1. Characterization of breast cancer subtypes based on quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
- Author
-
Jin You Kim, Hie Bum Suh, Ji Won Lee, Jin Joo Kim, Taewoo Kang, Heeseung Park, Suk Kim, Ki Seok Choo, Nam Kyung Lee, Kyung Jin Nam, and Lee Hwangbo
- Subjects
Adult ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Contrast Media ,Breast Neoplasms ,Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms ,Linear analysis ,Breast cancer ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Quantitative assessment ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Breast ,skin and connective tissue diseases ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Neuroradiology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Dynamic contrast ,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Evaluated data ,Female ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
To investigate whether intratumoral heterogeneity, assessed via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), reflects the molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancers. We retrospectively evaluated data from 248 consecutive women (mean age ± standard deviation, 54.6 ± 12.2 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI and DWI between 2019 and 2020. To evaluate intratumoral heterogeneity, kinetic heterogeneity (a measure of heterogeneity in the proportions of tumor pixels with delayed washout, plateau, and persistent components within a tumor) was assessed with DCE-MRI using a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were obtained using a region-of-interest technique, and ADC heterogeneity was calculated using the following formula: (ADCmax−ADCmin)/ADCmean. Possible associations between imaging-based heterogeneity values and breast cancer subtypes were analyzed. Of the 248 invasive breast cancers, 61 (24.6%) were classified as luminal A, 130 (52.4%) as luminal B, 25 (10.1%) as HER2-enriched, and 32 (12.9%) as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). There were significant differences in the kinetic and ADC heterogeneity values among tumor subtypes (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). The TNBC showed higher kinetic and ADC heterogeneity values, whereas the HER2-enriched subtype showed higher kinetic heterogeneity values compared to the luminal subtypes. Multivariate linear analysis showed that the HER2-enriched (p < 0.001) and TNBC subtypes (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher kinetic heterogeneity values. The TNBC subtype (p = 0.042) was also significantly associated with higher ADC heterogeneity values. Quantitative assessments of heterogeneity in enhancement kinetics and ADC values may provide biological clues regarding the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. • Higher kinetic heterogeneity was associated with HER2-enriched and triple-negative breast cancer. • Higher ADC heterogeneity was associated with triple-negative breast cancer. • Aggressive breast cancer subtypes exhibited higher intratumoral heterogeneity based on MRI.
- Published
- 2021