Search

Background/Aims: We aimed to determine the association between blood urea level and incident cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients.Methods: The association between blood urea level and liver fibrosis/liver-related events were evaluated on continuous scale with restricted cubic spline curves based on generalized additive model or Cox proportional hazards models. Then, the above associations were evaluated by urea level within intervals.Results: Among 4,282 patients who had undergone liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography, baseline urea level had a U-shaped association with LSM and hepatic decompensation development after a median follow-up of 5.5 years. Compared to patients with urea of 3.6–9.9 mmol/L, those with urea ≤3.5 mmol/L (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68–10.24) and ≥10 mmol/L (aHR, 5.22; 95% CI, 1.86–14.67) had higher risk of hepatic decompensation. Patients with urea ≤3.5 mmol/L also had higher risk of incident cirrhosis (aHR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.50–6.98). The association between low urea level and incident cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation was consistently observed in subgroups by age, gender, albumin level, and comorbidities. The U-shaped relationship between urea level and LSM was validated in another population screening study (n=917). Likewise, urea ≤3.5 mmol/L was associated with a higher risk of incident cirrhosis in a territory-wide cohort of 12,476 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease at a median follow-up of 9.9 years (aHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03–1.57).Conclusions: We identified a U-shaped relationship between the urea level and liver fibrosis/incident cirrhosis/hepatic decompensation in patients with CLD.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The uptake of antiviral treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has been suboptimal. We aimed to determine the secular trend of treatment uptake in the territory-wide CHB cohort in Hong Kong from 2000 to 2017 and the factors for no treatment despite fulfilling treatment criteria. METHODS Chronic hepatitis B patients under public clinics and hospitals were identified through electronic medical records. The treatment indications were defined according to the Asian-Pacific guidelines published at the time of patients' first appearance in four periods: 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2013, and 2014-2017. RESULTS There were 135 395 CHB patients were included; 1493/12472 (12.0%), 7416/43426 (17.1%), 10 129/46559 (21.8%), 8051/32 938 (24.4%) patients fulfilled treatment criteria in the four periods, respectively. The treatment uptake rate increased with time: 35.1%, 43.4%, 60.2%, and 68.6% respectively. High fibrosis indices (APRI, FIB-4, and Forns indices) appeared to be the main factors for treatment indication in non-cirrhotic patients, with over 90% fulfilling treatment criteria due to high fibrosis indices alone. Of those fulfilling treatment criteria by high fibrosis indices, less than 60% of patients (25.2%, 36.1%, 46.0%, and 58.9%, respectively) had antiviral treatment initiated. Normal platelet count (odds ratio 0.42, P

Reducing the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is the key ultimate goal set in essentially all treatment guidelines. There has been solid evidence supporting the relationship between serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level and risk of HCC. Antiviral treatment with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) leads to sustained viral suppression and hence is often adopted as the secondary prevention for HCC in CHB patients. The first-generation NA, lamivudine, reduced the risk of HCC at 3 years compared to placebo; yet, its high emergence of antiviral resistance has made it no longer recommended in the international guidelines. Recent heated debate is about the two current first-line NAs—entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)—Are they just as good to reduce HCC risk in CHB patients? A handful of cohort studies show two different kinds of observations—TDF is better than entecavir in lowering HCC risk, or these two NAs have led to similarly low risk of HCC. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a modified version of TDF higher rate of ALT normalization, would be another potent nucleotide analogue is the treatment of choice for secondary prevention for HCC.

BACKGROUND & AIMS How adiposity influences the effect of genetic variants on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the Asian population remains unclear. We aimed to study the association between genetic risk variants and susceptibility/severity of NAFLD in the lean, overweight and obese individuals. METHODS Nine hundred and four community subjects underwent proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and transient elastography examination. Lean (

Background & Aims Antiviral treatment is known to improve survival in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, the treatment uptake in CHB patients remains low. We aimed to report the secular trend in antiviral treatment uptake from 2007–2017, and to compare the effect of different nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) initiation times (before vs. after HCC diagnosis) on survival. Methods A 3-month landmark analysis was used to compare overall survival in patients not receiving NA treatment (i.e. no NA), patients receiving NAs after their first HCC treatment (i.e. post-HCC NA), and patients receiving NAs ≤3 months before their first HCC treatment (i.e. pre-HCC NA). A propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to balance clinical characteristics between the 3 groups and to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Results The uptake of antiviral treatment in HCC patients increased from 47.3% in 2007 to 98.3% in 2017. The pre-HCC NA group contributed mostly to the uptake rate, which increased from 72.7% to 96.0% in the past decade. In addition, 3,843 CHB patients (407 no NA; 2,932 pre-HCC NA; 504 post-HCC NA) with HCC, receiving at least 1 type of HCC treatment, were included in the analysis. Lack of NA treatment at the time of HCC diagnosis increased the risk of death (weighted HR 3.05; 95% CI 2.70–3.44; p, Graphical abstract, Highlights • Antiviral treatment improves survival in patients with chronic hepatitis B-related HCC. • The uptake of antiviral treatment in HCC patients was suboptimal in the past (47.3% in 2007), but dramatically improved to 98.3% in 2017. • The timing of antiviral treatment (before or after HCC occurrence) does not matter that much in terms of patient survival. • Antivirals should be started soon after HCC has been diagnosed in patients with chronic hepatitis B who are not already on them.

Background The epidemiology of acute hepatitis A and E has been changing over the last 2 decades. The impact of concomitant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) on clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of patients with acute hepatitis A or E with and without underlying CHB. Methods We identified consecutive patients with acute hepatitis A or E based on hepatitis serology from the electronic medical records of the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong from January 2000 to December 2016. Hepatic events, all-cause mortality, and liver-related mortality within 30 days of the diagnosis of acute hepatitis were evaluated. Results The cohort included 1068 cases of acute hepatitis A and 846 cases of acute hepatitis E. More patients with acute hepatitis E than those with acute hepatitis A had underlying CHB (13.5% vs 8.0%; P < .001). Patients with hepatitis E had more all-cause mortality (3.9% vs 0.6%; P < .001), liver-related mortality (2.0% vs 0.3%; P < .001), and hepatic events (2.8% vs 0.3%; P < .001) within 30 days from diagnosis. In patients with acute hepatitis E, underlying renal failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.90; P < .001) and age ≥50 years (aHR, 3.25; P = .036) were associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, whereas CHB (aHR, 3.34; P = .02) was associated with 30-day liver-related mortality. Conclusions The mortality is higher in patients with acute hepatitis E than in those with hepatitis A. Coexisting CHB is the independent risk factor for liver-related mortality in patients with acute hepatitis E.