Search

Purpose of Review Telemedicine use in dermatology, termed “teledermatology”, offers a cost-effective model to improve healthcare efficiency and access. Only a minority of dermatology practices has integrated teledermatology into their practice prior to COVID-19. A thorough understanding of the barriers and facilitators may promote teledermatology adoption. Implementation science frameworks offer theoretically driven ways to assess factors affecting teledermatology implementation. This review uses a comprehensive implementation science framework to summarize barriers and facilitators of teledermatology implementation and appraises the quality of existing research. Recent Findings Technological characteristics of teledermatology (e.g., user-friendliness) and factors within the outer setting (e.g., reimbursement and legal considerations) were the most commonly reported barriers. No existing studies use a comprehensive implementation framework to identify factors influencing teledermatology implementation. Many included studies have a risk of bias in at least two of the five study quality indices evaluated. Summary This systematic review is the first study to summarize the existing teledermatology implementation literature into well-defined constructs from a comprehensive implementation science framework. Findings suggest future studies would benefit from the use of an implementation framework to reduce study bias, improve result comprehensiveness, facilitate comparisons across studies, and produce evidence-based resolutions to implementation barriers. Tools, resources, and recommendations to facilitate the use of an implementation framework in future studies are provided. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13671-020-00323-0.

BACKGROUND The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) is an international initiative that offers standardized and validated tools to guide the appraisal of patient-reported outcome measures in healthcare. AIMS To explore the use of a new set of tools from the COSMIN to appraise studies on one outcome measure available to speech and language therapists (SLTs). METHODS & PROCEDURES We used the COSMIN tools to appraise seven studies and a user manual that reported the measurement properties of the Focus on the Outcomes of Children Under Six (FOCUS), a validated measure of pre-schoolers' communicative participation that is used in various contexts around the world. OUTCOMES & RESULTS Using COSMIN guidelines, the FOCUS was categorized as a 'category A' tool because there was a sufficient level of evidence to support its content validity and internal consistency. According to the COSMIN guidelines, this means that the FOCUS can be recommended for use. The quality of evidence supporting measurement properties of the FOCUS received a rating of 'moderate', meaning users can have moderate confidence in its measurement properties. Since these ratings from the COSMIN tools may be unclear to users of the FOCUS, we have provided more specific recommendations. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The COSMIN tools offer detailed standards to support the appraisal of outcome measures available to SLTs. However, several limitations were observed, and recommendations to support the application of the COSMIN tools are provided. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Collecting outcome data is essential to ensure speech and language therapy is effective. Until the development of COSMIN there was a lack of standards in the way the measurement properties of outcome measure instruments were appraised. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper used the FOCUS, a measure of pre-schoolers' communicative participation outcomes in speech and language therapy, as a case example to illustrate the applications of the COSMIN tools. In doing so, the strengths and limitations of the current COSMIN tools in appraising the quality of outcome measure instruments are emphasized. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The COSMIN tools offer a step-by-step, standardized approach to appraise various measurement properties in outcome instruments. Due to existing limitations of the COSMIN tools, appraisal should provide clear and specific recommendations so users of outcome measures (e.g., SLTs, researchers) can identify the appropriate uses of each instrument.

Background To improve the uptake of research into practice, knowledge translation frameworks recommend tailoring implementation strategies to address practice barriers. This study reports our experience pairing the Theoretical Domains Framework with information from multiple stakeholder groups to co-develop practice-informed strategies for improving the implementation of an evidence-based outcome measurement tool across a large community health system for preschoolers with communication impairments. Methods Concept mapping was used to identify strategies for improving implementation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS) in Ontario Canada’s Preschool Speech and Language Program. This work was done in five stages. First, we interviewed 37 speech-language pathologists (clinicians) who identified 90 unique strategies to resolve practice barriers to FOCUS implementation. Second, clinicians (n = 34), policy-makers (n = 3), and members of the FOCUS research team (n = 6) sorted and rated the strategies by importance and feasibility. Third, stakeholders’ sorting data were analyzed to generate a two-dimensional concept map. Based on the rating data from stakeholders, we prioritized a list of strategies that were rated as highly important and highly feasible, and summarized the practice barriers addressed by each of the prioritized strategies. Fourth, we validated these findings with stakeholders via an online survey. Fifth, the mechanisms of action of the prioritized list of strategies were considered based on available evidence from the Theoretical Domains Framework and associated behavior change literature. Results Stakeholders categorized the 90 unique implementation strategies into a six-cluster concept map. Based on stakeholders’ ratings, a list of 14 implementation strategies were prioritized. These implementation strategies were reported to resolve barriers within the environmental context and resources and beliefs about consequences domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. All but one of the prioritized strategies have a demonstrated link in resolving existing barriers according to the behavioral change literature. Conclusions Our study contributes to a growing literature that demonstrates the process of tailoring implementation strategies to specific barriers. Practical drawbacks and benefits of using concept mapping as a way to engage stakeholders in implementation research are discussed.

Purpose Immature auditory processing has been proposed to underlie language impairments in children with developmental language disorder (DLD; also known as specific language impairment ). Using newly available normative auditory evoked potential (AEP) waveforms, we estimated AEP maturity in individual children with DLD and explored whether this maturational index was related to their language abilities. Method AEPs were elicited by 225 trials of a 490-Hz pure tone. Using intraclass correlation and our previously established normative AEP waveforms of 7- to 10-year-old children with typical development, we estimated the age equivalent of the AEPs (AEP–age) from 21 children with DLD. The relation between AEP maturity and language was explored through regression analysis. Results AEP–age predicted 31% of the variance in the language abilities of children with DLD. The AEP–age of children with mild DLD was similar to their chronological age, whereas children with moderate–severe DLD showed, on average, a 1.3-year delay in their neural responses. AEP–age predicted receptive, but not expressive, language performance. Conclusion Maturation in auditory neural responses is a significant predictor of language ability, particularly in children with moderate–severe DLD.

Background Few studies have compared patient and anatomic characteristics across the broad scope of oral and maxillofacial disease seen in dental clinics. The authors conducted a study to make these comparisons by surveying a large sample of histologically diagnosed oral and maxillofacial lesions in a US adult population. Methods A total of 51,781 specimens biopsied from 51,781 adult patients were received by an oral pathology service over 13 years (2001-2015) and analyzed. A description of patients’ sex and age at diagnosis, as well as the anatomic site of biopsy was given for diagnoses of 10 oral disease types, including malignant neoplasm, benign neoplasm, infectious, reactive, potentially malignant, developmental, healthy tissue, immune dysfunction, physical trauma, and other. Results The authors reported reactive lesions were the most prevalent disease type found in the sample (74.9%). Malignant diagnoses comprised 1.97% of all biopsies. The 3 most prevalent diagnoses in this study included benign keratosis, chronic apical periodontitis, and radicular cyst. Different anatomic sites, patient age groups, and sexes show different distributions of disease. Conclusions Certain disease types and diagnoses were found to have a higher prevalence by sex, among particular age groups, and in certain anatomic sites. Practical Implications This information provides clinicians with a detailed and broad scope of the variety of oral and maxillofacial lesions processed at an oral pathology service and may assist practitioners in forming clinical impressions and differential diagnoses.