1. Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Versus Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Triggering in Fertility Preservation Cycles
- Author
-
Adi Reches, Hadar Amir, Dalit Ben-Yosef, Sabaa Knaneh, Foad Azem, Nivin Samara, Einat Haikin Herzberger, and Yael Kalma
- Subjects
Agonist ,endocrine system ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.drug_class ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin ,Reproductive medicine ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Physiology ,Retrospective cohort study ,Oocyte cryopreservation ,Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist ,medicine ,Fertility preservation ,business ,Ovulation ,hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists ,media_common - Abstract
The purpose of this research is to study the efficacy of GnRH-a versus r-hCG triggering in patients who go through fertility preservation cycles. This retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. It includes 191 patients undergoing fertility preservation cycles between May 2013 and September 2018, in which ovulation was induced by either GnRH-a or r-hCG. Main outcome measures were number and rate of mature oocyte. Among treatment cycles with medical indication, GnRH agonist significantly increases the odds for high mature rate by 3.55 (1.30-9.66), while in treatment cycles with social indication, there is no significant effect of the triggering agent. An advantage for GnRH-a triggering was observed in medically indicated preservation cycles.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF