1. Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysis
- Author
-
Hui Xie, Zhong‐hai Shen, Hai‐chao Xu, Yao‐feng Jin, and Xue‐kang Pan
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Femoral shaft ,Femoral Shaft Fracture ,Nonunion ,Bone Nails ,Cochrane Library ,law.invention ,Intramedullary rod ,Fracture Fixation, Internal ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,lcsh:Orthopedic surgery ,Blood loss ,law ,Humans ,Medicine ,Femoral shaft fractures ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,Augmentative plating ,030222 orthopedics ,Clinical Article ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary ,Surgery ,lcsh:RD701-811 ,Fractures, Ununited ,Exchanging nailing ,Meta-analysis ,Intramedullary nailing ,Clinical Articles ,business ,Union rate ,Bone Plates ,Femoral Fractures ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objective The aim of this meta‐analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of augmentative plating (AP) and exchange nailing (EN) in the treatment of nonunion of femoral shaft fracture. Methods For the present meta‐analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant articles up to April 2019. Two investigators independently evaluated the quality of original publications following the guidelines proposed by the Cochrane Handbook. Data were extracted from the studies and analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results Five studies were included in this meta‐analysis, with a total of 506 patients. There were 232 patients in the AP group and 276 patients in the EN group. The AP group was associated with higher union rate (OR, 11.66; 95% CI, 4.31–31.50; P
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF