Search

The efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outside clinical study are undetermined. This retrospective study examined the efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin administered in real life settings. Forty-seven patients, 31 with

We reviewed pre-diagnosis clinical data of 420 patients with pathologically confirmed myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) presenting with anemia. In 232 patients with yearly pre-diagnosis complete blood counts (CBCs), we also analyzed CBC kinetics in respects to a standardized timepoint in which all patients had similar levels of hemoglobin (Hgb). At the standardized timepoint (last documented 12 > Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL), occurring months-years before diagnosis, median CBC values were Hgb 11.4 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 2.7 × 103 (k)/mcl, and platelets (PLTs) 181 k/mcl. Gradual changes in CBC could be observed years prior to this timepoint, for the most part while within normal/near-normal limits. During this time, most patients had a coexisting alternative etiology for anemia. Patients with high-risk cytogenetic/blast features had a rapid and steeper decrease in counts in the last year before developing a concerning anemia (decrease in: Hgb 0.75 g/dL vs 0.55 g/dL; PLT 29.5 vs 4.5 k/mcl; ANC 0.86 vs 0.4 k/mcl, P = .03). Low-risk patients had a high rate of longstanding mild anemia (31% vs 16%, P = .05). Rate of development of cytopenia and number of involved hematopoietic lines were prognostic. In 65% of patients, with near normal CBC at the standardized timepoint, but in whom there was a decrease in multiple hematopoietic lines over the preceding year, the 5-year overall survival (5yOS) was 53% compared to 71% in patients with isolated slowly progressing anemia (20% of patients). In 15% of patients with mild cytopenia developing after both a rapid decrease and multiple involved lines, prognosis was dismal (5yOS 34%). In conclusion, kinetics of pre-MDS CBC values correlate with disease risk and survival.

Objectives To ascertain the relevance of bone marrow cellularity (BMC) to the interpretation of blast percentage (blast%) in MDS prognostication. Methods We compared survival prediction based on blast% adjusted to different levels of cellularity, compared to the survival based on the original IPSS-R blast% grouping. Results We analyzed 355 consecutive MDS patients. Cellularity, in and of itself or its interaction with blast%, was not associated with overall survival (OS). In a small subset of patients with a hypercellular marrow (15%; n = 26), dismal prognosis was observed at lower levels of blast%. For these cases OS was similar to higher IPSS-R blast groups. For example, within the Intermediate group (blast% 5%-10%), those with a hypercellular marrow and >6% blasts had an OS of 10 m similar to 16 m in the High (blast% 10%-19%) blast group. These changes did not translate into a significant improvement in overall prognostic power of a cellularity-adjusted IPSS-R (C index 0.71 vs. 0.70). Conclusion Adjusting blast% to cellularity did not improve prognostication. However, within IPSS-R-defined blast groups, a small subset of patients with relatively higher blast% and hypercellularity may have a worse prognosis than expected.

Background The assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is critical to organize more robustly patient-centered care. Therefore, availability of well-validated disease-specific HRQoL measures in this area is important. Objectives We investigate the validity of the Quality of Life in Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS), to assess HRQoL in MDS patients reported to the European MDS (EUMDS) Registry. A prior validation effort has been reported (Abel G, et al. Haematologica, 2016 June; 781-88), but this was largely a North American cohort and subscales suggested by the original principal components analysis had not been validated. Patients and Methods The QUALMS questionnaire was included in the EUMDS Registry (de Swart L, et al. Br J Haematol. 2015 Aug;170:372-83), a large international initiative including several European countries and Israel. We used proportions, median and interquartile range (IQR) to summarize patients' characteristics at baseline. We also assessed internal consistency and test-retest reliability by Cronbach's alpha (threshold for acceptability Cronbach's alpha ≥0.70). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the model fit for the underlying scale structure. The model performance was evaluated by Comparative Fit Index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), and the Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation (RMSEA), where acceptable values were >0.90 for CFI and TLI and RMSEA Results Overall, 270 MDS patients completed the QUALMS questionnaire, from 17 centers across four countries: Austria (N = 61), Israel (N = 67), The Netherlands (N = 37) and United Kingdom (N = 105). The majority of patients were male (67.4%) with a median age at diagnosis of 74 years (IQR =68.0-80.0) and a low MDS-CI score (n=158). CFA indicated acceptable model fit, respectively CFI=0.93, TLI=0.93 and RMSEA=0.07. For all analyses, the scales QUALMS-physical burden (P), QUALMS-emotional burden (E) and the total score showed satisfactory results, while the scale QUALMS-benefit finding (BF) showed worse results. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were acceptable for the total score (TS) and all scales but BF (see figure). Pairwise correlations between QUALMS-P, QUALMS-E, TS and all the scales from EQ-5D-3L (including VAS) showed satisfactory concurrent validity (range from -0.67 to 0.60). Only the QUALMS-BF did not correlate with any of the EQ-5D-3L scales (range from -0.07 with EQ-VAS to 0.14 with EQ-5D Anxiety/ Depression). As per discriminant validity, all known-group comparisons were statistically significant and consistent with the underlying clinical construct for all scales apart for the QUALMS-BF. For example, the QUALMS-P mean scores were 75.8 vs 54.6 (p< 0.001) for patients with a higher vs lower KPS, while the corresponding QUALMS-BF mean scores were 49.4 vs 50.9 (p=0.829). The same profile resulted for responsiveness to change, where all scales reflected significant changes in Hb levels and in EQ-VAS score in the expected direction, while QUALMS-BF did not. For example, those patients who experienced a clinically meaningful deterioration in the VAS score also had also a worsening in QUALMS-P (Δ=-6, p=0.003), QUALMS-E (Δ=-1.8, p=0.075) and TS (Δ=-3, p=0.003). Conclusions Current findings provide novel evidence-based data that support the validity of the QUALMS for its use in European and Israeli patients with MDS. Implementation of the QUALMS in MDS research may further raise PRO standards in this area. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Efficace: Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: Grants (to Institution); Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Grants (to Institution). Mittelman: Janssen · Roche · Novartis · Takeda · Medison / Amgen · Neopharm / Celgene / BMS · Abbvie · Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis · Takeda · Fibrogen · Celgene / BMS · Onconova · Geron: Other: Clinical Trial Support; Onconova · Novartis · Takeda · Silence: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MDS HUB: Consultancy; Celgene / BMS · Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Van Marrewijk: Novartis Pharmacy B.V. Oncology Europe: Other: project manager of the EUMDS Registry, is funded from the EUMDS (educational grants from Novartis Pharmacy B.V. Oncology Europe); Amgen Limited: Other: project manager of the EUMDS Registry, is funded from the EUMDS (educational grants from Amgen Limited); Celgene International: Other: project manager of the EUMDS Registry, is funded from the EUMDS (educational grants from Celgene International); Janssen Pharmaceutical: Other: project manager of the EUMDS Registry, is funded from the EUMDS (educational grants from Janssen Pharmaceutical); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International: Other: project manager of the EUMDS Registry, is funded from the EUMDS (educational grants from Takeda Pharmaceuticals International); EU's Horizon 2020 program: Other: MDS-RIGHT (grant from EU's Horizon 2020 program) project budgets. de Witte: Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Stauder: Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Summary This multicentre study evaluated 5-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), where therapy was individualized based on initial prognostic factors and positron emission tomography-computed tomography performed after two cycles (PET-2). Between September 2006 and August 2013, 359 patients aged 18–60 years, were recruited in nine Israeli centres. Early-HL patients initially received ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) ×2. Depending on initial unfavourable prognostic features, PET-2-positive patients received additional ABVD followed by involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT). Patients with negative PET-2 and favourable disease received ISRT or ABVD ×2; those with unfavourable disease received ABVD ×2 with ISRT or, alternatively, ABVD ×4. Advanced-HL patients initially received ABVD ×2 or escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; EB) ×2 based on their international prognostic score (≤2 or ≥3). PET-2-negative patients further received ABVD ×4; PET-2-positive patients received EB ×4 and ISRT to residual masses. With a median follow-up of 55 (13–119) months, 5-year PFS was 91% and 69% for PET-2-negative and positive early-HL, respectively; 5-year OS was 100% and 95%, respectively. For advanced-HL, the PFS was 81% and 68%, respectively (P = 0·08); 5-year OS was 98% and 91%, respectively. PET-2 positivity is associated with inferior prognosis in early-HL, even with additional ABVD and ISRT. Advanced-HL patients benefit from therapy escalation following positive PET-2. EB can be safely de-escalated to ABVD in PET-2-negative patients.

Bone marrow (BM) metastases are known to worsen the outcome in patients with malignancies and alter the choice of the treatment regimen. In an attempt to identify routine parameters for the prediction of BM metastasis we evaluated the clinical and laboratory data of 103 patients with metastatic solid tumors. We also assessed which of these factors appeared to influence survival. Three laboratory abnormalities were found to be predictive of metastasis on BM biopsy: thrombocytopenia < 50 × 109/L OR 14.4; p = 0.02; hypocellular or dry tap aspirate OR 7.0; p = 0.02 and high serum alkaline phosphatase OR 6.5; p = 0.03. Three additional factors were found to be associated with deceased survival. Thrombocytopenia was associated with decreased survival from a median of 0.8 months to 4.1 months, p < 0.0001. Serum LDH levels more than twice the upper limit of normal were also reduced survival from 1.8 months versus 4.7 months, p = 0.03. Finally, the initial diagnosis of malignancy by bone marrow examination was associated with reduced survival from 1.8 months vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.03 in individuals where BM metastases were not the presenting feature of malignancies. Use of these simple clinical parameters may help in the early diagnosis of bone marrow metastases and improve clinical approach.

Azacitidine treatment is effective in higher risk MDS (HR-MDS), with less than 50 % response, lasting 2 years. Aza and lenalidomide (Len) have a potential synergistic effect. ViLen-01 phase IIa trial includes 6-month induction (Aza 75 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5, Len 10 mg/day, days 6-21, every 28 days), 6-month consolidation (Aza 75 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5, every 28 days), and 12-month maintenance (Len 10 mg/day, days 1-21, every 28 days). Response was evaluated according to IWG criteria. Totally, 25 patients enrolled, with an average of 76.3 years old (60-87), and 88 % with major comorbidities. Thirteen patients completed induction, 7 proceeded for consolidation, and 2 for maintenance. The overall response rate (ORR) was 72 % (18/25), with 6 (24 %) for CR, 3 (12 %) for marrow CR, and 9 (36 %) for hematologic improvement (HI). The 7 non-responding patients were on the study 3 days to 4.1 months. At 6 months, 4 of 6 evaluable patients achieved complete cytogenetic response and 2 with del (5q) at diagnosis. Adverse events (AEs) were as expected in these patients: grades III-IV, mainly hematologic-thrombocytopenia (20 patients) and neutropenia (13 patients). The common non-hematologic AEs were infections (14 patients), nausea (7), vomiting (7), diarrhea (7), and skin reactions (5). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 ± 1.36 months, with median overall survival (OS) of 12 ± 1.7 months. Quality of life (FACT questionnaire) data were available for 12 patients with a tendency towards improved QoL. This trial with elderly HR-MDS patients with an expected poor prognosis demonstrates a high (72 %) response rate and a reasonable expected safety profile but a relatively short PFS and OS.

Background The Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab suppresses B-lymphocytes and may induce hypogammaglobulinemia in treated patients. The incidence and clinical significance of rituximab induced hypogammaglobulinemia in lymphoma patients is underestimated. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the rates of hypogammaglobulinemia, infection and infection-related mortality in 136 lymphoma patients who were treated with a combination of chemotherapy and rituximab. Results Rituximab given in more than 8 doses (OR 6.05, 95% CI: 1.24-29.5), relative hypogammaglobulinemia at time of lymphoma diagnosis (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.26-14.1) and the combination of fludarabine with rituximab (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.24-9.47) were factors significantly associated with prolonged (more than 6 months) hypogammaglobulinemia. The combination of fludarabine and rituximab (OR 6.4, 95% CI: 1.49-27.0) and secondarily prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia (OR 4.5, 95% CI: 1.19-18.5) were found to be predictive factors for severe infections and infection-related mortality. Conclusion These data suggest the importance of following serum immunoglobulin levels before and after combination immuno-chemotherapy, particularly in patients with recurrent infections or relapsed/refractory disease.

Structural mitochondrial abnormalities as well as genetic aberrations in mitochondrial proteins have been known in Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) , yet there is currently little data regarding the metabolic properties and energy production of MDS cells. In the current study we used state-of-the-art methods to assess OXPHOS in peripheral blood cells obtained from MDS patients and healthy controls We then assessed the effect of food supplements- Coenzyme Q10 and carnitine on mitochondrial function and hematological response .We show here for the first time that in low risk MDS there is a significant impairment of mitochondrial respiration in peripheral blood cells and this can be improved with food supplements. We also show that such myelodysplastic syndrome, mitochondria, oxidative phosphorylation, coenzyme Q10, seahorse XF analyzer. supplements lead to improvement in cytopenia's and quality of life.

Introduction Azacitidine (AZA) dose reduction is a common practice in cytopenic patients. However, a correlation between AZA dose and infection complications has never been studied. Patients and Methods Higher-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia treated with AZA in 18 Israeli hospitals between the years 2008 and 2011 were included in a former national survey. To reveal the effect of AZA dosage on infection risk we limited our analysis to the infection rate after the first AZA dose alone. We excluded subsequent cycles of AZA from the analysis, because infectious events during these cycles might be related to other cofactors such as disease response to AZA therapy. Results After the first AZA cycle, infectious events were more frequent after doses of 75 mg/m 2 for 7 days than 75 mg/m 2 for 5 days (36/106 [34%] and 10/67 [14.9%], respectively; P = .008), regardless of the patient's age. Of the 46 recorded infectious events, the causative pathogen was identified as bacterial in 25 (54.3%) and as viral or fungal in 2 (4.3%) and 2 (4.3%) cases, respectively. No pathogen was identified in 17 (37%) cases. Infections were significantly more prevalent among patients who presented with platelet counts P = .012) and poor risk cytogenetics (40.7% vs. 19.8%; P = .008). Conclusion Reduction of AZA dose might decrease infection rate and therefore should be considered in patients with high infection risk.

Not available

Introduction The therapeutic options for diffuse large cell B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients (pts) that fail to respond/relapse after≥2 treatment regimens are limited. The SCHOLAR-1 study reported an overall response/ complete remission (ORR/CR) rates of 26%/ 7% with a median overall survival (OS) of 6.3 months in chemorefractory and early relapsing DLBCL pts. Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) is a conjugated antibody that delivers the microtubule inhibitor MMAE to CD79b-expressing cells. Polatuzumab administered in combination with Bendamustine-Rituximab (P-BR) has been recently approved by the FDA for pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL that failed to respond≥2 prior therapies. The current study investigated the tolerability and efficacy of Pola mainly with BR, in DLBCL pts, treated through a compassionate program after failing ≥2 prior regimens. Methods Data of all pts with consecutive R/R DLBCL, treated with Pola-BR or Pola-R (2-8 cycles) in 11 Israeli centers between 6/2018 and -5/2019 were analyzed. Inclusion criteria for this study were: R/R DLBCL (denovo and transformed follicular lymphoma [t-FL]), age ≥ 18 years, ≥ 2 prior treatments. We evaluated pt characteristics, treatment details and toxicities, overall response and CR rates, progression free survival (PFS) and OS. Cox regression model was used to define factors affecting outcomes. Results 34 patients- (denovo DLBCL, n=24 and t-FL, n=10 ⌈50% -non CGB and 50% - GCB type⌉) were included. Median age at Pola administration was 65.5 (range 60-72) years. Stage ≥3 disease was recorded in 88% and IPI ≥3 in 73.5%. Median prior lines was 3 (range 3-5); including anthracyclines and rituximab in 100% and cisplatin-based regimens in 91%. 32% relapsed after ASCT and 9% after CART infusion. 53% had primary refractory disease, 29% had refractory relapse and 18% had prior sensitive relapse. 22 pts received Pola-B, mostly with Rituximab (n=19), and 12 received Pola-R. In 5 pts, Pola-based regimen was used as a bridge for Allo SCT (all responded CR, n=4 and PR, n=1) and in 6 as a bridge to CARTs (all responded CR n=1, PR n=2, SD n=3). Median number of Pola B cycles was 3 (3-5) and median Pola-R cycles was 4 (3-6). Median B dose per cycle was 90 mg/m2 (45-90). GCSF was used in 47%. Early treatment discontinuation due to progressive disease (PD) occurred in 8 (23%) of the entire cohort: 23% of Pola-B pts and 25% of Pola-R pts. Safety: Hematological AEs grade 3-4, reported with Pola- B vs Pola-R were: neutropenia (45.5.% vs 33%), thrombocytopenia (25% vs 8%) and anemia (23% vs 17%). Infections were recorded in 41% and 36% of Pola-B pts and Pola-R respectively. Neutropenic fever was reported in 36% in Pola-B pts and none in Pola-R. Pulmonary infections were recorded in 33.3% and 27.3% of Pola-B and Pola-R pts respectively, resulting in death in one pt. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 18% of Pola- B pts (grade ≤2) vs 8% with Pola -R. Hospitalization due to AEs was recorded in 41% of Pola-B vs 25% of Pola-R. Pola dose reduction due to AE was reported in 1 pt (8%) in the Pola-R. Efficacy: ORR for the entire cohort was 65%, including 38% CRs and 27% PRs. 12% pts attained SD and 23% experienced PD. ORR was higher in non-GCB than in GCB pts 80% vs 43% (p=0.036). Median follow up of the entire cohort from Pola administration was 4.4 months (range 0.6-11.4). 6 months projected OS and PFS were 83% and 63%, respectively. Post Pola treatment in pts that failed to respond/Relapsed post pola: 8 patients had PD; 3 died from progression, 1-CART, 1-Allo SCT, 2-paliative care and 1-unknown. Additional 5 pts progressed during follow up; 4-CART and 1-palliative care. 1 patient continues Pola treatment after achieving SD. Univariate analysis for factors predicting PFS and OS GCB type (HR-1.816, P=0.055), Primary refractory vs relapsed disease (HR-1.507, p=0.049) and a higher number of prior lines since diagnosis (HR-1.35, p=0.079) tended to be associated with shorter time to progression. T-FL vs denovo DLBCL was associated with decreased OS (p=0.008). Data of 60 patients, including pts treated recently, therefore, not evaluable at the time of abstract submission, would be presented at ASH. Conclusions The toxicity of Pola-based regimen was relatively low. Pola based treatment provided an encouraging PFS and OS in pts with R/R DLBCL that failed to respond ≥2 prior therapies, treated in a real-life setting. Primary refractory disease, higher number prior lines and t-FL vs denovo DLBCL were associated with inferior outcome. Figure Disclosures Herishanu: Roche: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Background: The majority of the patients with low risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) become RBC-transfusion-dependent and thus symptoms resulting from iron overload and oxidative stress may develop. Yet, iron-chelation has not been part of the standard treatment for these patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of deferiprone (L1), an iron chelator, on oxidative stress parameters in iron overloaded and blood dependent patients with low risk MDS. Methods: This work was supported by a grant from Apopharma. Nineteen low risk MDS patients were enrolled. Patients were classified as very low-, low- and intermediate-risk disease, according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). Inclusion criteria were a cumulative transfusion burden of >20 red blood cells (RBC) units and evidence of iron overload (serum ferritin >1,000 ng/mL). Deferiprone at a dose of up to a maximum dose of 100 mg/kg was administrated for 4 months. Blood samples were taken at baseline, at each monthly visit, and at the end of the study. The samples were tested for oxidative stress parameters: reactive oxygen species (ROS), phosphatidylserine (PS), glutathione (GSH) and membrane lipid peroxidation (LP); iron parameters: serum ferritin and cellular labile iron pool (LIP), and CBC. The primary efficacy variable as a measurement of oxidative stress was ROS. Student's t-test was applied for statistical analyses. Results: Patients (n=19) were treated with deferiprone in a daily dose of 25-100 mg/kg, median of 50 mg/kg/day. Eight patients received treatment for 120 days and completed the study. One of them had mild neutropenia that resolved after short discontinuation of the study drug and finished the study with no more complications. Eleven patients did not finish the study: eight patients due to gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects, two patients withdrew their consent (one of them after mild neutropenia that resolved) and one patient was killed in a car accident. We thus had measurements of at least two time points for 16 of the patients. The median number of RBC transfusions during study period was 11 (2-20). The primary efficacy variable ROS, as a measurement of oxidative stress, was significantly decreased, in all three lineages: platelet, RBC and neutrophils (decrease of 32%, 33% and 32% respectively, each at P=0.001). Deferiprone administration was also associated with a reduction in other cellular markers of oxidative stress in RBC: PS, GSH, LP and LIP (decrease of 54%, 98%, 300%, and 42% respectively, each at P=0.001). No significant changes were observed in serum ferritin levels, likely due to the short treatment period in patients on repeated transfusion requirements. Conclusions: This is the first prospective study on chelation with Deferiprone in MDS patients. Our data provide preliminary evidence that administration of Deferiprone in a median daily dose of at 50 mg/kg can decrease iron-induced oxidative stress in iron-overloaded MDS patients. Of note, no events of agranulocytosis were observed. The future remains challenge is to prove that reduction in iron toxicity will eventually translate into a clinically meaningful improvement. Prof. Rachmilewitz who unfortunately passed away last year, had a significant contribution to the conception and design of this study. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction: The treatment of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has undergone many changes in recent years. The original International Prognostic Score (IPS) introduced by Hasenclever et al (1998) was based on a cohort of 1618 patients (pts) mainly treated with MOPP-ABV or ABVD between the years 1983 and 1992. One third (33%) of those pts also underwent involved field radiation therapy (IFRT). Staging was based on CT. The 5-y freedom from progression (FFP) results ranged between 84% and 42%, depending on the presence of 0-≥5 risk factors. The IPS has been validated in a number of studies and settings. Currently, staging is based on baseline PET/CT, which upgrades the disease stage in 15% and downgrades it in 5% of pts compared to CT scan. Positive interim PET/CT (PET-2) is predictive of an inferior prognosis in pts with early and advanced HL. Based on these findings, several studies have used a positive PET-2 as an indication for therapy escalation. However, the majority of relapses still occur in pts with negative PET-2, highlighting the need for additional prognostic markers. We evaluated baseline factors and lab results in a prospectively collected database of pts enrolled in a multicenter clinical trial (NCT00392314) where treatment was modified based on PET-2 results. The current study aimed to develop a model for refined prediction of HL progression risk in advance-disease pts with negative PET-2, using baseline risk factors. Methods: Pts with advanced classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) were stratified according to their baseline IPS; treatment was modified according to PET-2 results. Pts with IPS 0-2 initially received 2 ABVD cycles and those with IPS ≥ 3 received 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP (EB). In the former group, if PET-2 was positive without evidence of disease progression, therapy was escalated to EB with involved site radiation therapy (ISRT) given to residual masses. If PET-2 was negative in both IPS strata, 4 additional ABVD cycles were administered. We evaluated whether traditional IPS parameters continued to predict relapse when treatment was modified based on PET-2 results, and assessed the need for new cutoffs based on ROC curves using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Of 185 enrolled pts, 33 (18%) experienced disease progression and 27 (15%) had a positive PET-2. The 5-y PFS for the whole group, PET-2 negative and PET-2 positive subgroups was 80%, 82% and 68%, respectively (p=0.07). Eight of 33 (28%) relapsed pts had a positive Deauville score (≥3). On univariate analysis of traditional IPS parameters, male gender, age >45, stage IV disease were not found to be associated with a significantly increased hazard ratio (HR) for progression. New cutoffs for lymphocyte count and albumin level predictive of relapse were determined. The following parameters were significantly (P Conclusions: The current analysis, using data prospectively collected during a phase II study but analyzed retrospectively after pts had been stratified by IPS, suggests a scoring model that could refine the IPS-based identification of pts at a higher risk for disease progression, even if their PET-2 is negative. The findings imply that pts with 2 new risk factors (19% of pts) may need to initiate more intensive therapy than ABVD. However, given the retrospective nature of the analysis, its results should be interpreted with caution. The model needs to be verified in an independent cohort of pts with advanced HL using uniform treatment protocols. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Bairey: Janssen: Consultancy.

