1. Delayed graft function and acute rejection following HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation
- Author
-
Enrico Benedetti, Arjang Djamali, Madeleine M. Waldram, Kenneth L. Brayman, Stanley C. Jordan, Michael A. Rees, Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang, Lloyd E. Ratner, Matthew Cooper, Eliot Heher, Robert A. Montgomery, Jane J. Long, Jose Oberholzer, Christopher L. Marsh, George S. Lipkowitz, Marc L. Melcher, Adel Bozorgzadeh, Ty B. Dunn, Karina Covarrubias, Mark D. Stegall, Jason R. Wellen, Ron Shapiro, Jennifer Verbesey, Babak J. Orandi, John P. Roberts, Jose M. El-Amm, Debra L. Sudan, Allan B. Massie, R. Pelletier, Bashir R. Sankari, David A. Gerber, Pooja Singh, Marc P. Posner, Kyle R. Jackson, Tomasz Kozlowski, Dorry L. Segev, Jennifer D. Motter, Francis L. Weng, Sandip Kapur, A. Osama Gaber, Beatrice P. Concepcion, and J. Harold Helderman
- Subjects
Graft Rejection ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Preoperative counseling ,Urology ,Delayed Graft Function ,Human leukocyte antigen ,030230 surgery ,Kidney transplant ,Living donor ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Living Donors ,medicine ,Humans ,Immunology and Allergy ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Kidney transplantation ,Retrospective Studies ,Transplantation ,business.industry ,Graft Survival ,medicine.disease ,Kidney Transplantation ,Histocompatibility ,Cohort ,business - Abstract
Incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (ILDKTr) have pre-existing donor-specific antibody (DSA) that, despite desensitization, may persist or reappear with resulting consequences, including delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR). To quantify the risk of DGF and AR in ILDKT and downstream effects, we compared 1406 ILDKTr to 17 542 compatible LDKT recipients (CLDKTr) using a 25-center cohort with novel SRTR linkage. We characterized DSA strength as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF); positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC); or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC). DGF occurred in 3.1% of CLDKT, 3.5% of PLNF, 5.7% of PFNC, and 7.6% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher DGF for PCC recipients (aOR = 1.03 1.682.72 ). However, the impact of DGF on mortality and DCGF risk was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction > .1). AR developed in 8.4% of CLDKT, 18.2% of PLNF, 21.3% of PFNC, and 21.7% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher AR (aOR PLNF = 1.45 2.093.02 ; PFNC = 1.67 2.403.46 ; PCC = 1.48 2.243.37 ). Although the impact of AR on mortality was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction = .1), its impact on DCGF risk was less consequential for ILDKT (aHR = 1.34 1.621.95 ) than CLDKT (aHR = 1.96 2.292.67 ) (p interaction = .004). Providers should consider these risks during preoperative counseling, and strategies to mitigate them should be considered.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF