1. CEBPA mutations in 4708 patients with acute myeloid leukemia
- Author
-
Christoph Schliemann, Sylvia Herold, Friedrich Stölzel, Claudia D. Baldus, Sebastian Scholl, Richard Noppeney, Michael Kramer, Martin Bornhäuser, Martin Kaufmann, Julia Annabell Georgi, Tim H. Brümmendorf, Uwe Platzbecker, Hubert Serve, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Bjoern Steffen, Wolfgang E. Berdel, Stefan W. Krause, Sebastian Stasik, Malte von Bonin, Ralph Naumann, Andreas Petzold, Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart, Andreas Neubauer, Gerhard Ehninger, Mathias Hänel, Alwin Krämer, Roger Mulet-Lazaro, Hermann Einsele, Utz Krug, Markus Schaich, Andreas Hochhaus, Johannes Schetelig, Peter J. M. Valk, Christian Thiede, Christoph Röllig, Andreas Burchert, Franziska Taube, Jan Moritz Middeke, Katja Sockel, Ulrich Kaiser, and Hematology
- Subjects
Oncology ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Immunology ,Medizin ,Favorable prognosis ,Biochemistry ,Transactivation ,Internal medicine ,CEBPA ,medicine ,Basic Leucine Zipper ,Humans ,Differential impact ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Myeloid leukemia ,Cell Biology ,Hematology ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Prognosis ,Survival Analysis ,Leukemia ,Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ,Basic-Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors ,Mutation ,CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins ,Female ,business ,Protein Binding - Abstract
Biallelic mutations of the CEBPA gene (CEBPAbi) define a distinct entity associated with favorable prognosis; however, the role of monoallelic mutations (CEBPAsm) is poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed 4708 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who had been recruited into the Study Alliance Leukemia trials, to investigate the prognostic impact of CEBPAsm. CEBPA mutations were identified in 240 patients (5.1%): 131 CEBPAbi and 109 CEBPAsm (60 affecting the N-terminal transactivation domains [CEBPAsmTAD] and 49 the C-terminal DNA-binding or basic leucine zipper region [CEBPAsmbZIP]). Interestingly, patients carrying CEBPAbi or CEBPAsmbZIP shared several clinical factors: they were significantly younger (median, 46 and 50 years, respectively) and had higher white blood cell (WBC) counts at diagnosis (median, 23.7 × 109/L and 35.7 × 109/L) than patients with CEBPAsmTAD (median age, 63 years, median WBC 13.1 × 109/L; P < .001). Co-mutations were similar in both groups: GATA2 mutations (35.1% CEBPAbi; 36.7% CEBPAsmbZIP vs 6.7% CEBPAsmTAD; P < .001) or NPM1 mutations (3.1% CEBPAbi; 8.2% CEBPAsmbZIP vs 38.3% CEBPAsmTAD; P < .001). CEBPAbi and CEBPAsmbZIP, but not CEBPAsmTAD were associated with significantly improved overall (OS; median 103 and 63 vs 13 months) and event-free survival (EFS; median, 20.7 and 17.1 months vs 5.7 months), in univariate and multivariable analyses. Additional analyses revealed that the clinical and molecular features as well as the favorable survival were confined to patients with in-frame mutations in bZIP (CEBPAbZIP-inf). When patients were classified according to CEBPAbZIP-inf and CEBPAother (including CEBPAsmTAD and non-CEBPAbZIP-inf), only patients bearing CEBPAbZIP-inf showed superior complete remission rates and the longest median OS and EFS, arguing for a previously undefined prognostic role of this type of mutation.
- Published
- 2022