Mastocytosis covers a spectrum of heterogeneous disorders, characterized by increased proliferation, accumulation, and survival of abnormal mast cells in various organs and tissues.The classificati...

Hypomethylating agents have become the standard therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In Israel, azacitidine (AZA) is routinely used. Yet, infectious complications are common during AZA therapy. The current study was aimed to evaluate the incidence and predisposing risk factors for infections in AZA-treated patients. This retrospective study included patients treated with AZA in 18 Israeli medical institutions between 2008 and 2011. Data on 184 patients [157 high-risk MDS and 27 acute myeloid leukemia (AML)], with a median age of 71.6 (range 29-92) were recorded. Overall, 153 infectious events were reported during 928 treatment cycles (16.5%) administered to 100 patients. One hundred fourteen, 114/153 (75%) events required hospitalization and 30 (19.6%) were fatal. In a univariate analysis, unfavorable cytogenetics, low neutrophil, hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (PLT) counts were found to be associated with infections (24.4% vs. 12.9%, P < 0.0001; 27% vs. 13.5%, P < 0.0001; 20.4% vs. 11%, P < 0.0001 and 29.2% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only low Hb level, low PLT count, and unfavorable cytogenetics remained significant. Prior to therapy, poor cytogenetics, PLT count below 20 × 10⁹/L and neutrophil count below 0.5 × 10⁹/L were predictive of the risk of infection during the first two cycles of therapy. In conclusion, patients with unfavorable cytogenetics, presenting with low neutrophil and PLT counts, are susceptible to infections. Evaluation of infection risk should be repeated prior to each cycle. Patients with poor cytogenetics in whom AZA is prescribed despite low PLT count are particularly at high risk for infections and infection prophylaxis may be considered.

regarding treatment of refractory and relapsing acute myeloid leuke-mia (AML) with the intermediate-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone(MIDAM) regimen. As is well known, the complete response rates(CRR) for these patients are low and the remission duration is short.The MIDAM regimen consisting of cytarabine 1g/m

Background Hypomethylating agents are the standard therapy for higher-risk (HR, Int-2 and high-risk) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Lenalidomide is effective in lower-risk (LR) MDS, with or without 5q-, in HR-MDS and in acute leukemia. Many patients remain resistant to a single agent. A potential synergistic effect of both agents has been shown [Sekeres M et al, Am J Hemat 2010; Blood 2012]. Thus, the MDS Israel group has designed a phase II clinical trial (NIH trial #: TASMC-10-MM-0437-09-CTIL). Protocol The ViLen-01 protocol consists of 3 phases. The induction phase includes 6 monthly cycles of SC azacitidine (Aza), 75 mg/m daily, days 1-5, and PO lenalidomide (Len) 10 mg daily, days 6-21, followed by a 7-day (days 22-28) respite. The consolidation consists of 6 monthly cycles of Aza only for 5 days each, followed by 12 months of maintenance with Len only. Response is evaluated by the IWG criteria [Cheson B et al, Blood 2006]. Results As of July 2013, 7 medical centers have enrolled 18 patients. Patients had been diagnosed with either HR-MDS, or LR-MDS with transfusion-dependence, erythropoietin resistance and poor cytogenetics. Adverse events (AE) were as expected in these elderly HR-MDS patients. The common AEs were grade IV transient cytopenias, requiring dose modification in 15 patients. Only 2 patients stopped the protocol due to AE. Thirteen patients completed the induction, 8 continued to consolidation, and 5 patients continued to maintenance. Eight of the 18 enrolled patients (44%, 8 of the 13, 61.5%) who had completed the induction, achieved CR. Three of the 8 patients in CR also attained cytogenetic response. The other 5 had normal karyotype on study initiation. Five other patients obtained erythroid response and became transfusion-free, and another patient achieved platelet response, for a total of 14 (78%) responders. It is still too early to evaluate response duration and survival. One patient is in early induction, and 4 are still being treated. The others have either died or have discontinued for various reasons (patient refusal, progressive disease, transplant). Conclusions These preliminary data in a small group of patients with HR-MDS and expected poor prognosis, demonstrate a high response rate and a reasonable safety profile. The study is ongoing. If these results are confirmed in randomized trials, it may set new standards for the treatment of this disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

e19529 Background: Bone marrow (BM) involvement is not a rare finding in advanced stages of solid tumors, it may have a profound influence on prognosis and affect a treatment approach. Methods: 103 patients (pts) with an advanced metastatic solid tumor were included in retrospective study. BM metastasis were diagnosed in 72 cases according to Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) ; 31 other metastatic pts. didn't have a marrow spread. We analyzed a basic demographic characteristics, localization of primary tumors and metastasis, laboratory tests, blood smears, BM aspirates (BMA) and biopsies reports.Results: Pts in both groups had comparable median age, gender distribution, pattern of primary tumor and metastatic spread. Hematological parameters' strong correlated with marrow metastasis were: anemia 83% vs. 61% p=0.015 ,thrombocytopenia 55% vs.16% p2ULN) of LDH and ALP in the metastatic BM cohort: 50% vs. 16% and 35% vs. 9%, p=0.002 and p=0.007 respectively. Factors predicted metastatic BM by multivariate analysis were: thrombocytopenia 9/L OR 14.4 95%CI (1.6-128), hypocellular BMA OR 7.0 95%CI (1.82-21.2) and alkaline phosphatase >2ULN levels OR 6.5 95%CI ( 1.2-35.3). Causes which influenced the survival of pts with BM metastasis: thrombocytopenia < 50X109/ L median survival 0.8 month 95% CI (0.1-1.5) vs. 4.1m 95%CI( 2.0-6.1), LDH level >2ULN 1.8m 95%CI(0.5-3.0) vs.4.7m 95%CI(3.0-6.3) and tumor presenting with BM metastasis vs. previously recognized carcinoma with BM involvement 1.8m 95% CI(0.3-3.0) vs.4.0 m.95%CI(1.3-6.7).Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that thrombocytopenia , alkaline phosphatase level>2ULN and probably LEB reflect hypoplastic BM predict BM metastasis in cancer patients; furthermore, thrombocytopenia, LDH>2ULN and BM metastasis in a clinical presentation affect their survival.

Abstract 3811 Background: Azacitidine is an effective therapy for high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Neutropenic fever is a common life threatening complication during azacitidine therapy, however predicting it, is challenging. Despite a number of large scale prospective studies, there are no established indications for primary or secondary prophylactic antibiotics or for the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (Pierre Fenauxa et al. Leukemia Research 2010). We used a retrospective survey of 98 high risk MDS and AML patients treated with Azacitidine, to develop a predicting model for infection during each cycle of Azacitidine therapy. Methods: We retrospectively studied 82 high risk MDS and 16 AML patients treated with 456 azacitidine cycles between 9.2008 and 7.2011at 11 institutions from Israel. Information, of complete blood count, creatinine and liver enzymes was documented prior to initiation of each cycle. Results: Patients' median age was 71 (range 27–92) and 57 (58%) of them males. Poor cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in 30.8% (25 of 82 patients with available cytogenetic) and 65 (67%) were transfusions dependent. The median interval between the initial diagnosis and the initiation of azacitidine therapy was 187 days (range 4 days – 18 years). Azacitidine was administrated as first line therapy in 24 (24%) of patients, 37 (38%) had failed growth factors, 5 (5%) were relapsing after allogeneic transplantation and 32 (33%) were given different chemotherapies prior to azacitidine therapy. Doses and schedule of azacitidine data were available for 98% (446/456) of cycles. The prevalence of 7 days cycles of 75mg/m2, 5 days cycles of 75mg/m2 or attenuated doses were 50.4%, 30%, 16.9% respectively. Adverse events were obtained from patient's charts. 13 major bleeding and 78 infections episodes (2.85% and 16.9% of all cycles) were recorded. Due to the low number of bleeding events we focused on factors predicting infection episodes. Infection rates of 22.7%, 14.2% and 6.9% correlated with azacitidine dose (75mg/m2x7d Vs 5d) and lower respectively). Excluding 87 cycles of doses lower than 75mg/m2 for 5 days, predictors of infections were evaluated in 369 cycles. Nine parameters were included in final analysis: age, sex, cytogenetics, being transfusion dependent prior to first cycle, time from diagnosis to the first cycle, azacitidine dose and neutrophil, thrombocyte and creatinine values prior to each cycle. The odd ratio off infections related to neutrophils count was higher than ANC, so we used neutrophils counts as a predictor. For each cycle we considered full 7 days Vs 5 days schedule, neutrophil above or below 500 cells/mcl, platelet above or below 20,000 cells/mcl and creatinine level prior to the first day of cycle. In univariate analysis neutrophil below 500, platelet below 20,000, creatinine level, azacitidine dose and being transfusion dependent were correlated with infection. In a multivariate analysis (table 1) transfusion dependency and platelets lower than 20,000 were the only significant parameters. Risk of infection was higher when a full seven days cycle was administrated but haven't reach statistical significance (p=0.07). Conclusions: Transfusion dependency prior to first cycle and platelets lower than 20,000 prior to each cycle, are the main significant risk factors for infections during azacitidine therapy. Neutropenia and age are known risk factors for infections in general, but were not significant in our study. We assume that in high risk MDS patients when most off the patients are old and neutropenic, thrombocytopenia is a surrogate marker of disease status which makes the patient more prone to infections. Therefore physicians should considerer these two parameters prior to every azacitidine cycle as guidance in the debate of concurrent prophylactic antibiotics, G-CSF or a tolerable dose of azacitidine. Our findings should be confirmed in a larger sample set but may pave the road for prospective studies of infection prophylaxis during azacitidine therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 2809 The current aim of treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is to maximize response and minimize long term toxicity. This study prospectively evaluates the outcome of patients with HL whose therapy is chosen based on baseline prognostic factors and is tailored based on results of PET/CT imaging performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. In this multicenter study, initiated in 2006, we reduce the intensity of therapy for early responders and escalate the intensity for those with suboptimal early response. Patients with classic HL aged 18–60 years, I-IV are eligible. Those with early disease are categorized according to the German Hodgkin study group criteria for early favorable and unfavorable disease. Following 2 cycles of ABVD, patients with early favorable disease and a negative PET/CT undergo involved nodal radiation therapy (INRT) and those with early unfavorable disease receive 2 more cycles of ABVD (total of 4 cycles) followed by INRT. Patients whose interim PET/CT remains positive are given 2 additional cycles of ABVD for a total of 4 or 6 cycles followed by radiation therapy. Patients with advanced disease including all those with B symptoms or stages III and IV are assigned treatment according to the International Prognostic Score (IPS). Standard risk patients (IPS score 0–2) are initially treated with 2 cycles of ABVD and those with IPS score of ≥ 3 receive 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP (EB). If interim PET/CT is negative or shows minimal residual uptake in no more than a single site then further therapy with 4 cycles of ABVD is administered and radiation therapy to bulky mediastinal mass is omitted. If interim PET/CT is positive but there no evidence of disease progression then therapy is escalated to EB with radiation therapy given to bulky mediastinal mass. 153 patients enrolled, of which 134 reached their interim imaging. Table 1 shows the number of patients in each risk group, positive predictive value of interim positive PET/CT and negative predictive value of negative study. Six patients had disease progression, two of them had primary refractory disease. One patient succumbed during autologous bone marrow transplantation. After a short follow up, median 20 month (6-50), the current study appears to demonstrate progression free survival (PFS) of 95%. The negative predictive value for the patient with negative interim study was 96% demonstrating that de-escalation is feasible and safe for patients with interim negative imaging. Further follow up and a larger cohort is needed to draw conclusions regarding the PFS of patients with interim positive PET/CT study as well as the long term toxicity. Table 1. Risk group score n Positive interim PET/CT Negative interim PET/CT Progression Total Progression Total No Progression All patients 152 18 2 118 114 6 (4%) Early favorable 15 2 0 6 6 0 Early unfavorable 70 2 1 55 53 3 (4%) Advanced disease 67 Score 0–2 38 2 0 31 29 2 (5%) Score ≥3 29 6 1 20 20 1 (3%) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Rituximab is a chimerical human/mouse monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody successfully applied in B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. The suppression of B-lymphocytes may induce hypogammaglobulinemia and increased risk for infection. These complications are rarely observed as a result of monotherapy with rituximab but have been often noted following combination with aggressive chemotherapy or in the setting of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In an attempt to study the role of rituximab in induction of hypogamma, we analyzed the frequency of this phenomenon, its possible causes, infectious complications and infection-related mortality in lymphoma patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens with or without rituximab. We analyzed 136 patients who received rituximab concurrently with chemotherapy (R-Chemo) and 46 patients who were treated with chemotherapy only, with follow-up period of up to five years. Following R-Chemo, 17 cases (12.5%) of severe hypogamma (defined as 6 doses of rituximab were given. Moreover, rituximab in >8 doses leaded to severe hypogamma in 50% of patients compared to 11.8% in patients treated with 6 months were 4.5 times more likely to have severe infection (95%CI 1.19–18.5). In conclusion, we emphasized the importance of follow-up on immunoglobulin level in patients receiving rituximab. Hypogammoglobulinemia is not rare and is a clinical important phenomenon, leading to increase in infection and mortality rate in patients receiving R-Chemo. Longer treatment with more than six doses of rituximab significantly increases the incidence of hypogammoglobulinemia. The type chemotherapy regimen, except for fludarabine didn’t affect the incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia and infection rate in our patients.