Search

Relapse involving the central nervous system (CNS) is an infrequent event in the progression of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with an incidence of approximately four percent. We report four cases of MCL with CNS relapse. In three of the four patients a large chromosomal copy-number alteration (CNA) of 1q was demonstrated together with TP53 mutation/deletion. These patients experienced brief response to ibrutinib, whereas a fourth patient harboring mutated ATM demonstrated a long-term effect to ibrutinib and no CNA. Although it is unclear whether chromosome 1q CNA contribute to specific phenotypes these reports may be of value as such lesions are uncommon features of MCL.

Background: Semi-automated quantitative measurement of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for prognosis in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has gained considerable interest lately. However, simple tumor volume measures may be inadequate for assessment of prognosis in DLBCL as other characteristics such as growth pattern and metabolic heterogeneity may be just as important. In addition, MTV measurements require delineation of tumor lesions by semi-automated software, which can be time-consuming. We hypothesized that a simple visual assessment of tumor volume performs as well as standardized MTV measurements in DLBCL prognostication. Materials and methods: Quantitative and visual analyses of pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in 118 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL were conducted. Quantitative analyses were performed using Hermes TumourFinder® to obtain MTV 2.5 (SUV 2.5 cut-off) and MTV 41 (41% SUVmax isocontour cut-off). Visual assessments included a binary prediction (good/poor prognosis) as well as tumor burden based on a visual analog scale (MTV VAS ) and an estimated volume (eMTV). Three experienced nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to clinical outcome performed visual evaluations. Progression-free survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Inter-observer variability was evaluated by Fleiss’ kappa for multiple observers. Results: In the quantitative analysis, a ROC-determined MTV 2.5 cut-off (log-rank p = 0.11) seemed to outperform MTV 41 (log-rank p = 0.76) for PFS prediction. TLG2.5 (log-rank p = 0.14) and TLG41 (log-rank p = 0.34) were not associated with outcomes. By visual analysis, all three reviewers were able to stratify patients into good/poor prognosis (reviewer A log-rank p = 0.002, reviewer B log-rank p = 0.016, and reviewer C log-rank p = 0.012) with fair inter-observer agreement (Fleiss’ kappa 0.47). MTV VAS and eMTV were not consistently correlated with the outcome. Conclusion: Predictions of outcome after first-line treatment for DLBCL were surprisingly good when left to the unsupervised, subjective judgment of experienced readers of lymphoma 18F-FDG-PET/CT. The study highlights the importance of non-standardized clinical judgments and shows potential loss of valuable prognostic information when relying solely on semi-automated MTV measurements.

Over the last decade, several prognostic models have been proposed for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), but consensus on the optimal model for these patients is absent or lacking. This study aims to review available prognostic models for PCNSL and discuss their prognostic features. A comprehensive literature search performed in Pubmed/Embase identified ten studies with a variable number of analysed patients (range 32–3453), which proposed 12 prognostic models. Age and performance status were the most important prognostic factors in PCNSL and an integral part of the majority of the proposed models. However, there is no universally accepted prognostic model for PCNSL owning to a number of limitations such as a small number of patients, limited samples obtained for genetic analysis, retrospective nature of studies, single centre studies, and lack of validation. Future multicentre studies are necessary to determine the optimal prognostic model for PCNSL by combining different prognostic markers of significance.