1. Network meta-analysis–based comparison of first-line steroid-sparing adjuvants in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus
- Author
-
Meng-Sui Lee, Tom C. Chan, Yi-Chun Yeh, and Yu-Kang Tu
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Network Meta-Analysis ,Azathioprine ,Dermatology ,law.invention ,030207 dermatology & venereal diseases ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Recurrence ,law ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Immunologic Factors ,Cyclophosphamide ,Pemphigus foliaceus ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,integumentary system ,business.industry ,Pemphigus vulgaris ,Mycophenolic Acid ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,Pemphigus ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cyclosporine ,Drug Therapy, Combination ,Steroids ,Rituximab ,business ,Adjuvant ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background Steroid-sparing adjuvants may enhance oral glucocorticoid benefits in pemphigus treatment. Selecting the optimal therapeutic option among various first-line steroid-sparing adjuvants is often a clinical challenge due to the lack of head-to-head clinical trials. Objective To determine the best first-line steroid-sparing adjuvants for pemphigus treatment. Methods Randomized controlled trials comparing different steroid-sparing adjuvants in patients with pemphigus were identified through a systematic literature search and subjected to a network meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were the proportion of remission and the mean cumulative glucocorticoid dose. Results Ten trials involving 592 patients were analyzed. Among the 7 steroid-sparing adjuvants evaluated, rituximab was the most effective for achieving remission and was more effective than steroid alone (odds ratio, 14.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.71-43.68). Rituximab, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide pulse therapy enabled the reduction of the cumulative glucocorticoid doses compared to the use of steroid alone: mean differences, −11,830.5 mg (95% CI, −14,089.48 to −9571.52), −3032.48 mg (−4700.74 to −1364.22), and −2469.54 mg (−4128.42 to −810.66), respectively. Limitations The results were driven primarily by a small number of studies, and the effect estimates are imprecise because of indirect comparisons. Conclusion Network meta-analysis showed that rituximab appears to be an efficacious, well tolerated steroid-sparing adjuvant for pemphigus.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF