Search

The uptake of predictive DNA testing in families with a hereditary disease is

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: Inherited cardiac conditions present with a wide range of symptoms and may even result in sudden cardiac death. Relatives of probands with a confirmed pathogenic genetic variant are advised predictive DNA testing to enable prevention and treatment. In 2 previous cohort studies of 115 probands with a pathogenic variant, family uptake of genetic counseling was assessed in the first year(s) after test result disclosure to the proband. This study assesses uptake in these cohorts in the 14 to 23 years following disclosure. Methods: Uptake was determined retrospectively using patient records. First-degree relatives, and second-degree relatives of a deceased first-degree relative suspected of having an inherited cardiac condition, were considered eligible. Results: Of 717 eligible relatives (598 first-degree and 119 second-degree relatives), 60% attended genetic counseling. Most of them (68.6%) attended genetic counseling in the first year. A total of 98.4% of counseled relatives pursued predictive DNA testing. A total of 49.2% was identified as carrier. Median time between disclosure to the proband and counseling of relatives was 6 months (range: 0–187 months). Attending genetic counseling was observed more frequently in first-degree relatives, female relatives, primary arrhythmia syndromes, relatives with manifest inherited cardiac condition, relatives without children and families with sudden cardiac death in first-degree relatives

Chromosomal microarray analysis is an important diagnostic tool to identify copy number variations (CNV). Some of the CNVs affect susceptibility regions, which means that deletions or duplications in these regions have partial penetrance and often give an increased risk for a spectrum of neurocognitive disorders. Not much is known about the impact of rare CNV susceptibility syndromes on the life of patients or their parents. In this study, we focus on one specific susceptibility CNV disorder, 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. This rare condition is characterised by an increased risk of mild intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, and obesity. We aimed to explore the impact of such a disorder on the family members involved in the daily care of children with this syndrome. Three focus group discussions were held with 23 Dutch (grand)parents. Thematic analysis was performed by two independent researchers. The following five themes emerged: (1) the end of a diagnostic odyssey and response to the diagnosis, (2) after the diagnosis-life with a child with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome, (3) access to medical care and support services, (4) nobody knows what 16p11.2 deletion syndrome is, and (5) future perspective-ideal care. The participants experienced a lack of knowledge among involved professionals. Together with the large variability of the syndrome, this led to fragmented care and unfulfilled needs regarding healthcare, social, and/or educational assistance. Care for children with a CNV susceptibility syndrome could be improved by a multidisciplinary approach or central healthcare professional, providing education and information for all involved professionals.

Background Thorough investigation of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in those aged 1–40 years commonly reveals a heritable cause, yet access to postmortem genetic testing is variable. Objective The purpose of this study was to explore practices of postmortem genetic testing and attitudes of health care professionals worldwide. Methods A survey was administered among health care professionals recruited through professional associations, social media, and networks of researchers. Topics included practices around postmortem genetic testing, level of confidence in health care professionals’ ability, and attitudes toward postmortem genetic testing practices. Results There were 112 respondents, with 93% from North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand, and 7% from South America, Asia and Africa. Only 30% reported autopsy as mandatory, and overall practices were largely case by case and not standardized. North American respondents (87%) more often perceived practices as ineffective compared to those from Europe (58%) and Australia/New Zealand (48%; P = .002). Where a heritable cause is suspected, 69% considered postmortem genetic testing and 61% offered genetic counseling to surviving family members. Financial resources varied widely. Half of participants believed practices in their countries perpetuated health inequalities. Conclusion Postmortem genetic testing is not consistently available in the investigation of young SCD despite being a recommendation in international guidelines. Access to postmortem genetic testing, which is critical in ascertaining a cause of death in many cases, must be guided by well-resourced, multidisciplinary teams.

BackgroundGenetic heart diseases often affect young people, can be clinically heterogeneous and pose an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a lifesaving therapy. Impacts on prospective and long-term psychological and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) after ICD implant in patients with genetic heart diseases are unknown. We investigate the psychological functioning and HR-QoL over time in patients with genetic heart diseases who receive an ICD, and identify risk factors for poor psychological functioning and HR-QoL.MethodsA longitudinal, prospective study design was used. Patients attending a specialised clinic and diagnosed with a genetic heart disease, for which they received an ICD between May 2012 and January 2015, were eligible. Baseline surveys were completed prior to ICD implantation with five-year follow-up after ICD implant. We measured psychological functioning (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, Florida Shock Anxiety Scale), HR-QoL (Short-Form 36v2) and device acceptance (Florida Patient Acceptance Scale).ResultsThere were 40 patients with an inherited cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia syndrome included (mean age 46.3 ± 14.2 years; 65.0% males). Mean psychological and HR-QoL measures were within normative ranges during follow-up. After 12 months, 33.3% and 19.4% of participants showed clinically elevated levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. Longitudinal mixed effect analysis showed significant improvements from baseline to first follow-up for the overall cohort, with variability increasing after 36 months. Low education and female gender predicted worse mental HR-QoL and anxiety over time, while comorbidities predicted depression and worse physical HR-QoL.ConclusionWhile the majority of patients with a genetic heart disease adjust well to their ICD implant, a subset of patients’ experience poor psychological and HR-QoL outcomes.

If undetected, inherited cardiac conditions can lead to sudden cardiac death, while treatment options are available. Predictive DNA testing is therefore advised for at-risk relatives, and probands are currently asked to inform relatives about this. However, fewer than half of relatives attend genetic counselling. In this trial, we compared a tailored approach to informing relatives, in which probands were asked whether they preferred relatives to be informed by themselves or by the genetic counsellor, with current practice. Our primary outcome was uptake of genetic counselling in relatives in the first year after test result disclosure. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of the approach and impact on psychological/family functioning measured 3 (T1) and 9 (T2) months post-disclosure via telephone interviews and questionnaires. We included 96 probands; 482 relatives were eligible for counselling and genetic testing. We observed no significant difference in uptake of genetic counselling between the control (38%) and the intervention (37%) group (p = 0.973). Nor were there significant differences between groups in impact on family/psychological functioning. Significantly more probands in the tailored group were satisfied (p = 0.001) and felt supported (p = 0.003) by the approach, although they also felt somewhat coerced to inform relatives (p < 0.001) and perceived room for improvement (p < 0.001). To conclude, we observed no differences in uptake and impact on family/psychological functioning between the current and tailored approach, but probands in the tailored group more often felt satisfied. Further research on barriers to relatives attending genetic counselling and on how to optimize the provision of a tailored approach is needed.

PurposeThorough investigation of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in those aged 1-40 years commonly reveals a heritable cause, yet access to postmortem genetic testing is variable. We explore practices of postmortem genetic testing and attitudes of healthcare professionals worldwide.MethodsA survey was administered among healthcare professionals recruited through professional associations, social media and networks of researchers. Topics included practices around postmortem genetic testing, level of confidence in healthcare professionals’ ability, and attitudes towards postmortem genetic testing practices.ResultsThere were 112 respondents, with 93% from North America, Europe and Australia and 7% from South America, Asia and Africa. Only 30% reported autopsy as mandatory, and overall practices were largely case-by-case and not standardised. North American respondents (87%) more often perceived practices as ineffective compared to those from Europe (58%) and Australia/New Zealand (48%, p=0.002). Where a heritable cause is suspected, 69% considered postmortem genetic testing and 61% offered genetic counseling to surviving family members; financial resources varied widely. Half believed practices in their countries perpetuated health inequalities.ConclusionPostmortem genetic testing is not consistently available in the investigation of young SCD despite being a recommendation in international guidelines. Access to postmortem genetic testing, guided by well-resourced multidisciplinary teams, is critical in ascertaining a cause of death in many cases.

Inherited cardiac conditions (ICCs) can lead to sudden cardiac death at young age, even without previous symptoms, yet often remain undetected. To prevent sudden cardiac death, cardiac monitoring and/or predictive DNA testing is advised for at-risk relatives. Probands in whom a causal variant is detected are asked to inform their relatives about the possibility of testing, often supported by a family letter. This qualitative study investigates experiences with and attitudes toward this family-mediated approach in ICCs and explores whether and how improvements can be made. Two online focus groups were conducted with 28 healthcare professionals (HCPs) from various disciplines, as were 25 face-to-face semi-structured interviews with counselees (10 probands; 15 relatives). Data were analysed by two researchers independently using a thematic approach. Participants, both HCPs and counselees, preferred that probands inform relatives about genetic risks in ICCs, but both groups struggled with the dependency on and burden on probands to inform their relatives. To overcome this, HCPs do see a more active role for themselves in informing relatives, but prefer uniformity in procedures in order to maintain their workload. Counselees, on the other hand, prefer a tailored information provision strategy adjusted to family dynamics and the personality characteristics of relatives. In conclusion, although it is generally preferred that probands inform relatives themselves, a more active role of HCPs could be considered to overcome the dependency and burden on probands. Further research is needed to study how HCPs can engage more actively in informing at-risk relatives in current clinical genetic practise.

IntroductionIn current practice, probands are asked to inform relatives about the possibility of predictive DNA testing when a pathogenic variant causing an inherited cardiac condition (ICC) is identified. Previous research on the uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing in relatives suggests that not all relatives are sufficiently informed. We developed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored approach in which probands decide together with the genetic counsellor which relatives they inform themselves and which relatives they prefer to have informed by the genetic counsellor. Here, we present the study protocol of this randomised controlled trial.MethodsA multicentre randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design will be conducted in which an intervention group receiving the tailored approach will be compared with a control group receiving usual care. Adult probands diagnosed with an ICC in whom a likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant is identified will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (total sample: n=85 probands). Primary outcomes are uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing by relatives (total sample: n=340 relatives). Secondary outcomes are appreciation of the approach used and impact on familial and psychological functioning, which will be assessed using questionnaires. Relatives who attend genetic counselling will be asked to fill out a questionnaire as well.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centres (MEC 2017-145), the Netherlands. All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation in the study. Results of the study on primary and secondary outcome measures will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNTR6657; Pre-results.