Search

Objectives The use of broad-spectrum cephalosporins is associated with induction of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Recent knowledge on the importance of the healthy microbiota in preventing pathogen colonization/outgrowth highlights the caution needed when prescribing broad-spectrum antibiotics. The use of historical narrow-spectrum antibiotics, such as first-generation cephalosporins, is gaining increased attention once more as they have a reduced impact on the microbiota whilst treating infections. Here, the effects of two first-generation cephalosporins, compared with a third-generation cephalosporin, on the human microbiota were investigated and their propensity to induce simulated CDI. Methods Three in vitro chemostat models, which simulate the physiochemical conditions of the human colon, were seeded with a human faecal slurry and instilled with either narrow-spectrum cephalosporins, cefalexin and cefradine, or a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, at concentrations reflective of colonic levels. Results Instillation of cefalexin was associated with reduced recoveries of Bifidobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae; however, Clostridium spp. recoveries remained unaffected. Cefradine exposure was associated with decreased recoveries of Bifidobacterium spp., Bacteroides spp. and Enterobacteriaceae. These changes were not associated with induction of CDI, as we observed a lack of C. difficile spore germination/proliferation, thus no toxin was detected. This is in contrast to a model exposed to ceftriaxone, where CDI was observed. Conclusions These model data suggest that the minimal impact of first-generation cephalosporins, namely cefalexin and cefradine, on the intestinal microbiota results in a low propensity to induce CDI.

Summary Background Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) can colonize the gut and are of major clinical concern. Identification of CPE colonization is problematic; there is no gold-standard detection method, and the effects of antibiotic exposure and microbiota dysbiosis on detection are unknown. Aim Based on a national survey we selected four CPE screening assays in common use. We used a clinically reflective in vitro model of human gut microbiota to investigate the performance of each test to detect three different CPE strains under different, clinically relevant antibiotic exposures. Methods Twelve gut models were seeded with a pooled faecal slurry and exposed to CPE either before, after, concomitant with, or in the absence of piperacillin-tazobactam (358 mg/L, 3 × daily, seven days). Total Enterobacterales and CPE populations were enumerated daily. Regular screening for CPE was performed using Cepheid Xpert® Carba-R molecular test, and with Brilliance™ CRE, Colorex™ mSuperCARBA and CHROMID® CARBA SMART agars. Findings Detection of CPE when the microbiota are intact is problematic. Antibiotic exposure disrupts microbiota populations and allows CPE proliferation, increasing detection. The performances of assays varied, particularly with respect to different CPE strains. The Cepheid assay performed better than the three agar methods for detecting a low level of CPE within an intact microbiota, although performance of all screening methods was comparable when CPE populations increased in a disrupted microbiota. Conclusion CPE strains differed in their dynamics of colonization in an in vitro gut model and in their subsequent response to antibiotic exposure. This affected detection by molecular and screening methods, which has implications for the sensitivity of CPE screening in healthcare settings.

PURPOSE APHINITY, at 45 months median follow-up, showed that pertuzumab added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy significantly improved invasive disease–free survival (IDFS) (hazard ratio 0.81 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.00], P = .045) for patients with early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer (BC), specifically those with node-positive or hormone receptor (HR)–negative disease. We now report the preplanned second interim overall survival (OS) and descriptive updated IDFS analysis with 74 months median follow-up. METHODS After surgery and central HER2-positive confirmation, 4,805 patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative BC were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 1-year pertuzumab or placebo added to standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1-year trastuzumab. RESULTS This interim OS analysis comparing pertuzumab versus placebo did not reach the P = .0012 level required for statistical significance ( P = .17, hazard ratio 0.85). Six-year OS were 95% versus 94% with 125 deaths (5.2%) versus 147 (6.1%), respectively. IDFS analysis based on 508 events (intent-to-treat population) showed a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91) and 6-year IDFS of 91% and 88% for pertuzumab and placebo groups, respectively. The node-positive cohort continues to derive clear IDFS benefit from pertuzumab (hazard ratio 0.72 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.87]), 6-year IDFS being 88% and 83%, respectively. Benefit was not seen in the node-negative cohort. In a subset analysis, IDFS benefit from pertuzumab showed a hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.92) for HR-positive disease and a hazard ratio of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.10) for HR-negative disease. Primary cardiac events remain < 1% in both the treatment groups. No new safety signals were seen. CONCLUSION This analysis confirms the IDFS benefit from adding pertuzumab to standard adjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive HER2-positive early BC. Longer follow-up is needed to fully assess OS benefit.

Aim: To assess revision rates and postoperative mortality in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty (HA) for inflammatory arthritis compared to hip osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: The analysis was conducted among cases of HA that were recorded in the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) between April 2003 and December 2012 and linked to Office for National Statistics mortality records. Procedures were identified where the indication for surgery was listed as seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), other inflammatory arthritis (otherIA), or OA. 5-year revision risk and 90-day postoperative mortality according to indication were compared using Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, year of operation, implant type, and surgical approach. Results: The cohort included 1457 HA procedures conducted for RA, 615 for AS, 1000 for otherIA, and 183,108 for OA. When compared with OA, there was no increased revision risk for any form of inflammatory arthritis (adjusted HRs: RA: 0.93 (0.64–1.35); AS: 1.14 (0.73–1.79); otherIA: 1.08 (0.73–1.59)). Postoperative 90-day mortality was increased for RA when compared with OA (adjusted HR: 2.86 (1.68–4.88)), but not for AS (adjusted HR: 1.56 (0.59–4.18)) or otherIA (adjusted HR: 0.64 (0.16–2.55)). Conclusions: The revision risk in HA performed for all types of inflammatory arthritis is similar to that for HA performed for OA. The 3-fold increased risk of 90-day mortality in patients with RA compared with OA highlights the need for active management of associated comorbidities in RA patients during the perioperative period.

The phase 2 CAVALLI (NCT02055820) study assessed efficacy and safety of venetoclax, a selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) inhibitor, with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in first-line (1L) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including patients demonstrating Bcl-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (Bcl-2 IHC+). Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and had previously untreated DLBCL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and International Prognostic Index 2 to 5. Venetoclax 800 mg (days 4-10, cycle 1; days 1-10, cycles 2-8) was administered with rituximab (8 cycles) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (6-8 cycles) in 21-day cycles. Primary end points were safety, tolerability, and research_plete response (CR) at end of treatment (EOT). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Comparative analyses used covariate-adjusted R-CHOP controls from the GOYA/BO21005 study, an appropriate contemporary benchmark for safety and efficacy. Safety and efficacy analyses included 206 patients. CR rate at EOT was 69% in the overall population and was maintained across Bcl-2 IHC+ subgroups. With a median follow-up of 32.2 months, trends were observed for improved investigator-assessed PFS for venetoclax plus R-CHOP in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.87) and Bcl-2 IHC+ subgroups (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89) vs R-CHOP. Despite a higher incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (86%), related mortality was not increased (2%). Chemotherapy dose intensity was similar in CAVALLI vs GOYA. The addition of venetoclax to R-CHOP in 1L DLBCL demonstrates increased, but manageable, myelosuppression and the potential of improved efficacy, particularly in high-risk Bcl-2 IHC+ patient subgroups. Key Points: • The phase 2 CAVALLI study assessed efficacy and safety of venetoclax + R-CHOP in patients with DLBCL, including Bcl-2+ subpopulations. • Venetoclax + R-CHOP showed potential for improved efficacy vs R-CHOP alone, supporting further investigation of venetoclax in Bcl-2+ DLBCL.

C. difficile infection (CDI) is a worldwide healthcare problem with ~30% of cases failing primary therapy, placing a burden on healthcare systems and increasing patient morbidity. We have little understanding of why these therapies fail. Here, we use a clinically validated in vitro gut model to assess the contribution of biofilms towards recurrent disease and to investigate biofilm microbiota-C. difficile interactions. Initial experiments show that C. difficile cells became associated with the colonic biofilm microbiota and are not depleted by vancomycin or faecal microbiota transplant therapies. We observe that transferring biofilm encased C. difficile cells into a C. difficile naïve but CDI susceptible model induces CDI. Members of the biofilm community can impact C. difficile biofilm formation by acting either antagonistically or synergistically. We highlight the importance of biofilms as a reservoir for C. difficile, which can be a cause for recurrent infections.

Background Total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR) are two of the most common elective orthopaedic procedures worldwide. Physiotherapy is core to the recovery of people following joint replacement. However, there remains uncertainty as to physiotherapy provision at a national level. Objectives To examine the relationship between patient impairment and geographical variation on the provision of physiotherapy among patients who undergo primary total hip or knee replacement (THR/TKR). Design Population-based observational cohort study. Methods Patients undergoing THR (n = 17,338) or TKR (n = 20,260) recorded in the National Joint Registry for England (NJR) between 2009 and 2010 and completed Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) questionnaires at Baseline and 12 months postoperatively. Data were analysed on the frequency of physiotherapy over the first postoperative year across England’s Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs). Logistic regression analyses examined the relationship between a range of patient and geographical characteristics and physiotherapy provision. Results Following THR, patients were less likely to receive physiotherapy than following TKR patients (‘some’ treatment by a physiotherapist within 1st post operative year: 53% vs 79%). People with worse functional outcomes 12 months postoperatively, received more physiotherapy after THR and TKR. There was substantial variation in provision of physiotherapy according to age (younger people received more physiotherapy), gender (females received more physiotherapy) ethnicity (non-whites received more physiotherapy) and geographical location (40% of patients from South West received some physiotherapy compared to 40 73% in London after THR). Conclusions There is substantial variation in the provision of physiotherapy nationally. This variation is not explained by differences in the patient’s clinical presentation.

Background: The APHINITY trial demonstrated that pertuzumab, when added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy, modestly but statistically significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) among patients with HER2-positive, operable breast cancer. From November 2011 until August 2013, 2400 patients were randomly assigned to receive pertuzumab and 2405 to receive placebo. The clinical cut off-date for the primary analysis was 19 Dec 2016 after a median follow-up of 45.4 months. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, the estimates of the 3-year rates of IDFS were 94.1% in the pertuzumab group and 93.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 1.00; P=0.045). The benefit appeared more pronounced in patients with node-positive disease, with a HR of 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.96), and in those with hormone receptor-negative disease, where the HR was 0.76 (95% CI 0.56-1.04). Based on these results, pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab was approved for high risk early HER2-positive breast cancer patients. The first interim analysis of OS took place at that same time. A total of 169 patients had died, with no significant treatment effect with regards to mortality found at that time. Diarrhea, grade 3 or higher, was more frequent within the pertuzumab group (9.8%) compared with the placebo group (3.7%). Heart failure, cardiac death, and cardiac dysfunction were infrequent in both treatment groups. Results: At 74.1 months of median follow-up (clinical cut-off date June 19, 2019), we now report results of the pre-planned, calendar-driven second interim OS analysis which requires a p-value of 0.0012 to reach statistical significance. Updated descriptive analyses of IDFS and cardiac safety were also performed. Fewer deaths were observed in the pertuzumab (P) arm [125 (5.2%) vs 147 (6.1%)], however statistical significance was not reached at this interim analysis. The hazard ratio for OS is 0.85 [95% CI 0.67-1.07 (p=0.17)]; 6-year OS percents are 94.8% vs 93.9% (0.9% difference).Updated IDFS results based on 508 events in the ITT population are: hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI 0.64-0.91]; 6-year IDFS percents are 90.6% vs 87.8% (2.8% difference). Of note, the difference was due mainly to the reduction in distant (5.9% vs 7.7%) and loco-regional (1.2% vs 2.0%) BC relapses. The node-positive cohort continues to derive clear benefit from the addition of P: hazard ratio 0.72 (95% CI 0.59-0.87). The benefit in terms of 6-year IDFS percent is 4.5% [87.9% vs 83.4%].In the node-negative cohort, the IDFS hazard ratio is 1.02 (95% CI; 0.69-1.53) with 95% of patients being event-free in both arms at 6 years.With longer follow up, a treatment benefit of P is also seen in the hormone receptor (HR) positive cohort: IDFS hazard ratio for HR positive is 0.73 (95% CI 0.59 -0.92). IDFS hazard ratio for HR negative is 0.83 (95% CI 0.63 -1.10). No new cardiac safety concerns emerged. One additional primary cardiac event (heart failure) was reported in the P arm and 1 additional patient in each arm had a secondary cardiac event resulting to 18 and 8 for primary cardiac events and 65 and 68 for secondary cardiac events in the P and placebo arms, respectively. The benefit of P in HER2+ early BC is maintained, with the greatest benefit continuing to be observed in the node positive population. With longer follow-up, the benefit of P no longer appears to depend on HR status. Continued follow up of patients is very important to determine possible benefit for OS. A calendar-driven third interim OS analysis is planned in 2.5 years, and the event-driven final OS analysis is planned when 640 deaths have occurred. Citation Format: Martine Piccart, Marion Procter, Debora Fumagalli, Evandro de Azambuja, Emma Clark, Michael S. Ewer, Eleonora Restuccia, Guy Jerusalem, Susan Dent, Linda Reaby, Hervé Bonnefoi, Ian Krop, Tsang-Wu Liu, Tadeusz Pieńkowski, Masakazu Toi, Nicolas Wilcken, Michael Andersson, Young-Hyuck Im, Ling-Ming Tseng, Hans-Joachim Lueck, Marco Colleoni, Estefania Monturus, Mihaela Sicoe, Sébastien Guillaume, José Bines, Richard Gelber, Giuseppe Viale, Christoph Thomssen. Interim overall survival analysis of APHINITY (BIG 4-11): A randomized multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus placebo as adjuvant therapy in patients with operable HER2-positive early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-04.

Scoliosis is a 3D-torsional rotation of the spine, but risk factors for initiation and progression are little understood. Research is hampered by lack of population-based research since radiographs cannot be performed on entire populations due to the relatively high levels of ionising radiation. Hence we have developed and validated a manual method for identifying scoliosis from total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans for research purposes. However, to allow full utilisation of population-based research cohorts, this needs to be automated. The purpose of this study was therefore to automate the identification of spinal curvature from total body DXA scans using machine learning techniques. To validate the automation, we assessed: (1) sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operator curve value (AUC) by comparison with 12,000 manually annotated images; (2) reliability by rerunning the automation on a subset of DXA scans repeated 2–6 weeks apart and calculating the kappa statistic; (3) validity by applying the automation to 5000 non-annotated images to assess associations with epidemiological variables. The final automated model had a sensitivity of 86.5%, specificity of 96.9% and an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI 0.74–0.87). There was almost perfect agreement of identification of those with scoliosis (kappa 0.90). Those with scoliosis identified by the automated model showed similar associations with gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, BMI and lean mass to previous literature. In conclusion, we have developed an accurate and valid automated method for identifying and quantifying spinal curvature from total body DXA scans.

Osteoporosis causes bones to become weak, porous and fracture more easily. While a vertebral fracture is the archetypal fracture of osteoporosis, it is also the most difficult to diagnose clinically. Patients often suffer further spine or other fractures, deformity, height loss and pain before diagnosis. There were an estimated 520,000 fragility fractures in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2017 (costing £4.5 billion), a figure set to increase 30% by 2030. One way to improve both vertebral fracture identification and the diagnosis of osteoporosis is to assess a patient’s spine or hips during routine computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients attend routine CT for diagnosis and monitoring of various medical conditions, but the skeleton can be overlooked as radiologists concentrate on the primary reason for scanning. More than half a million CT scans done each year in the National Health Service (NHS) could potentially be screened for osteoporosis (increasing 5% annually). If CT-based screening became embedded in practice, then the technique could have a positive clinical impact in the identification of fragility fracture and/or low bone density. Several companies have developed software methods to diagnose osteoporosis/fragile bone strength and/or identify vertebral fractures in CT datasets, using various methods that include image processing, computational modelling, artificial intelligence and biomechanical engineering concepts. Technology to evaluate Hounsfield units is used to calculate bone density, but not necessarily bone strength. In this rapid evidence review, we summarise the current literature underpinning approved technologies for opportunistic screening of routine CT images to identify fractures, bone density or strength information. We highlight how other new software technologies have become embedded in NHS clinical practice (having overcome barriers to implementation) and highlight how the novel osteoporosis technologies could follow suit. We define the key unanswered questions where further research is needed to enable the adoption of these technologies for maximal patient benefit.

Aims To determine the trajectories of patient reported pain and functional disability over five years following total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A prospective, longitudinal cohort sub-study within the National Joint Registry (NJR) was undertaken. In all, 20,089 patients who underwent primary THA and 22,489 who underwent primary TKA between 2009 and 2010 were sent Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires at six months, and one, three, and five years postoperatively. OHS and OKS were disaggregated into pain and function subscales. A k-means clustering procedure assigned each patient to a longitudinal trajectory group for pain and function. Ordinal regression was used to predict trajectory group membership using baseline OHS and OKS score, age, BMI, index of multiple deprivation, sex, ethnicity, geographical location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. Results Data described two discrete trajectories for pain and function: ‘level 1’ responders (around 70% of cases) in whom a high level of improvement is sustained over five years, and ‘level 2’ responders who had sustained improvement, but at a lower level. Baseline patient variables were only weak predictors of pain trajectory and modest predictors of function trajectory. Those with worse baseline pain and function tended to show a greater likelihood of following a ‘level 2’ trajectory. Six-month patient-reported outcome measures data reliably predicted the class of five-year outcome trajectory for both pain and function. Conclusion The available preoperative patient variables were not reliable predictors of postoperative pain and function after THA and TKA. Reviewing patient outcomes at six months postoperatively is a reliable indicator of outcome at five years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1111–1118.

Background/Aims Fracture Liaison Services (FLSs) are recommended to deliver best practice in secondary fracture prevention. As part of the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) research programme this study aimed to 1) co-design content for a ‘model FLS consultation’ and 2) gain consensus on the appropriateness of osteoporosis clinical guidelines in the context of FLSs. Methods Three rounds of modified Delphi survey were sent to patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures, carers, and clinicians. Participants were presented with potential consultation content derived from an evidence synthesis of current guidelines, frameworks and theories of shared decision-making, communication and medicine adherence, and stakeholder consultation. Participants were asked to rate their perception of the importance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale and elaborate using free-text boxes. In Round 2, participants were shown mean scores of importance from Round 1. Statements identified as of ‘low importance’ at the end of Rounds 1 and 2 were discussed by the study team, including patient contributors, and were removed or amended. In Round 3, participants were asked whether the statement was ‘essential’ or ‘optional’ in a time-limited FLS consultation. Percentage agreement with each statement was ranked. The threshold for ‘essential’ versus ‘optional’ was determined by the study team. Results 391 invitations to participate were sent, with 72, 49, and 52 responders to Rounds 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Throughout Rounds 1-3 participants considered 122 statements. By Round 3, 81 statements were deemed essential, with an additional 14 optional statements. Essential statements were distilled into 18 recommendations constituting the ‘model FLS consultation’. Statements related to stages of the consultation, including: introductions; gather information; consider therapeutic options; elicit patient perceptions; establish shared decision-making preferences; share information about condition and treatment; check understanding; and signpost next steps. There was consensus that FLS clinicians should discuss the benefits and risks of oral and intravenous bisphosphonates and denosumab. Optional consultation content included a statement suggesting clinicians should observe the patient to look for signs of fractures in their spine, with free-text responses suggesting that FLS clinicians may not ‘be best qualified’ to perform physical examinations. Removed statements included those relating to the discussion of Hormone Replacement Therapy, Raloxifene and Teriparatide, with free-text statements suggesting that ‘specialists’ (e.g. Rheumatologists) should discuss these medications. Additionally, statements that described the potential consequences of fracture (e.g. ‘the clinician should explain that one in ten patients with a hip fracture will die within 12 months of fracture.’) were removed. Free-text comments described these statements as potentially ‘scary’. Conclusion The Delphi survey has informed iFraP intervention development by highlighting essential and optional FLS consultation content. Findings also provide insight into aspects of current osteoporosis clinical guidelines deemed appropriate in nurse/allied health professional led FLSs. Disclosure L. Bullock: None. C. Jinks: Grants/research support; CJ is part funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands. F. Crawford-Manning: Grants/research support; FCM is part funded by the NIHR Clinical Research Network Scholar Programme. S. Leyland: None. J. Fleming: None. E.M. Clark: None. E. Cottrell: None. J. Edwards: Grants/research support; JE is an NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer in Primary Care (CL-2016-10-003). Z. Paskins: Grants/research support; ZP is funded by the NIHR, Clinician Scientist Award (CS-2018-18-ST2-010)/NIHR Academy.

Background/Aims The iFraP study (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention Treatments) is developing a computerised decision-support tool to support clinician decision-making, risk communication and informed patient decision-making in Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) consultations. To inform iFraP intervention development, this study explored 1) patient and clinician experiences of FLSs and 2) perspectives towards the new iFraP tool. Methods Four focus groups and supplementary interviews included 9 FLS clinicians, 7 General Practitioners (GPs), and 8 patients who recently attended an FLS consultation. Theoretically-informed thematic analysis was conducted to facilitate understanding of current FLS practice, potential intervention acceptability and possible barriers to, and facilitators of, implementation. Results FLS clinicians and GPs suggested that FLSs worked well to identify patients at high risk of future fracture and to recommend medication. FLS clinicians were confident in their role and felt their consultations were person-centred and addressed information needs. However, some FLS clinicians described communicating risk as difficult and gave examples of when they are uncertain whether medication should be recommended (e.g. patient with osteopenic bone mineral density). FLS clinicians had varying perceptions of their roles in discussing medications, with some not viewing this as their responsibility; whereas GPs reported that medication discussions were an important aspect of the FLS clinician role. When medication recommendations (and discussion) were delivered, the setting varied across services including face-to-face in clinic or at the patient’s home, by letter, or by telephone. On the whole, patients reflected positively on their FLS appointment. However, some patients described unmet information needs, such as risk of future fractures, potential benefits and risks of medications, and information about follow-up.Many FLS clinicians and GPs reflected upon the potential value of the tool, including the inclusion of visual images to facilitate understanding of fracture risk, and to promote consistent messages across FLSs and between primary and secondary care. Barriers to intervention implementation were also identified. Clinicians expressed concern that evidence-based Cates plots to support explanations of medication effectiveness may make patients believe medications are not ‘worthwhile’. This suggests that clinicians prioritised promotion of medication adherence over informed decision-making, highlighting that the goal of FLS clinicians and iFraP may not align. Furthermore, concern was expressed that use of a computerised tool may detract from the clinician-patient relationship. Conclusion These novel findings illustrate the experience of FLS consultations from three perspectives. They highlight FLS clinicians’ clinical decision-support needs and patients’ unmet need for clear information that addresses their medication concerns. Overall, the iFraP intervention was viewed as acceptable, with the potential to support clinicians’ decision-making and to facilitate informed decision-making. Differences in FLS configuration and a move to more remote consulting may mean the intervention needs to be adaptable to different settings to address barriers to implementation. Disclosure L. Bullock: None. C. Jinks: Grants/research support; CJ is part funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands. A. Hawarden: Grants/research support; AH is a NIHR funded Academic Clinical Fellow. F. Crawford-Manning: Grants/research support; FCM is part funded by the NIHR Clinical Research Network Scholar Programme. S. Leyland: None. J. Fleming: None. E.M. Clark: None. E. Cottrell: None. J. Edwards: Grants/research support; JE is an NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer in Primary Care (CL-2016-10-003). Z. Paskins: Grants/research support; ZP is funded by the NIHR, Clinician Scientist Award (CS-2018-18-ST2-010)/NIHR Academy.

Summary Fracture Liaison Services are recommended to deliver best practice in secondary fracture prevention. This modified Delphi survey, as part of the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study, provides consensus regarding tasks for clinicians in a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation. Purpose The clinical consultation is of pivotal importance in addressing barriers to treatment adherence. The aim of this study was to agree to the content of the ‘model Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) consultation’ within the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study. Methods A Delphi survey was co-designed with patients and clinical stakeholders using an evidence synthesis of current guidelines and content from frameworks and theories of shared decision-making, communication and medicine adherence. Patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures, their carers, FLS clinicians and osteoporosis specialists were sent three rounds of the Delphi survey. Participants were presented with potential consultation content and asked to rate their perception of the importance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale and to suggest new statements (Round 1). Lowest rated statements were removed or amended after Rounds 1 and 2. In Round 3, participants were asked whether each statement was ‘essential’ and percentage agreement calculated; the study team subsequently determined the threshold for essential content. Results Seventy-two, 49 and 52 patients, carers and clinicians responded to Rounds 1, 2 and 3 respectively. One hundred twenty-two statements were considered. By Round 3, consensus was reached, with 81 statements deemed essential within FLS consultations, relating to greeting/introductions; gathering information; considering therapeutic options; eliciting patient perceptions; establishing shared decision-making preferences; sharing information about osteoporosis and treatments; checking understanding/summarising; and signposting next steps. Conclusions This Delphi consensus exercise has summarised for the first time patient/carer and clinician consensus regarding clearly defined tasks for clinicians in a model FLS consultation.

Highlights • All RCTs on physical activity, fast-mimicking diet and psychological interventions with evaluated survival outcomes in all cancers were reviewed. • Long-term psychological therapies in primary and/or adjuvant treatment settings have demonstrated potential to improve survival. • The effects of fast-mimicking diet on cancer survival has not been evaluated to date. • Well-designed and sufficiently powered RCTs are needed to evaluate the survival benefits of physical activities and psychological and behavioural therapies in cancer., Background Health professionals are often asked if non-pharmacological interventions prolong life. This review aims to evaluate the effects of physical activity, fast-mimicking diet (FMD) and psychological interventions on survival in all cancers. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only RCTs of physical activity, FMD and psychological interventions (including counselling, cognitive and other psychotherapies) in cancer patients that reported survival outcomes were included. Data sources CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 2020 were searched without language restrictions. The protocol was prospectively registered at PROSPERO (CRD42019160944). Results Thirty-one RCTs (9 on physical activity and 22 on psychological interventions) were included in the final analysis after evaluation of 60,207 records from our initial search. No eligible RCT on FMD was reported. RCTs on group psychological interventions (41.9 %) and in patients with breast cancer (38.7 %) were the most common. Most evaluated short-term interventions and in primary or adjuvant settings. Only one of 9 (11 %) RCTs on physical activity and 8 of 22 (36 %) RCTs on psychological interventions were associated with improved overall survival. Only group psychological interventions in breast cancer had adequate number of RCTs to allow a meta-analysis to be performed. It demonstrated a trend towards improved overall survival (HR -0.20, 95 %CI -0.49 to 0.10), particularly in RCTs that evaluated long-term (>6 months) therapies (HR -0.29, 95 %CI -0.59 to 0.01). Conclusion Longer term interventions starting early in the patients’ care journey in primary and adjuvant settings have shown the most promise for improving survival. Better designed RCTs including survival outcomes are particularly needed in non-breast cancers.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a toxin-mediated infection in the gut and a major burden on healthcare facilities worldwide. We rationalized that it would be beneficial to design an antibody therapy that is delivered to, and is active at the site of toxin production, rather than neutralizing the circulating and luminal toxins after significant damage of the layers of the intestines has occurred. Here we describe a highly potent therapeutic, OraCAb, with high antibody titers and a formulation that protects the antibodies from digestion/inactivation in the gastrointestinal tract. The potential of OraCAb to prevent CDI in an in vivo hamster model and an in vitro human colon model was assessed. In the hamster model we optimized the ratio of the antibodies against each of the toxins produced by C. difficile (Toxins A and B). The concentration of immunoglobulins that is effective in a hamster model of CDI was determined. A highly significant difference in animal survival for those given an optimized OraCAb formulation versus an untreated control group was observed. This is the first study testing the effect of oral antibodies for treatment of CDI in an in vitro gut model seeded with a human fecal inoculum. Treatment with OraCAb successfully neutralized toxin production and did not interfere with the colonic microbiota in this model. Also, treatment with a combination of vancomycin and OraCAb prevented simulated CDI recurrence, unlike vancomycin therapy alone. These data demonstrate the efficacy of OraCAb formulation for the treatment of CDI in pre-clinical models.

Background We assessed health-related quality of life (symptoms of therapy/patient functioning/global health status), in APHINITY (pertuzumab/placebo, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy as adjuvant HER2-positive early breast cancer therapy). Methods Patients received 1 year/18 cycles of pertuzumab/placebo with trastuzumab and chemotherapy and completed EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires until 36 months post-randomisation/disease recurrence. Changes ≥10 points from baseline were considered clinically meaningful. Results 87-97% of patients completed questionnaires. In the pertuzumab versus placebo arms, mean decrease in physical function scores (baseline → end of taxane) was -10.7 (95% CI -11.4, -10.0) versus -10.6 (-11.4, -9.9), mean decrease in global health status was -11.2 (-12.2, -10.2) versus -10.2 (-11.1, -9.2), and mean increase in diarrhoea scores (baseline → end of taxane) was +22.3 (21.0, 23.6) versus +9.2 (8.2, 10.2). Diarrhoea scores remained elevated versus baseline in the pertuzumab arm throughout HER2-targeted treatment (week 25: +13.2; end of treatment: +12.2). Role functioning was maintained in both arms. Conclusions Improved invasive disease-free survival achieved by adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy did not adversely affect the ability to conduct activities of daily living versus trastuzumab and chemotherapy alone. Patient-reported diarrhoea worsened during taxane therapy in both arms, persisting during HER2-targeted treatment in the pertuzumab arm. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01358877.

Background HSD and hEDS are complex and multisystemic disorders of connective tissue with arthralgia and other musculoskeletal features being acknowledged in the 2017 diagnostic criteria. Physiotherapy is a core component of management but there is no clear consensus regarding its effectiveness. For the last 21/2 years we have run an NHS group-based physiotherapy intervention consisting of four sessions focussing on patient education, exercises and lifestyle advice. The aim of this medical student-led project was to evaluate this service by canvassing patients' opinions and experiences and asking them to propose ways of improving care. Methods The physiotherapy intervention is open to all adults diagnosed with HSD and hEDS by rheumatologists or physiotherapists. 90 patients were invited to attend, and eleven groups were run between July 2017 and February 2019. To evaluate the service, patients were asked to complete an anonymised questionnaire which contained Likert scales (poor, average, good, very good or excellent) for four areas: (1) information on hypermobility; (2) pace of sessions; (3) physiotherapist's knowledge; and (4) relevance. In addition, free-text boxes asked about the patients' experiences of the course (likes, dislikes and suggested changes for future courses), and lessons learnt (lifestyle changes implemented, and take-home messages from the course). Results were recorded and analysed for recurring themes. Results 43 patients attended all four classes and 40 questionnaires were completed and returned. 100% rated the information on hypermobility and physiotherapist's knowledge as good, very good or excellent. Similarly, 94% rated the pace of sessions, and 97% the relevance of sessions as good, very good or excellent. Analysis of the free-text fields revealed three major themes: meeting people; effectiveness of the course; and lack of written information. Patients found it particularly valuable to meet others with similar concerns and experiences. They felt able to support each other by sharing and learning together, making them feel more comfortable with their condition. In terms of effectiveness of the course, they valued the information delivered about the condition and fatigue management. Patients reported benefit from learning exercises and relaxation techniques that they have built into their daily routines. Some patients came to realise that they can be active without causing injury and therefore incorporated regular exercise into their lifestyle. All patients reported actively implementing advice provided throughout the course. However, there was a lack of written information: patients requested leaflets relevant to the contents of classes. They also highlighted lack of information about the widespread effects of HSD/hEDS that they could share with friends, family and work colleagues. Conclusion Patients particularly valued learning alongside others with the same condition, and many reported actively implementing advice provided. An important area for development was written patient education and a resource pack needs generating to improve this. Disclosures D.M. Paxton None. R. Lewis None. S. Palmer None. E.M. Clark None.

Background Patient-reported outcome measures are a cornerstone of the current early inflammatory arthritis audit and part of the best practice tariff. However, outcome data are collected infrequently meaning longitudinal changes in disease activity cannot be accurately examined. We report results of a twelve-month clinical pilot of a cloud-enabled commercial smartphone app to record patient self-reported disease activity outcome measures to evaluate trends of disease activity in a routine rheumatology setting. Methods Patients with a clinical diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis attending routine rheumatology clinic were offered the opportunity to use a smartphone app to record their disease activity between hospital appointments using the RAPID3. Data from the first twelve months (July 2018 - July 2019) was extracted and latent class modelling using aggregate data was undertaken to explore the trends of disease activity experienced by our patients at a group level. Standard analysis recommendations were followed. Results Over the course of twelve-months, 58 patients used the app to record their disease activity using the RAPID3. These patients had a mean age of 53 and were 76% female. 35 patients had rheumatoid arthritis, 15 patients had psoriatic arthritis and 8 had another inflammatory arthritis. The median number of RAPID3 scores completed per patient was 8 (interquartile range 14), and a total of 706 RAPID3 scores were submitted over the 12 months. Three different trajectories of disease activity were identified among our cohort of patients. The first trajectory showed a low stable plateau of disease activity for six months before further improvement (27 patients:47%) over six months. The second trajectory (23 patients; 40%) showed an initial moderate disease activity which gradually declined over six months before improving markedly in the last three months, returning to moderate disease activity. The final trajectory (8 patients; 14%) identified patients with the highest disease activity which showed a gradual but slow improvement of disease activity over twelve months. These different trajectories show the changing burden of inflammatory arthritis over time. Conclusion Regular longitudinal data collection of patient-reported outcomes via a smartphone app can be used to show distinct group level trajectories of disease activity and could be used to examine changes in outcomes of patients over time. Data such as these could be used at a departmental level to examine the burden of inflammatory arthritis experienced by patients, assist planning future service requirements, and help anticipate the timings of future appointments more accurately for patients. Disclosures P.D.H. Hamann Consultancies; Living With Ltd. Royalties; PH has provided consultancy for and has an options and limited royalty agreement with, Living With Ltd. software company for the development of the smartphone application described in this abstract. N. Minaur None. J.H. Tobias None. E.M. Clark None.

Summary: Little is known about the long-term impact of vertebral fractures on physical activity. There is also uncertainty over the clinical significance of mild vertebral fracture. We showed that women with moderate/severe but not mild vertebral fracture do less walking duration and housework than those without fracture after 5.4 years of follow-up. Introduction: Little is known about the long-term impact of vertebral fractures on physical activities. There is also uncertainty over the clinical significance of mild fracture. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prospective association between vertebral fracture and future physical activity. Methods: This is a 5-year prospective study of a mixed community and secondary care cohort of women aged > 50 from the UK. Vertebral fractures were identified at baseline on radiographs or DXA-based Vertebral Fracture Assessment by a Quantitative Morphometric approach and defined as moderate/severe (≥ 25% height decrease) or mild (20–24.9% height decrease). Physical activity data were collected 5.4 years later by self-completion questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between presence of fracture and various physical activities while adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Two hundred eighty-six women without, 58 with mild, and 69 with moderate/severe fracture were recruited. Those with mild and moderate/severe fracture were older than women without fracture and had more concomitant diseases at baseline. At 5.4 years follow-up, women with moderate/severe fracture self-reported shorter walking duration compared to those without fracture, even after adjusting for potential confounders (OR 2.96, 95%CI 1.11–7.88, P = 0.030). No independent association was seen between the presence of mild fractures and reduced physical activity at follow-up. Conclusion: This is the first study of older women from the UK that explored the prospective association between vertebral fracture and physical activity duration. Moderate/severe fractures were associated with reduced walking duration. Mild fractures had no impact on future physical ability.

Background Diarrhea is the most commonly reported adverse event (AE) on pertuzumab (Ptz) in both early and metastatic breast cancer (BC) settings. We report safety analyses of diarrhea from the large adjuvant APHINTY study in HER2 positive early breast cancer (EBC). Patients and methods In this exploratory analysis, the safety population included 2364 patients in the Ptz arm and 2405 in the placebo (Pla) arm. No specific prophylaxis was mandated by the protocol, however early intervention with loperamide as well as fluid and electrolyte replacement was recommended. Diarrhea incidence, severity (NCI-CTCAE v4.0), onset and management were analyzed. Results Diarrhea was the most common AE in the Ptz arm (71.3% vs. 45.2% in the Pla arm) and the events were mostly G1. Diarrhea ≥G3 was observed in 9.8% and 3.7% in Ptz and Pla arms, respectively. The highest incidence was reported during administration of HER2 targeted therapy and taxane (61.4% vs. 33.8% with Ptz and Pla, respectively) with a marked decrease observed upon chemotherapy cessation (18.1% vs. 9.2% with Ptz and Pla, respectively). The median time from first targeted treatment to onset of diarrhea during the chemotherapy phase was 7 and 10 days (Ptz/Pla). On average, diarrhea events lasted longer in the Ptz than in the Pla arm (median 8 vs. 6 days). Diarrhea events were more frequent with the administration of docetaxel + carboplatin and targeted agents, irrespective of the severity. Detailed results are reported in Table 1. Conclusions In the curative setting, diarrhea due to Ptz was mild, generally manageable with common antidiarrheals and did not affect patients' ability to receive treatment. The APHINITY findings are consistent with the well-characterized pattern of pertuzumab-related diarrhea across the HER2 BC spectrum. Diarrhea incidence, severity (NCI-CTCAE v4.0), onset and management Ptz, n=2364Pla, n=2405Incidence and severityTotal number of patients with at least one adverse event$1685 (71.3%)1086 (45.2%)Total number of events$34151792NCI CTC AE Grade (highest grade per patient)!n1683 (71.2%)1085 (45.1%)Grade 1829 (35.1%)690 (28.7%)Grade 2622 (26.3%)305 (12.7%)Grade 3229 (9.7%)90 (3.7%)Grade 43 (0.1%)0Onset and duration$Median time (days) from 1st HER2 targeted treatment to onset (min-max)7 (1 – 358)10 (1 - 384)Median Duration (days) of each event (min-max)8 (1 - 811)6 (1 - 1022)ManagementAntidiarrheals$898 (38.0%)386 (16.0%)Dose modification* of any study drug!210 (8.9%)74 (3.1%)Dose modification* of HER2 targeted treatment!69 (2.9%)18 (0.7%)Discontinuation of any study drug!38 (1.6%)7 (0.3%)Discontinuation of HER2 Targeted treatment!20 (0.8%)2 ( Citation Format: Bines J, de Azambuja E, Zardavas D, Procter M, Restuccia E, Viale G, Suter T, Arahmani A, van Dooren V, Clark E, Eng-Wong J, Gelber R, Piccart M, von Minckwitz G, Baselga J. Incidence and management of diarrhea with adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-Positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-07.

Background: MCL is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtype and pts with progressive disease (PD) after BTKi therapy have a poor prognosis (Martin et al. Blood 2016). Glofitamab is a T-cell-engaging, CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody with a novel 2:1 molecular configuration with bivalency for CD20 on B cells and monovalency for CD3 on T cells. Glofitamab with obinutuzumab pretreatment (Gpt) has shown promising efficacy with frequent, durable complete responses (CR) and manageable tolerability with fixed dosing (NCT03075696; Dickinson et al. EHA 2020) and step-up dosing (SUD; Hutchings et al. J Clin Oncol 2021) in NHL. Glofitamab and obinutuzumab compete for binding to CD20 receptors; as a result, Gpt reduces the receptor occupancy (RO) of glofitamab. Pts with MCL have a 2-fold higher clearance of obinutuzumab vs other NHL histologies (Gibiansky et al. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2014), leading to lower obinutuzumab concentrations and higher glofitamab RO at the start of glofitamab treatment (Djebli et al . Blood 2020). A higher dose of Gpt prior to glofitamab SUD may therefore further reduce the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in MCL. We report preliminary data from the NP30179 Phase I/II trial in pts with R/R MCL who received a 1000mg or 2000mg dose of Gpt prior to glofitamab monotherapy. Methods: All pts received Gpt 7 days prior to the first glofitamab dose. Intravenous glofitamab SUD was given on days 1 and 8 of Cycle (C)1, then at the target dose from C2 day (D)1 (from C3D1 for SUD starting at 0.5mg), every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles (0.5/2.5/10/30, 2.5/10/16 or 2.5/10/30mg after 1000mg Gpt, or 2.5/10/30mg after 2000mg Gpt). Pts on fixed dosing received glofitamab (0.6, 16 or 25mg) after 1000mg Gpt from C1 for up to 12 cycles. Response rates are based on the Lugano criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Results: As of May 18, 2021, 29 pts had received glofitamab: fixed dosing after 1000mg Gpt (n=3); SUD after 1000mg Gpt (n=7; 1 pt received SUD starting at 0.5mg) or 2000mg Gpt (n=19). Median age was 69 years (range, 41-84; 69% male), 83% of pts had Ann Arbor Stage III-IV disease and 62.1% had MCL international prognostic index score ≥6 at study entry. Median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1-6), 69% (n=20) had prior BTKi therapy and 14% (n=4) had prior lenalidomide therapy. Many pts were refractory to their first line of therapy (52%; n=15) and/or their last prior therapy (69%; n=20). Median time since last therapy was 1.7 months (range, 0.1-107.5). In efficacy-evaluable pts (n=21), the overall response rate was 81.0% (n=17) and complete metabolic response rate was 66.7% (n=14; Table 1). Similar response rates were observed in pts who had received prior BTKi therapy vs pts who had not (Table 2). Median duration of CR follow-up was 2.4 months (range, 0.0-25); 85.7% (12/14) pts with a CR remained in remission at the data cut-off (median duration of response and median duration of CR were not reached). In safety-evaluable pts (n=29), the most common adverse events (AEs) were CRS (58.6%) and infusion-related reactions (24.1%). All CRS events were Grade (Gr) 1-2 (by ASTCT criteria), except for 1 Gr 4 CRS in the 1000mg Gpt + SUD cohort (3.4%; pt died due to cardiopulmonary insufficiency as a result of rapid PD; at time of death CRS was persisting). CRS rates were lower in the 2000mg Gpt + SUD cohort (9/19; 47.4%) vs the 1000mg Gpt + SUD (5/7; 71.4%) and 1000mg Gpt + fixed dosing (3/3; 100%) cohorts. Overall, median time to first CRS event and duration of CRS event were 16.8 hrs and 38.8 hrs, respectively. All CRS events were manageable (tocilizumab used in 4 pts, low-flow oxygen in 2 pts) and most resolved at data cut-off. Neurologic AEs occurred in 6 pts (20.7%, all Gr 1 [n=5] or Gr 2 [n=1]). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS)-like AEs occurred in 1 pt (3.4%): Gr 1 confusional state and Gr 2 ataxia, both resolving in 1 day. Tumor flare events occurred in 3 pts (10.3%, all Gr 1 [n=2] or Gr 2 [n=1]). No pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. Three deaths were reported and considered unrelated to study treatment: PD (n=2); cardiac arrest (n=1). Conclusions: Glofitamab SUD as monotherapy after Gpt induced high response rates in pts with MCL, most of whom had failed prior BTKi therapy. CRS rates were manageable and mostly low grade. ICANS-like AEs were infrequent, low grade and resolved within 1 day. No treatment discontinuations due to AEs were observed. Further analyses will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Phillips: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Incyte, Karyopharm, Morphosys, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: received travel expenses from Incyte, Research Funding. Dickinson: Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Morschhauser: Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy. Bachy: Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Daiishi: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Crump: Kyte/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding. Trněný: MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General Hospital in Prague: Current Employment; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Bartlett: Washington University School of Medicine: Current Employment; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zaucha: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Humphrey: Roche: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Perez-Callejo: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lundberg: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Relf: Roche Pharmaceutical Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; F-Star Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Harpoon Therapeutics: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Filézac de L'Étang: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Carlile: AstraZeneca: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Clark: Roche Products Ltd: Current Employment. Carlo-Stella: Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Glofitamab is a full-length, humanized, immunoglobulin G1 bispecific antibody with a 2:1 molecular format that facilitates bivalent binding to CD20 on B-cells, and monovalent binding to CD3 on T-cells. Glofitamab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Glofitamab is an investigational agent.

Background: Despite recent advances, prognosis for pts with NHL who undergo multiple lines of therapy remains poor. Novel drugs that provide durable complete responses (CRs) are needed for these pts. Glofitamab (RG6026) is a novel T-cell-engaging, bispecific antibody that binds bivalently to CD20 on B cells, and monovalently to CD3 on T cells. In study NP30179 (NCT03075696), an ongoing Phase I/II dose-escalation and expansion study, glofitamab fixed-dosing (0.6-25mg) with obinutuzumab pre-treatment (Gpt) achieved high, durable CRs with manageable safety in pts with heavily pre-treated R/R NHL (Dickinson et al. EHA 2020). Step-up dosing (SUD) of glofitamab, in addition to Gpt, allowed dose-escalation up to the highest planned dose of 30mg to maximize efficacy, while mitigating cytokine release syndrome (CRS; [Hutchings et al. J Clin Oncol 2021]). We present updated duration of response (DoR) data from the glofitamab monotherapy fixed-dosing and SUD cohorts of study NP30179 in pts with R/R NHL. Methods: Pts received 1000mg obinutuzumab 7 days prior to first dose of glofitamab. Glofitamab was given intravenously at a fixed dose (0.6-25mg) every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks (q3w) or with SUD (2.5/10/16mg or 2.5/10/30mg [recommended Phase II dose; RP2D]) on Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1 and 8, and then at the target dose from C2D1 q3w, for up to 12 cycles. Response rates are based on Lugano criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Results: As of May 18, 2021, 258 pts were enrolled in the previously specified cohorts. Median age was 64.0 (range, 22‒86) years, 62.0% were male, and the median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1‒12). A total of 183 (70.9%) pts had aggressive NHL (aNHL), and 75 (29.1%) had indolent NHL (iNHL). Of the pts with aNHL, 98 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 26 had mantle cell lymphoma, 31 had transformed follicular lymphoma (FL), and 11 had Richter's transformation. All pts with iNHL had Grade (Gr) 1‒3a FL. Response rates are reported across all doses investigated. Highest responses were seen with the RP2D (2.5/10/30mg) in pts with aNHL (Table). At the clinical cut-off date (CCOD), median duration of follow-up in pts with aNHL was 13.4 (range: 0‒36) months. In efficacy-evaluable pts with aNHL (n=175), the overall response rate (ORR) was 53.7% and the CR rate was 39.4%. Median duration of CR had not yet been reached (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.4‒not estimable [NE], n=69; Figure); 72.5% of pts with a CR (50/69) were still in CR at the time of analysis. Median DoR (CR plus partial response) was 29.4 months (95% CI: 6.0‒NE; responders, n=94). In pts with iNHL (n=75), ORR was 81.3% and CR rate was 69.3%; median follow-up was 8.6 (range: 0‒37) months. Median duration of CR had not yet been reached (95% CI: 10.5‒NE, n=52; Figure); 82.7% of pts with a CR (43/52) were still in CR at the time of the analysis. Median DoR had not been reached (95% CI: 10.5‒NE; responders, n=61). A total of 149/258 pts (57.8%) experienced a serious adverse event (AE). CRS was the most prevalent AE, occurring in 152/258 pts (58.9%). The majority of CRS events were mild: Gr 1-2, 139 (53.9%) pts; Gr 3, 9 (3.5%) pts; Gr 4, 4 pts (1.6%). Four pts (1.6%) experienced a glofitamab-related AE that led to withdrawal of the study drug. Ninety-two (35.7%) pts experienced a neurological AE; the majority of events were Gr 1 (56/258; 21.7%) or Gr 2 (33/258; 12.8%). Three pts experienced a Gr 3 neurological AE (facial paralysis, syncope, radiculopathy), which were considered unrelated to glofitamab treatment. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS)-like events related to glofitamab occurred in 9 pts (3.5%); all events were Gr 1 or Gr 2, and all but one (Gr 1 tremor) resolved at CCOD. Conclusions: The current dataset on DoR is the largest presented to date for a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, with median follow-up exceeding 13 months for pts with aNHL. Glofitamab, with a fixed treatment duration and 'off-the-shelf' accessibility, has demonstrated high levels of monotherapy activity in heavily pretreated pts with R/R NHL, including those who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy. Glofitamab has shown promising response rates and durable responses a range of different doses for both aNHL and iNHL. Duration of responses in pts with aNHL were in the range of those observed in pts with refractory aNHL from an early chimeric antigen receptor T-cell data set (Neelapu et al. N Engl J Med 2017). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dickinson: Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Carlo-Stella: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Morschhauser: Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patel: BeiGene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Juno Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy; Xencor: Research Funding; Curis, Inc: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Velos Bio: Research Funding; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Khan: Genentech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Speakers Bureau; SeaGen: Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Speakers Bureau; Kite: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Bartlett: Affimed: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Washington University School of Medicine: Current Employment. Iacoboni: BMS/Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Janssen, Roche: Honoraria. Hertzberg: Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Leppä: Genmab: Research Funding; Orion: Consultancy; CHO Pharma USA: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital: Current Employment; Takeda: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Van Den Neste: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Cartron: Roche, Celgene-BMS: Consultancy; Danofi, Gilead, Novartis, Jansen, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Abbvie, Takeda: Honoraria. Salar: Beigene: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; EusaPharma: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Hospital del Mar: Current Employment; Abbvie: Research Funding. Perez-Callejo: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lundberg: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Relf: F-Star Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Harpoon Therapeutics: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Roche Pharmaceutical Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Clark: Roche Products Ltd: Current Employment. Humphrey: Roche: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Hutchings: Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Glofitamab is a full-length, humanized immunoglobulin G1 bispecific antibodywith a 2:1 molecular format that facilitates bivalent binding to CD20 on B-cells, and monovalent binding to CD3 on T-cells. Glofitamab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Glofitamab is an investigational agent.

Background: The primary analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled APHINITY trial, published in 2017, including 4804 patients (pts) with HER2-positive, early breast cancer with 45.4 months' median follow-up, demonstrated that adjuvant pertuzumab (P) added to trastuzumab and chemotherapy, statistically significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) compared with placebo (Pla) added to trastuzumab and chemotherapy overall and for pts with node-positive (N+) disease. In 2019, updated descriptive analyses of IDFS with 74.1 months' median follow-up, demonstrated sustained benefit of adding P both overall (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91), and for N+ disease (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87), while confidence intervals remained wide for the node-negative (N-) cohort (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.69-1.53). There is great interest to explore how these significant overall results translate into absolute treatment benefits for different patient subpopulations. Methods: Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) is an exploratory, graphical method that plots estimates of treatment effect for overlapping patient subpopulations defined by a covariate of interest. Four continuous covariates of interest are considered for defining subpopulations in this report: i) a clinical composite risk score (see below), ii) TILs percentage, iii) HER2 FISH copy number, and iv) a clinical-biological composite risk score combining the previous three factors. Pts with lowest values for the covariate comprise the extreme left STEPP subpopulation, and pts with highest values comprise the extreme right subpopulation. The clinical composite risk score for IDFS based on the overall cohort was calculated using a Cox regression model including the following prespecified clinical characteristics: number of positive nodes, tumor size, age, and centrally-reviewed hormone receptor status. Composite risk scores were scaled between 0 and 100 with higher scores reflecting higher risk of an IDFS event. An example of low clinical risk factors would be T1N0 and aged 40-64; while high risk would be T3N2 or higher and ages Results: Table of 6-year IDFS percents (%) from Aphinity STEPPs, Overall and for N- and N+ cohorts. For each analysis, results are shown for the two subpopulations at either extreme of the STEPP (i.e. lowest and highest risk or values) as well as the intermediate STEPP subpopulation. Conclusions: Based on the two extreme and one intermediate subpopulations of the STEPP analyses shown in the table, the intermediate clinical composite risk subpopulation and the highest TILs percentages had the largest absolute improvements in 6-year IDFS percents for P compared with Pla. Table of 6-year IDFS percents (%) from Aphinity STEPPs, Overall and for N- and N+ cohorts.6-year IDFS %Overall (N=4804)Node-Negative (N=1799)Node-Positive (N=3005)PPlaΔ±SEPPlaΔ±SEPPlaΔ±SEOverall Average Results90.687.82.8±0.995.094.90.1±1.187.983.44.5±1.2Clinical composite riskLowest risk (0 - 21)95.396.2-0.9±1.396.196.5-0.4±1.5---Intermediate (39 - 63)92.687.35.3±1.995.091.04.0±3.093.686.76.9±2.3Highest risk (81 - 100)80.575.84.7±2.8---79.475.44.0±3.2TILs percentageLowest values (0-9)90.487.82.6±2.094.795.2-0.5±2.087.282.64.6±2.7Intermediate (13-21)89.487.71.7±2.194.294.10.1±2.285.484.80.6±2.7Highest values (≥31)95.689.36.3±1.798.194.93.2±1.792.384.97.4±2.4HER2 copy numberLowest values (1-8)87.186.40.7±2.292.794.8-2.1±2.284.182.12.0±2.8Intermediate (9.5-11)91.889.02.8±1.994.996.1-1.3±1.990.783.37.4±2.5Highest values (13-32)90.588.91.6±2.096.095.10.9±2.087.785.32.4±2.6Clinical-biological composite riskLowest risk (0-21)96.796.40.3±1.298.295.72.5±1.6---Intermediate (40-60)93.489.53.9±1.991.792.7-1.0±2.594.288.85.4±2.2Highest risk (79-100)80.175.94.2±2.7---79.575.24.3±3.2 Citation Format: Richard D. Gelber, Xin Victoria Wang, Bernard F. Cole, David Cameron, Fatima Cardoso, Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen, Ian Krop, Sherene Loi, Roberto Salgado, Astrid Kiermaier, Elizabeth Frank, Debora Fumagalli, Carmela Caballero, Evandro de Azambuja, Marion Procter, Emma Clark, Eleonora Restuccia, Sarah Heeson, Jose Bines, Sibylle Loibl, Martine Piccart-Gebhardt. 6-year absolute invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) benefit of adding adjuvant pertuzumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy for patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer: A STEPP analysis of the APHINITY (BIG 4-11) trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-01.

Context Glofitamab, a T-cell-engaging, bispecific, full-length antibody, allows bivalent binding to CD20 (B-cells) and monovalent binding to CD3 (T-cells). In NP30179 (NCT03075696), an ongoing multicenter, phase I, dose-escalation and expansion study, glofitamab SUD, in addition to Gpt, allowed dose escalation ≤30 mg to maximize efficacy while mitigating cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (Hutchings et al. J Clin Oncol 2021). Objective To present updated efficacy data from glofitamab monotherapy SUD cohorts. Methods Gpt (1000 mg) was given 7 days pre-glofitamab initial dose. Intravenous glofitamab SUD was given on day (D) 1 and 8 of cycle (C) 1, then at target dose from C2D1 (2.5/10/16 mg or 2.5/10/30 mg); treatment continued for ≤12 cycles, every 21 days. Response rates were based on the Lugano criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Results As of December 1, 2020, 52 pts received glofitamab SUD; 17 and 35 pts received 2.5/10/16 mg and 2.5/10/30 mg, respectively. Twenty-eight pts (53.8%) had aggressive NHL (aNHL) and 24 pts had indolent NHL (iNHL). Median age: 68 (44–85) years; median 3 (1–12) prior lines of therapy; 40 (76.9%) and 38 (73.1%) pts were refractory to their most recent and any prior CD20 therapy, respectively. Median follow-up duration: 6.3 months. Best overall response (OR) and complete metabolic response (CMR) rates for aNHL cohort: 64.3% and 57.1%, respectively. 4/5 pts (80%) with mantle cell lymphoma (2.5/10/16 mg, n=2; 2.5/10/30 mg, n=2) had CMR. For aNHL, 13/16 CMRs are ongoing, with 8 CMRs lasting >3 months. OR and CMR rates for pts with iNHL: 79.2% and 70.8%, respectively, with 14/17 CMRs ongoing and 10 CMRs lasting >3 months. As of August 3, 2020, common adverse events were CRS (63.5%), neutropenia (38.5%), and pyrexia (32.7%), with CRS mostly confined to C1. Grade (Gr) 1 and 2 CRS was reported in 18 (34.6%) and 12 (23%) pts, respectively; 3 pts had Gr 3 CRS; none had Gr 4/5 events (defined by ASTCT 2019 criteria). Conclusions Updated data for glofitamab monotherapy SUD show higher preliminary response rates than previously reported in pts with R/R NHL who have failed multiple lines of therapy. CRS was mostly manageable, low-grade, and confined to C1.

Funder: Wellcome Trust, INTRODUCTION: Prevention of fragility fractures, a source of significant economic and personal burden, is hindered by poor uptake of fracture prevention medicines. Enhancing communication of scientific evidence and elicitation of patient medication-related beliefs has the potential to increase patient commitment to treatment. The Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments (iFraP) programme aims to develop and evaluate a theoretically informed, complex intervention consisting of a computerised web-based decision support tool, training package and information resources, to facilitate informed decision-making about fracture prevention treatment, with a long-term aim of improving informed treatment adherence. This protocol focuses on the iFraP Development (iFraP-D) work. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The approach to iFraP-D is informed by the Medical Research Council complex intervention development and evaluation framework and the three-step implementation of change model. The context for the study is UK fracture liaison services (FLS), which enact secondary fracture prevention. An evidence synthesis of clinical guidelines and Delphi exercise will be conducted to identify content for the intervention. Focus groups with patients, FLS clinicians and general practitioners and a usual care survey will facilitate understanding of current practice, and investigate barriers and facilitators to change. Design of the iFraP intervention will be informed by decision aid development standards and theories of implementation, behaviour change, acceptability and medicines adherence. The principles of co-design will underpin all elements of the study through a dedicated iFraP community of practice including key stakeholders and patient advisory groups. In-practice testing of the prototype intervention will inform revisions ready for further testing in a subsequent pilot and feasibility randomised trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from North West-Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (19/NW/0559). Dissemination and knowledge mobilisation will be facilitated through national bodies and networks, publications and presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: researchregistry5041.

Background Exposure to higher magnitude vertical impacts is thought to benefit bone health. The correlates of this high-impact physical activity (PA) in later life are unknown.Methods Participants were from the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon, Hertfordshire Cohort Study and MRC National Survey of Health and Development. Associations of demographic, behavioural, physiological and psychological factors with vertical acceleration peaks ≥1.5 g (i.e. high-impact PA) from 7-day hip-worn accelerometer recordings were examined using linear regression.Results A total of 1187 participants (mean age = 72.7 years, 66.6% females) were included. Age, sex, education, active transport, self-reported higher impact PA, walking speed and self-rated health were independently associated with high-impact PA whereas BMI and sleep quality showed borderline independent associations. For example, differences in log-high-impact counts were 0.50 (P < 0.001) for men versus women and −0.56 (P < 0.001) for worst versus best self-rated health. Our final model explained 23% of between-participant variance in high impacts. Other correlates were not associated with high-impact activity after adjustment.Conclusions Besides age and sex, several factors were associated with higher impact PA in later life. Our findings help identify characteristics of older people that might benefit from interventions designed to promote osteogenic PA.

Accurate diagnosis of vertebral osteoporotic fractures is crucial for the identification of individuals at high risk of future fractures. Different methods for radiological assessment of vertebral fractures exist, but a gold standard is lacking. The aim of our study was to estimate statistical measures of agreement and prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the population-based Rotterdam Study, across two assessment methods. The quantitative morphometry assisted by SpineAnalyzer® (QM SA) method evaluates vertebral height loss that affects vertebral shape whereas the algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) method judges endplate integrity and includes guidelines for the differentiation of vertebral fracture and nonfracture deformities. Cross-sectional radiographs were assessed for 7582 participants aged 45 to 95 years. With QM SA, the prevalence was 14.2% (95% CI, 13.4% to 15.0%), compared to 4.0% (95% CI, 3.6% to 4.5%) with ABQ. Inter-method agreement according to kappa (κ) was 0.24. The highest agreement between methods was among females (κ = 0.31), participants age >80 years (κ = 0.40), and at the L1 level (κ = 0.40). With ABQ, most fractures were found at the thoracolumbar junction (T12–L1) followed by the T7–T8 level, whereas with QM SA, most deformities were in the mid thoracic (T7–T8) and lower thoracic spine (T11–T12), with similar number of fractures in both peaks. Excluding mild QM SA deformities (grade 1 with QM) from the analysis increased, the agreement between the methods from κ = 0.24 to 0.40, whereas reexamining mild deformities based on endplate depression increased agreement from κ = 0.24 to 0.50 (p

Purpose: \ud \ud This narrative review aimed to scope the patient safety literature to identify interprofessional intervention approaches, sources of evidence and reported outcomes.\ud \ud Data sources: \ud \ud Two major databases (MEDLINE and CINAHL) were searched from 2005 to 2015.\ud \ud Study selection: \ud \ud A total of 1552 abstracts were initially identified. After screening these abstracts, 129 full papers were obtained. Further screening resulted in a total of 89 papers included in this review.\ud \ud Data extraction: \ud \ud The following information was extracted from each included paper: details on the patient safety intervention, study methods employed and outcomes reported.\ud \ud Results of data synthesis: \ud \ud It was found that the bulk of the included studies was undertaken in a North American acute care context. Most often, studies involved qualified professionals from nursing and medicine collaborating in hospitals and medical centres. Nearly half the studies reported in this review employed educational interventions, such as TeamSTEPPS, aimed at enhancing practitioners' competence of delivering safe patient care. Nearly a third of studies involved practice-based interventions (e.g. checklists) aimed at improving the delivery of safe care. Most of the studies used a quasi-experimental design and typically gathered survey data. The majority reported outcomes related to changes in professionals' attitudes, knowledge and skills. There were, however, fewer studies reporting changes in practitioners' safety behaviours, organizational practices or patient benefit.\ud \ud Conclusion: \ud \ud The use of different interprofessional interventions are key activities involved in promoting safe patient care practices. However, further work is needed to strengthen these interventions and their evaluations.

Recent evidence has implicated N- methyl- d -aspartate receptors (NMDARs) in several aspects of learning and behavioral flexibility in rodents. Here, we examined the effects of treatment with Ro 25-6981, a selective antagonist of NMDARs containing GluN2B subunits, on two types of behavioral flexibility in rats, spatial reversal learning and set-shifting (spatial vs. motor strategy). To examine spatial reversal learning, rats were trained to swim to a hidden platform in a water maze over four days. On the following day, the platform was moved to a new location in the maze. Administration of Ro 25-6981 (10 mg/kg) selectively impaired the early phase of reversal learning, but all rats learned to navigate to the new platform location over 12 trials. To examine set-shifting, independent groups of rats were trained to either swim to a fixed location (spatial strategy) or use a motor response (e.g., “turn left”; motor strategy) to find a hidden escape platform in a cross-shaped water maze apparatus; after task acquisition, rats were trained on the second, novel strategy (set-shift) following treatment with either Ro 25-6981 (10 mg/kg) or saline. Administration of Ro 25-6981 had no effect on the ability of rats to perform the set-shift and use the new strategy to locate the escape platform. These results suggest that, in rats, spatial reversal learning, but not set-shifting, is sensitive to Ro-25-6981 treatment. Thus, NMDARs-GluN2B signaling may play a selective role in some forms of behavioral plasticity, particularly for situations involving the updating of information in the spatial domain.

Summary Background High quantities of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in primary HER2-positive breast cancer are associated with improved prognosis and response to therapy. We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of host antitumour immunity as represented by baseline quantities of TILs in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with either pertuzumab or placebo in addition to trastuzumab and docetaxel. Methods CLEOPATRA was a randomised phase 3 study comparing the addition of either pertuzumab or placebo to first-line therapy with trastuzumab and docetaxel for patients with locally recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. We assessed the quantity of stromal TILs in prospectively collected tumour samples and investigated their association with progression-free survival, overall survival, clinicopathological characteristics, and pertuzumab treatment. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs with multivariate Cox regression models fitting stromal TILs as a continuous variable (per 10% increment). The CLEOPATRA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00567190. Findings Tumour samples from 678 (84%) of 808 participants were evaluable for TILs, including 519 (77%) archival samples, 155 (23%) freshly obtained samples (collected 45 days or fewer before randomisation), and four samples of unknown archival status. Median follow-up was 50 months (IQR 41–54) for progression-free survival and 51 months (IQR 46–57) for overall survival. 519 progression-free survival events occurred and 358 patients died. The median TIL value was 10% (IQR 5–30). Freshly obtained tumour samples had significantly lower TIL values than did archival samples (10·00% [95% CI 5·00–20·00] vs 15·00% [5·00–35·00]; p=0·00036). We detected no significant association between TIL values and progression-free survival (adjusted HR 0·95, 95% CI 0·90–1·00, p=0·063). However, for overall survival, each 10% increase in stromal TILs was significantly associated with longer overall survival (adjusted HR 0·89, 95% CI 0·83–0·96, p=0·0014). The treatment effect of pertuzumab did not differ significantly by stromal TIL value for either progression-free survival (p interaction =0·23) or overall survival (p interaction =0·21). Interpretation In patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab or placebo, higher TIL values are significantly associated with improved overall survival, suggesting that the effect of antitumour immunity extends to the advanced setting. Future clinical studies in this cancer subtype should consider TILs as a stratification factor and investigate whether therapies that can augment immunity could potentially further improve survival. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche–Genentech and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Long-term smartphone-based remote disease activity reporting is feasible in routine practice without additional clinical resource

Summary The aim of this study is to produce an easy to use checklist for general practitioners to complete whenever a woman aged over 65 years with back pain seeks healthcare. This checklist will produce a binary output to determine if the patient should have a radiograph to diagnose vertebral fracture. Purpose People with osteoporotic vertebral fractures are important to be identified as they are at relatively high risk of further fractures. Despite this, less than a third of people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures come to clinical attention due to various reasons including lack of clear triggers to identify who should have diagnostic spinal radiographs. This study aims to produce and evaluate a novel screening tool (Vfrac) for use in older women presenting with back pain in primary care based on clinical triggers and predictors identified previously. This tool will generate a binary output to determine if a radiograph is required. Methods The Vfrac study is a two-site, pragmatic, observational cohort study recruiting 1633 women aged over 65 years with self-reported back pain. Participants will be recruited from primary care in two sites. The Vfrac study will use data from two self-completed questionnaires, a simple physical examination, a lateral thoracic and lateral lumbar radiograph and information contained in medical records. Results The primary objective is to develop an easy-to-use clinical screening tool for identifying older women who are likely to have vertebral fractures. Conclusions This article describes the protocol of the Vfrac study; ISRCTN16550671.

We describe a method to automatically predict scoliosis in Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scans. We also show that in- termediate representations, which in our case are segments of body parts, help improve performance. Hence, we propose a two step process for pre- diction: (i) we learn to segment body parts via a segmentation Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which we show outperforms the noisy labels it was trained on, and (ii) we predict with a classification CNN that uses as input both the raw DXA scan and also the intermediate representation, i.e. the segmented body parts. We demonstrate that this two step process can predict scoliosis with high accuracy, and can also localize the spinal curves (i.e. geometry) without additional supervision. Furthermore, we also propose a soft score of scoliosis based on the classification CNN which correlates to the severity of scoliosis.

Summary Background CLEOPATRA was a phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In the primary analysis and subsequent reports, progression-free and overall survival were significantly improved in the pertuzumab group compared with the placebo group. Here, we report the end-of-study analysis of CLEOPATRA. Methods This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that was done at 204 centres in 25 countries. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer, had not received previous chemotherapy or biological treatment for their metastatic disease, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. All study drugs were given intravenously, every 3 weeks. Patients were assigned to receive either pertuzumab or placebo at a loading dose of 840 mg, and 420 mg thereafter; plus trastuzumab at 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at 75 mg/m2, escalating to 100 mg/m2 if tolerated. Pertuzumab or placebo and trastuzumab were given until disease progression; docetaxel was given for six cycles, or longer at the investigators’ discretion. Randomisation (1:1) was done by use of an interactive voice-response system and was stratified by geographical region (Asia, Europe, North America, or South America) and previous treatment (previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs none). The primary endpoint was independent review facility-assessed progression-free survival, which has been reported previously. Since the confirmatory overall survival analysis had also occurred before this prespecified end-of-study analysis, analyses presented here are descriptive. Overall survival analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population with crossover patients analysed in the placebo group; analyses were not adjusted for crossover to the pertuzumab group and are likely to be conservative. Safety analyses were based on treatment received; crossover patients were counted in the placebo group up to the day before first pertuzumab dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00567190 . Findings Between Feb 12, 2008, and July 7, 2010, 1196 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 808 were enrolled and randomly assigned. 402 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, and 406 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel plus trastuzumab plus placebo. Clinical cutoff for this analysis was Nov 23, 2018. Between July 2012 and clinical cutoff, 50 patients crossed from the placebo to the pertuzumab group. Median follow-up was 99·9 months in the pertuzumab group (IQR 92·9–106·4) and 98·7 months (90·9–105·7) in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 57·1 months (95% CI 50–72) in the pertuzumab group and 40·8 months (36–48) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·58–0·82); 8-year landmark overall survival rates were 37% (95% CI 31–42) in the pertuzumab group and 23% (19–28) in the placebo group. The most common grade 3–4 adverse event was neutropenia (200 [49%] of 408 patients in the pertuzumab group, 183 [46%] of 396 patients in the placebo group). Five (1%) of 408 patients in the pertuzumab group and six (2%) of 396 patients in the placebo group had treatment-related deaths. One new serious adverse event suggestive of congestive heart failure (pertuzumab group) and one new symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (post-crossover) occurred since the previous analysis. Interpretation Our analysis shows that the previously observed improvements in overall survival with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel versus placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel were maintained after a median of more than 8 years of follow-up. The long-term safety and cardiac safety profiles of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel were maintained in the overall safety population and within crossover patients. HER2-targeted therapy has changed the natural history of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with the dual blockade of pertuzumab and trastuzumab, with docetaxel, demonstrating an 8-year landmark overall survival rate of 37%. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.

Background Little is understood about the causes of adolescent onset idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). No prospective studies assessing the association between physical activity and idiopathic adolescent scoliosis have been carried out. We aimed to carry out the first prospective population-based study of this association. Methods The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) collected self-reported measures of physical ability/activity at ages 18 months and 10 years. Objective measures of physical activity were collected by accelerometry at age 11 years. scoliosis was identified using the dxa scoliosis Method at age 15 years. Participants with scoliosis at age 10 years were excluded. Results Of 4640 participants at age 15 years who had DXA scans, 267 (5.8%) had scoliosis. At age 18 months, those infants who were able to stand up without being supported were 66% less likely to have developed scoliosis by age 15 (P = 0.030) compared with infants who could not. Those children whose mothers reported they did most vigorous physical activity at age 10 years were 53% less likely to develop scoliosis (P = 0.027). Those children who did more objectively measured moderate/vigorous physical activity at age 11 were 30% less likely to have developed scoliosis (P Conclusions We report reduced physical ability and activity as early as age 18 months in those who go on to develop scoliosis by age 15 years. Further research is justified to examine the mechanisms underlying this association.

Objective Older women are at particular risk of osteoporosis. Among women with osteoporosis, fractures of the vertebra (vertebral fracture) are common, hard to detect and associated with risk of further fracture. Identifying vertebral fracture in a timely manner allows instigation of preventive measures to reduce the risk of further fracture. Although detection of vertebral fracture requires spinal radiograph, many women do not receive referral. To begin development of a screening tool to identify women in need of referral we undertook a qualitative study to characterize women’s experiences of vertebral fracture, using Eccleston’s ‘Ten Neglected Bodily Senses’. Methods Four qualitative focus groups were conducted with women who had been diagnosed with vertebral fracture (n = 19, age 60–91 years). Data were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using the ‘Ten Neglected Bodily Senses’. Results Women’s experiences of vertebral fractures related to seven senses: pain, movement, fatigue, balance, pressure, appetite and breathing. Pain was the dominant sense and all participants explained how pain increased with activity, reaching a crescendo, and described strategies to minimize this disruption. Most participants had become physically shorter, making some feel ‘squashed’, putting pressure on other body parts. Some described appetite loss or a sense of restricted breathing. Participants experienced a sense of being ‘pulled’ forwards, impacting on balance and exacerbating fear of falling. Conclusion The study found senses that have not been previously described in the experiences of women with vertebral fracture. These will be used to inform the design of a new screening tool for use in primary care.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures that are stable, non-traumatic, unrelated to other underlying pathologies and associated with low bone density, vary enormously in terms of the level of symptoms and impact on quality of life. Patients may present for ‘symptomatic control’ with acute or chronic pain, loss of height caused by a shortening of the trunk and increased kyphosis-creating problems with activities of daily living. Symptoms can include: breathlessness, bloating and abdominal distension, pressure on the bladder and dysuria.

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been primarily treated with metronidazole or vancomycin. High recurrence rates, the emergence of epidemic PCR ribotypes (RTs) and the introduction of fidaxomicin in Europe in 2011 necessitate surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and CDI epidemiology. The ClosER study monitored antimicrobial susceptibility and geographical distribution of C. difficile RTs pre- and post-fidaxomicin introduction. From 2011 to 2016, 28 European countries submitted isolates or faecal samples for determination of PCR ribotype, toxin status and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of metronidazole, vancomycin, rifampicin, fidaxomicin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, imipenem, chloramphenicol and tigecycline. RT diversity scores for each country were calculated and mean MIC results used to generate cumulative resistant scores (CRSs) for each isolate and country. From 40 sites, 3499 isolates were analysed, of which 95% (3338/3499) were toxin positive. The most common of the 264 RTs isolated was RT027 (mean prevalence 11.4%); however, RT prevalence varied greatly between countries and between years. The fidaxomicin geometric mean MIC for years 1–5 was 0.04 mg/L; only one fidaxomicin-resistant isolate (RT344) was submitted (MIC ≥ 4 mg/L). Metronidazole and vancomycin geometric mean MICs were 0.46 mg/L and 0.70 mg/L, respectively. Of prevalent RTs, RT027, RT017 and RT012 demonstrated resistance or reduced susceptibility to multiple antimicrobials. RT diversity was inversely correlated with mean CRS for individual countries (Pearson coefficient r = − 0.57). Overall, C. difficile RT prevalence remained stable in 2011–2016. Fidaxomicin susceptibility, including in RT027, was maintained post-introduction. Reduced ribotype diversity in individual countries was associated with increased antimicrobial resistance. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-019-03708-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

7519 Background: Glofitamab (RG6026), a T-cell-engaging, bispecific, full-length antibody, allows bivalent binding to CD20 (B-cells), and monovalent binding to CD3 (T-cells). In NP30179 (NCT03075696), an ongoing multicenter, Phase I dose-escalation and expansion study, 0.6–25mg glofitamab fixed-dosing with obinutuzumab pretreatment (Gpt), showed high, durable complete responses and manageable safety in heavily pretreated R/R NHL (Dickinson, et al. EHA 2020). Glofitamab SUD, in addition to Gpt, allowed dose escalation up to 30mg to maximize efficacy, while mitigating cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (Hutchings, et al. JCO 2021). We present updated efficacy data from glofitamab monotherapy SUD cohorts. Methods: Gpt (1000mg) was given to pts 7 days pre-glofitamab initial dose. Intravenous SUD of glofitamab was given on Day (D) 1 and 8 of Cycle (C) 1 and then at the target dose from C2D1 (2.5/10/16mg or 2.5/10/30mg); treatment continued for up to 12 cycles, every 21 days. Response rates were based on the Lugano criteria (Cheson, et al. JCO 2014). Results: Fifty-two pts received glofitamab SUD; 17 and 35 pts received 2.5/10/16mg and 2.5/10/30mg, respectively. Twenty-eight pts (53.8%) had aggressive NHL (aNHL) and 24 pts had indolent NHL (iNHL). Pts had a median age of 68 (44–85) years and received a median of 3 (1–12) prior lines of therapy. Forty (76.9%) and 38 (73.1%) pts were refractory to their most recent and any prior CD20 therapy, respectively. After a median follow-up of 6.3 months, an updated efficacy analysis was conducted on December 1, 2020. For pts with aNHL (N = 28), the best overall response (OR) and complete metabolic response (CMR) rates were 64.3% and 57.1%, respectively; a trend of improved response was observed with increased target dose, with a CMR rate of 71.4% at 2.5/10/30mg (N = 14). Notably, 4/5 pts (80%) with mantle cell lymphoma (2.5/10/16mg, n = 2; 2.5/10/30mg, n = 2) had CMR. For aNHL, 13/16 CMRs are ongoing, with 8 CMRs lasting > 3 months. For pts with iNHL (N = 24), OR and CMR rates were 79.2% and 70.8%, respectively; 14/17 CMRs are ongoing, with 10 CMRs lasting > 3 months. As of August 3, 2020, common adverse events (52 pts) were CRS (63.5%), neutropenia (38.5%), and pyrexia (32.7%). CRS was mostly confined to C1: 24/50 pts had CRS after 2.5mg; 20/49 pts after 10mg; 2/16 and 8/32 pts had CRS after 16 and 30mg (C2D1), respectively. Grade [Gr] 1 and 2 CRS was reported in 18 (34.6%) and 12 (23%) pts, respectively; 3 pts had Gr 3 CRS; none had Gr 4/5 events (ASTCT 2019). Updated data, including biomarker data on baseline CD20 expression and CD8 levels in the tumor, will be presented. Conclusions: Updated data for glofitamab monotherapy SUD show higher preliminary response rates than previously reported in pts with R/R NHL who have failed multiple lines of therapy. CRS was mostly manageable, of low grade, and confined to the first cycle of treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03075696.

Summary This study assessed the effect of accelerometry-measured higher impacts resulting from habitual weight-bearing activity on lower limb bone strength in older women. Despite higher impacts being experienced rarely in this population-based cohort, positive associations were observed between higher vertical impacts and lower limb bone size and strength. Introduction We investigated whether the benefit of habitual weight-bearing physical activity (PA) for lower limb bone strength in older women is explained by exposure to higher impacts, as previously suggested by observations in younger individuals. Methods Four hundred and eight women from the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA), mean 76.8 years, wore tri-axial accelerometers at the waist for a mean of 5.4 days. Y-axis peaks were categorised, using previously identified cutoffs, as low (0.5–1.0 g), medium (1.0–1.5 g), and higher (≥1.5 g) impacts. Mid and distal peripheral quantitative computed tomography scans of the tibia and radius were performed, as were hip and lumbar spine Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Regressions between (log transformed) number of low, medium and high impacts, and bone outcomes were adjusted for artefact error grade, age, height, fat and lean mass and impacts in other bands. Results Eight thousand eight hundred and nine (4047, 16,882) low impacts were observed during the measurement week, 345 (99, 764) medium impacts and 42 (17, 106) higher impacts (median with 25th and 75th quartiles). Higher vertical impacts were positively associated with lower limb bone strength as reflected by cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) of the tibia [0.042 (0.012, 0.072) p = 0.01] and hip [0.067 (0.001, 0.133) p = 0.045] (beta coefficients show standard deviations change per doubling in impacts, with 95 % confidence interval). Higher impacts were positively associated with tibial periosteal circumference (PC) [0.015 (0.003, 0.027) p = 0.02], but unrelated to hip BMD. Equivalent positive associations were not seen for low or medium impacts. Conclusions Despite their rarity, habitual levels of higher impacts were positively associated with lower limb bone size and strength, whereas equivalent relationships were not seen for low or medium impacts. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00198-016-3863-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

OBJECTIVE: A proportion of older individuals report subjective memory complaints (SMCs), which can predict the development of cognitive impairment and dementia. Previous studies based on secondary care suggest that SMC is also associated with other adverse health consequences, including falls, fractures and increased healthcare utilization. In this study, we aimed to establish whether similar findings are observed in the wider population. METHODS: Prospective analysis of the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon, a population-based cohort recruited from primary care, was carried out. Data were collected by self-completion questionnaire at baseline and 2 years. SMC was assessed at baseline. Fractures, measures of falls, mobility and healthcare utilization were assessed 2 years later. A random 5% subsample of data was validated against electronic general practitioner records. Logistic regression was used to identify independent associations, following adjustment for a range of confounders assessed at baseline. RESULTS: Data were available on 3184 women. Three hundred and fifty participants (11.0%) reported SMC. They were older (73.3 ± 4.5 vs 72.0 ± 4.2 years) and less mobile compared with those not reporting SMC. SMCs at baseline were associated with an increased risk of upper limb fractures over the following 2 years (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.02-2.90). SMCs were also associated with an increased risk of falls (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.41-2.38) and increased healthcare utilization (OR for hospital appointments 2.20, 95% CI 1.26-3.86). No association was observed with bone mineral density at any site. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective memory complaints are important markers of adverse health outcomes and should prompt interventions to reduce fractures such as physiotherapy-led fall reduction programmes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Language: en

Background The APHINITY (BIG 4-11) study showed that pertuzumab significantly improved the rates of invasive disease-free survival among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, operable breast cancer when added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Because diarrhea was a common adverse event that could compromise treatment administration, we evaluated the incidence and management of diarrhea in the APHINITY study. Patients and Methods The APHINITY trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1 year of trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab or placebo. The diarrhea incidence, severity (National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 4.0), onset, and management were analyzed. Results A total of 4805 patients were randomized. Diarrhea of any grade was the most common adverse event and occurred in 71% of patients in the pertuzumab arm versus 45% in the placebo arm. Diarrhea grade 3 to 4 was observed in 10% and 4% in the pertuzumab and placebo arms, respectively. The greatest incidence of diarrhea was reported during the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and taxane (61% vs. 34% of patients experienced an event with pertuzumab vs. placebo, respectively). A marked decrease was observed on chemotherapy cessation. Antidiarrheal agents were commonly used, and diarrhea rarely caused treatment dose modifications or discontinuation. Conclusion Diarrhea was a common adverse event in the APHINITY study. Most episodes were low grade and were generally manageable with common antidiarrheal agents. The incidence of diarrhea was greater with the combination of a taxane and HER2-targeted treatment and decreased once chemotherapy was stopped.

lthough Eating Disorders (ED) are known to affect bone health and development, little is known about the longitudinal effect of ED and ED behaviours on bone health in community dwelling adult women. Women (n = 3507) enrolled in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) participated in a two-phase prevalence study to assess lifetime ED and ED behaviours (fasting, restrictive eating, vomiting and misuse of medication). Crude and adjusted linear regression methods investigated the association between ED diagnoses and behaviours, and total body, hip, leg and arm bone mineral density (BMD) DXA scans at mean ages of 48 and 52 years. Lifetime occurrence of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) was associated with lower BMD Z-scores for the whole body (mean difference (MD) = −0.28; 95% CI: -0.49, −0.05), hip (MD = −0.45; 95% CI -0.74, −0.16), leg (MD = −0.28; 95% CI -0.52, −0.03) and arm (MD = −0.44; 95% CI -0.68, −0.19) compared to no ED. This effect was mostly accounted for by lowest ever BMI. In post-hoc analyses, Restrictive AN, but not Binge-Purge AN was associated with a lower total body BMD Z-scores (MD = −0.37; 95% CI -0.62, −0.12). Lifetime Fasting and Restrictive Eating were associated with low BMD of the total body, hip, arm and leg in adjusted analyses, all p

Objectives: We conducted a systematic review to identify adverse effects of physical activity and/or exercise for adults with osteoporosis/osteopenia. We synthesised evidence from observational studies, and updated three previously published systematic reviews. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, grey literature and reference lists of relevant studies. Selection criteria were: (1) observational studies in patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia; and (2) in accordance with the criteria used in the previous reviews. A narrative synthesis was conducted for the observational data. Random effects meta-analysis was undertaken for the review updates. Results: For the observational synthesis 14 studies were included. The majority of studies reported no adverse events, reduced incidence/improvement, or no significant change after physical activity or exercise. Activities that involved spinal flexion (certain yoga moves and sit-ups) were associated with a greater risk of vertebral fractures but these events were rare. For the update of reviews, 57 additional studies were identified. Exercise was generally associated with a greater number of minor adverse events including mild muscle/joint pain. Serious adverse events were rare and could not be attributed to the intervention. Conclusion: Patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia can safely participate in structured exercise programmes, whether at home or in supervised facilities. Systematic review registration for observational studies: PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017070551

Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Objective: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are common and present a significant burden to patients and healthcare services. Poor posture can increase vertebral pressure, pain and the risk of further fractures. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of postural taping on pain, function and quality of life when used in addition to usual care. Methods: A feasibility randomized, controlled trial was carried out in men and women with at least one clinically diagnosed painful OVF. Participants were randomly allocated to use an adhesive postural taping device at home for 4weeks or to continue with usual care. Outcomes assessed at baseline and 4weeks included pain at rest and on movement (visual analogue scales [VASs]), and function and quality of life (Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis [QUALEFFO]). Health resource use and acceptability were explored using a specifically designed questionnaire. Results: Twenty-four participants completed the trial (taping, n=13; control, n=11). Groups were comparable in age, although the control group contained more men (n=3 versus n=0) and scored slightly lower on most outcome measures at baseline. Descriptive analysis favoured the taping group for most outcome measures. Effect sizes were small to medium (0.37, 0.45 and 0.66 for VAS rest, VAS movement and QUALEFFO, respectively). Conclusions: The taping device demonstrated potential to improve pain and function. However, the findings need to be replicated in an appropriately powered study. The study procedures were largely acceptable. A more extensive pilot trial is recommended prior to a definitive trial.