Search

ObjectivesTo compare the incidence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis (PsO) according to different treatments for their skin: topics/no treatment, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (cDMARDs) or biological DMARDs (bDMARDs).MethodsPatients with PsO without PsA followed at a university hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified according to their treatment in topics (topics, phototherapy or no treatment), cDMARDs (methotrexate and cyclosporine) and bDMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin 17 inhibitors (IL-17i) and IL-12-23i ((interleukin (IL) 12/IL-23 inhibitor))) groups. Incident cases of PsA were attributed to one treatment if developed during the administration of that treatment. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the adjusted risk of PsA development by treatment group.Results1719 patients with PsO contributed a total of 14 721 patient/years (py). 1387 (81%) patients were in the topics, 229 (13%) in cDMARDs and 103 (6%) in the bDMARDs group. During follow-up, 239 patients (14%) developed PsA (231 under topics, six under cDMARDs and two under bDMARDs). Global incidence was 1.6 per 100 py. The risk of developing PsA in patients with PsO treated with bDMARDs was significantly lower (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.26; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.94; p=0.0111), compared with topics, but not compared with cDMARDs (IRR=0.35; 95% CI 0.035 to 1.96; p=0.1007). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that male sex, nail involvement and higher body max index were associated with increased risk of developing PsA, while biologics use was protective (HR: 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.81).ConclusionTreatment with biologics in patients with PsO reduced the risk of PsA development.

Electroencephalography is proposed as an alternative for evaluating user experience with two interactive systems. Traditionally, evaluation methods are applied either during the interaction, which can disturb the user, or at the end where the user does not usually remember all of their interactions. Therefore, using a BCI (Brain Computer Interface) device as OPEN-BCI as an alternative to evaluate the user experience of a subject while interacts with two interactive systems. In this evaluation were analyzed the sub-bands: alpha, theta and beta. The results show differences in workload and emotions. In addition, consistent analysis of the EEG data, were applied questionnaires, as: SUS, NASA-TLX y SAM, where data showed high consistency.

Objective To compare length of stay (LOS) in neonatal care for babies born extremely preterm admitted to networks participating in the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates (iNeo). Study design Data were extracted for babies admitted from 2014 to 2016 and born at 24 to 28 weeks of gestational age (n = 28 204). Median LOS was calculated for each network for babies who survived and those who died while in neonatal care. A linear regression model was used to investigate differences in LOS between networks after adjusting for gestational age, birth weight z score, sex, and multiplicity. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for babies who were discharged home directly. Results Observed median LOS for babies who survived was longest in Japan (107 days); this result persisted after adjustment (20.7 days more than reference, 95% CI 19.3-22.1). Finland had the shortest adjusted LOS (−4.8 days less than reference, 95% CI –7.3 to −2.3). For each week's increase in gestational age at birth, LOS decreased by 12.1 days (95% CI –12.3 to −11.9). Multiplicity and male sex predicted mean increases in LOS of 2.6 (95% CI 2.0-3.2) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.6-2.6) days, respectively. Conclusions We identified between-network differences in LOS of up to 3 weeks for babies born extremely preterm. Some of these may be partly explained by differences in mortality, but unexplained variations also may be related to differences in clinical care practices and healthcare systems between countries.

Background Very preterm infants are at high risk of death or severe morbidity. The objective was to determine the significance of severe congenital heart defects ( CHDs ) for these risks. Methods and Results This cohort study included infants from 10 countries born from 2007–2015 at 24 to 31 weeks’ gestation with birth weights CHDs were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD‐9 ) and Tenth ( ICD‐10 ) codes and categorized as those compromising systemic output, causing sustained cyanosis, or resulting in congestive heart failure. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were neonatal brain injury, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and retinopathy of prematurity. Adjusted and propensity score–matched odds ratios ( ORs ) were calculated. Analyses were stratified by type of CHD , gestational age, and network. A total of 609 (0.77%) infants had severe CHD and 76 371 without any malformation served as controls. The mean gestational age and birth weight were 27.8 weeks and 1018 g, respectively. The mortality rate was 18.6% in infants with CHD and 8.9% in controls (propensity score–matched OR , 2.30; 95% CI , 1.61–3.27). Severe CHD was not associated with neonatal brain injury, necrotizing enterocolitis, or retinopathy of prematurity, whereas the OR for bronchopulmonary dysplasia increased. Mortality was higher in all types, with the highest propensity score–matched OR (4.96; 95% CI, 2.11–11.7) for CHD causing congestive heart failure. While mortality did not differ between groups at OR for mortality in infants with CHD increased to 10.9 (95% CI, 5.76–20.70) at 31 weeks’ gestational age. Rates of CHD and mortality differed significantly between networks. Conclusions Severe CHD is associated with significantly increased mortality in very preterm infants.

Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a pegylated humanized tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) approved for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the USA and for AS and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) in Europe and in some Latin American countries. CZP lacks Fc region, preventing complement fixation and cytotoxicity mediated by antibody; CZP does not actively cross the placenta, unlike other TNFi. RAPID-axSpA study is a Phase III trial conducted in patients with AS and nr-axSpA as double blind and placebo controlled to week 24, dose blind to week 48 and open label to week 204. Of a total of 325 patients recruited, 107 patients were assigned to placebo and 218 patients to CZP (111 to CZP 200 mg Q2W, 107 to CZP 400 mg Q4W). Improvements in axial involvement, joint involvement, enthesitis and quality of life were reported in patients treated with CZP. Safety profile was like that reported for other TNFi in axSpA patients. In this article, we summarized the pharmacology and we reviewed the efficacy and tolerability of this drug for the treatment of axSpA. Some special considerations of CZP during pregnancy are included. CZP, the latest TNFi to be approved, showed efficacy in all manifestations of AS and nr-axSpA.

Purpose of review The review gives an updated overview of some of the new concepts in the management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA): early diagnosis, remission as an objective, treat-to-target, and treatment guidelines. Recent findings Early diagnosis, targeting remission as part of a treatment strategy, and new guidelines providing evidence-based support to these concepts are main topics in recent publications. Summary Dermatologists and rheumatologists should work together to reduce the number of patients remaining undiagnosed, and the time to do so.Remission definition in PsA is still controversial. There is good evidence and convincing arguments for both multidimensional measures, such as minimal disease activity, or unidimensional ones, as disease activity index for PsA. New data on the analysis of tight control of inflammation in early PsA trial showed that the strategy might not be cost-effective on the short term, and that oligoarthritis is less benefited.The new European League Against Rheumatism and Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and PsA recommendations exhibit differences. Methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are favored in European League Against Rheumatism guidelines, whereas other conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologics are equally positioned in Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and PsA recommendations.

It has been shown that nail involvement in psoriasis is associated with systemic enthesopathy. Our objective was to evaluate the association of nail involvement and enthesopathy at distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) level in psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients.Consecutive patients (54 PsO and 56 PsA) seen at the outpatients clinic in this cross-sectional study were included. All patients underwent both clinical and ultrasound (US) assessment on the same day.US revealed enthesopathy in at least 1 DIP joint in 9 patients with PsO (17%, 95% CI: 8-29%) and in 18 patients with PsA (32%, 95% CI: 20-46%). US extensor tendon enthesopathy was detected in a higher proportion of fingers with clinical nail involvement compared with fingers without clinical nail involvement, both in PsO and PsA patients (61.2% vs 16.8%, p0.0001 and 60.1% vs 22%, p0.0001, respectively). Among patients with PsO, 20% (95% CI: 7-41%) and 14% (95% CI: 4-32%) of those with and without clinical nail involvement showed enthesopathy on US examination, respectively (p = 0.54). Among PsA patients, the prevalence of enthesopathy was 30% (95% CI: 15-49%) for patients with clinical nail involvement and 35% (95% CI: 17-56%) for those without nail involvement (p = 0.71).Nail disease was associated with DIP US enthesopathy. There was a significant increased prevalence of extensor tendon enthesopathy in fingers with involved nails both in PsO and PsA, although no association was found between nail involvement and extensor tendon enthesopathy at patients' level. These features might support the nail-entheseal pathogenesis theory at DIP level.

Objective.To evaluate components of the minimal disease activity (MDA) criteria in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Methods.In patients achieving and not achieving MDA, fulfillment of each of the 7 criteria was evaluated.Results.Among 41 patients with MDA, 7.4% did not fulfill the tender/swollen joint count whereas 49% did not fulfill the skin criteria. Of the 42 patients not fulfilling MDA, 100%, 76.5%, and 65% did not fulfill the patient pain score, the patient’s global assessment, and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), respectively.Conclusion.A minority of patients with PsA fulfilling the MDA criteria presented active joints, but half had active skin. Visual analog scale scores and the PASI prevented patients from achieving MDA.

Para contribuir a mejorar al abordaje del anciano diabético diseñamos el Estudio MADICA© , cuyo objetivo es conocer el grado de Inercia Terapéutica (IT) en los mayores de 65 años con Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2, tras intervención a profesionales sanitarios y pacientes. Estudio descriptivo transversal retrospectivo MADICA I© , y de cohortes MADICA II© . Corresponden a la Zona Básica de Salud de Cádiz “La Laguna”, el grupo intervención, y “Loreto-Puntales”, el grupo control, N=570. Se revisan las historias de los pacientes analizando variables socio-demográficas, clínicas, analítica-bioquímicas, farmacológicas, valoración geriátrica e IT. En el estudio MADICA I© , la IT global es 81.58%, correspondiendo el 60.86% a la "La Laguna”, siendo vía MIR 58.79% y no vía MIR 72.81%, y ascendiendo al 91.23% en “Loreto-Puntales”, en el que vía MIR es de 92.25% y no MIR 90.38%. Post-intervención, MADICA II© , la IT global resultante es 72.98%. En “La Laguna” hay inercia en el 58.39% de los casos, en MIR 51.69% y no MIR 70.83%. En “Loreto-Puntales” se presenta en el 88.17% del total, siendo entre los MIR el 89.92% y no MIR del 86.67%. El grado de IT en los mayores diabéticos de Cádiz es elevado. La formación académica previa y continuada en diabetes y geriatría es una medida indispensable para reducir la IT.

Purpose of review The purpose of this study is to give an overview of the new treatments approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Recent findings FDA has approved three new drugs for PsA: Certolizumab-pegol: a PEGylated Fc-free tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi); ustekinumab: an anti interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 mAb; and apremilast and oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. On well designed and extensive developing programmes, all three drugs proved to be effective for the treatment of most PsA manifestations, including peripheral arthritis, skin involvement, enthesitis, dactylitis, quality of life and radiographic progression in patients failing traditional disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) and TNFi. Safety profile of all three drugs seems to be reassuring until now, although long-term data are still not available. Although Certolizumab-pegol is likely to be placed among the other TNFi, ustekinumab and apremilast, due to lower efficacy on arthritis, are being more frequently used as second-line therapy after TNFi failure, especially among rheumatologists. Summary There are new therapeutic options approved for the treatment of PsA. For the first time, well proved effective therapies with a different mechanism of action than the inhibition of TNF alpha are available for the treatment of this progressive disease.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the responsiveness to therapy change of a global ultrasound (US) assessment in the short-term monitoring of spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients with peripheral involvement. Consecutive SpA patients with both clinical peripheral involvement and active disease (initiating or changing therapy) were included. All patients underwent both clinical and US assessment in day entering the study and after 3 months of follow-up. Peripheral global US assessment included the recognition of abnormal inflammatory findings at joint, tendon, and entheseal level according to standardized scanning methods. A total of 34 patients completed both basal and 3-month follow-up assessments. Acute phase reactants, both erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, tenderness (68) and swollen (66) joint counts, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Health Assessment Questionnaire decreased significantly at 3-month follow-up. Total score for the global US assessment also decreased significantly between basal and 3-month follow-up assessment [mean difference, 12.33 (IC 95 %, 9.23-15.42); p 0.0001]. All individual component, joint, tendon, and enthesis scores, also showed a significant decrease during the follow-up period. A high degree of intra-observer reliability was found for the global US assessment (ICC [95 % CI]: 0.977 [0.961-0.993]). This global US assessment, including joints, tendons, and entheses, showed a good responsiveness to clinical changes and might be useful for monitoring SpA patients with peripheral involvement.

Malformations of the inferior vena cava are rare and the absence of the intrahepatic inferior vena cava corresponds to a small percentage of these anomalies. It can be associated with other malformations, but its mayor association is with congenital cardiac abnormalities. It is generally under-diagnosed because most of the cases are asymptomatic and its diagnosis therefore incidental. The most common diagnostic methods to study this entity are computed tomography, angiography or magnetic resonance. The case we report is a patient with interruption of the inferior vena cava with azygos vein continuation.

Objective To update the 2009 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for the spectrum of manifestations affecting patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods GRAPPA rheumatologists, dermatologists, and PsA patients drafted overarching principles for the management of PsA, based on consensus achieved at face-to-face meetings and via online surveys. We conducted literature reviews regarding treatment for the key domains of PsA (arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin disease, and nail disease) and convened a new group to identify pertinent comorbidities and their effect on treatment. Finally, we drafted treatment recommendations for each of the clinical manifestations and assessed the level of agreement for the overarching principles and treatment recommendations among GRAPPA members, using an online questionnaire. Results Six overarching principles had ≥80% agreement among both health care professionals (n = 135) and patient research partners (n = 10). We developed treatment recommendations and a schema incorporating these principles for arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin disease, nail disease, and comorbidities in the setting of PsA, using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process. Agreement of >80% was reached for approval of the individual recommendations and the overall schema. Conclusion We present overarching principles and updated treatment recommendations for the key manifestations of PsA, including related comorbidities, based on a literature review and consensus of GRAPPA members (rheumatologists, dermatologists, other health care providers, and patient research partners). Further updates are anticipated as the therapeutic landscape in PsA evolves.

Traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) are the first line for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) globally, in spite of the lack of evidence from randomized control trials. Most of the evidence comes from observational studies that will be reviewed in this chapter. Rehabilitation in rheumatology focuses on prevention of functional disorders of the musculoskeletal system, maintenance of working ability and prevention of care dependency. Rehabilitation and physical therapy is part of non-pharmacological treatment in patients with rheumatic disease. Few studies have been identified in PsA, related to this issue, and are included in this review. Finally, surgery is preferably preventable, but necessary in some cases. Evidence suggests that results of orthopedic surgery in PsA are similar to those reported in other inflammatory diseases.

The incident of the measles has diminished in the last decades thanks to the widespread use of the vaccine in The United States and Europe. Nevertheless, recently we are seeing new epidemics of measles due to the lack of coverage in some social areas. Measles during pregnancy is associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality, being a frequent cause of abortion in preterm deliveries. We report two cases of measles attended in the Unit of Neonatology held coinciding with the epidemic lived in this area during the last year.

This manuscript focuses on the pharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis – including ankylosing spondylitis – using traditional biologic and non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Early treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis/ankylosing spondylitis as well as the treat-to-target concept receive particular attention. This review also surveys recent national and international guidelines for the treatment of both psoriatic arthritis and couches practice recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis/ankylosing spondylitis within the context of various international guidelines.

Traditional drug treatments for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) include nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents (NSAID) and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), although the evidence base for their effectiveness is not well established. This review was compiled from a comprehensive literature search of electronic bibliographic databases for all English publications that were systematic reviews, metaanalyses, randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, and observational studies. The evidence supports NSAID for symptom relief, although data are lacking for COX-2-specific agents. No evidence exists to support systemic corticosteroids or corticosteroids by intraarticular injection, although the latter are commonly used in clinical practice. Among traditional DMARD, grade 1B evidence supports sulfasalazine, cyclosporine, and leflunomide for symptom relief, with lower-grade evidence for methotrexate. None of them slows radiographic progression. Grade 1B evidence supports improvement in symptoms, physical function, quality of life, and radiographic progression with anti-TNF antagonists (etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab). The relative lack of evidence poses challenges in developing algorithms for treatment of peripheral arthritis in PsA.

Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a pegylated humanized tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Europe, the USA, and Latin American countries. CZP neutralizes TNF-α at its soluble and membrane portions. Due to the lack of Fc region, it does not induce complement or antibody-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro, unlike other TNFi. RAPID-PsA study, the only randomized clinical trial performed in PsA, is a Phase III clinical trial conducted in 409 PsA patients during 24 weeks. Patients were randomized to CZP (200 mg every 2 weeks or 400 mg every 4 weeks) or placebo. Patients in CZP arms reported improvements in skin disease, joint involvement, dactylitis, enthesitis, and quality of life. Safety profile was similar to that reported for other TNF-α inhibitors in PsA patients. This article summarizes the pharmacology and reviews the efficacy and tolerability of this drug in PsA. CZP is the newest TNFi with proved efficacy in all manifestations of psoriasis disease, except for axial involvement where the evidence has been derived from response to axial spondyloarthritis.