Search

Background Standard treatments for small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) have not been established. In this study, we aimed to estimate the optimal treatment strategy for SCCC. Methods This was a multicenter retrospective study. Medical records of patients with pathologically proven SCCC treated between 2003 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the differences in survival according to stage, treatment strategy, and chemotherapy regimen. Results Data of 78 patients were collected, and after excluding patients without immunohistopathological staining, 65 patients were evaluated. The median age of the included patients was 47 (range: 24–83) years. The numbers of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stages I-IIA, IIB-IVA, IVB were 23 (35%), 34 (52%), and 8 (12%), respectively. Of 53 patients who had undergone chemotherapy, 35 and 18 received SCCC and non-SCCC regimens as their first-line chemotherapy regimen, respectively. The 5-year OS for all patients was 49%, while for patients with FIGO stages I-IIA, IIB-IVA, IVB, it was 60, 50, and 0%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for patients who underwent treatment with SCCC versus non-SCCC regimens were 59 and 13% (p Conclusion Our results suggest that the application of an SCCC regimen such as EP or IP as first-line chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced SCCC may play a key role in OS. These findings need to be validated in future nationwide, prospective clinical studies.

Background Despite advances in chemotherapy, curing multiple liver metastases is quite rare. Even when response is obtained, regrowth of the tumors is almost inevitable. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of helical tomotherapy for chemo‐refractory multiple liver metastases. Methods Forty‐five patients with chemo‐refractory multiple (3‐10) liver metastases after standard systemic chemotherapy entered the single‐institutional prospective study. Liver metastases were the major disease; however, 31 also had uncontrolled primary lesions and/or other metastases. The prescribed dose was 55 Gy in 25 fractions. The median planning target volume (PTV) and normal liver volume (NLV) of first treatment were 128 cm3 and 1175 cm3, respectively. The median of V15Gy, V30Gy, and mean dose to NLV were 45%, 23%, and 19.4 Gy, respectively. Results Forty‐two patients (93%) completed the planned treatment. Median survival time (MST) for all patients was 8 months, and the 1‐year survival rate was 29%. The median local control (LC) period was 5 months and the 6‐month control rate of irradiated tumors was 33%. A ≥30% decrease in tumor markers was observed in 31%. The most common grade 3 toxicity was lymphocytopenia (40%), followed by fatigue (6%). Radiation‐induced liver disease (RILD) was not observed. Pancreatic cancer as the primary tumor, distant metastases outside the liver, low pretreatment neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and low pretreatment monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were associated with poorer prognoses. Conclusions Helical tomotherapy for chemo‐refractory multiple liver metastases is a feasible and potentially effective treatment. Incorporating tomotherapy into the first‐line treatment in combination with systemic chemotherapy should be considered. Trial registration number CROG 12005., Despite the remarkable advances of systemic chemotherapy for multiple liver metastases, the efficacy is still limited and cure of the multiple lesions is difficult. Helical tomotherapy for chemo‐refractory multiple liver metastases was suggested to be a feasible and potentially effective treatment with acceptable adverse events.

Pleural dissemination is a common pattern of failure after initial treatment of thymoma and thymic carcinoma, but there is no standardized treatment. As these tumors are relatively radiosensitive, we investigated the effectiveness of radiotherapy. Twenty patients underwent 33 series of local radiotherapy for 96 pleural dissemination lesions after initial treatment. Conventional radiotherapy (CRT), tomotherapy, and combination of the two were employed in 19, 13, and 1 series, respectively. The median follow-up period after the first irradiation for pleural dissemination was 46 months (range, 14–161). For all 20 patients, overall survival (OS) rates from initial radiotherapy for pleural dissemination were 100% at three years and 86% at five years. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates after 33 series of radiotherapy were 30% at three years and 16% at five years. Local control (LC) rates for 96 lesions were 98% at three years and 96% at five years. In-field recurrence was observed in only two among the 96 lesions. One patient (5%) developed grade 3 radiation pneumonitis and another (5%) developed grade 3 pericardial effusion. No other serious adverse events were observed. When disseminated nodules can be covered within localized fields, local radiotherapy may be a treatment option. Using tomotherapy, multiple lesions can be treated safely.

Background To treat multiple targets separated in the craniocaudal direction within a short time, we invented a new technique using multiple static‐port tomotherapy with the dynamic‐jaw mode and named it the pseudo‐DJDC (pDJDC) technique. We compared the pDJDC plans and helical tomotherapy plans using the dynamic‐jaw mode (HDJ) for multiple targets. In the pDJDC plans, we used a beam set with 2–7 ports to the targets at the same level in the craniocaudal direction, and employed another beam set for other targets using different port angles (9–12 angles in total). Methods In seven patients, two plans using the pDJDC and HDJ techniques were compared. For multiple targets (n = 2–6), 20–60 Gy in 2‐ to 7.5‐Gy fractions were prescribed for the planning target volumes at D50%. The conformity index, uniformity index (D5%/D95%), dose distribution in the lung, and treatment time were evaluated. Results The median conformity index of all seven patients was 3.0 for the pDJDC plans and 2.4 for the HDJ plans (P = 0.031). The median uniformity indices of the planning target volume (n = 25) for the two plans were 1.048 and 1.057, respectively (P = 0.10). For five patients with thoracic targets, the median mean lung doses were 2.6 Gy and 2.4 Gy, respectively (P = 0.63). The median V5Gy and V20Gy of the lungs in the five patients were 11.8% and 8.5% (P = 0.63), and 1.6% and 2.1% (P = 0.31), respectively. The pDJDC plans reduced the treatment time by 48% compared to the HDJ plans (median: 462 and 884 sec, respectively, P = 0.031). Conclusion The pDJDC technique allows treatment of multiple targets in almost half the time of the HDJ technique. The pDJDC plans were comparable to the HDJ plans in dose distribution, although the conformity index deteriorated.