Search

Objective To describe the development of an Environmental contextual factors (EF) Item Set (EFIS) accompanying the disease specific Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI). Method First, a candidate item pool was developed by linking items from existing questionnaires to 13 EF previously selected for the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) /ASAS Core Set. Second, using data from two international surveys, which contained the EF item pool as well as the items from the ASAS HI, the number of EF items was reduced based on the correlation between the item and the ASAS HI sum score combined with expert opinion. Third, the final English EFIS was translated into 15 languages and cross-culturally validated. Results The initial item pool contained 53 EF addressing four ICF EF chapters: products and technology (e1), support and relationship (e3), attitudes (e4) and health services (e5). Based on 1754 responses of axial spondyloarthritis patients in an international survey, 44 of 53 initial items were removed based on low correlations to the ASAS HI or redundancy combined with expert opinion. Nine items of the initial item pool (range correlation 0.21–0.49) form the final EFIS. The EFIS was translated into 15 languages and field tested in 24 countries. Conclusions An EFIS is available complementing the ASAS HI and helps to interpret the ASAS HI results by gaining an understanding of the interaction between a health condition and contextual factors. The EFIS emphasizes the importance of support and relationships, as well as attitudes of the patient and health services in relation to self-reported health.

Objectives To delineate the impact of peripheral musculoskeletal manifestations on stratification of disease phenotype and outcome in new-onset spondyloarthritis (SpA), using a prospective observational nationwide inception cohort, the BelGian Inflammatory Arthritis and spoNdylitis cohorT (Be-Giant). Methods Newly diagnosed adult SpA patients, fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for axial or peripheral SpA, were included in Be-Giant and prospectively followed every six months. Peripheral involvement (defined as arthritis, enthesitis and/or dactylitis) was determined in relation to clinically similar patient subsets at baseline and disease activity patterns during two-year follow-up, identified through K-means cluster analysis and latent class growth analysis. Results From November 2010 to March 2020, 367 patients were enrolled in Be-Giant, of whom 162 (44%) had peripheral manifestations. Two patient clusters [A, axial predominant (n = 248) and B, peripheral predominant (n = 119)] were identified at diagnosis. Longitudinal analysis (n = 115) revealed two trajectories of disease activity in each cluster: one with persistently high disease activity over time (‘High’), the other rapidly evolving to low disease activity (‘Low’). In cluster A patients, peripheral manifestations predisposed to the ‘High’ trajectory [odds ratio (OR) = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3, 3.1, P = 0.001], despite more rapid initiation of biologics compared with patients without peripheral manifestations (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.0, 4.4, P = 0.04 – Cox proportional-hazards model). Conclusion Peripheral musculoskeletal manifestations are major determinants of phenotypical diversity in new-onset SpA. Intriguingly, stratification of axial SpA according to concomitant peripheral involvement identified an endotype with an unfavorable outcome despite more prompt therapeutic intensification with biologics. These observations justify an endotype-tailored approach beyond current ASAS/EULAR management recommendations.

ObjectivesRisankizumab is an interleukin-23 inhibitor under study for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab versus placebo in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response or intolerance to ≤2 biological therapies (Bio-IR) and/or ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR). Results through week 24 are reported here.MethodsAdults with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR were randomised to receive subcutaneously administered risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 during a 24-week, double-blind treatment period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology score (ACR20) at week 24. Secondary endpoints assessed key domains of PsA and patient-reported outcomes.ResultsA total of 444 patients (median age 53 years, range 23–84 years) were randomised to risankizumab (n=224) or placebo (n=220); 206 patients (46.5%) were Bio-IR. At week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving risankizumab achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 (51.3% vs 26.5%, pConclusionTreatment with risankizumab resulted in significant improvements versus placebo in key disease outcomes and was well tolerated in patients with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR.Trial registration numberNCT03671148.

Introduction Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has a major impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs), important components in the assessment of therapeutic efficacy. We evaluated the impact of upadacitinib on PROs in PsA patients with inadequate responses or intolerance to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR). Methods Patients enrolled in the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 randomized controlled trial (RCT) received 56 weeks of oral upadacitinib 15 mg QD, upadacitinib 30 mg QD, or placebo switched to either dose of upadacitinib at week 24. PROs included patient global assessment of disease activity (PtGA), pain, physical function (HAQ-DI), health-related quality of life (SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary and domain scores), fatigue (FACIT-F), psoriasis symptom severity (SAPS), and work productivity (WPAI). Mean changes from baseline in PROs, improvements ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and scores ≥ normative values, and maintenance of improvements were assessed. Results At weeks 12 and 24, patients treated with either upadacitinib dose reported statistically and nominally significant improvements from baseline across all PROs versus placebo (p ≤ 0.05), except the WPAI absenteeism domain, which were maintained or further improved to week 56. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving either upadacitinib dose reported improvements ≥ MCID and scores ≥ normative values versus placebo (nominal p ≤ 0.01) in most PROs at weeks 12 and 24, with clinically meaningful improvements continuing to week 56. Improvements ≥ MCID were reported as early as week 2 in PtGA, pain, and HAQ-DI. Conclusions Upadacitinib provides rapid, clinically meaningful, and sustained improvements in PROs reported by bDMARD-IR PsA patients. SELECT-PsA 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03104374. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00377-x.

IL-23 is a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritides, including PsA and axial spondyloarthritis, as well as related conditions, such as psoriasis and IBD. Genetic associations, animal models and translational studies in humans demonstrate the key role played by IL-23, especially when coupled with downstream overexpression of IL-17 via stimulation of T helper 17 (Th17) and other cells by IL-23. Whereas IL-23 inhibition has shown clear-cut benefit in psoriasis and peripheral manifestations of PsA, trials of IL-23 inhibitors have failed in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. More recently, exploratory data from PsA patients with axial symptoms suggests that improvement may occur, but needs confirmation in dedicated axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) trials. Hypotheses for these apparently conflicting findings about IL-23 inhibition in various forms of spondylitis are discussed.

Introduction Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor under investigation in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study assessed the 56-week efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with PsA and an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic therapy. Methods In the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study, patients were randomized to 56 weeks of blinded treatment with oral upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily, or placebo switched to upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily at week 24. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving 20/50/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20/50/70), 75/90/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/90/100), and minimal disease activity. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results Of 641 patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug, 479 (74.7%) completed 56 weeks of treatment. Improvements in the proportion of patients achieving ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100, and minimal disease activity were maintained with both doses of upadacitinib through 56 weeks. Week 56 results for patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib at week 24 were similar to those for patients originally randomized to the upadacitinib groups. The exposure-adjusted event rate for serious infections was 2.6 and 6.1 events/100 patient-years in the upadacitinib 15 and 30 mg groups, respectively. Herpes zoster occurred more frequently with upadacitinib 30 versus 15 mg; most cases were non-serious. Conclusion In patients with PsA who had an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic therapy, the efficacy of upadacitinib was maintained over 56 weeks with no new significant safety signals observed. Trial registration NCT03104374. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-021-00305-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives Treatment with golimumab monotherapy in early peripheral SpA (pSpA) results in higher rates of clinical remission compared with treatment in more longstanding disease. When reaching remission, treat-to-target recommendations suggest tapering of treatment. We therefore explored whether addition of MTX would permit discontinuation of golimumab in patients with pSpA in sustained clinical remission. Methods After a 2-year extension phase with golimumab treatment, patients with pSpA reaching clinical remission in the CRESPA trial were offered a tapering strategy leading to discontinuation of golimumab and replacement by MTX monotherapy. Patients were prospectively followed to assess the rate of sustained biologic-free clinical remission. In case of relapse of arthritis, enthesitis or dactylitis under MTX monotherapy, golimumab was restarted. Results Of the original 60 pSpA patients, 25 entered the step-down strategy. Currently, only 4 patients (16%) are still in sustained remission under MTX monotherapy. In 21 patients (84%), golimumab was reinstalled because of relapse of disease activity (n = 19) or development of adverse events related to MTX (n = 2). Restarting golimumab treatment promptly restored clinical remission in all patients within 12 weeks. Conclusion In patients with early pSpA achieving clinical remission after 2 years of golimumab treatment, step-down therapy to monotherapy with MTX led to high rates of clinical relapse. This underscores the overall weak efficacy of MTX in maintaining clinical remission in pSpA. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01426815.

Introduction Clinical remission in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been determined using composite indices such as the AS Disease Activity Score inactive disease (ASDAS-ID), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria partial remission (ASAS-PR), and low Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores. The objective of this exploratory analysis was to evaluate the proportion of secukinumab-treated patients with AS achieving remission defined based on the ASDAS-ID (score < 1.3), ASAS-PR or BASDAI score ≤ 2. Methods The analysis pooled data from the MEASURE 1 and 2 studies over 3 years. The proportion of patients who achieved ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, or BASDAI ≤ 2 with secukinumab was compared with placebo at week 16; results for secukinumab-treated patients were summarized through week 156. Sustainability of each criterion was assessed from week 16 to 156 using shift analysis. The association between each of these criteria and specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as health-related quality of life, function, fatigue, and work impairment, was also explored. Results At week 16, a higher proportion of secukinumab-treated patients versus placebo achieved ASDAS-ID (17.6 vs. 3.5%), ASAS-PR (15.4 vs. 4.1%), or BASDAI ≤ 2 (22.3 vs. 6.4%) criteria (all P

ObjectivesTo evaluate efficacy and safety of immediate switch from upadacitinib to adalimumab, or vice versa, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with non-response or incomplete-response to the initial therapy.MethodsSELECT-COMPARE randomised patients to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (n=651), placebo (n=651) or adalimumab 40 mg every other week (n=327). A treat-to-target study design was implemented, with blinded rescue occurring prior to week 26 for patients who did not achieve at least 20% improvement in both tender and swollen joint counts (‘non-responders’) and at week 26 based on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10 (‘incomplete-responders’) without washout.ResultsA total of 39% (252/651) and 49% (159/327) of patients originally randomised to upadacitinib and adalimumab were rescued to the alternate therapy. In both switch groups (adalimumab to upadacitinib and vice versa) and in non-responders and incomplete-responders, improvements in disease activity were observed at 3 and 6 months following rescue. CDAI low disease activity was achieved by 36% and 47% of non-responders and 45% and 58% of incomplete-responders switched to adalimumab and upadacitinib, respectively, 6 months following switch. Overall, approximately 5% of rescued patients experienced worsening in disease activity at 6 months postswitch. The frequency of adverse events was similar between switch groups.ConclusionsThese observations support a treat-to-target strategy, in which patients who fail to respond initially (or do not achieve sufficient response) are switched to a therapy with an alternate mechanism of action and experience improved outcomes. No new safety findings were observed despite immediate switch without washout.

Physical therapy (PT) forms the cornerstone of non-pharmacological treatment in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).1 The effect of temporary cessation of PT on SpA outcomes is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of a lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity patterns, spinal mobility and health perception in SpA. Patients of the BeGIANT cohort, a Belgian multicentre prospective observational registry of newly diagnosed patients with SpA, completed an online questionnaire during the first lockdown in Belgium (March/April 2020), followed by a standardised clinical examination immediately thereafter. The online questionnaire (online supplemental file 1), developed jointly with patient advocacy groups, assessed changes in PT, exercise and sport regimens. We also probed the impact of a lockdown on health perception, including completion of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. Patients from this lockdown cohort were clinically assessed by measuring Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) and chest expansion immediately after the lockdown (May 2020). Data were compared with the last available measurements as part of the standardised follow-up.### Supplementary data [annrheumdis-2021-220584supp001.pdf] The online questionnaire was completed by 185 patients during the third week of the lockdown, of whom 65 patients (35 men, (mean±SD) age 40.8±11.6 years, symptom duration of 10.5±8.0 years) visited our outpatient clinic immediately post-lockdown. All 65 patients had stable disease and therapy prior to the lockdown. Among 33 (51%) patients following PT, 30 discontinued due to inaccessibility as a …

Gut inflammation is strongly associated with spondyloarthritis (SpA), as exemplified by the high prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the even higher occurrence of subclinical gut inflammation in patients with SpA. The gut-joint axis of inflammation in SpA is further reinforced by similarities in immunopathogenesis at both anatomical sites and by the clinical success of therapies blocking TNF and IL-23 in IBD and in some forms of SpA. Many genetic risk factors are shared between SpA and IBD, and changes in the composition of gut microbiota are seen in both diseases. Current dogma is that inflammation in SpA initiates in the gut and leads to joint inflammation; however, although conceptually attractive, some research does not support this causal relationship. For example, therapies targeting IL-17A are efficacious in the joint but not the gut, and interfering with gut trafficking by targeting molecules such as alpha 4 beta 7 in IBD can lead to onset or flares of SpA. Several important knowledge gaps remain that must be addressed in future studies. Determining the true nature of the gut-joint axis has real-world implications for the treatment of patients with co-incident IBD and SpA and for the repurposing of therapeutics from one disease to the other.In this article, the authors summarize the latest clinical and basic research on gut inflammation in spondyloarthritis and highlight important questions to address in future research.

ObjectivesBone marrow oedema (BMO) on MRI of sacroiliac joints (SIJs) represents a hallmark of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), yet such lesions may also occur under augmented mechanical stress in healthy subjects. We therefore sought to delineate the relationship between pregnancy/delivery and pelvic stress through a prospective study with repeated MRI. Results were matched with maternal, child and birth characteristics.MethodsThirty-five women underwent a baseline MRI-SIJ within the first 10 days after giving birth. MRI was repeated after 6 months and, if positive for sacroiliitis according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) definition, after 12 months. BMO and structural lesions were scored by three trained readers using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) method.ResultsSeventy-seven per cent of the subjects (27/35) displayed sacroiliac BMO immediately postpartum, 60% fulfilled the ASAS definition of a positive MRI. After 6 months, 46% of the subjects (15/33) still showed BMO, representing 15% (5/33) with a positive MRI. After 12 months, MRI was still positive in 12% of the subjects (4/33). Few structural lesions were detected. Intriguingly, in this study, the presence of BMO was related to a shorter duration of labour and lack of epidural anaesthesia.ConclusionA surprisingly high prevalence of sacroiliac BMO occurs in women immediately postpartum. Our data reveal a need for a waiting period of at least 6 months to perform an MRI-SIJ in postpartum women with back pain. This study also underscores the importance of interpreting MRI-SIJ findings in the appropriate clinical context.

To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of bone marrow edema (BME) in patients suspected for sacroiliitis. Patients aged 18–55 years with clinical suspicion for sacroiliitis were enrolled. All patients underwent DECT and 3.0 T MRI of the sacroiliac joints on the same day. Virtual non-calcium (VNCa) images were calculated from DECT images for demonstration of BME. VNCa images were scored by two readers independently using a binary system (0 = normal bone marrow, 1 = BME). Diagnostic performance was assessed with fluid-sensitive MRI as the reference standard. ROIs were placed on VNCa images, and CT numbers were displayed. Cutoff values for BME detection were determined based on ROC curves. Forty patients (16 men, 24 women, mean age 37.1 years ± 9.6 years) were included. Overall inter-reader agreement for visual image reading of BME on VNCa images was good (κ = 0.70). The sensitivity and specificity of BME detection by DECT were 65.4% and 94.2% on the quadrant level and 81.3% and 91.7% on the patient level. ROC analyses revealed AUCs of 0.90 and 0.87 for CT numbers in the ilium and sacrum, respectively. Cutoff values of − 44.4 HU (for iliac quadrants) and − 40.8 HU (for sacral quadrants) yielded sensitivities of 76.9% and 76.7% and specificities of 91.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Inflammatory sacroiliac BME can be detected by VNCa images calculated from DECT, with a good interobserver agreement, moderate sensitivity, and high specificity. • Virtual non-calcium images calculated from dual-energy CT can detect sacroiliac bone marrow edema in patients suspected for sacroiliitis. • Dual-energy CT has a high specificity in bone marrow edema detection. • Virtual non-calcium images for bone marrow edema in patients with a large amount of red bone marrow or obvious sclerosis near the articular surface should be interpreted with caution.

Background The JAK pathway is a potential therapeutic target in ankylosing spondylitis. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.Methods This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, parallel-group, phase 2/3 study, SELECT-AXIS 1, enrolled adults in 62 sites in 20 countries. Eligible patients had active ankylosing spondylitis, fulfilled modified New York criteria, were previously untreated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and had inadequate response to at least two or intolerance or contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 using interactive response technology to take oral upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or oral placebo for the 14-week period 1; only period 1 data are reported here. The primary endpoint was the composite outcome measure of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 response at week 14. Analyses were done in the full analysis set of patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03178487.Findings Between Nov 30, 2017, and Oct 15, 2018, 187 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 15 mg (93 patients) or to placebo (94 patients), and 178 (95%) patients (89 in the upadacitinib group and 89 in the placebo group) completed period 1 on study drug (by the completion date of Jan 21, 2019). Significantly more patients had an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 response in the upadacitinib group versus in the placebo group at week 14 (48 [52%] of 93 patients vs 24 [26%] of 94 patients; p=0.0003; treatment difference 26% [95% CI 13-40]). Adverse events were reported in 58 (62%) of 93 patients in the upadacitinib group versus 52 (55%) of 94 in the placebo group. The most common adverse event in the upadacitinib group was increased creatine phosphokinase (eight [9%] of 93 patients in the upadacitinib group vs two [2%] of 94 patients with placebo). No serious infections, herpes zoster, malignancy, venous thromboembolic events, or deaths were reported; one serious adverse event was reported in each group.Interpretation Upadacitinib 15 mg was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis who had an inadequate response or contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These data support the further investigation of upadacitinib for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND: Spondyloarthritis is the most frequent extra-intestinal manifestation of IBD. AIM: To present simple strategies to identify and differentiate inflammatory joint pain in IBD patients. METHODS: A panel of Belgian gastroenterologists and rheumatologists developed seven algorithms for IBD patients with joint symptoms based on a Delphi exercise conducted between April and December 2016. Here, we focus on referral strategies for patients with chronic back pain (evidence-based strategy), large joint monoarthritis, oligo- or polyarticular arthritis or arthralgia (based on expert opinion). We also present management tools for IBD patients with acute back pain and small joint monoarthritis (Supplementary file). RESULTS: The reported algorithm for IBD patients with chronic back pain uses basic clinical criteria to identify which patients should be referred to the emergency room (spondylodiscitis), physical medicine and rehabilitation (mechanical back pain) or rheumatologist (spondyloarthritis). IBD patients with large joint monoarthritis should be referred to emergency room if septic arthritis is suspected; in other patients, blood analyses and referral to a rheumatologist for articular puncture with evacuation of synovial fluid are recommended. The analysis of synovial fluid allows for identification of non-inflammatory (e.g., osteoarthritis) and inflammatory (e.g., [pseudo]-gout, peripheral spondyloarthritis and Borrelia burgdorferi arthritis) conditions. In patients with inflammatory oligoarticular or polyarticular arthralgia, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, concomitant therapies, anti-nuclear factor and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels should be evaluated; in anti-tumour necrosis factor-treated patients, a drug-induced lupus-like syndrome should be considered. CONCLUSION: We propose straightforward strategies for IBD patients with joint symptoms, which are specific enough to select initial treatment and referral pattern. ispartof: ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS vol:50 issue:11-12 pages:1204-1213 ispartof: location:England status: published

Objectives To characterize the frequency of PsA subtypes, estimate the severity based on damage and inflammation and estimate the impact of PsA on patients’ health-related quality of life. Methods We conducted a longitudinal observational study in 17 academic and non-academic centres in Belgium. Patients with PsA fulfilling Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis were recruited. Three visits were scheduled: at baseline (T0), at 1 year (±1 month; T1) and at 2 years (±1 month; T2) of follow-up. Demographics, clinical data and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at T0, T1 and T2. X-rays of the hands and feet were collected yearly (T0, T1 and T2). X-rays of the spine were collected at T0 and T2. Here we report on the burden of disease based on the clinical data and patient-reported outcomes. Results A total of 461 patients were recruited; 73.5% had combined peripheral and axial involvement and 13.7% had hip involvement. Plaque psoriasis was predominant (83.9%). At inclusion, 42.7% and 58.8% had no tender or swollen joints, respectively. Dactylitis and enthesitis were still present in 13.7% and 24.1% of the patients, respectively. Patients was treated with DMARDs (68%) and/or anti-TNF (44.2%). Forty-three per cent of the patients had a state of minimal disease activity and 62% considered the actual state as satisfactory. The mean HAQ score was 0.7%, with 32.5% of patients having a normal score ( Conclusion Despite the availability of different treatment options, including biologics (anti-TNF), a substantial number of patients have active disease and have a high disease burden.

Introduction Improvements in both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations are important treatment goals in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Objective These post hoc analyses determined whether additional benefits related to various PsA domains are observed in patients simultaneously achieving 50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI100), the primary endpoint of the SPIRIT-H2H study. Methods Patients with active PsA and psoriasis in SPIRIT-H2H (N = 566) were categorised into two sets of four response groups irrespective of treatment allocation (approved dosages of ixekizumab or adalimumab): patients who simultaneously achieved ACR50 and PASI100 response, achieved ACR50 response only, achieved PASI100 response only, or did not achieve ACR50 or PASI100 response after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. Patients achieving simultaneous ACR50 and PASI100 response were compared with the other patient response groups at the corresponding time point for efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. Results Patients simultaneously achieving ACR50 and PASI100 responses at week 24 or 52 showed higher rates of ACR70 response, minimal disease activity, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis ≤ 4, resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis, and HRQoL improvement at weeks 24 and 52, respectively, than the other corresponding response groups at both time points. Conclusion High levels of disease control, such as those obtained with simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 response, were linked to better outcomes across a wide range of endpoints that are important for patients with PsA. Patients meeting this combined endpoint showed more comprehensive and thus greater control of disease activity. Trial registration NCT03151551 Key Points• Treatment goals for patients with psoriatic arthritis emphasise the importance of improving both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations of the disease.• A combined endpoint considering both these manifestations, achievement of at least 50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index, was linked with achievement of a number of other endpoints relevant to psoriatic arthritis, including health-related quality of life that are important to patients with psoriatic arthritis.• Patients meeting the combined endpoint were more likely to achieve a disease state of remission, which is the stated aim of treatment for psoriasis.

Background To investigate the efficacy of secukinumab in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) grouped by disease activity as assessed by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 status, and sex. Methods The phase III PREVENT study randomized (1:1:1) 555 patients to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg with (LD) or without (NL) loading dose or placebo weekly, followed by every 4 weeks starting at week 4. Here, we report the results of a post hoc analysis reporting the efficacy outcomes (pooled secukinumab) to 16 weeks by CRP, MRI, HLA-B27, and sex. Results Efficacy differences between the secukinumab and the placebo groups were highest in the CRP+, MRI+, HLA-B27+, and male subgroups, particularly for Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-CRP inactive disease and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) partial remission outcomes. ASAS40 response rates in the CRP+/MRI+ subgroup was 52.3% (secukinumab) versus 21.8% (placebo; P < 0.0001) at week 16. ASAS40 response rates (secukinumab versus placebo) were 43.9% versus 32.6% in HLA-B27+, 32.7% versus 16.4% in HLA-B27− subgroups, 51.2% versus 30.8% in male, and 31.7% versus 25.3% in female patients, respectively. Conclusions Secukinumab improved the signs and symptoms of nr-axSpA across patients grouped by CRP (+/−) and/or MRI (+/−) status, HLA-B27 (+/−) status, and sex. The highest treatment differences between secukinumab and placebo were observed in patients with both elevated CRP and evidence of sacroiliitis on MRI. Treatment difference was minimal between HLA-B27 (+) and (−) subgroups. Male patients had higher relative responses than female patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02696031. Registered on 02 March 2016

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogenous, chronic, inflammatory musculoskeletal disease that can lead to peripheral and axial damage and loss of function. Axial involvement occurs in 25% to 70% of patients with PsA, varying greatly depending on its definition, with the key manifestations being sacroiliitis and/or spondylitis. However, there are no agreed-upon classification or diagnostic criteria for axial involvement in PsA and no consensus on treatment paradigms, which complicates management of PsA. There have only been a few studies assessing biologics in patients with PsA with axial involvement, and most treatment plans are based on evidence from patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatologists therefore face many challenges in the management of axial PsA, including diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and choice of appropriate treatment. In this review, we summarize the clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, differential diagnoses, treatment options, and prognosis of axial PsA, with the aim of increasing rheumatologists’ knowledge of this phenotype of PsA and thereby aiding its optimal management.

We would like to thank Cai and Peng1 for the interest they have expressed in our recently published article ‘Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial’2 and the ARD editorial team to give us the opportunity to address their comments. First, Cai and Peng pinpoint another reason behind the lack of statistical significance of our primary outcome, that is, the shortage of our sample size. As suggested by Cai and Peng we have performed a post-hoc power calculation based on our estimated results (and sample), with p1=0.47 and p2=0.36 (p1 and p2 being the proportion of responders in the active arm and control arms, respectively) and an α risk of 5%, the post-hoc-calculated power is 29.9%. However, we have also performed a post-hoc power calculation based on the sample size that we aimed for (ie, 116 patients per arm) and the results observed in the trial: with an α risk of 5% and the p1 and p2 mentioned earlier, the power was still 41%, that is, very …

Objective To report the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib through 1 year in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods In the SELECT-AXIS 1 study, adults with active AS and an inadequate response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo. At week 14, patients who had been randomized to receive placebo were switched to upadacitinib, and all patients continued in the open-label extension and received upadacitinib up to week 104; interim data up to week 64 are reported herein. Results Of 187 patients, 178 completed week 14 on study drug and entered the open-label extension. Similar proportions of patients in either group (continuous upadacitinib or placebo-to-upadacitinib) achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% response (ASAS40) or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) showing low disease activity at week 64: >= 70% of patients achieved these end points based on nonresponder imputation (NRI) and >= 81% based on as-observed analyses. Furthermore, >= 34% (NRI) and >= 39% (as-observed analysis) achieved ASDAS showing inactive disease or ASAS showing partial remission at week 64. Mean changes from baseline (week 0) to week 64 in pain, function, and inflammation showed consistent improvement or sustained maintenance through the study. Among 182 patients receiving upadacitinib (237.6 patient-years), 618 adverse events (260.1 per 100 patient-years) were reported. No serious infections, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal perforation, or deaths were reported. Conclusion Upadacitinib 15 mg once daily showed sustained and consistent efficacy over 1 year. Patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib at week 14 showed similar efficacy versus those who received continuous upadacitinib.

Background/Aims Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are effective treatments for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA), but may be less effective in patients (pts) without elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). This study evaluated the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody selectively targeting interleukin-17A, in pts with r-axSpA at 52 weeks (wks) with nonelevated (≤5mg/L) and elevated (>5mg/L) baseline (BL) CRP. Methods COAST-V (NCT02696785) and COAST-W (NCT02696798) were phase 3, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, PBO-controlled trials investigating efficacy of 80-mg IXE every 4 wks and every 2 wks in pts who met ASAS criteria for raxSpA, had radiographic sacroiliitis according to mNY criteria, and were biological diseasemodifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARDs)-naïve (COAST-V) or TNFiexperienced (COAST-W). Data from 157 COAST-V pts and 188 COAST-W pts treated with IXE from Wk0 to 52 were analyzed. Patients were stratified based on nonelevated (≤5mg/L) vs elevated (>5 mg/L) BL CRP. Additional analysis was done with BL CRP ≤10.0mg/L vs > 10.0mg/L. Efficacy was assessed by ASAS40, ≥50% improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50), and change in Short Form 36 physical component summary (SF36 PCS) score. Missing data were imputed by nonresponder imputation for binary measures and modified BL observation carried forward for continuous measure. Week 16 data are presented for comparison. Results Of pts treated with IXE through Wk52, 34.4% had CRP ≤5.0mg/L, 65.6% had CRP >5.0mg/L, 61.8% had CRP ≤10.0mg/L, and 38.2% had CRP >10.0mg/L at BL in COASTV and 33.0% had CRP ≤5.0mg/L, 67.0% had CRP >5.0mg/L, 55.9% had CRP ≤10.0mg/L, and 44.1% had CRP >10.0mg/L at BL in COAST-W.At Wk16, the proportion of pts achieving ASAS40 in COAST-V was numerically higher with IXE in the ≤5mg/L group and significantly higher with IXE in the >5mg/L group vs PBO, as previously shown, and was significantly higher with IXE in the ≤10mg/L and >10mg/L groups vs PBO. Results were similar in COAST-W and significant in the >5mg/L and ≤10mg/L groups vs PBO. At Wk52, greater than 45% of COAST-V pts and greater than 35% of COAST-W pts treated with IXE achieved an ASAS40 response, greater than 40% of COAST-V pts and greater than 25% of COAST-W patients treated with IXE achieved a BASDAI50 response, and change from baseline in SF-36 PCS score in patients treated with IXE was greater than 5 points in both studies regardless of the BL CRP cutoffs evaluated. Conclusion A higher proportion of ASAS40 responders was observed in IXE treated arms versus PBO among bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-experienced pts with r-axSpA when the CRP cutoff of 10mg/L was evaluated, and the responses were consistent through Wk52. Furthermore, similar proportions of pts achieved BASDAI50 and SF-36 responses within each patient population regardless of the BL CRP cutoff evaluated. Disclosure J.D. Reveille: None. P. Rahman: None. D.M. Sandoval Calderon: Shareholder/stock ownership; D. Sandoval Calderon is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. T. Muram: Shareholder/stock ownership; T. Muram is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. A. Kronbergs: Shareholder/stock ownership; A. Kronbergs is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. R. Bolce: Shareholder/stock ownership; R.Bolce is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. V. Geneus: Shareholder/stock ownership; V. Geneus is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. T. Hunter: Shareholder/stock ownership; T. Hunter is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. S. Liu-Leage: Shareholder/stock ownership; S.L. League is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. M. Rudwaleit: None. J.A. Maldonado-Cocco: None. F. van den Bosch: None.

Background/Aims Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective JAK inhibitor licensed for moderate-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), under evaluation for treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of UPA versus placebo (PBO) in PsA patients with prior inadequate response or intolerance to ≥ 1 biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD). This research was previously presented at EULAR; published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. Methods In SELECT-PsA-2, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to once-daily UPA 15mg (UPA15), UPA 30mg (UPA30), or PBO. Patients were stratified by baseline DMARD use, number of prior failed bDMARDs, and extent of psoriasis. Primary endpoint: the proportion of patients achieving ACR20 response at Wk12. Multiplicity controlled secondary endpoints: change in HAQ-DI, FACIT-Fatigue (FACIT-F), SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) at Wk12, static Investigator Global Assessment (sIGA) of Psoriasis of 0/1 and at least a 2-point improvement from baseline, PASI75, change in Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Symptoms (SAPS) at Wk16 and proportion of patients achieving MDA at Wk24. Additional secondary endpoints: ACR50 and ACR70 at Wk12, ACR20 at Wk2. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported for patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug. Results 641 patients were randomized and received study drug; 54.3% were female with mean age of 53.4 years and mean duration since PsA diagnosis of 10.1 years, 61%,18%, 13% of patients failed 1, 2, ≥3 bDMARD respectively. 543 (84.6%) patients completed Wk24 study drug. At Wk12, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving UPA15 and UPA30 vs PBO achieved ACR20 (56.9% and 63.8% vs 24.1%; p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Statistically significant improvements were observed in UPA15 and UPA30 arms vs PBO in all multiplicity controlled secondary endpoints, including ΔHAQ-DI (PBO, -0.10; UPA15, -0.30; UPA30, -0.41), ΔSF-36 PCS (PBO, 1.6; UPA15, 5.2; UPA30, 7.1), ΔFACIT-F (PBO, 1.3; UPA15, 5.0; UPA30, 6.1), and ΔSAPS (PBO, -1.5; UPA15, -24.4; UPA30, -29.7; p < .0001 for all endpoints). In addition, a greater proportion of patients achieved ACR50 and ACR70 at Wk12 with UPA vs PBO. Generally, TEAEs were reported at similar frequencies in the PBO and UPA15 arms and at a higher frequency in the UPA30 arm. Numerically higher rates of serious AEs were reported in the UPA arms. Herpes zoster was more frequent with UPA30. Three malignancies occurred in each UPA arm. One adjudicated non-fatal myocardial infarction and one adjudicated pulmonary embolism were reported with UPA15. Conclusion In this bDMARD-IR PsA population, UPA15 and UPA30 demonstrated significant improvements across PsA domains including improvements in joint and skin signs and symptoms vs PBO through Wk24, with improvement observed by Wk2. A greater percentage of patients treated with UPA achieved MDA and ACR50/70, stringent composite measures of disease control. No new safety signals were identified compared to those with UPA in RA. Disclosure M.C. Genovese: Consultancies; M.G. is a consultant for AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GSK, Novartis, RPharm, Sanofi Genzyme. Grants/research support; M.G. has received grants/research support from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GSK, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., RPharm, Sanofi Genzyme. A. Lertratanakul: Shareholder/stock ownership; A.L. is a stock/shareholder of AbbVie Inc. J. Anderson: Shareholder/stock ownership; J.A. may be a stock/ shareholder of AbbVie Inc. K. Papp: Consultancies; K.P. is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Baxalta, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, *. Member of speakers’ bureau; K.P. is a member of the speakers bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Baxalta, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma *. Grants/research support; K.P. has received grants/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Baxalta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma *. Other; * & Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline,Janssen, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, MedImmune, Merck-Serono,Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Stiefel, Takeda, UCB and Valeant. W. Tillett: Consultancies; W.T. is a consultant of AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer Inc. & UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; W.T. is a member of the speakers bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc. & UCB. Grants/research support; W.T. has received grants/research support from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB. F. van den Bosch: Consultancies; F.vdB. is a consultant of AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; F.vdB. is a member of the speakers bureau for AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. S. Tsuji: Member of speakers’ bureau; S.T. is a member of the speakers bureau for AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Celgene, and Novartis Pharma K.K. Grants/research support; S.T. has received grants/research support from Eli Lilly. E. Dokoupilova: Grants/research support; E.D. has received grants/research support from Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Novartis, MAURO KEISERMAN. M. Keiserman: Honoraria; M.K. has received honoraria from Pfizer, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Biogen Idec Inc, Celltrion Inc., Eli Lilly, Human Genome Sciences, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi,. Member of speakers’ bureau; M.K. is a member of the speakers bureau for Pfizer, Abbott, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen. X. Wang: Shareholder/stock ownership; X.W. may be a shareholder of AbbVie Inc. S. Zhong: Shareholder/stock ownership; S.Z. may be a stock/ shareholder of AbbVie Inc. P. Zueger: Shareholder/stock ownership; P.Z. may be a stock/shareholder of AbbVie Inc. A. Pangan: Shareholder/stock ownership; A.P. may be a stock/shareholder of AbbVie Inc. P. Mease: Consultancies; P.M. is a consultant of Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; P.M. is a member of the speakers bureau for Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; P.M. has received grants/research support from Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB.

Imaging of sacroiliac joints (SIJ) is one of the cornerstones in early recognition of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).1 Currently, MRI is the preferred technique to visualise bone marrow oedema (BME), which can be defined as sacroiliitis when certain criteria are met.2 However, the definition of sacroiliitis as being ‘highly suggestive for axSpA’ has limitations in situations when BME is subtle or when SpA-like BME lesions are present due to other conditions such as mechanical stress.3 4 This underscores the need for additional and more specific imaging modalities. Given the marked efficacy of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in axSpA, with approximately 50% of patients achieving a clinically important response,5 we reasoned that molecular imaging studies aiming at selectively visualising TNFα in vivo at the site of clinical inflammation could be an attractive approach. Therefore, we set up a proof-of-concept study in axSpA patients by performing scintigraphy with Tc99m-labelled certolizumab pegol (CZP) as tracer. We investigated the agreement between tracer uptake on immunoscintigrapy and BME on MRI at the same localisation of the SIJ. CZP was conjugated with succinimidyl-6-hydrazino-nicotinamide (S-HYNIC), a bifunctional crosslinker. Subsequently, solutions of 1.25 mg conjugated S-HYNIC CZP were used to radiolabel with Tc99m. Seven axSpA patients (71.4% male; mean age 36±5.7 …

ObjectivesThe Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) MRI working group (WG) was convened to generate a consensus update on standardised definitions for MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), and to conduct preliminary validation.MethodsThe literature pertaining to these MRI lesion definitions was discussed at three meetings of the group. 25 investigators (20 rheumatologists, 5 radiologists) determined which definitions should be retained or required revision, and which required a new definition. Lesion definitions were assessed in a multi-reader validation exercise using 278 MRI scans from the ASAS classification cohort by global assessment (lesion present/absent) and detailed scoring (inflammation and structural). Reliability of detection of lesions was analysed using kappa statistics and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsNo revisions were made to the current ASAS definition of a positive SIJ MRI or definitions for subchondral inflammation and sclerosis. The following definitions were revised: capsulitis, enthesitis, fat lesion and erosion. New definitions were developed for joint space enhancement, joint space fluid, fat metaplasia in an erosion cavity, ankylosis and bone bud. The most frequently detected structural lesion, erosion, was detected almost as reliably as subchondral inflammation (κappa/ICC:0.61/0.54 and 0.60/0.83) . Fat metaplasia in an erosion cavity and ankylosis were also reliably detected despite their low frequency (κappa/ICC:0.50/0.37 and 0.58/0.97).ConclusionThe ASAS-MRI WG concluded that several definitions required revision and some new definitions were necessary. Multi-reader validation demonstrated substantial reliability for the most frequently detected lesions and comparable reliability between active and structural lesions.

Improvements in both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations are important treatment goals in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).These post hoc analyses determined whether additional benefits related to various PsA domains are observed in patients simultaneously achieving 50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI100), the primary endpoint of the SPIRIT-H2H study.Patients with active PsA and psoriasis in SPIRIT-H2H (N = 566) were categorised into two sets of four response groups irrespective of treatment allocation (approved dosages of ixekizumab or adalimumab): patients who simultaneously achieved ACR50 and PASI100 response, achieved ACR50 response only, achieved PASI100 response only, or did not achieve ACR50 or PASI100 response after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. Patients achieving simultaneous ACR50 and PASI100 response were compared with the other patient response groups at the corresponding time point for efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.Patients simultaneously achieving ACR50 and PASI100 responses at week 24 or 52 showed higher rates of ACR70 response, minimal disease activity, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis ≤ 4, resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis, and HRQoL improvement at weeks 24 and 52, respectively, than the other corresponding response groups at both time points.High levels of disease control, such as those obtained with simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 response, were linked to better outcomes across a wide range of endpoints that are important for patients with PsA. Patients meeting this combined endpoint showed more comprehensive and thus greater control of disease activity. Trial registration NCT03151551 Key Points • Treatment goals for patients with psoriatic arthritis emphasise the importance of improving both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations of the disease. • A combined endpoint considering both these manifestations, achievement of at least 50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index, was linked with achievement of a number of other endpoints relevant to psoriatic arthritis, including health-related quality of life that are important to patients with psoriatic arthritis. • Patients meeting the combined endpoint were more likely to achieve a disease state of remission, which is the stated aim of treatment for psoriasis.

Objectives To study the presence of high signal intensity of the intervertebral disc, syndesmophytes, vertebral corner bridging and transdiscal ankylosis on spinal T1-weighted MR images in spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods A retrospective case-control study of whole spine MRI examinations, obtained in 100 patients with axial SpA and in 100 control patients, was performed. All disco-vertebral units (DVUs) were analyzed on T1-weighted MR images for normal or high signal intensity of the intervertebral disc, presence of syndesmophytes, vertebral corner bridging or transdiscal ankylosis and correlated with final diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. Results In this study group, intradiscal high signal intensity, vertebral corner bridging and transdiscal ankylosis on T1-weighted MR images of the spine were all highly specific (specificity: 100%) for diagnosis of axial SpA. However, these signs all had low sensitivity (vertebral corner bridging: 15.0%; intradiscal high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images: 12.0%; transdiscal ankylosis: 8.0%). Syndesmophytes on spinal MRI were observed in 25 patients but had a more limited diagnostic value (sensitivity: 16.0%, specificity: 91.0%). Conclusions When present in a patient with inflammatory back pain, intradiscal high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images could be a specific and reliable sign of the presence of axial SpA. Vertebral corner bridging and transdiscal ankylosis also show potential as specific and reliable signs of axial SpA. In contrast, syndesmophytes on MRI do not show potential as a specific or reliable sign of axial SpA.

Objective This study was undertaken to assess the inflammatory burden in peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the legs in an early remission-induction strategy study of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockade. Furthermore, we sought to determine the value of MRI to predict disease relapse versus sustained remission after treatment discontinuation. Methods Thirty-two patients with early peripheral SpA with involvement of the legs determined on clinical examination and confirmed by ultrasonography (US) participated in a remission-induction trial of a TNF inhibitor (TNFi). Patients underwent MRI of the joints and entheses of the legs at baseline and at clinical remission, after which TNFi treatment was withdrawn. Images were evaluated for joint effusion, joint osteitis, entheseal soft tissue inflammation, and entheseal osteitis. Results Joint effusion and enthesitis on clinical examination and US correlated well with MRI abnormalities. In addition, a substantial amount of subclinical involvement was seen on MRI, mainly in the ankle joints and heel entheses. Inflammation scores were markedly lower in the subclinically involved joints and entheses versus those that were clinically involved (P values ranged from 0.01 to

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of secukinumab on axial and peripheral enthesitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) using pooled data from randomized controlled phase III studies.MethodsIn this posthoc analysis, data were pooled from patients originally randomized to secukinumab 150 mg, 300 mg, or placebo (PBO) from phase III MEASURE 1–4 studies (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01358175, NCT01649375, NCT02008916, and NCT02159053). Maastricht AS Enthesitis Score (MASES) was used for assessments of enthesitis through Week 52. Efficacy outcomes were mean change in MASES score and complete resolution (MASES = 0) of enthesitis in patients with baseline MASES > 0.ResultsA total of 693 (71.5%) patients had enthesitis at baseline in secukinumab 300 mg, 150 mg, and PBO groups (58 [76.3%], 355 [70.4%], and 280 [72%], respectively) out of 969 patients pooled in this analysis. At Week 16, mean changes from baseline for overall MASES and enthesitis at axial MASES sites, respectively, were as follows: –2.9 (P < 0.01) and –2.9 (P < 0.01) for secukinumab 300 mg; –2.4 (P < 0.015) and –2.3 (P < 0.05) for secukinumab 150 mg; and –1.9 and –1.8 for PBO, with improvements seen through Week 52. More than one-third of secukinumab-treated patients (300 mg: 36.2%; 150 mg: 40.8%) achieved complete resolution of enthesitis at Week 16.ConclusionSecukinumab improved enthesitis at overall MASES and axial sites in patients with AS.

Background Evaluation of structural lesions in the sacroiliac (SI) joints can improve the accuracy for diagnosis of spondyloarthritis. However, structural lesions, such as erosions, are difficult to assess on routine T1-weighted MRI scans. Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) in the depiction of erosions, sclerosis, and ankylosis of the SI joints compared with T1-weighted MRI, with CT as the reference standard. Materials and Methods A prospective study (clinical trial registration no. B670201837885) was performed from February 2019 to November 2019. Adults were referred from a tertiary hospital rheumatology outpatient clinic with clinical suspicion of inflammatory sacroiliitis. MRI and CT of the SI joints were performed on the same day. SCT images were generated from MRI scans using a commercially available deep learning-based image synthesis method. Two readers independently recorded if structural lesions (erosions, sclerosis, and ankylosis) were present on T1-weighted MRI, sCT, and CT scans in different reading sessions, with readers blinded to clinical information and other images. Diagnostic performance of sCT and T1-weighted MRI scans were analyzed using generalized estimating equation models, with consensus results of CT as the reference standard. Results Thirty participants were included (16 men, 14 women; mean age, 40 years ± 10 [standard deviation]). Diagnostic accuracy of sCT was higher than that of T1-weighted MRI for erosion (94% vs 86%, P = .003), sclerosis (97% vs 81%, P < .001), and ankylosis (92% vs 84%, P = .04). With sCT, specificity for erosion detection (96% [95% CI: 90, 98] vs 89% [95% CI: 81, 94], P = .01] and sensitivity for detection of sclerosis [94% [95% CI: 87, 97] vs 20% [95% CI: 10, 35], P < .001] and ankylosis (93% [95% CI: 78, 98] vs 70% [95% CI: 47, 87], P = .001) were improved. Conclusion With CT as the reference standard, synthetic CT of the sacroiliac joints has better diagnostic performance in the detection of structural lesions in individuals suspected of having sacroiliitis compared with routine T1-weighted MRI. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Fritz in this issue.

ObjectivesJanus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for use in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. With five agents licensed, it was timely to summarise the current understanding of JAKi use based on a systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy and safety.MethodsExisting data were evaluated by a steering committee and subsequently reviewed by a 29 person expert committee leading to the formulation of a consensus statement that may assist the clinicians, patients and other stakeholders once the decision is made to commence a JAKi. The committee included patients, rheumatologists, a gastroenterologist, a haematologist, a dermatologist, an infectious disease specialist and a health professional. The SLR informed the Task Force on controlled and open clinical trials, registry data, phase 4 trials and meta-analyses. In addition, approval of new compounds by, and warnings from regulators that were issued after the end of the SLR search date were taken into consideration.ResultsThe Task Force agreed on and developed four general principles and a total of 26 points for consideration which were grouped into six areas addressing indications, treatment dose and comedication, contraindications, pretreatment screening and risks, laboratory and clinical follow-up examinations, and adverse events. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined based on the SLR and levels of agreement were voted on for every point, reaching a range between 8.8 and 9.9 on a 10-point scale.ConclusionThe consensus provides an assessment of evidence for efficacy and safety of an important therapeutic class with guidance on issues of practical management.

Introduction Achievement of remission is a key treatment goal for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). C-OPTIMISE assessed achievement of sustained clinical remission in patients with axSpA, including radiographic (r) and non-radiographic (nr) axSpA, during certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment, and subsequent maintenance of remission following CZP dose continuation, dose reduction or withdrawal. Here, we report outcomes from the first 48 weeks (induction period) of C-OPTIMISE, during which patients received open-label CZP. Methods C-OPTIMISE (NCT02505542) was a two-part, multicenter, phase 3b study in adult patients with early axSpA (r-/nr-axSpA), including a 48-week open-label induction period followed by a 48-week maintenance period. Patients with active adult-onset axSpA

BackgroundUpadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor under evaluation for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We evaluated upadacitinib in patients with PsA and prior inadequate response or intolerance to at least one biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).MethodsIn this 24-week randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial, 642 patients were randomised (2:2:1:1) to once per day upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg, placebo followed by upadacitinib 15 mg or placebo followed by upadacitinib 30 mg at week 24. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 12. Achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA) was assessed at week 24. Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported for all patients who received at least one dose of trial drug.ResultsAt week 12, significantly more patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg versus placebo achieved ACR20 (56.9% and 63.8% vs 24.1%; pConclusionIn this trial of patients with active PsA who had inadequate response or intolerance to at least one biologic DMARD, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg was more effective than placebo over 24 weeks in improving signs and symptoms of PsA.Clinical trial registration numberNCT03104374

Objective To confirm validity of the Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire modified for patients with SpA (mSCQ), and assess whether validity improves when adding items on extra-articular manifestations (EAMs), i.e. uveitis, psoriasis, and IBD, and osteoporosis and fractures. Methods Data from the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society COMOrbidities in SPondyloArthritis study were used. Criterion validity of presence of EAMs, osteoporosis and fractures was assessed as agreement (kappa) between patients’ self-reported and physician-confirmed disease. Construct validity of the mSCQ including EAMs, osteoporosis and/or fractures (SpA-SCQ) was assessed by testing hypotheses about correlations with demographics, physical function, work ability, health utility and disease activity, and was compared with construct validity of the rheumatic disease comorbidity index. Results In total, 3984 patients contributed to the analyses. Agreement between patient-reported and physician-reported EAMs was substantial to almost perfect (uveitis ĸ = 0.81, IBD ĸ = 0.73, psoriasis ĸ = 0.86). Agreement for osteoporosis (ĸ = 0.38) and fractures (ĸ = 0.39) was fair. As hypothesized, the mSCQ correlated moderately to weakly with age, physical function, work limitations and health utility, and very weakly with disease activity. In contrast to our hypothesis, adding EAMs, osteoporosis and/or fractures to the mSCQ decreased correlations with several external constructs, especially among patients with peripheral SpA. Correlations with the different constructs were stronger for the both mSCQ and SpA-SCQ (rBASFI = 0.34; rEQ-5D = −0.33) compared with the rheumatic disease comorbidity index (rBASFI = 0.24; rEQ-5D = −0.21). Conclusion The mSCQ is a valid self-report instrument to assess the influence of comorbidities on health outcomes in patients with SpA. Adding EAMs and/or osteoporosis or fractures does not improve validity of the mSCQ.

ObjectivesTo assess axial involvement on MRI in early peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) and to evaluate whether axial inflammation predicts relapse on treatment withdrawal.MethodsFifty-six patients with early, active, newly diagnosed pSpA underwent MRI of the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) and spine prior to golimumab initiation. At sustained clinical remission of pSpA, treatment was withdrawn and a second MRI was performed. Bone marrow oedema (BME) was scored by three readers according to the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) method. Scores were compared with an axial spondyloarthritis cohort (Belgian Arthritis and Spondylitis cohort). Structural lesions were assessed using a similar method. Furthermore, fulfilment of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) definition of a positive MRI for sacroiliitis was assessed. Spinal images were evaluated for BME and structural lesions using the Canada-Denmark MRI spine scoring system by two readers.ResultsThirty-six per cent showed SIJ BME at baseline, all fulfilling the ASAS definition of sacroiliitis. No association with back pain was found. Twenty-one per cent displayed SIJ structural lesions. Spinal BME was limited: the median inflammation scores were low and no patients had ≥5 inflammatory corner lesions. On clinical remission, a significant decrease in SIJ SPARCC scores was detected. On clinical remission, no significant differences in SIJ SPARCC scores were noted between patients relapsing and those maintaining remission after treatment discontinuation.ConclusionIn patients with early pSpA, a surprisingly high prevalence of sacroiliitis on MRI was observed; SPARCC scores decreased significantly on tumour necrosis factor inhibition. Residual inflammation on MRI was not predictive of relapse of peripheral manifestations. No relevant inflammatory spinal involvement was detected. Collectively, our findings suggest a higher inflammatory burden in patients with early pSpA than anticipated.

ObjectiveTo update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsAccording to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was followed by a consensus meeting to develop this update involving 28 international taskforce members in May 2019. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined.ResultsThe updated recommendations comprise 6 overarching principles and 12 recommendations. The overarching principles address the nature of PsA and diversity of both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations; the need for collaborative management and shared decision-making is highlighted. The recommendations provide a treatment strategy for pharmacological therapies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local glucocorticoid injections are proposed as initial therapy; for patients with arthritis and poor prognostic factors, such as polyarthritis or monoarthritis/oligoarthritis accompanied by factors such as dactylitis or joint damage, rapid initiation of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is recommended. If the treatment target is not achieved with this strategy, a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) targeting tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-17A or IL-12/23 should be initiated, taking into account skin involvement if relevant. If axial disease predominates, a TNF inhibitor or IL-17A inhibitor should be started as first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors is addressed primarily after bDMARD failure. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition is proposed for patients in whom these other drugs are inappropriate, generally in the context of mild disease. Drug switches and tapering in sustained remission are addressed.ConclusionThese recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological management of PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.

Background Filgotinib (FIL) is an orally administered, selective janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor in development for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Efficacy and safety of FIL in patients with active PsA were evaluated in a 16-week phase 2 study (EQUATOR, NCT03101670). After 16 weeks, patients could roll-over to an Open Label Extension (OLE) Study (EQUATOR2, NCT03320876) for the purpose of evaluating long-term safety and efficacy. The aim of this analysis was to assess safety and efficacy through 52 weeks of exposure to filgotinib. Methods Patients who completed the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study were eligible for participation in the OLE, during which all patients received once daily (qd) open-label FIL 200mg. In this interim analysis of OLE, for the safety analysis, all data were included from the screening in the core study up to the data cut of 18 April 2019 in the OLE. For the efficacy analysis, all data until OLE Week 52 visit for each patient were included (observed case analysis). Results Of the 131 patients randomised and dosed in EQUATOR, 124 (95%) completed the study and 122 (93%) enrolled in EQUATOR2; 50% were female and mean age was 50. At this interim analysis, 106/122 (87%) remained in the OLE (premature discontinuations during OLE due to: 4 for safety, 11 withdrew consent, and 1 for other reasons). Cumulative patient years of exposure (PYE) on FIL were 160, median time on FIL was 66 weeks. Key safety data are summarised in Table 1. Key ≥Grade 2 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities seen with FIL arm (N = 128) compared with PBO (N = 66) were lymphocyte decrease 11.1% vs 4.5%, neutrophil decrease 5.5% vs 0%, ALT increase 1.6% vs 1.5% and creatinine increase 0.8% vs 0%, respectively. At week 52, 34% of the patients fulfilled criteria for minimal disease activity and 81%, 55%, and 33% of patients, respectively, achieved ACR20/50/70 responses. Conclusion FIL 200mg qd was generally well tolerated and the safety profile in PsA was comparable to that observed in the FIL rheumatoid arthritis studies. The data from this interim analysis suggest that further improvement of the patient condition can be expected beyond 16 weeks of treatment. Disclosures L. Coates: Other; Received support from Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Prothena, Sun pharma, and UCB. P. Mease: Other; Received support from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB. D. Gladman: Other; Received support from Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, BMS, and Galapagos. F. Van den Bosch: Other; Received support from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. A. Rychlewska-Hanczewska: Other; Received support from Galapagos and Gilead Sciences. C. Tasset: Corporate appointments; Employee of Galapagos NV. L. Meuleners: Corporate appointments; Employee of Galapagos NV. M. Trivedi: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc... Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R. Besuyen: Other; Employee of Galapagos NV. P. Helliwell: Other; Received support from Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.

Background Enthesitis can be a debilitating extra-articular spondyloarthritis manifestation that causes considerable pain and reduced quality of life. We evaluated the effect of secukinumab on axial and peripheral enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with baseline enthesitis (BLE) across all MASES sites (N = 13), axial MASES sites (N = 11; 13 MASES minus Achilles tendons [AT] [AxS]), peripheral sites (N = 6; AT + lateral condyles of humerus/femur [PS]) and the AT (N = 2) at Weeks 16 and 52. Methods This post-hoc analysis pooled data across four AS studies (MEASURE 1-4) from patients originally randomised to secukinumab 150 mg (approved AS dose), 300 mg (MEASURE 3 only) or placebo with BLE (MASES >0). Evaluations included mean change from baseline in MASES score, complete resolution (CR; MASES=0) and improvement from baseline in MASES score ≥5 counts. Mixed-effect model repeat measurement analysis was performed on change from baseline in MASES score and non-responder imputation for resolution of enthesitis at Week 16; data are reported as observed at Week 52. Results 355 (70.4%), 58 (76.3%) and 280 (72%) patients had BLE in the 150 mg, 300 mg and placebo groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. At Week 16, mean change from baseline for overall MASES and at AxS was greater for secukinumab 150 mg (−2.4, −2.3) and 300 mg (−2.9, −2.9) vs placebo (−1.9, −1.8; P < 0.05, P < 0.01). At Week 16, patients treated with secukinumab 150 mg (40.8%, 42.7%) and 300 mg (36.2%, 42.1%) vs placebo (28.9%, 30.1%) achieved CR of enthesitis at overall MASES and AxS. Secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg were consistently associated with a higher mean change in MASES and CR of enthesitis at PS and AT vs placebo. More patients treated with secukinumab 150/300 mg vs placebo achieved a higher threshold of improvement (≥5 counts) in overall MASES at Week 16. Further improvements were observed for all endpoints at Week 52 (Table 1). Conclusion Secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg were associated with a higher mean change in MASES and CR of enthesitis for overall MASES and at AxS vs placebo in AS patients at Week 16, which further improved through Week 52. Disclosures N. Barkham Grants/research support; Novartis, Eli Lilly, UCB, Celgene. G. Schett None. X. Baraliakos Consultancies; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen Biologics, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Galapagos. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Chugai, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB. F. van den Bosch Consultancies; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. A. Deodhar Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB. L.S. Gensler Consultancies; Novartis, Lilly, Janssen. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, UCB Pharma. M. Ǿstergaard Consultancies; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis. S. Agawane Other; Employee of: Novartis. A. Das Gupta Other; Employee of: Novartis. S. Mpofu Other; Employee of: Novartis. T. Fox Other; Employee of: Novartis. A. Winseck Other; Employee of: Novartis. A. Shete Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis. Other; Employee of: Novartis. B. Porter Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis. Other; Employee of: Novartis.

Purpose To assess the effect of slice thickness on the diagnostic accuracy of erosion detection at MR T1-weighted images (T1WI) of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) in adult patients suspected of sacroiliitis. Method Patients aged 18–60 years with clinical suspicion of sacroiliitis were enrolled. All patients underwent CT and 3 T MRI of the SIJs on the same day. CT at 1 mm slice thickness, semi-coronal spin echo T1WI sequences with four different slice thicknesses (2, 3, 4 and 5 mm) were obtained. For scoring erosions, each SIJ was divided into four quadrants. Presence or absence of erosions was scored on T1WI sequences by two independent readers blinded to other data. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using κ statistics. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for erosions at each slice thickness was evaluated vs. consensus CT as reference standard, using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Fifty-three patients (23 men, 30 women, mean age, 39.0 years ± 10.2) were included. Inter-reader agreement for erosion score on all T1WI sequences was moderate (κ value 0.54 to 0.60). With increasing slice thickness, both the recorded total number of erosions and sensitivity for erosion vs. CT decreased. The AUC were significantly higher for 2 mm and 3 mm T1WI than for 4 mm and 5 mm T1WI. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of T1WI for erosion detection vs. a CT reference standard is affected by slice thickness. Thinner slices (2 or 3 mm) had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than thicker slices (4 or 5 mm).

Peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) refers to a number of seemingly different spondyloarthritis subsets in which psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most common, and symptoms of arthritis, enthesitis or dactylitis predominate the clinical presentation. Although formal classification criteria for pSpA have been introduced in 2011, only a minority of epidemiological and clinical studies addressed this clinical entity as a separate disease. Moreover, research on outcome measures and treatment modalities in pSpA has been mainly focused on PsA. Subsequently, all biological treatments are off-label in patients with non-psoriatic pSpA. Its neglected status has important implications for clinical practice since the emerging group of early-diagnosed non-psoriatic pSpA patients remains poorly characterised and lacks specific treatment recommendations. This review summarises what is currently known regarding pSpA in terms of epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapeutic approach.

ObjectivesThe Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) aimed to develop a set of quality standards (QS) to help improve the quality of healthcare provided to adult patients affected by axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) worldwide.MethodsAn ASAS task force developed a set of QS using a stepwise approach. First, key areas for quality improvement were identified, discussed, rated and agreed on. Thereafter, areas were prioritised and statements for the most important key areas were phrased on consensus. Appropriate quality measures were defined to allow quantification of the QS at the community level.ResultsThe ASAS task force, consisting of 20 rheumatologists, two physiotherapists and two patients, selected and proposed 34 potential key areas for quality improvement which were then commented by 140 ASAS members and patients. Within that process three new key areas came up, which led to a re-evaluation of all 37 key areas by 120 ASAS members and patients. Five key areas were identified as most important to determine quality of care: referral including rapid access, rheumatology assessment, treatment, education/self-management and comorbidities. Finally, nine QS were agreed on and endorsed by the whole ASAS membership.ConclusionsASAS successfully developed the first set of QS to help improving healthcare for adult patients with axSpA. Even though it may currently not be realistic to achieve the QS in all healthcare systems, they provide high-quality of care framework for patients with axSpA that should be aimed for.

BackgroundThe best strategy for maintaining clinical remission in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has not been defined. C-OPTIMISE compared dose continuation, reduction and withdrawal of the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor certolizumab pegol (CZP) following achievement of sustained remission in patients with early axSpA.MethodsC-OPTIMISE was a two-part, multicentre phase 3b study in adults with early active axSpA (radiographic or non-radiographic). During the 48-week open-label induction period, patients received CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W). At Week 48, patients in sustained remission (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) 3.5 at any time point) during the double-blind period.ResultsAt Week 48, 43.9% (323/736) patients achieved sustained remission, of whom 313 were randomised to CZP full maintenance dose, CZP reduced maintenance dose or placebo. During Weeks 48 to 96, 83.7% (87/104), 79.0% (83/105) and 20.2% (21/104) of patients receiving the full maintenance dose, reduced maintenance dose or placebo, respectively, were flare-free (pConclusionsPatients with early axSpA who achieve sustained remission at 48 weeks can reduce their CZP maintenance dose; however, treatment should not be completely discontinued due to the high risk of flare following CZP withdrawal.Trial registration numberNCT02505542, ClinicalTrials.gov.

ObjectivesTo evaluate construct validity, interpretability, reliability and responsiveness as well as determination of cut-off points for good and poor health within the original English version and the 18 translations of the disease-specific Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) in 23 countries worldwide in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA).MethodsA representative sample of patients with SpA fulfilling the ASAS classification criteria for axial (axSpA) or peripheral SpA was used. The construct validity of the ASAS HI was tested using Spearman correlation with several standard health outcomes for axSpA. Test–retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) in patients with stable disease (interval 4–7 days). In patients who required an escalation of therapy because of high disease activity, responsiveness was tested after 2–24weeks using standardised response mean (SRM).ResultsAmong the 1548 patients, 64.9% were men, with a mean (SD) age 42.0 (13.4) years. Construct validity ranged from low (age: 0.10) to high (Bath AnkylosingSpondylitisFunctioning Index: 0.71). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α of 0.93). The reliability among 578 patients was good (ICC=0.87 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.89)). Responsiveness among 246 patients was moderate-large (SRM=−0.44 for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, −0.69 for conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and −0.85 for tumour necrosis factor inhibitor). The smallest detectable change was 3.0. Values ≤5.0 have balanced specificity to distinguish good health as opposed to moderate health, and values ≥12.0 are specific to represent poor health as opposed to moderate health.ConclusionsThe ASAS HI proved to be valid, reliable and responsive. It can be used to evaluate the impact of SpA and its treatment on functioning and health. Furthermore, comparison of disease impact between populations is possible.

Psoriatic arthritis, or the broader term psoriatic disease, refers to an inflammatory disorder that affects multiple organs, including the skin and joints, and that also has related extra-articular manifestations and can have comorbidities. Patients with psoriatic disease have a substantial clinical burden. Early identification leading to timely diagnosis and treatment is crucial to prevent long-term structural damage and disability and the associated socioeconomic consequences. The increase in therapeutic options, such as disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, both biological and targeted synthetic, has revolutionised the treatment of skin and joint disease, and has prompted clinicians to use the full clinical picture of an individual patient to make rational treatment decisions. Current research is also focused on treatment strategies, including treat to target, early remission-induction, and tapering.

Upadacitinib is a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and was efficacious in phase 2 studies in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs).This study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 150 sites in 35 countries. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with active rheumatoid arthritis for 3 months or longer, who had received csDMARDs for at least 3 months with a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before study entry, and had an inadequate response to at least one of the following csDMARDs: methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or leflunomide. Using interactive response technology, we randomly assigned patients receiving stable background csDMARDs (2:2:1:1) to receive a once-daily extended-release formulation of upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg, or placebo, for 12 weeks. Patients, investigators, and the funder were masked to allocation. After 12 weeks, patients taking placebo received 15 mg or 30 mg of upadacitinib once daily, according to the prespecified randomisation assignment. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients at week 12 who achieved 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20), and a 28-joint disease activity score using C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) of 3·2 or less. We did efficacy analyses in the full analysis set of all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug, and used non-responder imputation for assessment of the primary outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02675426.Between Dec 17, 2015, and Dec 22, 2016, 1083 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 661 were recruited and randomly assigned to receive upadacitinib 15 mg (n=221), upadacitinib 30 mg (n=219), or placebo (n=221). All patients received at least one dose of study drug, and 618 (93%) completed 12 weeks of treatment. At week 12, ACR20 was achieved by 141 (64%; 95% CI 58-70) of 221 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 145 (66%; 60-73) of 219 patients receiving upadacitinib 30 mg, compared with 79 (36%; 29-42) of 221 patients receiving placebo (p0·0001 for each dose vs placebo). DAS28(CRP) of 3·2 or less was met by 107 (48%; 95% CI 42-55) patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 105 (48%; 41-55) patients receiving upadacitinib 30 mg, compared with 38 (17%; 12-22) patients receiving placebo (p0·0001 for each dose vs placebo). Adverse events were reported in 125 (57%) of 221 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, 118 (54%) of 219 patients receiving upadacitinib 30 mg, and 108 (49%) of 221 patients receiving placebo. The most frequently reported adverse events (≥5% of patients in any group) were nausea (16 [7%] of 221 in the upadacitinib 15 mg group; three [1%] of 219 in the upadacitinib 30 mg group; and seven [3%] of 221 in the placebo group), nasopharyngitis (12 [5%]; 13 [6%]; and nine [4%]), upper respiratory tract infection (12 [5%]; 12 [5%]; and nine [4%]), and headache (nine [4%]; seven [3%]; and 12 [5%]). More infections were reported for upadacitinib (64 [29%] of 221 patients receiving 15 mg and 69 [32%] of 219 patients receiving 30 mg) versus placebo (47 [21%] of 221 patients). There were three herpes zoster infections (one [1%] in the placebo group, one [1%] in the upadacitinib 15 mg group, and one [1%] in the upadacitinib 30 mg group) and one primary varicella zoster virus infection (one [1%] in the upadacitinib 30 mg group), two malignancies (both in the upadacitinib 30 mg group), one adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event (in the upadacitinib 30 mg group), and five serious infections (one [1%] in the placebo group, one [1%] in the upadacitinib 15 mg group, three [1%] in the upadacitinib 30 mg group). No deaths were reported during the trial.Patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who received upadacitinib (15 mg or 30 mg) in combination with csDMARDs showed significant improvements in clinical signs and symptoms.AbbVie Inc.

Therapeutic targets have been defined for axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) in 2012, but the evidence for these recommendations was only of indirect nature. These recommendations were re-evaluated in light of new insights. Based on the results of a systematic literature review and expert opinion, a task force of rheumatologists, dermatologists, patients and a health professional developed an update of the 2012 recommendations. These underwent intensive discussions, on site voting and subsequent anonymous electronic voting on levels of agreement with each item. A set of 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations were developed and voted on. Some items were present in the previous recommendations, while others were significantly changed or newly formulated. The 2017 task force arrived at a single set of recommendations for axial and peripheral SpA, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The most exhaustive discussions related to whether PsA should be assessed using unidimensional composite scores for its different domains or multidimensional scores that comprise multiple domains. This question was not resolved and constitutes an important research agenda. There was broad agreement, now better supported by data than in 2012, that remission/inactive disease and, alternatively, low/minimal disease activity are the principal targets for the treatment of PsA. As instruments to assess the patients on the path to the target, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) for axial SpA and the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) for PsA were recommended, although not supported by all. Shared decision-making between the clinician and the patient was seen as pivotal to the process. The task force defined the treatment target for SpA as remission or low disease activity and developed a large research agenda to further advance the field. orcid-numbers: Machado, Pedro/0000-0002-8411-7972 Inman, Robert/0000-0002-4750-1422 unique-id: ISI:000417778700007 ispartof: Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases vol:77 issue:1 pages:3-17 ispartof: location:England status: published

ObjectivesThe value of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in spondyloarthritis (SpA) is well recognised, but global access to these treatments can be limited due to high costs and other factors. This study explores country variation in the use of bDMARDs in SpA in relation to country-level socioeconomic factors.MethodsPatients fulfilling the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) SpA criteria in the multinational, cross-sectional ASAS Comorbidities in Spondyloarthritis study were studied. Current use of bDMARDs or conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) was investigated in separate models, with multilevel logistic regression analysis, taking the country level into account. Contribution of socioeconomic factors, including country health expenditures, gross domestic product and human development index as independent country-level factors, was explored individually, in models adjusted for sociodemographic as well as clinical variables.ResultsIn total, 3370 patients from 22 countries were included (mean (SD) age 43 (14) years; 66% male; 88% axial disease). Across countries, 1275 (38%) patients were bDMARD users. Crude mean bDMARD use varied between 5% (China) to 74% (Belgium). After adjustment for relevant sociodemographic and clinical variables, important variation in bDMARD use across countries remained (PConclusionsThere remains important residual variation across countries in bDMARD uptake of patients with SpA followed in specialised SpA centres. This is independent of well-known factors for bDMARD use such as clinical and country-level socioeconomic factors.

Objective To evaluate the long-term clinical and imaging efficacy of etanercept in patients with early, active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods Adult patients who satisfied the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial SpA (but not the modified New York radiographic criteria), with symptom duration >3 months to Results Of 215 randomized patients (etanercept: n = 106; placebo: n = 109), 205 entered the study (etanercept/etanercept: n = 100; placebo/etanercept: n = 105) and 169 completed the open-label period (etanercept/etanercept: n = 83; placebo/etanercept: n = 86). At week 104, 61 of 81 (75%), 49 of 81 (61%), 48 of 80 (60%), and 57 of 81 (70%) patients who received etanercept throughout the trial achieved ASAS20, ASAS40, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index criteria for 50% improvement (BASDAI 50) scores, respectively (observed). From baseline to week 104, continued improvements in clinical outcomes (ASDAS-C-reactive protein: -1.5 and -1.7; BASDAI: -3.3 and -3.8 [last observation carried forward]), and SPARCC MRI scores (sacroiliac joint: -6.0 and -3.4; spinal: -2.1 and -0.8 [observed]) were seen in patients receiving etanercept/etanercept and placebo/etanercept. During the study, 8% in the etanercept/etanercept group and 7% in the placebo/etanercept group had serious adverse events; no new safety signals were seen. Conclusion Patients with early, active nonradiographic axial SpA and an inadequate response to at least 2 NSAIDs demonstrated improvement in clinical and imaging outcomes that were sustained through 104 weeks of etanercept treatment.

Objective The aim was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol over 4 years of continuous treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), including both AS and non-radiographic (nr-) axSpA. Methods RAPID-axSpA was a phase 3 randomized trial, double blind and placebo controlled to week 24, dose blind to week 48 and open label to week 204. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of axSpA, meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria, and had active disease. The assessed outcomes included ASAS20, ASAS40, AS DAS (ASDAS), BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI scores, along with selected measures of remission. Further patient-reported outcomes, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, uveitis and quality-of-life measures are also reported. Results Two hundred and eighteen of 325 patients randomized (AS: 121; nr-axSpA: 97) received certolizumab pegol from week 0. Of these, 65% remained in the study at week 204 (AS: 67%; nr-axSpA: 63%). Across all outcomes, for AS and nr-axSpA, sustained improvements were observed to week 204 [week 204 overall axSpA: ASAS20: 54.1% (non-responder imputation); 83.7% (observed case, OC); ASAS40: 44.0% (non-responder imputation); 68.1% (OC); ASDAS inactive disease: 32.1% (last observation carried forward); 31.4% (OC)]. In the safety set (n = 315), there were 292.8 adverse events and 10.4 serious adverse events per 100 patient-years. No deaths were reported. Conclusion In the first study to evaluate the efficacy of an anti-TNF across both axSpA subpopulations, improvements in clinical and patient-reported outcomes at 24 and 96 weeks were sustained through 4 years of treatment, with no new safety signals. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01087762.

Background In this study, we sought to compare the performance of spondyloarthritis (SpA) classification criteria sets in an international SpA cohort with patients included from five continents around the world. Methods Data from the (ASAS) COMOrbidities in SPondyloArthritis (ASAS-COMOSPA) study were used. ASAS-COMOSPA is a multinational, cross-sectional study with consecutive patients diagnosed with SpA by rheumatologists worldwide. Patients were classified according to the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG), modified European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (mESSG), Amor, modified Amor, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA), ASAS peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) and ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. Overlap between the classification criteria sets was assessed for patients with and without back pain. Furthermore, patients fulfilling different arms of the ASAS axSpA criteria (imaging arm, clinical arm, both arms) were compared on the presence of SpA features. Results A total of 3942 patients (5 continents, 26 countries) were included. The mean age was 43.6 years, 65.0% were male, 56.2% were human leucocyte antigen B27-positive and 64.4% had radiographic sacroiliitis (based on modified New York criteria). Of the patients, 85.5% were classified by the ASAS SpA criteria (87.7% ASAS axSpA, 12.3% ASAS pSpA). Fulfilment of the Amor, ESSG and CASPAR criteria was present in 83.3%, 88.4% and 21.6% of patients, respectively. Of the patients with back pain (n = 3227), most were classified by all three of Amor, ESSG and ASAS axSpA criteria (71.4%). Patients fulfilling the imaging arm and the clinical arm of the ASAS axSpA criteria had similar presentations of SpA features. In patients without back pain, overlap between classification criteria sets was seen, although to a lesser extent. Conclusions Most patients with a clinical diagnosis of axial SpA in the worldwide ASAS-COMOSPA study fulfil several classification criteria sets, and a substantial overlap between different criteria sets is seen, which suggests a high level of credibility of the criteria. Large inter-regional differences in the fulfilment of classification criteria were not found. Patients fulfilling the clinical arm were remarkably similar to patients fulfilling the imaging arm with respect to the presence of most SpA features. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-017-1281-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.