Search

Introduction Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) have increased in popularity as a potentially less harmful alternative to tobacco smoking; however, the literature suggests “vaping” can cause endothelial damage, which can adversely affect erectile function. While there is a known link between smoking cigarettes and erectile dysfunction (ED), the effect of e-cigs on erectile function has been understudied. Objectives To review the evidence for e-cig use causing endothelial dysfunction, to explore endothelial dysfunction as a potential mechanism for ED, and to determine if there is literature to support e-cigs as a cause of ED. Methods A literature review was performed to identify publications pertaining to e-cig consumption and ED. Publications regarding e-cig consumption and vascular or endothelial damage were also included. The search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE database, the Cochrane Library Central Search, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We identified 40+ publications for review, including 6 clinical trials and 3 basic science studies. Results The literature suggests that e-cig use induces oxidative stress, including the direct formation of reactive oxygen species and hydroxyl radicals, leading to endothelial damage. Endothelial dysfunction is a potential mechanism for ED, but there is a paucity of studies evaluating the relationship between e-cig use and ED. Conclusion E-cig use may cause ED in men, but more studies, specifically clinical trials, are needed to establish a relationship between e-cigs and ED. E-cig-induced endothelial dysfunction is a potential mechanism for ED that is worth exploring further. J Pincus, V Sandoval, B Dick, et al. E-Cigarette-Associated Endothelial Damage: A Potential Mechanism for Erectile Dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2021;XX:XXX–XXX.

African American (AA) men have increased risk of prostate cancer diagnosis and mortality, but the cause remains unknown. MRI fusion improves diagnosis of localized prostate cancer, particularly in anterior lesions, however, cost and access are limited in a community practice setting. By utilizing a diverse cohort of veterans with equal access to care in a single payer system, we describe prostate cancer detection. We queried a prospectively maintained institutional review board-approved database of men undergoing prostate biopsy for untreated prostate cancer. We included all consecutive patients from October 2017 to February 2020. Statistical analysis including Kaplan–Meier Curves, Fisher’s exact test, and Forest plot was performed. From 246 consecutive patients, 166 were AA and 80 were non-AA. There were similar distributions of PSA, PSAD, and number of targetable lesions between the AA and non-AA cohort (p &gt, 0.05 for all). We found no difference in location on MRI between race groups. There was similar cancer detection, focusing on anterior lesions and rate of positive Gleason grade (≥GG1) and clinically significant (≥GG2) cancer between cohorts. In a predominant AA cohort of veterans, we found similar distribution of location for MRI-targeted lesions, along with rates of tumor detection and aggressiveness of disease. In this single payer veteran population, we did not identify specific biologic differences inherent to tumor detection between AA and non-AA patients.

210 Background: The UroNav fusion biopsy system allows for the real time visualization of the prostate using multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) data. This technology has become a valuable instrument for staging prostate cancer at the time of PSA elevation. However, data is still yet emerging over the use of this tool for patients currently being followed on an active surveillance (AS) protocol. In this study we sought to evaluate the efficacy of the UroNav system in patients on AS. Methods: Patients were enrolled into our prospective study, at a single center institution, approved by the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System (SLVHCS) IRB. Inclusion criteria for this study was men previously enrolled in an active surveillance protocol with a life expectancy ≥10 years. Statical analysis was performed using R 4.0.2 (Ann Arbor, MI). Results: A total of 103 patients were entered into this study for analysis. These patients had a median age of 67.1(62.8 - 70.8) and BMI of 28.6(25.5 - 32.3). The clinical profiles of these patients were median PSA of 6.36(4.65 - 8.89) with a velocity slope of (0.065 (-0.14 - 0.27), TRUS volume of 39.5(32.2 - 56.8), PSAD of 0.15(0.09 - 0.23), and a PI-RAD score of 4(3 – 5). A logistic regression was performed using upgrading on UroNav or Template bx as the outcome. Patients with an increased PSA were more likely to upgrade of Bx (OR = 1.2 (1.05 - 1.39)). Additionally, patients with decreasing MRI volumes were also more likely to upgrade on Bx (OR = 0.97 (0.94 - 0.98)). A total of 42 (40%) patients upgraded on either MRI or Template bx from their initial AS workup. MRI found 13 (12.6%) patients with an upgraded GG that displayed consistent or benign disease on template. Conversely, template also found 13 (12.6%) unique patients who upgraded but were found to have constant or benign disease on mpMRI. Conclusions: mpMRI guided biopsy is a useful tool that can further assist physicians in characterizing prostate cancer in patients being concurrently followed on an active surveillance protocol. MRI is able to find clinically significant cancer that would have otherwise been missed on traditional template biopsies. [Table: see text]