Search

BACKGROUND As we emerge into the genomic medicine era, the epidemiology of diseases is taken for granted. Accurate prevalence figures, especially of rare diseases (RDs, ≤50/100,000), will become even more important for purposes of health care and societal planning. We noticed that the numbers of affected individuals in regionally established registries for mainly hereditary RDs do not align with published estimated and expected prevalence figures. We therefore hypothesized that such non-population-based means overestimate RDs and sought to address this by recalculating prevalence for an important 'common' hereditary disease, autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) whereby presumed-prevalence is 100-250/100,000 METHODS: The Else-Kroener-Fresenius-ADPKD-Study in south-west Germany with a population of 2,727,351 inhabitants was established with the cooperation of all nephrology centres. Furthermore, general practitioners, internists, urologists, human geneticists and neurosurgery centres were contacted with questionnaires for demographic, family and kidney function data. Germline-mutation screening of susceptibility genes PKD1 and PKD2 was offered. Official population data for 2010 were used for overall and kidney function-adjusted prevalence estimations. RESULTS A total of 891 subjects, 658 index-cases and 233 relatives, aged 10-89 (mean 52), were registered, with >90% response rate, 398 by nephrologists and 493 by non-nephrologists. Molecular-genetic analyses contributed to confirmation of the diagnosis in 57%. The overall prevalence of ADPKD was 32.7/100,000 reaching a maximum of 57.3/100,000 in the 6th decade of life. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence of ADPKD is overestimated by 2- to 5-fold and close to the limit of RDs which may be of broad clinical, logistic and policy implications.

Background: The role of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) as a risk factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still under discussion. Data on prevalence of RCC in ADPKD are limited, especially on a large population scale. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of RCC in ADPKD kidneys and characterize the clinical features of this coincidence. Methods: Based on our histopathological registry for ADPKD and the Else Kröner-Fresenius Registry, we retrospectively reviewed malignant and benign renal lesions in patients with ADPKD who had undergone renal surgery from 1988 to 2011. Results: 240 ADPKD patients underwent 301 renal surgeries. Mean age at surgery was 54 years. Overall, 16 malignant and 11 benign lesions were analyzed in 301 kidneys (5.3%; 3.7%), meaning that 12/240 (5%; 1:20) patients presented with malignant renal lesions. 66.7% (8/12) of these patients had undergone dialysis prior to surgery. We found 10/16 (63%) papillary RCC, 5/16 (31%) clear cell RCC, and 1/16 (6%) papillary noninvasive urothelial cancer. Regarding all renal lesions, 6/17 (35.3%) patients had more than one histological finding in their kidneys. In 2 cases, metachronous metastases were removed. Mean follow-up was 66.7 months. Conclusion: Kidney-related prevalence of RCC in ADPKD kidneys was surprisingly high. Whether or not this is due to chronic dialysis or due to the underlying disease is still speculative. Like other cystic renal diseases with an increased risk for RCC, the attending physician should be aware of the malignant potential of ADPKD, especially with concomitant dialysis.

BACKGROUND: ADPKD is one of the most common inherited disorders, with high risk for end-stage renal disease. Numerous patients, however, have no relatives in whom this disorder is known and are unsure whether they may transmit the disease to their offsprings. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether germline mutation analysis adds substantial information to clinical symptoms for diagnosis of ADPKD in these patients. METHODS: Clinical data included renal function and presence of liver or pancreas cysts, heart valve insufficiency, intracranial aneurysms, colonic diverticles, and abdominal hernias. Family history was evaluated regarding ADPKD. Germline mutation screening of the PKD1 and PKD2 genes was performed for intragenic mutations and for large deletions. RESULTS: A total of 324 adult patients with ADPKD including 30 patients without a family history of ADPKD (sporadic cases) were included. PKD1 mutations were found in 24/30 and PKD2 mutations in 6 patients. Liver cysts were present in 14 patients and intracranial aneurysms in 2 patients. Fourteen patients (45%) had no extrarenal involvement. Compared to the 294 patients with familial ADPKD, the clinical characteristics and the age at the start of dialysis were similar in those with sporadic ADPKD. CONCLUSION: The clinical characteristics of patients with sporadic and familial ADPKD are similar, but sporadic ADPKD is often overlooked because of the absence of a family history. Molecular genetic screening for germline mutations in both PKD1 and PKD2 genes is essential for the definitive diagnosis of ADPKD.

Cerebrovascular diseases / Extra 2(1), 71-79 (2012). doi:10.1159/000342620, Published by Karger, Basel

Pancreatic islet cell tumors (ICTs) occur as sporadic neoplasias or as a manifestation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and von Hippel–Lindau disease (VHL). Molecular classification of ICTs is mandatory for timely diagnosis and surveillance. Systematic comparison of VHL-ICTs and sporadic ICTs has been lacking. Our registry-based approaches used the German NET-Registry with 259 patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), who were primarily diagnosed with NETs, and the German VHL-Registry with 485 molecular genetically confirmed patients who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography of the abdomen. All patients provided blood DNA for testing of the MEN1 and VHL genes for intragenic mutations and large deletions. In the NET-Registry, 9/101 patients (8.9%) with ICTs had germline mutations, 8 in MEN1 and 1 in VHL. In the VHL-Registry, prevalence of NETs was 52/487 (10.6%), and all were ICTs. Interestingly, of those with VHL p.R167W, 47% developed ICTs, compared to 2% of those with p.Y98H. In total, there were 92 truly sporadic, i.e. mutation-negative ICT patients. Comparing these with the 53 VHL-ICT patients, the statistically significant differences were predominance of female gender (P=0.01), multifocal ICTs (P=0.0029), and lower malignancy rate (PVHL gene, unless they have multifocal ICTs, other VHL-associated tumors, and/or a family history for VHL.