1. Neural adaptations to long-term resistance training: evidence for the confounding effect of muscle size on the interpretation of surface electromyography
- Author
-
Thomas G. Balshaw, Garry J. Massey, Marcel B. Lanza, Jakob Škarabot, Thomas M. Maden-Wilkinson, Jonathan P. Folland, and Sumiaki Maeo
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Muscle size ,Physiology ,Strength training ,Electromyography ,Quadriceps Muscle ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Isometric Contraction ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Muscle, Skeletal ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Neural adaptation ,Resistance Training ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,030229 sport sciences ,Adaptation, Physiological ,Peripheral ,Compound muscle action potential ,Electrophysiology ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cardiology ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Muscle Contraction - Abstract
This study compared elbow flexor (EF; Experiment 1) and knee extensor (KE; Experiment 2) maximal compound action potential (Mmax) amplitude between long-term resistance trained (LTRT; n=15 and n=14, 6±3 and 4±1 years of training) and untrained (UT; n=14 and n=49) men; and examined the effect of normalising electromyography (EMG) during maximal voluntary torque (MVT) production to Mmax amplitude on differences between LTRT and UT. EMG was recorded from multiple sites and muscles of EF and KE, Mmax was evoked with percutaneous nerve stimulation, and muscle size was assessed with ultrasonography (thickness, EF) and magnetic resonance imaging (cross-sectional area, KE). Muscle-electrode distance (MED) was measured to account for the effect of adipose tissue on EMG and Mmax. LTRT displayed greater MVT (+66-71%, p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF