1. Waiting in Pain II: An Updated Review of the Provision of Persistent Pain Services in Australia
- Author
-
Anthony Kavanagh, Anne L. J. Burke, Michael Farrell, and Malcolm Hogg
- Subjects
Adult ,050103 clinical psychology ,Persistent Pain ,Time Factors ,Waiting Lists ,Clinical Neurology ,Staffing ,Pain ,Health Services Accessibility ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Pain Management ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Child ,Pandemics ,Original Research ,Service (business) ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,Pelvic pain ,Persistent pain ,05 social sciences ,Australia ,Chronic pain ,COVID-19 ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Disadvantaged ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Chronic Pain ,Action plan ,Neurology (clinical) ,Medical emergency ,medicine.symptom ,AcademicSubjects/MED00010 ,Cancer pain ,business ,Wait Time ,Treatment Access - Abstract
Objective To provide an update on Australian persistent pain services (number, structure, funding, wait times, activity). Methods An updated national search was conducted. Of those identified, 74 persistent pain services provided detailed responses between July 2016 and February 2018 (64 adult, seven pediatric, two pelvic pain, and one cancer pain). A similar structure to the original Waiting in Pain (WIP) survey was used, and participants chose online or telephone completion. Results Pediatric pain services had more than doubled but remained limited. Adult services had also increased, with a concurrent decrease in median wait times and an increase in the number of new referrals seen each year. Despite this, some lengthy wait times (≥3 years) persisted. Wait times were longest at clinics using public or combined funding models and offering pain management group programs (PMGPs). Although clinical activity had increased, medical staffing had not, suggesting that clinics were operating differently. Privately funded clinics performed more procedures than publicly funded services. Use of PMGPs had increased, but program structure remained diverse. Conclusions Specialist pain services have expanded since the original WIP survey, facilitating treatment access for many. However, wait time range suggested that the most disadvantaged individuals still experienced the longest wait times, often far exceeding the recommended 6-month maximum wait. More needs to be done. Numerous developments (e.g., National Strategic Action Plan for Pain Management, health system changes as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic) will continue to influence the delivery of pain services in Australia, and repeated analysis of service structures and wait times will optimize our health system response to the management of this condition.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF