Search

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction by means of electroanatomic mapping (EAM) systems, allows for the understanding of the mechanism of focal or re-entrant arrhythmic circuits, which can be identified by means of dynamic (activation and propagation) and static (voltage) color-coded maps. However, besides this conventional use, EAM may offer helpful anatomical and functional information for tissue characterisation in several clinical settings. Today, data regarding electromechanical myocardial viability, scar detection in ischaemic and nonischaemic cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic right ventricle dysplasia (ARVC/D) definition are mostly consolidated, while emerging results are becoming available in contexts such as Brugada syndrome and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) implant procedures. As part of an invasive procedure, EAM has not yet been widely adopted as a stand-alone tool in the diagnostic path. We aim to review the data in the current literature regarding the use of 3D EAM systems beyond the definition of arrhythmia. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction by means of electroanatomic mapping (EAM) systems, allows for the understanding of the mechanism of focal or re-entrant arrhythmic circuits along with pacing techniques. However, besides this conventional use, EAM may offer helpful anatomical and functional information. Data regarding electromechanical scar detection in ischaemic (and nonischaemic) cardiomyopathy are mostly consolidated, while emerging results are becoming available in contexts such as arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVC/D) definition and Brugada syndrome. As part of an invasive procedure, EAM has not yet been widely adopted as a stand-alone tool in the diagnostic path. We aim to review the current literature regarding the use of 3D EAM systems for right ventricle (RV) functional characterisation beyond the definition of arrhythmia.

Several epidemiological studies found an association between acute exposure to fine particulate matter of less than 2.5 &mu, m and 10 &mu, m in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5 and PM10) and cardiovascular diseases, ventricular fibrillation incidence and mortality. The effects of pollution on atrial fibrillation (AF) beyond the first several hours of exposure remain controversial. A total of 145 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (ICD-CRT), or pacemakers were enrolled in this multicentric prospective study. Daily levels of PM2.5 and PM10 were collected from monitoring stations within 20 km of the patient&rsquo, s residence. A Firth Logistic Regression model was used to evaluate the association between AF and daily exposure to PM2.5 and PM10. Exposure levels to PM2.5 and PM10 were moderate, being above the World Health Organization (WHO) PM2.5 and PM10 thresholds of 25 &mu, g/m3 and 50 &mu, g/m3, respectively, on 26% and 18% of the follow-up days. An association was found between daily levels of PM2.5 and PM10 and AF (95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 1.34&ndash, 2.40 and 1.44&ndash, 4.28, respectively) for an increase of 50 &micro, g/m3 above the WHO threshold. Daily exposure to moderate PM2.5 and PM10 levels is associated with AF in patients who are not prone to AF.

Electroanatomic Mapping for CRT Implantation RegistryIntroduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation guided by an electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) is an emerging technique that may reduce fluoroscopy and angiography use and provide information on coronary sinus (CS) electrical activation. We evaluated the outcome of the EAMS-guided CRT implantation technique in a multicenter registry. Methods During the period 2011–2014 we enrolled 125 patients (80% males, age 74 [71–77] years) who underwent CRT implantation by using the EnSite system to create geometric models of the patient's cardiac chambers, build activation mapping of the CS, and guide leads positioning. Two hundred and fifty patients undergoing traditional CRT implantation served as controls. Success and complication rates, fluoroscopy and total procedure times in the overall study population and according to center experience were collected. Centers that performed ≥10 were defined as highly experienced. Results Left ventricular lead implantation was successful in 122 (98%) cases and 242 (97%) controls (P = 0.76). Median fluoroscopy time was 4.1 (0.3–10.4) minutes in cases versus 16 (11–26) minutes in controls (P < 0.001). Coronary sinus angiography was performed in 33 (26%) cases and 208 (83%) controls (P < 0.001). Complications occurred in 5 (4%) cases and 17 (7%) controls (P = 0.28). Median fluoroscopy time (median 11 minutes vs. 3 minutes, P < 0.001) and CS angiography rate (55% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in low experienced centers, while success rate and complications rate were similar. Conclusions EAMS-guided CRT implantation proved safe and effective in both high- and low-experienced centers and allowed to reduce fluoroscopy use by ≈75% and angiography rate by ≈70%.

BACKGROUND: Pacing in the right ventricle can cause a variety of detrimental effects, including atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT/AF).OBJECTIVE: To evaluate incidence and predictors of persistent AT/AF in patients with long term exposure to ventricular pacing.METHODS: In a multi-center international trial, 605 patients (75±11 years, 240 females), referred for replacement of an implanted pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), with history of high percentage (>40%) ventricular pacing, were randomly allocated to standard dual-chamber pacing or Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP), a pacing modality which minimizes ventricular pacing. Main end point of this secondary analysis of the PreFER MVP randomized study was persistent AT/AF, defined as ≥7 consecutive days with AT/AF or AT/AF interrupted by atrial cardioversion or AT/AF present during 2 consecutive follow-up visits.RESULTS: Persistent AT/AF was observed in 71 patients (11.7%) after 2 years of follow-up. At multivariable Cox regression analysis, prior AT/AF (hazard ratio (HR)=2.85, 95% confidence intervals (CI)=1.20-6.22, p=0.017) and ventricular pacing percentage, estimated in the first 3 months, ≥10% (HR=3.24, CI=1.13-9.31, p=0.029) resulted as independent predictors for persistent AT/AF. MVP was associated with persistent AT/AF risk (HR=3.41, CI=1.10-10.6, p=0.024) in the subgroup of patients with a baseline long PR interval (PR>230 ms), but not in the whole population.CONCLUSION: In pacemaker and ICD replacement patients, high percentage of ventricular pacing is associated with higher risk of persistent AT/AF. The use of algorithms which minimize right ventricular pacing may benefit patients with normal spontaneous AV conduction but should be evaluated with caution in patients with long PR interval.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00293241.

An optimal active-can lead configuration during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement is important to obtain an adequate defibrillation safety margin. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the rate of the first shock success at defibrillation testing according to the type of lead implant (single vs. dual coil) and shock polarity (cathodal and anodal) in a large series of consecutive patients who received transvenous ICDs.This was a multicenter study enrolling 469 consecutive patients. Single- versus dual-coil leads and cathodal versus anodal polarity were evaluated at defibrillation testing. In all cases, the value of the energy for the first shock was set to 20 J less than the maximum energy deliverable from the device.A total of 469 patients underwent defibrillation testing: 158 (34 %) had dual-coil and 311 (66 %) had single-coil lead systems configuration, 254 (54 %) received anodal shock and 215 (46 %) received cathodal shock. In 35 (7.4 %) patients, the shock was unsuccessful. No significant differences in the outcome of defibrillation testing using single- versus dual-coil lead were observed but the multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of shock failure using cathodal shock polarity (OR 2.37, 95 % CI 1.12-5.03).Both single- and dual-coil transvenous ICD lead systems were associated with high rates of successful ICD implantation, and we found no significant differences in ventricular arrhythmias interruption between the two ICD lead systems configuration. Instead, anodal defibrillation was more likely to be successful than cathodal defibrillation.

Summary Background Although the effects of air pollution on mortality have been clearly shown in many epidemiological and observational studies, the pro-arrhythmic effects remain unknown. We aimed to assess the short-term effects of air pollution on ventricular arrhythmias in a population of high-risk patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators (ICD-CRT). Methods In this prospective multicentre study, we assessed 281 patients (median age 71 years) across nine centres in the Veneto region of Italy. Episodes of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation that were recorded by the diagnostic device were considered in this analysis. Concentrations of particulate matter of less than 10 μm (PM 10 ) and less than 2·5 μm (PM 2·5 ) in aerodynamic diameter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide, and ozone were obtained daily from monitoring stations, and the 24 h median value was considered. Each patient was associated with exposure data from the monitoring station that was closest to their residence. Patients were followed up for 1 year and then scheduled to have a closing visit, within 1 more year. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01723761. Findings Participants were enrolled from April 1, 2011, to Sept 30, 2012, and follow-ups (completed on April 5, 2014) ranged from 637 to 1177 days (median 652 days). The incidence of episodes of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation correlated significantly with PM 2·5 (p 10 . An analysis of ventricular fibrillation episodes alone showed a significant increase in risk of higher PM 2·5 (p=0·002) and PM 10 values (p=0·0057). None of the gaseous pollutants were significantly linked to the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. In a subgroup analysis of patients with or without a previous myocardial infarction, only the first showed a significant association between particulate matter and episodes of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Interpretation Particulate matter has acute pro-arrhythmic effects in a population of high-risk patients, which increase on exposure to fine particles and in patients who have experienced a previous myocardial infarction. The time sequence of the arrhythmic events suggests there is an underlying neurally mediated mechanism. From a clinical point of view, the results of our study should encourage physicians to also consider environmental risk when addressing the prevention of arrhythmic events, particularly in patients with coronary heart disease, advising them to avoid exposure to high levels of fine particulate matter. Funding There was no funding source for this study.

Manpower of Cardiac Device Home MonitoringBackground This study aimed to assess manpower and resource consumption of the HomeGuide workflow model for remote monitoring (Biotronik Home Monitoring [HM], Biotronik SE & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany) of cardiac implantable electronic devices in daily clinical practice. Methods The model established a cooperative interaction between a reference nurse (RN) for ordinary management, and a responsible physician (RP) for medical decisions in each outpatient clinic. RN reviewed remote transmissions and alerts, addressing critical cases to the RP. Results A total of 1,650 patients were enrolled in 75 sites: 25% pacemakers (PM), 22% dual-, 27% single-chamber implantable defibrillators (ICD), 2% PM with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and 24% ICD-CRT. During a median follow-up of 18 (10–31) months, 3,364 HM sessions were performed (74% by the RN, 26% by the RP) to complete 18,478 remote follow-ups. Median duration of remote follow-ups was 1.2 (0.6–2.0) minutes, corresponding to a manpower of 43.3 (4.2–94.8) minutes/month every 100 patients for nurses and 10.2 (0.1–31.1) for physicians (P < 0.0001). RN submitted 15% of remote transmissions to RP, who decided unscheduled follow-ups in 12% of the cases. The median manpower for phone calls was 1.9 (0.8–16.5) minutes/month every 100 contacted patients. There were 2.84 in-hospital visits/patient, 0.46 of which triggered by HM findings. A cumulative per-patient HM follow-up time of 15.4 minutes (20% of total follow-up time) allowed remote detection of 73% of actionable events. Conclusions HM implemented in the HomeGuide workflow model required

Remote Monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended in management of Atrial Fibrillation (AF), which is a recognized risk factor for thromboembolism. We tried to elucidate whether stroke incidence observed in a large, remotely monitored population was consistent with the CHA2DS2VASc risk profile.Data from 1650 patients [76% male, age 72 (63-68), CHA2DS2VASc score 3.0 (2.0-4.0)] enrolled during the HomeGuide study and monitored with a daily-transmission RM system providing automatic alerts for AF, were analysed. Of those, 25% had a pacemaker and 75% an implantable cardioverter defibrillator with or without cardiac resynchronization. Estimations of the expected thromboembolic events were based on the population CHA2DS2VASc score profile used in a computer-simulated Markov model.Eight thromboembolic events were observed with a 4-year cumulative stroke rate of 0.8% (confidence interval, 0.4%-1.5%). Simulations returned from 18.7 to 17.1 expected events, depending on the AF duration assumed to trigger anticoagulation (one-sample log-rank p0.03). During the study period, 681 (84%) AF episodes and 129 (16%) atrial tachycardias were detected in 291 patients (18%): 93% of episodes were detected remotely in 269 patients, 66% of whom had no history of AF. Medical interventions were necessary in 305 episodes, 85% of which were detected remotely. Reaction time was 1 (0-6) days for remotely-detected episodes and 33 (14-121) days for episodes detected in clinic (p0.0001).In a large CIED population followed remotely for up to 4years, the incidence of thromboembolic events was less than half the estimations based on the CHA2DS2VASc risk profile.

Aims The remote monitoring of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) promotes accurate supervision of the patient and device. Alert settings appear to be a crucial parameter of its efficacy. The purpose of our study was to evaluate various settings for alerts and alert message management in patients with pacemakers and ICDs. Methods and results We prospectively evaluated 282 patients (181 males, 101 females, mean age 72 ± 11 years) who were referred to nine electrophysiological centres in the Veneto region of Italy for a pacemaker (76 patients) or ICD (206 patients) implant in which remote monitoring was activated (Biotronik Home Monitoring®, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). During a mean follow-up of 382 ± 261 days, we received 106 039 transmissions. In the pacemaker group, the alerts that were most frequently activated were those concerning battery exhaustion, surveying impedances, sensing and threshold measurements, as well as missing transmissions. In the ICD/ICD-cardiac resynchronization therapy group, the alerts nearly always activated were those concerning a detection setoff, battery exhaustion, critical values of impedance, or ineffective maximum energy shock. In both groups, the alarms for heart rate monitoring and supraventricular arrhythmia were activated in fewer cases at higher variability among centres. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that more attention is paid to critical technical data than to patients’ clinical profiles, probably to limit an excessive flow of data into the centre. Accurate alert settings, personalized to the patients' features, are essential for easier and more effective management of patients who are followed remotely.

Efficient myocardial stimulation ensures reliable pacing with restricted energy expense. We assessed the ventricular stimulation performance of a single-pass lead for VDD pacing (Phymos 4, Medico) in the chronic follow-up (28±14 months) of 29 implants. This lead is tined, non-steroid eluting and

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that unnecessary right ventricular pacing has detrimental effects.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether minimization of ventricular pacing as compared with standard dual-chamber pacing (DDD) improves clinical outcomes in patients referred for pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) replacement.METHODS: In an international single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we compared DDD with managed ventricular pacing (MVP), a pacing mode developed to minimize ventricular pacing by promoting intrinsic atrioventricular conduction. We included patients referred for device replacement with >40% ventricular pacing, no cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade indication, no permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), and no permanent complete atrioventricular block. Follow-up was for 2 years. The primary end point was cardiovascular hospitalization. The intention-to-treat analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.RESULTS: We randomized 605 patients (556 referred for pacemaker and 49 referred for ICD replacement; mean age 75 ± 11 years; 365 [60%] men, at 7.7 ± 3.3 years from first device implantation) to MVP (n = 299) or DDD (n = 306). We found no significant differences in the primary end point cardiovascular hospitalization (MVP: 16.3% vs DDD: 14.5%; P = .72) and the secondary end point persistent AF (MVP: 15.4% vs DDD: 11.2%; P = .08), permanent AF (MVP: 4.1% vs DDD: 3.1%; P = .44), and composite of death and cardiovascular hospitalization (MVP: 23.9% vs DDD: 20.2%; P = .48). MVP reduced right ventricular pacing (median 5% vs 86%; Wilcoxon, P < .0001) as compared with DDD.CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred for pacemaker and ICD replacement with clinically well-tolerated long-term exposure to >40% ventricular pacing in the ventricle, a strategy to minimize ventricular pacing is not superior to standard DDD in reducing incidence of cardiovascular hospitalizations.

Aims The HomeGuide Registry was a prospective study ([NCT01459874][1]), implementing a model for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in daily clinical practice, to estimate effectiveness in major cardiovascular event detection and management. Methods and results The workflow for remote monitoring [Biotronik Home Monitoring (HM)] was based on primary nursing: each patient was assigned to an expert nurse for management and to a responsible physician for medical decisions. In-person visits were scheduled once a year. Seventy-five Italian sites enrolled 1650 patients [27% pacemakers, 27% single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), 22% dual-chamber ICDs, 24% ICDs with cardiac resynchronization therapy]. Population resembled the expected characteristics of CIED patients. During a 20 ± 13 month follow-up, 2471 independently adjudicated events were collected in 838 patients (51%): 2033 (82%) were detected during HM sessions; 438 (18%) during in-person visits. Sixty were classified as false-positive, with generalized estimating equation-adjusted sensitivity and positive predictive value of 84.3% [confidence interval (CI), 82.5–86.0%] and 97.4% (CI, 96.5–98.2%), respectively. Overall, 95% of asymptomatic and 73% of actionable events were detected during HM sessions. Median reaction time was 3 days [interquartile range (IQR), 1–14 days]. Generalized estimating equation-adjusted incremental utility, calculated according to four properties of major clinical interest, was in favour of the HM sessions: +0.56 (CI, 0.53–0.58%), P < 0.0001. Resource consumption: 3364 HM sessions performed (76% by nurses), median committed monthly manpower of 55.5 (IQR, 22.0–107.0) min × health personnel/100 patients. Conclusion Home Monitoring was highly effective in detecting and managing clinical events in CIED patients in daily practice with remarkably low manpower and resource consumption. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01459874&atom=%2Feuropace%2F15%2F7%2F970.atom

Radiofrequency transcatheter ablation is an effective and safe treatment for atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia. Slow pathway ablation is considered the ablative technique of choice, but when atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia is associated with a prolonged PR interval at sinus rhythm, a higher risk of delayed atrioventricular (AV) block has been reported. Studies on the subject are few, enrolling low numbers of patients with variable selection criteria and producing different results. Hence, optimal ablation strategy remains controversial. The aim of this study is to review the available knowledge on the topic. Experience from our centers is also briefly reported.

The electric treatment of cardiac bradyarrhythmias by an implanted pacemaker is mandatory whenever the reduction in ventricular rate results in a functional impairment affecting health, safety, and quality of life [1]. Nevertheless, it is well-known that electrical stimulation of the heart may have disadvantages and drawbacks, which have been progressively identified and brought to attention as a consequence of increasing clinical experience and medical knowledge. Parallel improvements in pacing technology have allowed many essential issues to be addressed and solved, such as the prevention of competitive pacing and synchronization of atrial and ventricular stimulation to maintain physiological sequential activation. In the last decade, the increasing use of biventricular pacing in the therapy of heart failure has underlined the relevance of interventricular and intraventricular synchronization for effective pump function. However, conventional singlesite pacing in the right ventricular apex (RVA) necessarily implies myocardial conduction of the evoked action potential, resulting in deep modification of the ventricular activation pattern and delayed contraction of the left ventricle (LV), as indicated by the altered axis and increased duration of the QRS complex and confirmed by echocardiographic observation. The shortand long-term impacts of RVA pacing on cardiac hemodynamics have therefore become major concerns in the care of patients presenting with bradycardia [2].