Search

Background Supportive care improves outcomes in many cancers. In the pivotal STORM study selinexor, a first-in-class, oral, selective exportin 1 inhibitor, and low-dose dexamethasone proved to be an effective treatment for patients with triple-class refractory myeloma. We conducted a post-hoc analysis to test the hypothesis that increased utilization of supportive care measures in a sub-cohort of the STORM study prolonged treatment duration with- and improved efficacy of- selinexor. Materials and Methods The STORM protocol included specific recommendations for dose modifications and supportive care to mitigate selinexor most common adverse events (AEs) including nausea, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. The Tisch Cancer Center at Mount Sinai School of Medicine (MSSM) incorporated additional supportive care strategies within the framework of the STORM protocol. Results Of 123 patients enrolled in STORM, 28 were enrolled at MSSM. The overall response rate was 26.2% in the overall STORM population and 53.6% in the MSSM cohort. Moreover, duration of response, progression free survival, and overall survival were longer in the MSSM cohort. AEs and dose modification events were similar in the 2 groups. The MSSM cohort had more dose reductions (67.9% vs. 50.5%), and higher use of multiple antiemetic agents (71.4% vs. 50.1%) and romiplostim (32.1% vs. 6.3%), but less discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs (3.6% vs. 25.3%). Conclusion These results suggests that in addition to more frequent dose reductions, prompter and more aggressive supportive care may have contributed to the low discontinuation rate, longer duration therapy, and greater efficacy rates observed in the MSSM cohort. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02336815).

Introduction We aimed to characterize real-world utilization of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) in women with ovarian cancer (OC). Methods This retrospective observational study of claims data from US MarketScan® Commercial/Medicare Supplemental databases included women with OC initiating olaparib, niraparib, or rucaparib from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019. Patients were observed from first outpatient prescription until at least 30 days’ follow-up. Clinical events of interest (CEIs), based on adverse reactions in PARPi prescribing information, were identified from claims using ICD-9/10 codes. Other outcomes included dose modification, persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost. Results Overall, 303, 348, and 162 women with OC received olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, respectively. During follow-up, risk of any CEI was higher with niraparib versus olaparib (odds ratio 3.36 [95% confidence interval 2.00–5.65]) and niraparib versus rucaparib (2.09 [1.10–3.95]), with no significant difference between rucaparib and olaparib (1.61 [0.93–2.79]). PARPi dose decreases were observed in 21.1%, 35.1%, and 30.2% of olaparib-, niraparib-, and rucaparib-treated patients, respectively. Persistence (no treatment gaps of more than 90 days) was significantly higher (P

Background Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm affecting >100,000 people in the United States annually. Patients (pts) with PV are at risk for thromboembolic events (TEs), premature death, and high symptom burden. Hydroxyurea (HU) is recommended for high-risk pts with PV; however, up to 40% of pts become resistant and/or intolerant to the drug (Demuynck T, et al. Ann Hematol. 2019;98:1421-1426). Ruxolitinib (RUX), a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, is currently the only FDA-approved treatment option for pts with PV who are resistant to or intolerant of HU. We conducted a retrospective chart review to characterize the reasons pts were switched from HU to RUX and to describe the real-world dosing patterns of RUX in pts with PV. Methods This retrospective medical chart review was conducted at US community hematology/oncology practices in the Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network. Eligible pts were ≥18 y old, initiated RUX therapy during the index period (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016), were previously treated with HU for ≥3 mo, and were seen at least twice during the 6 mo following RUX initiation. Data were collected for the 12 mo prior to RUX initiation (including near the time of HU discontinuation), near the time of RUX initiation (index), and up to the last provider visit. Pt and clinical characteristics were collected, including blood counts, symptoms, TEs, cardiovascular disease risk factors, phlebotomy, and HU and RUX treatment patterns. Target enrollment was 250 pts; interim results are presented here. Results Providers identified 99 pts for inclusion; mean (SD) age was 64 (9.9) y, 56% were male, and 68% had high-risk PV (ie, age ≥60 y and/or history of TE). All pts had been tested for the JAK2V617F mutation, and 99% were positive. At the time of HU discontinuation, 28% of pts had reached an HU dose of ≥2 g/d; median (range) HU treatment duration was 9.7 (3.6-182.4) mo. Causes of HU discontinuation were resistance (63%), intolerance (17%), resistance and intolerance (11%), and other reasons (9%; Table). The most frequent reasons for HU discontinuation due to resistance were hematocrit (Hct) ≥45% (79%), symptoms (45%), leukocytosis (32%), thrombocytosis (31%), and splenomegaly (22%). The most frequent intolerance signs and symptoms were nausea (43%), stomatitis (25%), fever (18%), and skin ulcers (14%). With respect to the RUX starting dose, 44 pts (44%) initiated RUX at the US package insert-recommended dose of 10 mg twice daily (BID); median (range) treatment duration for these pts was 26.4 (3.2-52.0) mo (Table). During the first 6 mo of RUX treatment, dose modification was noted in 19 pts (43%) who initiated at 10 mg BID (dose increase, n=13 [30%]; dose decrease, n=5 [11%]; dose interruption, n=1 [2%]). The most common reasons for dose increase were continued need for phlebotomy (39%) and symptoms (39%). Five pts required a dose reduction; the most common reason was low hemoglobin levels (n=3). Overall, pts starting at 10 mg BID had more dose modifications in the first 6 mo of RUX treatment (43%), with fewer dose modifications needed after 6 mo (25%). Hct control (Hct Conclusions In this interim analysis of real-world data pertaining to pts with PV who discontinued HU and were subsequently treated with RUX, the most common resistance events leading to HU discontinuation were Hct ≥45%, uncontrolled symptoms, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, and splenomegaly. Discontinuations due to intolerance were most commonly attributed to nausea, stomatitis, fever, and skin ulcers. Of pts who were switched from HU to RUX, the duration of HU treatment was shorter and the proportion of pts treated with HU doses of ≥2 g/d was higher than has been reported for all pts discontinuing HU, irrespective of their next line of therapy (Grunwald MR, et al. ASH Annual Meeting 2017. Poster 1633). Less than half of pts initiated RUX at the recommended dose of 10 mg BID; 41% of pts dosed in accordance with the recommended starting dose experienced dosing modifications (primarily dose increases); however, the majority of pts who discontinued RUX had no dosing modifications during their treatment. Results from the entire cohort of 250 pts will be presented. Disclosures Altomare: Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy. Nguyen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parasuraman:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paranagama:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kish:Cardinal Health: Employment. Lord:Cardinal Health: Employment, Equity Ownership. Colucci:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership.

OBJECTIVE Updated vancomycin guidelines suggest dose adjustment based on area under the curve in a 24-hour period (AUC24). This study aims to determine whether a pharmacist managed vancomycin protocol that incorporates maximum dosing paired with trough monitoring can achieve appropriate vancomycin AUC24 exposures. METHODS A retrospective review was performed evaluating vancomycin usage from October 2018 through September 2019 at a children's hospital. Patients with less than 4 doses or lack a trough concentration were excluded. Vancomycin AUC24 were estimated using 2 calculations: 1) the Le method, incorporating age and serum creatinine, and 2) the trapezoidal method based upon population data and patient-specific trough. Target AUC24 ranges were assessed. AUC24 goals were 400 to 600 mg·hr/L, but due to known variations between calculations, a variance of 20 mg·hr/L was allowed for each end of the goal. Secondary analyses included evaluations of efficacy and toxicity. RESULTS Two-hundred twenty-three patients were included. Initial doses were estimated to meet AUC24 goals in only 63%. After trough-based dose modification, 81% achieved a therapeutic AUC24. Using the trapezoidal method, therapeutic concentrations were found in 51% of patients based on the initial dose and 77% after dose modification. Only 6.3% of patients had kidney injury with only 1 of those patients having any calculated AUC24 > 600 mg·hr/L and none above 620 mg·hr/L. No clinical failures were identified. CONCLUSIONS Increased initial dosing in infants and children is needed to result in AUC24 exposures recommended in the guidelines. Maximum dosing paired with trough monitoring may be an alternative to AUC24 monitoring in areas that are unable to perform AUC24 calculations. Prospective data are needed to validate these conclusions.

BACKGROUND/AIM Niraparib is effective against epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but with adverse effects. In this study, we retrospectively investigated niraparib maintenance treatment feasibility in Korean patients newly diagnosed with EOC. PATIENTS AND METHODS The medical records of 35 patients were reviewed. Data on the baseline clinical characteristics were collected, and adverse effects were described. RESULTS Sixteen patients underwent treatment suspension or dose reduction. There was no significant difference in adverse effects (A/E) due to the interval between adjuvant chemotherapy conclusion and niraparib initiation. The two groups had similar International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages. The number of patients with a history of bevacizumab use was higher in the dose modification group than in the standard dose group. CONCLUSION Niraparib use must be considered in those previously treated with bevacizumab. There is a need for prospective research on lower dose (

Background Multiple studies have suggested that patients with early-stage SCC of the lung treated with SBRT are more susceptible to local failure compared to other NSCLC histologies. It is unknown if higher BED leads to improved outcomes in this patient population. We evaluated the effect of “high” BED versus “low” BED SBRT on overall survival (OS) in SCC and non-SCC NSCLC patients. Methods The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with cT1-2N0M0 NSCLC diagnosed between 2006–2016 treated with 3–5 fraction SBRT. Patients were grouped by BEDhigh (>150 Gy) and BEDlow (≤132 Gy). Univariate and multivariable analysis using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling were performed. Propensity-score matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment (IPTW) weighting was used to account for selection bias. Results We identified 4,717 eligible SCC patients and 8,807 eligible non-SCC NSCLC patients. In SCC patients, BEDhigh was associated with improved OS in both univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA HR 0.84 95% CI 0.76–0.92, p Conclusions Our analysis suggests that in patients with early-stage NSCLC, SBRT regimens with BED > 150 Gy may confer a survival benefit in patients with SCC histology. Histology-based dose modification should be considered, and prospective validation may be warranted.

Yueyue Liu, Qian Zhang, Chao Lu, Wei Hu Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Chao Lu; Wei HuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax + 86-551 63806057Email 765385306@qq.com; huwei@ahmu.edu.cnPurpose: Pyrotinib, an irreversible human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), is a epidermal growth factor receptor double-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for treating HER2-positive breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole on the safety and pharmacokinetics of pyrotinib in Chinese healthy adults.Patients and Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, self-control study. Eighteen healthy adults were included in this trial. They received a single 80 mg dose of pyrotinib orally on days 1 and 9, and a 200 mg once-daily dose of itraconazole on days 6 through 22. Blood samples were obtained, and the drug concentration was detected using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.Results: Compared with pyrotinib alone, the exposure to pyrotinib co-administered with itraconazole substantially increased, and the Cmax and AUC0-t increased by 2.78- and 10.8-fold, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported in this trial, and no participant dropped out of the trial because of adverse events.Conclusion: The exposure to pyrotinib was substantially affected by the action of itraconazole. The concomitant use of pyrotinib with itraconazole might require dose modification of pyrotinib. All treatments were well tolerated in healthy participants.Clinical Trial Registry: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.prosearch.dhtml, CTR20191866.Keywords: drug–drug interaction, itraconazole, pharmacokinetics, pyrotinib, safety

Aim To describe current rehabilitation paediatricians' use of intramuscular botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) to manage hypertonicity. Methods Cross-sectional survey. Results In late 2019, 32 of the 35 identified Australian rehabilitation paediatricians who use BoNT-A to manage paediatric hypertonicity completed the survey. Annually, they administer just over 3750 courses of BoNT-A to manage hypertonicity with a mean of 11 years of clinical experience. Sedation was used by all but 1 clinician who used a number of other strategies during the procedure. Mean (and median) maximum dose of OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) was 400 Units (range 300–450 Units). Only three clinicians indicated that they used AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) – the other BoNT-A preparation approved for children available in Australia; analysis of its use was not performed. Dose modifications were made by clinicians according to a patient's response to a previous course of BoNT-A (88% of respondents); patient experience of a previous adverse event (78%); history of aspiration or dysphagia (65 and 63%, respectively); and the presence of dystonia; and where the patient was GMFCS level V (53% each). Intervals between courses ranged from 3 to 24 months with the variation due to clinical circumstances. Conclusion Clinical practice in BoNT-A management of paediatric hypertonicity was largely consistent in regard to maximum doses of OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) used. Dose modification and time between injection courses varied according to individual clinical presentation. Procedural sedation was used extensively.

Aim Few real-world studies have reported detailed management and dose adjustment strategies of adverse events (AEs) of ovarian cancer (OC) patients treated with the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. This case series aimed to describe olaparib AEs in Chinese OC patients in real-life settings and to explore dose modification strategies. Methods We conducted a detailed examination of the clinical records of OC patients who were treated with olaparib at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit in Hong Kong from September 2015 to December 2019, including baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, AEs, and management strategies, particularly dose modifications. Results Nineteen patients were included, with a median olaparib treatment duration of 12 (range: 3-30) months. For recurrent platinum-sensitive cases (n = 16), the median progression-free survival was 16.0 months (95% confidence interval: 9.5-22.5). Eighteen (95%) patients experienced AE(s) of any grade, including four (21%) who experienced grade ≥3 AE(s). The most common AEs were as follows: nonhematologic fatigue (68%), nausea (42%), vomiting (26%), decreased appetite (26%), dyspepsia (21%), dizziness (21%), anemia (37%), neutropenia (26%), and thrombocytopenia (21%). Four specific cases involving anemia, lower limb lymphedema, myeloid neoplasm, and erythema nodosum are discussed separately. Eight patients required dose interruption or reduction due to AEs, of which five patients attempted and tolerated dose re-escalation. Conclusion In this study, most AEs were mild, but rare AEs were observed. In OC patients, olaparib AE management with dose reductions followed by re-escalations was feasible, including for anemia.

Obesity and its related comorbidities can negatively influence the outcomes of certain infectious diseases. Specific dosing recommendations are often lacking in the product label for patients with obesity that leads to unclear guidance in practice. Higher rates of therapeutic failure have been reported with some fixed dose antibiotics and pragmatic approaches to dose modification are limited for orally administered agents. For i.v. antimicrobials dosed on weight, alternate body size descriptors (ABSDs) have been used to reduce the risk of overdosing. These ABSDs are mathematical transformations of height and weight that represent fat-free weight and follow the same principles as body surface area (BSA)-based dosing of cancer chemotherapy. However, ABSDs are rarely studied in pivotal phase III studies and so can risk the underdosing of antimicrobials in patients with obesity when incorrectly applied in the real-world setting. Specific case examples are presented to highlight these risks. Although general principles may be considered by clinicians, a universal approach to dose modification in obesity is unlikely. Studies that can better distinguish human body phenotypes may help reduce our reliance on height and weight to define dosing. Simple and complex technologies exist to quantify individual body composition that could improve upon our current approach. Early evidence suggests that body composition parameters repurposed from medical imaging data may improve upon height and weight as covariates of drug clearance and distribution. Clinical trials that can integrate human body phenotyping may help us identify new approaches to optimal dose selection of antimicrobials in patients with obesity.

Background: The CALGB 40603 and BrighTNess studies found that adding high dose carboplatin every 3 weeks to the standard neoadjuvant DD AC - paclitaxel regimen in TNBC increased the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate to 54-58% but with the cost of increased treatment related toxicities resulting in decreased completion of the full course of treatment. Our hypothesis is by changing the high dose carboplatin every 3 weeks to low dose weekly carboplatin, it will retain the same benefit in pathologic response rate and minimize the treatment related toxicities, which in turn permits the full course of neoadjuvant treatment given to patients. Patients and Methods: This multi-center study was conducted through the WON (NCT03301350). Eligible TNBC patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy received weekly carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 12 doses, followed by dose dense doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with granulocyte growth factor support for 4 cycles. A one-week break was added before DD AC after the first 22 patients in order to minimize prolonged cytopenia. Primary end point was pCR. Secondary endpoints were frequency of dose modification and treatment related toxicities. Results: Accrual target was 50 with 80% power to detect a 20% difference using a one-sided binomial test at an alpha significance level of 0.025, but study was terminated earlier. Twenty-nine eligible patients consented for the study from November 2017 to February 2020. Median age was 52 year-old (range, 33-80). Twenty-eight patients received the study regimen. Three were removed due to early study termination and one (3.8%) died from grade 5 neutropenic sepsis after the last cycle of DD AC before surgery. Thus, 24 patients were evaluable for the primary outcome and 26 were evaluable for dose modification and toxicity outcomes. Eight patients (33%) achieved pCR and another 4 patients (17%) had minimal (ypT1aN0) residual disease. Of 26 patients, 24 (92%) were able to receive the full course of treatment +/- dose modification. One patient required the discontinuation of weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel completely due to severe infusion reaction and one did not finish the treatment before the study was terminated. Eight patients (31%) required dose delay with 5 of them during the weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel treatment. Seven patients (27%) also required dose reduction with 5 of them during the weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel treatment. Seventeen patients (65%) experienced severe adverse event (grade 3 or 4) with the majority of events (12/17) relating to grade 3-4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever. Conclusion: Although our study showed a lower pCR rate of 33% in compare to the previous CALGB 40603 (54%) and BrighTNess (58%) studies, we demonstrated that the majority of patients (92%) were able to receive the full course of study treatment. This weekly carboplatin with paclitaxel - AC regimen was used in the recent Keynote 522 study as the backbone chemotherapy to combine with check-point inhibitor immunotherapy in TNBC. However, any dosing schedules of carboplatin, weekly or every 3 weeks, add substantially to grade 3 or 4 toxicity of paclitaxel - AC. Aggressive supportive care management is needed when carboplatin is used. Citation Format: Yee Chung Cheng, Ruth O'Regan, Lubna N Chaudhary, Sailaja Kamaraju, Harvey Einhorn, Emmanuel Sampene, Marialane Pigsley, Mark E Burkard, Christopher R Chitambar, Kari B Wisinski. A phase II study of neoadjuvant weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (DD AC)in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): Wisconsin oncology network (WON) study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS13-51.

The oral prodrug fostemsavir (GSK3684394, formerly BMS-663068) is an antiretroviral treatment for HIV-1. Fostemsavir is metabolized to its active moiety, temsavir, a first-in-class HIV-1 attachment inhibitor that binds to the viral envelope glycoprotein 120. Long-term antiretroviral therapy, the resulting longer life expectancy, and/or certain coinfections can increase the risk of chronic liver and kidney disease in HIV-1-infected individuals. Two studies were conducted to collectively evaluate the impact of renal and hepatic impairment on temsavir pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety following a single dose of a 600-mg extended-release fostemsavir tablet. There was no clinically meaningful effect of renal or hepatic impairment on temsavir PK, although renal clearance decreased with increasing renal impairment from moderate to severe, and exposure (maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity) tended to increase with increasing severity of hepatic impairment. No clinically meaningful effect of hemodialysis on temsavir PK parameters was observed. Fostemsavir was generally safe and well tolerated by treated subjects. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild, with the exception of 1 patient in the renal impairment study who discontinued due to 2 serious AEs unrelated to the study drug. No other treatment-emergent serious AEs occurred, and no other AEs leading to discontinuation were reported. Overall, these results suggest that fostemsavir can be used without dose modification in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment, including those with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, and in subjects with mild to severe hepatic impairment.

Liumei Shou,1,2,* Tianyu Shao,2,* Fangmin Zhao,2 Shuyi Chen,1 Qunwei Chen,1 Qijin Shu1 1Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2The First Clinical Medicine College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qijin ShuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-13605706566Fax +86-571-6707-2196Email shuqjhz@163.comBackground: Multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) treatment plays an important role in cancer therapy, but still suffers from a high incidence of hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR), leading to MKIs dose modification or termination. Thus, there is a high need for therapeutic strategy for HFSR.Patients and Methods: This prospective analysis included twenty patients, who were continuously administered with MKIs treatment and presented with a grade 3 HFSR during January 2018 to December 2019. All the patients were treated with the Shouzu Ning Decoction (SND) twice a day, in addition to the MKIs treatment. Grading of HFSR was assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Pain intensity was evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Quality of life was assessed using the Hand–Foot Quality of Life Scale (HF-QoLS).Results: The median time from MKIs initiation to onset of grade 3 HFSR was 26.2 days. Following the SND treatment, seventeen (17/20) patients displayed grade 2 HFSR with a median time of 5.1 days. Among whom, seven (7/17) finally transformed to grade 1 with a median time of 9.9 days. While all of the grade 1 patients (7/7) had local recurrence, and retreatment of the SND was effective. In addition, after the SND treatment, the score of NRS and HF-QoLS decreased to 1.60 ± 1.14 (P < 0.01) and 26.75 ± 11.76 (P < 0.01), respectively.Conclusion: The SND treatment could alleviate symptoms, relieve pain and improve quality of life in HFSR patients. The SND treatment was proved to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for MKIs-associated grade 3 HFSR patients for the first time. Indeed, further randomized controlled trails with large-scale, multi-center are require to fully determine the clinical application of the SND in MKIs-associated HFSR.Keywords: hand-foot skin reaction, multi-kinase inhibitors, Shouzu Ning Decoction, efficacy, safety

Fixed-duration venetoclax plus rituximab (VenR) has a manageable safety profile and improves survival in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We present data from the phase III MURANO study on the impact of venetoclax modification or premature discontinuation on outcomes in patients with R/R CLL. Timedependent Cox proportional hazards regression models, stratified by 17p deletion and risk status, evaluated the impact of venetoclax discontinuation/ modification on investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Analyses were performed retrospectively (without type-1 error control) in intention-to-treat patients from the VenR arm of MURANO. Overall, 140 of 194 (72%) patients in the VenR arm completed 2 years of therapy; 54 of 194 (28%) patients prematurely discontinued treatment. Inferior PFS was observed in patients prematurely discontinuing venetoclax for any reason (disease progression excluded; P

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting dose modifications to reduce serious treatment-related adverse events of antineoplastic therapy is limited and frequently based on clinical trial protocols, which are not always generalisable to community patients. eviQ is an online resource with treatment protocols and recommendations for dose modification formulated by expert opinion and evidence-based review. Original recommended haematological thresholds to delay treatment were: neutrophil count

Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by an esophagectomy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, but remains a great challenge for elderly patients. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Methods From December 2007 to October 2017, forty esophageal cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Ten patients received standard doses of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 for 1-4 days, during the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy. Eighteen patients received modified doses of cisplatin 16-18 mg/m2 and 5-FU 600-800 mg/m2. Twelve patients received lower doses of cisplatin 10-12 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400-600 mg/m2. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), tumor response rate and treatment compliance. Results The 3-year OS rate was 28.8% The 3-year OS rates for patients receiving standard, modified and lower doses were 12.5%, 53.8% and 0.0%, respectively (p=0.05). There were 87.5% of patients completing the scheduled radiotherapy dose, along with 2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. The response rate (clinical complete response and partial response rate) was 70.0%. Multivariate analysis revealed that no statistical difference was found in the overall survival among these 3 groups of chemotherapy dosage. The treatment response was the only independent prognostic factor regarding overall survival (p Conclusion Definitive chemoradiotherapy with dose modification is a feasible, safe and reasonable treatment for elderly esophageal cancer patients. Achieving a better compliance to chemoradiotherapy through an optimal dose modification of chemotherapy may provide better clinical outcomes and would be the treatment goal for elderly esophageal cancer patients.

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib, through a bridging study to METEOR, in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Methods This phase II, open-label, single-arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03339219) included adult Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and measurable disease who had received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients received cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily while there was clinical benefit, or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end-point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1. Secondary end-points included clinical benefit rate (complete or partial response, or ≥8-week stable disease), progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Results Of the 35 patients enrolled, 68.6%, 22.9% and 8.6% had previously received one, two and three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors, respectively. The median duration of cabozantinib exposure was 27.0 weeks (range 5.1-43.0 weeks). The objective response rate was 20.0% (90% confidence interval 9.8-34.3%), and the clinical benefit rate was 85.7% (95% confidence interval 69.7-95.2%). The 6-month estimated progression-free survival was 72.3% (95% confidence interval 53.3-84.6%); the median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. All patients reported adverse events, which were manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification; two patients (5.7%) discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions The results showed that findings from METEOR can be extrapolated, and that cabozantinib 60 mg/day is a viable treatment option in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Long-term combination treatment with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone is important to achieve a curative effect in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In this study, the plasma concentration of lenalidomide was measured at 3 h after oral administration, when the drug is in the elimination phase and can be easily measured in outpatients, to identify factors that may lead to the discontinuation of this combination therapy. Patients were assigned to continuation or discontinuation of therapy groups, and the baseline characteristics of patients, lenalidomide concentration, and concentration/dose (C/D) ratios reflecting oral clearance were compared between the two groups. The efficacy and severity of adverse events were also compared. The results showed that patients who discontinued or modified treatment had low plasma concentrations of lenalidomide and C/D ratios, indicating high oral clearance of lenalidomide. The estimated creatinine clearance rate was negatively correlated with the C/D ratio. The plasma concentrations of lenalidomide were independent from kidney function and differed significantly among patients. Taken together, the results indicate that low plasma concentrations of lenalidomide and low C/D ratios may lead to discontinuation of combination therapy in patients with MM. This suggests that early measurement of lenalidomide plasma continuation would help to prevent discontinuation of therapy or a delay in modifying the dose of lenalidomide.

Neutropenia is the most common toxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitors, causing frequent dose interruptions. However, CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced neutropenia shows a benign clinical course in contrast to that caused by chemotherapy. Here, we investigated the safety of a new dose scheme for palbociclib, which avoids dose delays or reductions due to afebrile grade 3 neutropenia. A consecutive cohort of ER( +)/HER2( −) advanced breast cancer patients who received palbociclib between 2017 and 2018 was analyzed. The patients were classified into Group 1 (patients who maintained palbociclib dose with afebrile grade 3 neutropenia), Group 2 (patients who experienced any dose modification with afebrile grade 3 neutropenia), and Group 3 (patients without afebrile grade 3 neutropenia). The primary endpoint was febrile neutropenia incidence; other toxicities were compared with those of the PALOMA-2 trial. Among the 107 patients, 54.2%, 22.4%, and 23.4% were classified into Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was no febrile neutropenia in Groups 1 and 2 during palbociclib treatment. Group 1 showed higher incidence of thrombocytopenia (all-grade, 32.8%; grade 3–4, 8.6%) than Group 2 and the PALOMA-2 data, but there was no bleeding related to thrombocytopenia. Group 1 showed higher incidence of all-grade non-hematologic adverse events than Group 2; only one grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity was observed in Group 1. There were no treatment-related hospitalizations or deaths in Group 1. Thus, omitting palbociclib dose modification with afebrile grade 3 neutropenia is safe and tolerable without febrile neutropenia events. This scheme could be useful to avoid unnecessary reductions in palbociclib doses in future practice.

Controlling adverse events (AEs) through dose reduction can enhance drug adherence and treatment response. Currently, there is no guide for sorafenib dosing. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sorafenib dosing could affect treatment outcomes. A total of 782 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with sorafenib were evaluated for sorafenib dosing and its modifications via medical records at baseline and regular follow-up. Study outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), sorafenib duration, cumulative dose, AEs and drug discontinuation. The median patient survival was 7.7 months. Overall, 242 (30.9%) patients underwent dose reduction and 121 (17.5%) discontinued sorafenib due to AEs. In multivariate analysis, dose reduction was identified to be independently predictive of PFS and OS. The 800-to-400 mg/day group provided significantly better PFS than the 800 mg/day-maintained group or the 800-to-600 mg/day group. Likewise, the 800-to-400 mg/day group resulted in a significantly better OS than other dosing. However, dose reduction to 200 mg/day led to significantly worse PFS and OS. Hand-foot skin reaction and drug discontinuation due to AEs were higher in the 800-to-600 mg/day group than the 800-to-400 mg/day group. The 800-to-400 mg/day group had significantly longer treatment duration and higher cumulative dose than the 800 mg/day-maintained group. Sorafenib dose reduction can improve HCC survival and increase patient tolerance and adherence coupled with longer duration and higher cumulative dose. Dose reduction from 800 to 400 mg/day than to 600 mg/day is recommended when clinically warranted. However, dose reduction to 200 mg/day is not recommendable.

Background Numerous medications used in older adults require dose modification or should be avoided in individuals with impaired kidney function. Purpose To assess medical students' and physicians' knowledge of drug prescribing recommendations in older patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Patients and Methods A survey comprising a list of 64 drugs conducted in 183 medical students (Students), and 138 post-graduate trainees in internal medicine (Physicians). The respondents were asked to classify each drug into one of three categories: 1) no renal precautions; 2) dose should be reduced; and 3) medication should be avoided. Results A range of 16.9-68.3% students and 14.5-81.2% physicians correctly classified drugs in the category "No renal precautions." Drugs requiring dose reduction were correctly classified by 6-67.2% students, and 24.6-85.5% physicians. For drugs that should be avoided in subjects with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2, the range was 6-44.8% in the Students, and 8.7-76.1% in the Physicians. The Physicians did better than the Students by classifying five drugs that do not require renal precautions, 12 drugs requiring dose reduction, and six medications that should be avoided. The Students had a higher percentage of correct answers for seven drugs in the category "no renal precautions," and one drug requiring dose reduction. Conclusion Medical students and post-graduate trainees in internal medicine have poor knowledge of drug prescribing recommendations in older patients with renal impairment.

We recently described that oral immunotherapy (OIT)-induced gastrointestinal symptoms were associated with peripheral eosinophilic responses (termed OITIGER).To identify treatment outcomes after dose modification and risk factors for developing OITIGER.Treatment modifications in patients with OITIGER (n = 65) including cumulative dose reductions or treatment suspension were individualized and based on the severity of symptoms and an associated absolute eosinophil count (AEC, eosinophils/μL) of more than 900. Multivariate analysis for risk factors associated with OITIGER was performed in milk-OIT subjects.Treatment modifications reduced the cumulative daily dosage load by a median of 50% (interquartile range, 50%-67%) in 43 of 65 (66.1%) patients, deferred dose increases in 2 of 65 (3.1%) patients, or temporarily suspended treatment in 18 of 65 (27.7%) patients. Two patients (3.1%) had no treatment intervention. Symptoms and eosinophilia abated on dosage modification, allowing for resumption of dose increases (n = 34) or reinitiation of treatment (n = 9) after a median of 29 (interquartile range, 20-56) and 19 (interquartile range, 17-44) days, respectively. OITIGER reoccurred during treatment in 10 of 54 (18.5%) patients, which resolved after further dose modification. In long-term follow-up (3-26 months), 31 of 32 patients were asymptomatic with stable AECs. Patients with OITIGER had a higher OIT failure rate (P = .004) and were less likely to reach full desensitization (P.001), as compared with asymptomatic patients (n = 684). Multivariate analysis identified several risk factors for OITIGER: starting dose more than 120 mg (P.001; odds ratio, 7.14), second-month dose more than 4-fold over the starting dose (P = .037; odds ratio, 2.18), and baseline AEC more than 600/μL (P = .002; odds ratio, 3.2).OITIGER is transient or reversible in most subjects, and its occurrence is related to OIT starting dose, its rate of increase, and baseline AECs.

Introduction/Background* In the NOVA trial of niraparib maintenance treatment (MT) in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC), dose reduction due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 66.5% of patients initiating niraparib at 300 mg. Based on NOVA RADAR analysis, subsequent individualised starting dose (ISD) recommends patients with baseline bodyweight Methodology In NORA, adults with PSROC and complete/partial response to most recent platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomised 2:1 to niraparib or placebo MT of 28-day cycles. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). First 16 patients started treatment at 300 mg, before ISD was implemented. Dose interruption ≤28 days and dose reduction were permitted. Niraparib-treated patients with stabilised dosing at Cycle 4 were analysed, with descriptive statistics summarising TEAEs and descriptive PFS analysis by dose levels at the beginning of Cycle 4. Result(s)* During Month 1/2, platelet count decrease caused dose interruption and reduction in 32.8%/36.2% and 22.0%/23.6% of patients, respectively; neutrophil count decrease caused dose interruption and reduction in 9.0%/12.1% and 8.5%/9.2% of patients, respectively. These percentages decreased from Month 3 and remained low through Months 4–6 (figure 1). Anaemia-related dose interruption/reduction occurred in ≤10% of patients. Most patients’ stabilised doses at Cycle 4 were 100 mg (n=74) or 200 mg (n=78). These two groups had comparable baseline characteristics and showed similar PFS (figure 2) from Cycle 4 onward through 12 months, regardless of germline BRCA mutation status. Conclusion* Platelet count decrease and neutrophil count decrease were the major TEAEs necessitating niraparib dose modification. Early dose modification helped maintain safety and tolerability in Chinese patients receiving niraparib MT without compromising efficacy.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are extremely vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and show an impaired immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We analyzed factors related to vaccination efficiency in KTRs. In a multicenter prospective observational study (NCT04743947), IgG antibodies levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 subunit and their neutralization capacity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were analyzed in 225 KTRs and compared to 176 controls. After the vaccination, 56 (24.9%) KTRs became seropositive of whom 68% had neutralizing antibodies. This immune response was significantly lower compared to controls (239 [78-519] BAU/ml versus 1826 [560-3180] BAU/ml for KTRs and controls, p

Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase enzymes catalyze the conversion of isocitrate to alpha-ketoglutarate. Mutated IDH enzymes generate the "oncometabolite" 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), which inhibits TET2 function. IDH2 mutations have been reported in 9% to 19% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. Inhibition of the mutant IDH2 enzyme led to decreased 2-HG levels and induced myeloid differentiation in IDH2 mutant AML. Enasidenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH2, was approved in 2017, after a successful phase I/II trial showing an overall response rate (ORR) of 40.3% in relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, with 19.3% of patients achieving complete remission (CR). A Phase III trial is currently ongoing. It targets the mutant IDH2 variants R140Q, R172S, and R172K; at an approved dose of 100 mg oral daily dose. At higher doses the drug was less tolerated, however, few subjects received dose modification at the 650 mg daily dose group; these events did not qualify as a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). In this descriptive study, we are reporting a case series of R/R AML, with an IDH2 mutation, that are treated with escalated dose enasidenib. Method: This case series is based on retrospective observations of patients with R/R IDH2 mutant AML since January 2017, who are treated with enasidenib. We are reporting two cases treated with an escalated dose of 200 mg daily. We included patients with intermediate to poor-risk AML, who received at least one prior line of therapy, started on standard dose enasidenib (100 mg daily) for a minimum of 6 months and followed until disease relapse or death. We excluded patients who are primarily resistant to enasidenib (AML risk stratification and response evaluation by ELN-Leukemia NET. IDH2 mutations were identified by a local diagnostic laboratory that is regulated under CLIA through PCR which is validated to detect 10% or more mutant allele frequency. To quantify IDH2 variant frequency, confirmatory testing was performed via ARUP next-generation sequencing panel (NGS). Results: Here we report the descriptive outcomes of 2 cases from a single institution, who were treated with escalated dose enasidenib (200 mg oral daily) for R/R AML with an IDH2 mutation. The first case describes a 65-year-old female diagnosed with poor-risk AML in the setting of pancytopenia with bone marrow evaluation consistent with the background of erythroid and granulocytic dysplasia, with normal karyotype analysis. The patient has treated with induction chemotherapy and 2 cycles consolidation that was complicated with bacterial infections, prolonged hospitalization, and profound deconditioning led to stopping treatment. After 18 months of surveillance, repeat bone marrow evaluation for new-onset pancytopenia revealed relapsed AML with evidence of IDH2 mutation at codon 140, with a variant frequency of 36.9% by NGS. The case was started on enasidenib at 100 mg oral daily dose. After 6 months of therapy, the patient continued to be cytopenic, repeated bone marrow evaluation showed residual AML with IDH2 variant frequency of 27.6%. The decision was made to increase the enasidenib dose to 200 mg daily. With follow up for another 5 months on the escalated dose, the patient achieved hematologic complete response (hCR) with normalization of peripheral platelet count and ANC. [Figures 1-2] The patient maintained hCR for another 5 months on 200 mg enasidenib daily until she died from COVID-19 infection. The second case describes a 59-year-old female with poor-risk AML in the setting of leukocytosis, with bone marrow evaluation consistent with the background of megakaryocytic dysplasia and karyotype analysis positive for monosomy 7. The patient was treated with induction chemotherapy and failed to respond. Repeat bone marrow evaluation showed primary refractory disease with positive IDH2 mutation at codon 140 with a variant frequency of 40.7%. Treatment with 100 mg enasidenib was started. The patient maintained a partial response for 6 months, then peripheral blasts counts started to gradually increase. The decision was made to increase enasidenib dose to 200 mg daily, which improved peripheral blasts within one month of escalated dose therapy. [Figure 3] The patient maintained a response to therapy for another 3 months before she relapsed. Conclusion: Our limited data showed that initial response to standard dose enasidenib could potentially be optimized by dose escalation to 200 mg daily. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background In the EMBRACA phase III study (NCT01945775), talazoparib was associated with a significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCT) in germline BRCA1/2‐mutated HER2‐negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Herein, the safety profile of talazoparib is explored in detail. Materials and Methods Overall, 412 patients received ≥1 dose of talazoparib (n = 286) or PCT (n = 126). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated, including timing, duration, and potential overlap of selected AEs. The relationship between talazoparib plasma exposure and grade ≥3 anemia was analyzed. Time‐varying Cox proportional hazard models assessed the impact of dose reductions on PFS. Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with common AEs and health resource utilization (HRU) were assessed in both treatment arms. Results The most common AEs with talazoparib were hematologic (195 [68.2%] patients) and typically occurred within the first 3–4 months of receiving talazoparib. Grade 3‐4 anemia lasted approximately 7 days for both arms. Overlapping grade 3‐4 hematologic AEs were infrequent with talazoparib. Higher talazoparib exposure was associated with grade ≥3 anemia. Permanent discontinuation of talazoparib due to hematologic AEs was low (, Talazoparib is a viable option for patients with germline BRCA‐mutated advanced breast cancer. This article presents detailed safety analyses for talazoparib, as a follow‐up to reported results from the EMBRACA trial, to highlight patterns of toxicity compared with chemotherapy and to outline guidelines for management of talazoparib toxicity in clinical practice via dose modifications and/or standard supportive care.

In light of the recommendation of folic acid supplementation in chronic hemolytic anemia, with possible supratherapeutic dosing and associated side effects, we performed this study to investigate serum folate levels in children with chronic hemolytic anemia. Phase 1 was a cross-sectional study of 134 patients in the Pediatric Hematology service, documenting daily dosage and performing serum folate levels. In phase 2, we reduced the dose to 1 mg for 148 patients and repeated the testing after six months. We found very high serum folate levels with Phase 1, with 93.2% above the upper level of normal. In Phase 2, values remained high with 42.5% above the acceptable upper limit. Doses of folic acid given to sickle cell and thalassemia patients exceed their actual needs. This should be re-evaluated to strike a balance between benefit and harm, with close monitoring of serum folate levels.

Background Low body mass index (BMI) is suspected of being associated with low transdermal fentanyl (TDF) blood levels and worse pain relief. Clinical pain data to support this claim are lacking. Methods Using a Chronic Pain Registry, we identified 901 cancer patients who received TDF at outpatient pain service clinics of our cancer center from 7/1/2011 to 12/1/2016. Of these, 240 patients had a BMI measure, pain intensity, and pain relief scores documented within 30 days of a TDF order. We examined associations between BMI, TDF dose, Worst and Least pain scores, and pain relief scores using standard statistical tests. Results In cancer patients receiving TDF, low BMI (, Low body mass index (BMI) is suspected of being associated with low transdermal fentanyl (TDF) blood levels and worse pain relief. Of the 240 patients who reported patient‐reported outcomes, whereas on TDF, patients with lowest BMI trended toward better pain relief on the lowest TDF doses. When predicting percent pain relief, we found no basis for avoiding TDF or modifying its dose in cancer patients with low BMI and cachexia.

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of lipegfilgrastim, a glycopegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, used as primary (PP) or secondary prophylaxis (SP) on chemotherapy (CT) treatment modifications, as well as the incidence of CT-induced neutropenic events in adult patients receiving cytotoxic CT with or without biological therapy (BT) for solid and hematological tumors, in routine clinical practice. Other objectives were to characterize the population of lipegfilgrastim-treated cancer patients and safety assessment. Methods: This phase 4, prospective, observational study was conducted at 15 centers from Belgium and Luxembourg, between 2015 and 2017. Results: Of 139 patients, 82.7% had breast cancer and 54.7% were treated with dose-dense regimens. Most received lipegfilgrastim as PP (82.0%) and were at high-risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) (68.3%). FN and grade III/IV neutropenia were reported for 7.9% and 22.3% patients. Among 123 evaluated patients, CT/BT dose modifications were recorded for 33.3% (PP) and 52.4% (SP) of patients receiving lipegfilgrastim; dose reductions, followed by dose delays, were more frequent than omissions. Among 45 patients with dose modifications, FN was reported for 8.8% and 9.1% patients and grade IV neutropenia for 17.6% and 18.2% of patients when lipegfilgrastim was applied for PP and SP, respectively. Adverse events related to lipegfilgrastim occurred for 55 (39.6%) patients; bone pain and back pain were more frequent. Lipegfilgrastim-related serious adverse events were reported for 9 (6.5%) patients. Conclusion: Use of lipegfilgrastim in real-world settings resulted in limited CT dose modifications and low incidences of neutropenic events, with no new safety concerns arising.

Objective: The applicability of the linear quadratic (LQ) model to local control (LC) modeling after hypofractionated radiotherapy to treat lung cancer is highly debated. To date, the differences in predicted outcomes between the LQ model and other radiobiological models, which are characterized by additional dose modification beyond a certain transitional dose (dT), have not been well established. This study aims to compare the outcomes predicted by the LQ model with those predicted by two other radiobiological models in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Computer tomography (CT) simulation data sets for 20 patients diagnosed with stage Ⅰ primary NSCLC were included in this study. Three radiobiological models, including the LQ, the universal survival curve (USC) and the modified linear quadratic and linear (mLQL) model were employed to predict the tumor control probability (TCP) data. First, the dT values for the USC and mLQL models were determined. Then, the biologically effective dose (BED) and the predicted TCP values from the LQ model were compared with those calculated from the USC and mLQL models. Results: The dT values from the USC model were 29.6 Gy, 33.8 Gy and 44.5 Gy, whereas the values were 90.2 Gy, 84.0 Gy and 57.3 Gy for the mLQL model for 1-year, 2-year and 3-year TCP prediction. The remarkable higher dT values obtained from the mLQL model revealed the same dose-response relationship as the LQ model in the low- and high-dose ranges. We also found that TCP prediction from the LQ and USC models differed by less than 3%, although the BED values for the two models were significantly different. Conclusion: Radiobiological analysis reveals small differences between the models and suggested that the LQ model is applicable for modeling LC using SBRT to treat lung cancer, even when an extremely high fractional dose is used.

We herein report the first case in which an escalated dose of sunitinib was effective, even after dose reduction. A 64-year-old man with gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the small intestine discontinued adjuvant imatinib because of interstitial pneumonia. After two years, peritoneal recurrence was detected. Sunitinib was started at 50 mg/day for 4 weeks every 6 weeks, after which the dosage was reduced to 37.5 mg/day because of grade 1 gastritis, stomatitis, and a fever. Four months later, computed tomography showed progressive disease. As the adverse events were well-controlled by medication, we escalated the dose to 50 mg/day and achieved a partial response.

Purpose The effects of chemotherapy dose intensity on survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed dose delays/reduction, relative dose intensity (RDI), and the association between chemotherapy intensity and survival in advanced NSCLC. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults with advanced lung cancer who received first-line myelosuppressive platinum-based chemotherapy (January 2007–December 2010) in ~ 230 US Oncology Network community practices. Dose delays ≥ 7 days, dose reductions ≥ 15%, and RDI relative to standard regimens were described. Overall survival (OS) was measured using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard (PH) models. Results Among 3866 patients with advanced NSCLC, 32.4% experienced dose delays ≥ 7 days, 50.1% experienced dose reductions ≥ 15%, and 40.4% had RDI

Although dose reduction of S-1 is recommended for patients with impaired renal function, dose modification for such patients has not been prospectively evaluated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-fluorouracil, 5-chloro-2,4 dihydroxypyridine and oteracil potassium, and to review the recommended dose modification of S-1 in patients with renal impairment. We classified patients receiving S-1 into 4 groups according to their renal function, as measured using the Japanese estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation. The daily S-1 dose was adjusted based on the patient's eGFR and body surface area. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. A total of 33 patients were enrolled and classified into 4 groups as follows: 10 patients in cohort 1 (eGFR ≥ 80 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), 10 patients in cohort 2 (eGFR = 50-79 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), 10 patients in cohort 3 (eGFR = 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), and 3 patients in cohort 4 (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Those in cohorts 3 and 4 treated with an adjusted dose of S-1 showed a similar area under the curve for 5-fluorouracil (941.9 ± 275.6 and 1043.5 ± 224.8 ng/mL, respectively) compared with cohort 2 (1034.9 ± 414.3 ng/mL). Notably, while there was a statistically significant difference between cohort 1 (689.6 ± 208.8 ng/mL) and 2 (P = 0.0474) treated with an equal dose of S-1, there was no significant difference observed in the toxicity profiles of the cohorts. In conclusion, dose adjustment of S-1 in patients with impaired renal function using eGFR is appropriate and safe.

Background Oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and l-leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) has become one of the first-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). However, the relatively high rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events associated with the standard dosage of FOLFIRINOX limits its widespread use in clinical practice. In this study, we were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen as a first-line chemotherapy for Chinese patients with metastatic PC. Methods Patients with histologically confirmed primary metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0–2 were recruited to receive the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin, 65 mg/m2; irinotecan, 150 mg/m2; l-leucovorin, 200 mg/m2; and 5-fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m2, repeated every 2 weeks). The treatment was continued for 12 cycles unless the patient had progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD) with symptom deterioration, unacceptable adverse events, or requested to terminate the treatment prematurely. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results Sixty-five patients were enrolled from July 2012 to April 2017 in three institutions, and they all received at least one cycle of chemotherapy, with a median of 8 cycles (range 1–12 cycles). No complete response was observed. Twenty-one (32.3%) patients had partial responses, and 27 (41.5%) had SD. The ORR and disease control rate of the study cohort was 32.3% and 73.8%. The estimated median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.76–14.44) and 5.77 (95% CI 5.00–6.54) months. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse events included neutropenia (12.3%) and diarrhea (6.2%). No treatment-related death was observed. Conclusions Modified FOLFIRINOX was well-tolerated and might be a promising option as first-line therapy for Chinese patients with metastatic PC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02028806. Registered 7 January 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02028806

Background Regorafenib at the standard intermittent dosing schedule proved effective in the GRID trial for refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, this dosing schedule requires frequent dose reduction, and the progression of GISTs or tumor-related symptoms during the off-treatment period has also been noted in some patients. Therefore, we conducted this phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous dosing schedule. Methods Patients with measurable, metastatic, or recurrent GISTs who failed to respond to both imatinib and sunitinib were eligible for this study. Regorafenib 100 mg p.o. daily was administered continuously. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR: complete response plus partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]) lasting for at least 12 weeks using RECIST version 1.1. Results The best response was PR in 2 (8%), SD in 16 (64%), and progressive disease in 6 (24%) patients. DCR lasting for at least 12 weeks was 64% (16 of 25). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9–8.6), and the 1-year survival rate was 64.5%. Ten patients (40%) experienced grade 3–4 toxicities, including hand-foot skin reaction (n = 4, 16%) and elevation of alanine aminotransferase (n = 2, 8%). Only six patients (24%) needed dose modification with a relative dose intensity of 95.0% for eight cycles in all patients. Conclusion Regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous schedule might be an alternative treatment in patients with GISTs after failure of imatinib and sunitinib. Clinical trial identification number. NCT02889328 Implications for Practice Regorafenib at the standard intermittent dosing schedule proved effective in the GRID trial for refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, this dosing schedule requires frequent dose reduction, and the progression of GISTs or tumor-related symptoms during the off-treatment period has been noted in some patients. This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous dosing schedule. With good efficacy and acceptable safety profiles, regorafenib at a lower, continuously administered dose might be an alternative treatment in patients with GISTs after imatinib and sunitinib. Rechallenge of regorafenib may slow the disease progression.

In cancer patients, impairment of kidney function is not uncommon. Recently, the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients has been reported, however, there is no recommendation for dose and administration to patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). A 66-year-old man began receiving HD for chronic renal failure 4 years previously. He suffered from diarrhea, back pain, and loss of appetite, and his weight gradually decreased. Abdominal dynamic computed tomography showed a 45-mm hypodense mass in the pancreatic body and a 30-mm hypodense mass in the liver. The patient was diagnosed with metastatic PDAC. He started combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel without dose modification. He developed pneumonia and neutropenia in the first and second courses, so we modified to a 60% dose of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel on day 1 every 2 weeks. After dose modification, he continued combination chemotherapy for over 7 months without severe adverse events or tumor progression. Combination chemotherapy using gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel was effective in a PDAC patient undergoing HD. While it is possible to originally administer these drugs with no dose modification, early dose modification was needed for our patient because of severe adverse events.

Purpose We tried to evaluate whether there are any specific features in treatment outcomes of firstline afatinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared with gefitinib or erlotinib. Materials and Methods We analyzed patients treated with first-line afatinib, gefitinib, or erlotinib for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC at Samsung Medical Center between 2014 and 2016. Results In total, 467 patients received first-line afatinib (n=165), gefitinib (n=230), or erlotinib (n=72). Afatinib was used more often in patients with tumors harboring deletion in exon 19 (Del19), whereas the gefitinib group had more elderly, females, and never smokers. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time for afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib was 19.1 months, 13.7 months, and 14.0 months, respectively (p=0.001). The superior PFS of afatinib was more remarkable in subgroups of Del19 or uncommon EGFR mutations. Overall toxicity profiles of the three drugs were comparable, though more grade 3 or 4 toxicities were detected in afatinib (7.3%) compared with gefitinib (2.6%) or erlotinib (1.8%). The common grade 3 or 4 toxicities of afatinib included diarrhea (3.0%), paronychia (2.4%), and skin rash (1.8%). Dose modification was more frequently required in patients treated with afatinib (112/165, 68%), compared with gefitinib (5/230, 2%) and erlotinib (4/72, 6%). Interestingly, however, dose reduction in the afatinib group did not impair its efficacy in terms of PFS (dose reduction vs. no reduction group, 23.5 months vs. 12.4 months). Conclusion First-line afatinib showed satisfactory efficacy data and manageable toxicity profiles.

Ertugliflozin, a sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, prevents renal glucose reabsorption resulting in urinary glucose excretion. This open‐label, parallel cohort, randomized study conducted in healthy Chinese adults residing in China assessed the pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of 5 mg and 15 mg of ertugliflozin following single (fasted condition) and multiple‐dose (fed condition) administration. Sixteen subjects were randomized and completed the study. Ertugliflozin absorption was rapid, with maximum plasma concentrations observed 1 hour after dosing under fasted conditions and 2 to 4 hours after dosing under fed conditions. Following single‐ and multiple‐dose administration, ertugliflozin exhibited dose‐proportional exposures with an apparent mean terminal half‐life of approximately 9.5 to 11.9 hours. Steady state was reached after 4 once‐daily doses. The accumulation ratio based on the area under the plasma concentration–time curve after multiple‐dose administration was approximately 1.3 and 1.2 for ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg, respectively. Ertugliflozin was generally well tolerated following administration of single and multiple oral doses of 5 mg and 15 mg in healthy Chinese subjects. Pharmacokinetic comparison with non‐Asian subjects indicated that there are no clinically meaningful racial differences and no dose modification of ertugliflozin is required based on race or body weight.

The pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral dose of 200‐mg plant‐derived pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) in oral solution (Epidiolex in the United States; 100 mg/mL) were assessed in subjects with mild to severe hepatic impairment (n = 8 each for mild and moderate, n = 6 for severe) relative to matched subjects with normal hepatic function (n = 8). Blood samples were collected until 48 hours after dosing and evaluated by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters (primarily maximum measured plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to time t, area under the concentration‐time curve from time zero to infinity, time to maximum plasma concentration, and terminal half‐life) of CBD and its major metabolites were derived using non‐compartmental analysis. CBD was rapidly absorbed in all groups independent of hepatic function (median time to maximum plasma concentration, 2‐2.8 hours). Exposure (area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity) to total CBD slightly increased in subjects with mild hepatic impairment (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 1.48; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.90‐2.41). However, there were clinically relevant increases in subjects with moderate (GMR, 2.45; 90%CI, 1.50‐4.01) and severe (GMR, 5.15; 90%CI, 2.94‐9.00) hepatic impairment, relative to subjects with normal hepatic function. Exposure to the CBD metabolites (6‐hydroxy‐CBD and 7‐hydroxy‐CBD) also increased in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment, but to a lesser extent than the parent drug. The 7‐carboxy‐CBD metabolite exposure was lower in subjects with severe hepatic impairment when compared with subjects with normal liver function. These findings indicate that dose modification is necessary in patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment, and a lower starting dose and slower titration are necessary based on benefit‐risk. CBD was well tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events reported during the trial.

GSK3389404 is a liver‐targeted antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits synthesis of hepatitis B surface antigen and all other hepatitis B virus proteins. This first‐in‐human, randomized, double‐blind, phase 1 study assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics of GSK3389404 administered subcutaneously (SC) in healthy subjects. Four single ascending‐dose cohorts (10 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg, and 120 mg) and 3 multiple ascending‐dose cohorts (30 mg, 60 mg, and 120 mg once weekly for 4 weeks) each comprised 6 subjects randomized to GSK3389404 and 2 subjects randomized to placebo. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) or withdrawals due to AEs. The safety profile did not worsen with repeated dosing. The most frequent treatment‐related AEs were injection site reactions (19.0% [n = 8/42], frequency unrelated to dose levels); all were mild (Grade 1) and resolved without dose modification or discontinuation. GSK3389404 administered subcutaneously was readily absorbed with a time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of 1–4 hours and an elimination half‐life of 3–6 hours in plasma. Plasma area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax) were dose‐proportional. Dose‐normalized plasma AUC from time 0 to infinity averaged 69.9 ng·h/(mL·mg dose) across cohorts, and Cmax 9.5 ng/(mL·mg dose). Pharmacokinetic profiles and parameters were comparable between single and multiple dosing. No accumulation was observed with once‐weekly dosing. The metabolite was undetectable in urine and plasma. In the pooled urine, GSK3389404 was estimated to account for

Summary Objective Patients with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome (LGS) who completed 1 of 2 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials of add‐on cannabidiol (CBD) (GWPCARE3, NCT02224560 or GWPCARE4, NCT02224690) were invited to enroll in an open‐label extension (OLE) study evaluating the long‐term safety and efficacy of CBD (GWPCARE5, NCT02224573). Herein we present an interim analysis of the safety, efficacy, and patient‐reported outcomes from this trial. Methods Patients received a pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified CBD oral solution (Epidiolex; 100 mg/mL), titrated from 2.5 to 20 mg/kg/d over a 2‐week titration period, in addition to their existing medications. Doses could be reduced if not tolerated or increased up to 30 mg/kg/d if thought to be of benefit. Results This interim analysis was based on a November 2016 data cut. Of 368 patients who completed treatment in GWPCARE3 and GWPCARE4, 366 (99.5%) enrolled in the OLE study (GWPCARE5). Median treatment duration was 38 weeks at a mean modal dose of 23 mg/kg/d. Most patients (92.1%) experienced adverse events (AEs), primarily of mild (32.5%) or moderate (43.4%) severity. The most common AEs were diarrhea (26.8%), somnolence (23.5%), and convulsion (21.3%). Thirty‐five patients (9.6%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. Liver transaminase elevations were reported in 37 patients (10.1%), of whom 29 were receiving concomitant valproic acid; 34 cases resolved spontaneously or with dose modification of CBD or concomitant medication. Median reduction from baseline in drop seizure frequency (quantified monthly over 12‐week periods) ranged from 48% to 60% through week 48. Median reduction in monthly total seizure frequency ranged from 48% to 57% across all 12‐week periods through week 48. Eighty‐eight percent of patients/caregivers reported an improvement in the patient's overall condition per the Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change scale. Significance In this study, long‐term add‐on CBD treatment had an acceptable safety profile in patients with LGS and led to sustained reductions in seizures.

Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor which is used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. The cutaneous toxicities due to sorafenib can affect the daily activities of patients, resulting in interruption or dose modification of therapy. We report four cases of adverse cutaneous effects of sorafenib along with their management. The cases represent the wide spectrum of sorafenib cutaneous toxicities from mild to severe.

BACKGROUND: Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition (BRAF-MEK) is a standard therapy for patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma, but to the authors’ knowledge, the tolerance, adverse event (AE) profile, and efficacy have not been well defined in the post-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) setting. METHODS: Patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who received combined BRAF-MEK after prior PD-1-based therapy were assembled from 4 tertiary care centers in the United States and Australia. Dose modification was defined as a treatment break, dose reduction, or intermittent dosing. Rates of hospitalization and discontinuation due to AEs were collected, and overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods from the time of the initiation of BRAF-MEK therapy. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were identified as having received a BRAF-MEK regimen at a median of 34 days after the last dose of PD-1-based therapy. The majority of patients (86%) received the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib. Approximately 80% of patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer M1c or M1d disease. Sixty-five regimens (83%) had ≥1 dose modification. The median time to the first dose modification was 14 days; 86% occurred within 90 days and 71% involved pyrexia. Dose modifications were more common in patients receiving BRAF-MEK

Background The recommended starting dose of eribulin in patients with hepatic impairment is based on the Child-Pugh score, largely informed by a pharmacokinetic study of 18 patients. In the pivotal studies of eribulin in metastatic breast cancer (Study 301 and Study 305 [EMBRACE]), entry criteria and dose modifications were based on liver-function test (LFT) results rather than Child-Pugh score. In populations such as patients with metastatic breast cancer, in which metastatic infiltration is the predominant cause of hepatic impairment, using Child-Pugh score may be problematic; in clinical practice, it has been more common for oncologists to make dosing decisions based on LFTs. To address this, the effects of abnormal baseline LFT results on eribulin efficacy and safety were investigated. Methods In this pooled post hoc analysis, 1062 patients who were randomized to receive eribulin in Studies 301 and 305 were divided into 4 groups: (A) no elevated LFT results (no liver impairment); (B) increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase; (C) decreased albumin and/or increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase but not increased bilirubin; and (D) increased bilirubin. Patients were subcategorized by presence of liver metastasis. Drug exposure, dose intensity, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed. Results Eribulin mesylate mean dosage was 0.82 (group A)–0.65 mg/m2/week (group D). Group D had shorter treatment, more dose reductions/delays, more TEAEs leading to dose modifications, and numerically lower objective response rates and clinical benefit rates versus groups A–C. TEAE rates leading to dose modification were similar between group D (45.5%) and groups A–C (range, 43.5–54.9%) in the absence of liver metastases, but higher in group D (91.3%) compared with groups A–C (range, 41.7–54.3%) if liver metastases were present. Conclusions Mild elevations in bilirubin levels were associated with increased toxicity and a greater requirement for dose modifications. Based both on these study data and existing recommendations, we propose a novel scheme to guide initial dose selection in patients with metastatic breast cancer and hepatic impairment that is based on LFTs rather than Child-Pugh score.

Crizotinib is a small-molecule, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that exhibits decreased aqueous solubility at a higher pH. This open-label, randomized, phase 1 study (NCT01549574) evaluated the effect of multiple doses of the proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of crizotinib and the safety of crizotinib with or without esomeprazole in healthy adults. Participants received a single 250-mg crizotinib dose after overnight fast or a single 250-mg crizotinib dose following esomeprazole 40 mg/day for 5 days. After a washout of ≥14 days, participants crossed over to the alternate treatment. Blood samples for plasma analysis were taken up to 144 hours after crizotinib dosing and relevant PK parameters estimated. Safety was assessed in all participants receiving ≥1 dose of study medication. Fifteen participants were evaluable for PK and safety for each treatment. Coadministration with esomeprazole resulted in a slight decrease (≈10%) in the crizotinib geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to infinity (adjusted geometric mean ratio, 89.81% [90% confidence interval, 79.05-102.03]). Coadministration of esomeprazole did not affect peak crizotinib exposure. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in similar numbers between treatments; no serious or severe AEs occurred. The most common AE was diarrhea. Although esomeprazole decreased total exposure of crizotinib, it is not considered clinically meaningful, and dose modification is not required when crizotinib is coadministered with agents that affect gastric pH.

ObjectiveTo evaluate correlations between rucaparib exposure and selected efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma using pooled data from Study 10 and ARIEL2.MethodsEfficacy analyses were limited to patients with carcinomas harboring a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who had received ≥2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received ≥1 rucaparib dose. Steady-state daily area under the concentration-time curve (AUCss) and maximum concentration (Cmax,ss) for rucaparib were calculated for each patient and averaged by actual dose received over time (AUCavg,ss and Cmax,avg,ss) using a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model.ResultsRucaparib exposure was dose-proportional and not associated with baseline patient weight. In the exposure-efficacy analyses (n=121), AUCavg,ss was positively associated with independent radiology review-assessed RECIST response in the subgroup of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease (n=75, p=0.017). In the exposure-safety analyses (n=393, 40mg once daily to 840mg twice daily [BID] starting doses), most patients received a 600mg BID rucaparib starting dose, with 27% and 21% receiving 1 or≥2 dose reductions, respectively. Cmax,ss was significantly correlated with grade≥2 serum creatinine increase, grade≥3 alanine transaminase/aspartate transaminase increase, platelet decrease, fatigue/asthenia, and maximal hemoglobin decrease (p&nbsp

Background Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) must be continued for 3 years, to achieve a long-term modifying effect. Adherence is a key to ensure effectiveness. The objective of this study was, first of all, to evaluate the adherence with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and to identify the main causes of SCIT withdrawal in real-life practice in our clinic. Secondly, we also aimed to investigate to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic altered our SCIT receiving patients’ treatment adherence behaviors and the factors that affected their decisions. Methods Retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients ages ≥18 years, who had started SCIT in January 2014 or later until September 2020 in our department for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma or venom allergy, were included in the study. Adherence was determined as the accomplishment of 3 years of SCIT. Results A total of 124 patients (72 female [58.1%]; median age, 35 [19–77] years) were included. The adherence rate to SCIT in our tertiary center's real-life setting was 56.25% with a follow-up duration of 3 years before COVID-19 pandemic. Dose modification, defined as reducing patient's planned SCIT dose due to a systemic allergic/large local reaction or missed injection, and its frequency, which is the number of dose adjustments done throughout the SCIT, was found to be the only factor related to nonadherence. But with the pandemic only in 6 months, among 63 patients receiving SCIT, 15 patients (23.81%) dropped out, and the most common reason was fear of being infected with COVID-19 virus during receiving SCIT in hospital (93.33%). The only independent predictor of drop-out during the COVID-19 pandemic was short duration of AIT (p = 0.012). When we compare the dropped-out cases before and after the start of pandemic, AIT duration was significantly shorter in pandemic period (p = 0.005). Conclusion Adherence rate to SCIT in our real-world setting study was 56.25% before the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results indicated that patients requiring dose modification were more prone to be non-adherent. Approximately one quarter of patients dropped-out with the start of pandemic, almost all due to fear of being infected during receiving SCIT in hospital. Since short SCIT follow-up time was found to be the only risk factor for drop-out during the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe that patients who are in the early phases of their treatment should be observed more closely and their concerns should be answered by their doctors.

BackgroundINCB086550 is an orally administered small molecule that binds PD-L1 and inhibits PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. Translational data demonstrating markers of immune activation in patients following INCB086550 were previously reported.1 Preliminary clinical data from this phase 1 study are presented below.MethodsAdult patients (≥18 years) with advanced solid tumors were enrolled into this open-label study. Patients had disease progression after standard available therapy or were intolerant of or ineligible for standard treatment. Measurable disease was required. A modified 3+3 dose-escalation design was employed, followed by dose expansions. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of INCB086550, identification of a pharmacologically active dose and/or MTD, and confirmation of the RP2D. Secondary endpoints included PK, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy as assessed by investigator-determined ORR and DCR (CR, PR, or SD ≥12 weeks).ResultsAs of 9Apr2021, 79 patients received treatment (Table 1); 57.0% were female, 62.0% had ≥2 prior lines of therapy, and 16% received prior IO treatment. Forty-six (58.2%) patients had treatment-related TEAEs; those occurring in ≥5% of patients are presented in Table 2. Ten patients (12.7%) had grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAEs. Immune-related TEAEs occurred in 15 patients (19.0%); the most common (>1 patient) included peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=5), pruritus (n=3), immune-mediated neuropathy (n=2), and peripheral motor neuropathy (n=2). In total, 10 (12.7%) patients had TEAEs of peripheral neuropathy; all were grade ≤3. All grade 2 or 3 TEAEs of peripheral neuropathy resolved or improved with either study drug continuation without dose modification, dose reduction, or drug interruption/discontinuation. Patients with TEAEs leading to treatment interruption were 21 (26.6%), dose reduction 5 (6.3%), and discontinuation 13 (16.5%). Five patients (6.3%) died of a TEAE (cerebrovascular accident, dyspnea, general physical health deterioration, intestinal obstruction, intracranial hemorrhage [each n=1]); all fatal TEAEs were considered unrelated to study drug. The efficacy-evaluable population included 68 patients; ORR was 11.8% (95%CI, 5.2%–21.9%; CR, 1.5%; PR, 10.3%), and DCR was 19.1% (95%CI, 10.6%–30.5%; Table 3). Eight objective responses were observed at doses ≥400 mg BID (Table 4); 3 of these were noted among the 5 IO treatment-naive patients with MSI-H tumors who received 400 mg BID.ConclusionsImmune-related AEs observed in this ongoing phase 1 study are consistent with those seen with antibody immune checkpoint inhibitors, with the exception of peripheral neuropathy. Preliminary efficacy of INCB086550 in tumor types known to be responsive to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy is encouraging and warrants further investigation.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03762447ReferencesPiha-Paul S, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(suppl 3):A255.Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol was approved by institutional review boards (IRB) or independent ethics committees at participating centers. All study participants gave informed consent before taking part. The approval numbers were: Integ Review IRB (Austin, TX), RM 598; MD Anderson Cancer Center Office of Human Subject Protection (Houston, TX), IRB ID 2018-0765; ADVARRA (Columbia, MD), IRB# 00000971; Ethisch Comité/Comité d’ Ethique Hospital (Brussels, Belgium), A2021/085; Hôpital Saint-Louis (Paris, France), Prof Le Tourneau – 2020-118/Ref. of the Promoter 0.09.22.72214; NHS Health Research Authority London - City & East Research Ethics Committee (Bristol, UK), IRAS project ID:282291/REC reference: 20/LO/1001; Comitato Etico IRCCS Pascale (Milan, Italy), ISS Validation Protocol Number 29111(2020)-PRE21-1835; Comitato Etico Della Fondazione IRCCS ”Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori”- Milano CE150053 (Milan, Italy), INT 230/20; Comitato Etico Regione Toscana - Area Vasta Sud Est CE150047, 18064; Comitato Etico Indipendente Istituto Clinico Humanitas CE150081, 940/20; Regulatory Pharma Net (Pisa, Italy), IEC 1393.Abstract 529 Table 1Number of patients per dose levelBID, twice daily; QD, once daily.The tumor types in the study included breast, cervical, colorectal, endometrial, esophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, melanoma, mesothelioma, ovarian, small cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, renal cell, urothelial, adrenal, anal, cholangiocarcinoma, gall bladder, pancreatic, penile, salivary gland, sarcoma, vaginal, prostate, basal cell, pleomorphic sarcoma, fallopian, carcinoma of parotid gland, well-differentiated liposarcoma, myoepithelial, castrate-resistant prostate cancer, cancer of unknown primary, neuroendocrine, prostate adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, glioblastoma, anal canal, angiosarcoma, and gastroesophageal junction.Abstract 529 Table 2Treatment-related TEAEs reported by ≥5% of patients (N=79)TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.Abstract 529 Table 3Summary of best overall response by RECIST v1.1 or RANO*CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; GBM, glioblastoma; ORR, objective response rate; PR, partial response; RANO, Response Assessment of Neuro-Oncology; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease.* 1 patient with GBM was assessed by RANO and had best overall response of progressive disease.† The efficacy-evaluable population included all solid tumor participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of INCB086550, completed a baseline scan, and met at least 1 of the following criteria: ≥1 postbaseline scan, participant had been on the study for a minimum of 63 days of follow-up, or participant had discontinued from treatment.‡ ”Not evaluable” indicates participants in the efficacy-evaluable population that did not have valid postbaseline overall response assessments by RECIST or RANO.§ ”Not assessed” indicates participants in the efficacy-evaluable population that did not have any postbaseline overall response assessments by RECIST or RANO.Abstract 529 Table 4Tumor types with investigator-assessed objective response per RECIST v1.1 (n=8)BID, twice daily; dMMR, deficient mismatch repair; IO, immuno-oncology; MSI-H, high microsatellite instability; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.+Ongoing response.

Background Aim of this study was to analyze the effect of iron therapy in children with breath-holding spells, irrespective of their hemoglobin level. Method All of the children were evaluated in terms of age, sex, age at onset of the attack, attack frequency, type of breath-holding spell, family pedigree, laboratory values. All enrolled patients were given iron at the dose of 4 mg/kg/day as a single daily dose for 3 months. Patients were called for follow-up appointments 1 and 3 months after the initiation of treatment to record the frequency and severity of spells. Results The mean age of the patients was 12.50 +/- 9.51 months. Patients were divided into two groups according to the hemoglobin level. The frequency of anemia in children with spells was recorded as 27%. Out of 100 patients treated with iron, 43% showed complete remission at the end of 1 month. At the end of the 3 months, percentage of complete responders increased to 80%. After three-month of iron treatment, 96.2% of the anemic and 73.97% of the non-anemic patients were spell-free. Eight children had mild adverse effects after iron therapy that did not require dose modification. Conclusions This study confirmed that iron therapy reduces spell frequency regardless of anemia in all breath-holding spells. A three-month empiric iron therapy should be offered to all children with spells.