiles during robotic interventions provide insight into improving clinical gains.METHODS: A convenience sample (n = 22), from a larger randomized control trial, was taken of chronic stroke participants completing 12 sessions of arm therapy. One group received 60 minutes of robotic therapy (Robot only) and the other group received 45 minutes on the robot plus 15 minutes of translation-to-task practice (Robot + TTT). Movement time was assessed using the robot without powered assistance. Analyses (ANOVA, random coefficient modeling [RCM] with 2-term exponential function) were completed to investigate changes across the intervention, between sessions, and within a session.RESULTS: Significant improvement (P < .05) in movement time across the intervention (pre vs post) was similar between the groups but there were group differences for changes between and within sessions (P < .05). The 2-term exponential function revealed a fast and slow component of learning that described performance across consecutive blocks. The RCM identified individuals who were above or below the marginal model.CONCLUSIONS: The expanded analyses indicated that changes across time can occur in different ways but achieve similar goals and may be influenced by individual factors such as initial movement time. These findings will guide decisions regarding treatment planning based on rates of motor relearning during upper extremity stroke robotic interventions.

MIT’s motto is “Mens et Manus” (Mind and Hand), and we have adopted it as the guiding rule (principle) for our line of research: using robotics and information technology to reconnect the brain to the hand. Nurture allows a patient to reduce impairment, increase function, and improve the quality of life beyond natural recovery. This chapter describes our efforts toward this goal since the initial development of the MIT-Manus in 1989. Numerous clinical trials involving thousands of patients (subjects) working with (receiving therapy using) the commercial version of the MIT-Manus have been conducted since then, and we have created a complete robotic gym for the upper extremity. Recently, the American Heart Association and the Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense endorsed the use of robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation for upper extremity, and we have been focusing on how to tailor therapy to a particular patient’s need and in determining who is a responder (and no-responder) to this kind of intervention.

Background Effective rehabilitative therapies are needed for patients with long-term deficits after stroke. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving 127 patients with moderate-to-severe upper-limb impairment 6 months or more after a stroke, we randomly assigned 49 patients to receive intensive robot-assisted therapy, 50 to receive intensive comparison therapy, and 28 to receive usual care. Therapy consisted of 36 1-hour sessions over a period of 12 weeks. The primary outcome was a change in motor function, as measured on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery after Stroke, at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Stroke Impact Scale. Secondary analyses assessed the treatment effect at 36 weeks. Results At 12 weeks, the mean Fugl-Meyer score for patients receiving robot-assisted therapy was better than that for patients receiving usual care (difference, 2.17 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.23 to 4.58) and worse than ...