Search

Pregnancy loss has multifactorial causes, and the maternal risk factors are the most investigated. Therefore, this review investigates the current literature regarding the effect of paternal health on pregnancy loss. This review is conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed and Medline were the primary sources of information. The online tool covidence.org was used for the screening process. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for assessment of risk of bias across the non-RCT (Randomized Controlled Trials) included studies. Six cohort studies and one randomised clinical trial were included for assessment in this review. Especially three large retrospective studies reported that circulatory paternal health issue, increasing metabolic syndrome diagnoses and paternal age was significantly associated with a higher risk of pregnancy loss. Lower pregnancy loss was also found in couples with diabetes in the man compared to couples without diabetes. One study suggests a connection between varicocelectomy and improved sperm DNA fragmentation and lower abortion rate. This review confirms that paternal age, somatic health and particularly health regarding cardiovascular and metabolic disease are associated positively with risks of pregnancy loss. However, further research may lead to evidence, which are more conclusive.

ObjectiveTo compare the ongoing pregnancy rate between a freeze-all strategy and a fresh transfer strategy in assisted reproductive technology treatment.DesignMulticentre, randomised controlled superiority trial.SettingOutpatient fertility clinics at eight public hospitals in Denmark, Sweden, and Spain.Participants460 women aged 18-39 years with regular menstrual cycles starting their first, second, or third treatment cycle of in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.InterventionsWomen were randomised at baseline on cycle day 2 or 3 to one of two treatment groups: the freeze-all group (elective freezing of all embryos) who received gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist triggering and single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in a subsequent modified natural cycle; or the fresh transfer group who received human chorionic gonadotropin triggering and single blastocyst transfer in the fresh cycle. Women in the fresh transfer group with more than 18 follicles larger than 11 mm on the day of triggering had elective freezing of all embryos and postponement of transfer as a safety measure.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy rate defined as a detectable fetal heart beat after eight weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were live birth rate, positive human chorionic gonadotropin rate, time to pregnancy, and pregnancy related, obstetric, and neonatal complications. The primary analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.ResultsOngoing pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the freeze-all and fresh transfer groups (27.8% (62/223) v 29.6% (68/230); risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.10, P=0.76). Additionally, no significant difference was found in the live birth rate (27.4% (61/223) for the freeze-all group and 28.7% (66/230) for the fresh transfer group; risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.10, P=0.83). No significant differences between groups were observed for positive human chorionic gonadotropin rate or pregnancy loss, and none of the women had severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; only one hospital admission related to this condition occurred in the fresh transfer group. The risks of pregnancy related, obstetric, and neonatal complications did not differ between the two groups except for a higher mean birth weight after frozen blastocyst transfer and an increased risk of prematurity after fresh blastocyst transfer. Time to pregnancy was longer in the freeze-all group.ConclusionsIn women with regular menstrual cycles, a freeze-all strategy with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist triggering for final oocyte maturation did not result in higher ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates than a fresh transfer strategy. The findings warrant caution in the indiscriminate application of a freeze-all strategy when no apparent risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is present.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02746562.

BackgroundThe probability of a pregnancy, live birth, stillbirth and abortion has never been assessed in women with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) in a large population-based study.MethodsWe included 1006 women (15–49 years) registered with NF1 in the Danish National Patient Registry or followed in two national Centers for Rare Diseases and 10 020 women from the Danish population. Information on pregnancy outcomes was ascertained from health registries. Cumulative incidence, mean cumulative count, hazard ratios (HRs) and proportion ratios (PRs) with 95% CIs were calculated.ResultsThe cumulative incidence of a first pregnancy at age 50 years was slightly lower in women with NF1 (74%; 95% CI 70 to 77) than in population comparisons (78%; 95% CI 77 to 79). When all pregnancies were included, two pregnancies were expected per woman at age of 50 years, irrespective of a NF1 diagnosis. The hazard of a pregnancy did not differ between women with NF1 (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.11) and the comparisons after adjustment for somatic and psychiatric disease. The proportion of pregnancies that resulted in a live birth was 63% (783/1252) among women NF1 and 68% (8432/12 465) among the comparisons, yielding a PR of 0.95 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.00). The proportions of stillbirths (PR 2.83; 95% CI 1.63 to 4.93) and spontaneous abortions (PR 1.40; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.79) were increased in women with NF1.ConclusionsA similar hazard for pregnancy was observed for women with NF1 and population comparisons after adjustment for potential medical consequences of NF1. However, women with NF1 experienced more spontaneous abortions and stillbirths.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the 12 weeks following early pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived by IVF?SUMMARY ANSWER: The VTE risk is low in the 12 weeks following early pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived by IVF.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: There is an excess VTE risk during first trimester in complete IVF pregnancies leading to delivery. It is unknown whether this excess VTE risk also is present in IVF pregnancies terminated by early pregnancy loss (implantation failure, missed abortion, or spontaneous or induced abortion before 10 completed gestational weeks).STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A nationwide registry-based cohort study including all Danish IVF pregnancies registered in the Danish IVF Register between 1995 and 2005. Women who underwent frozen embryo replacement or oocyte donation were not included.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We included all 24 931 IVF treatments leading to pregnancy among 19 260 women. We identified 16 701 complete IVF pregnancies, 7567 IVF pregnancies with early pregnancy loss, and 663 IVF pregnancies terminated by late abortion (≥gestational weeks 10). We followed women for 12 weeks after termination of pregnancy and calculated the absolute risk of VTE during follow-up with 95% CI. As a relative risk estimate, we calculated the risk ratio for VTE following IVF pregnancies with early loss compared to the VTE risk following complete IVF pregnancies.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: During the 12 weeks of follow-up, only one case of VTE occurred in the group of early pregnancy loss, none in the late abortion group, and 13 VTE cases occurred in complete IVF pregnancies. The VTE risk per 10 000 pregnancies was 1.3 [0.03-7.4] for IVF pregnancies with early loss and 7.8 [4.1-13.3] for complete pregnancies; the corresponding risk ratio was 0.17 [0.02-1.3]. Thus, we found a low absolute VTE risk in the 12 weeks following early pregnancy loss in IVF pregnancies. The relative VTE risk was low in comparison to the VTE risk in early gestation reported for complete IVF pregnancies and for Danish background pregnancies.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Despite the use of complete nationwide data, only a few VTE events were available for the statistical analyses thereby limiting the precision of our estimates. We included both inpatient and outpatient VTE hospital diagnoses, but we cannot rule out the occurrence of VTE cases not diagnosed at hospital and hence not registered in the National Patient Registry. No information was available on the use of prophylactic low molecular weight heparin: access to such might have helped to explain our findings, but would not have changed our conclusions.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of the present study do not indicate a need for prophylactic anticoagulant therapy in women suffering early IVF pregnancy loss without other risk factors.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Millions of doses of HPV vaccine have been administered globally. Inadvertent administration of HPV vaccine during pregnancy occurs given that the main recipients of the vaccine are fertile young women, who might be unaware of their pregnancy at the time of their vaccination. To investigate the subject of HPV vaccine and pregnancy , the databases of PubMed and Embase were searched to find the relevant literature published in English within the last 10 y. Most of the evidence pertaining to fetal adverse events following HPV vaccination relates to spontaneous miscarriage. None of the relevant studies found any significantly increased rate of spontaneous abortion in the overall analyses. There was no indication of other HPV vaccine-associated adverse events in pregnancy or immediately post-conception.

Objectives To display and discuss the reasons and consequences of length and time-dependent bias. They might occur in presence of a time-dependent study entry or a time-dependent exposure which might change from unexposed to exposed. Study Design and Setting Recalling the popular study of Oscar nominees and using a real-data example from hospital epidemiology, we give innovative and easy-to-understand graphical presentations of how these biases corrupt the analyses via distorted time-at-risk. Cumulative hazard plots and Cox proportional hazards models were used. We are building bridges to medical disciplines such as critical care medicine, hepatology, pharmaco-epidemiology, transplantation medicine, neurology, gynecology and cardiology. Results In presence of time-dependent bias, the hazard ratio (comparing exposed with unexposed) is artificially underestimated. The length bias leads to an artificial underestimation of the overall hazard. When both biases coexist it can lead to different directions of biased hazard ratios. Conclusion Since length and time-dependent bias might occur in several medical disciplines, we conclude that understanding and awareness are the best prevention of survival bias.

OBJECTIVE: Brucellosis is a zoonosis with high morbidity in humans. This disease has gained interest recently due to its re-emergence and potential for weaponization. Pregnant women with this disease can develop severe complications. Its association with adverse obstetric outcomes is not clearly understood. The objective of this study was to describe the obstetric outcomes of brucellosis in pregnancy. METHODS: Cases of pregnant women with active brucellosis seen at the Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia from 1970 to 2012 were reviewed. Diagnostic criteria were a positive agglutination test and/or positive blood/bone marrow culture. Presentation and outcomes data were collected. The Chi-square test was used for nominal variables. A p-value of