1. Additional diagnostic value of new CT imaging techniques for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
- Author
-
Christophe Bauters, Lydia Guittet, Martial Hamon, Damien Geindreau, and Michèle Hamon
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Computed Tomography Angiography ,Perfusion scanning ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Fractional flow reserve ,Coronary Angiography ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Coronary artery disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Myocardial perfusion imaging ,0302 clinical medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Computer Simulation ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Computed tomography angiography ,Neuroradiology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Coronary Stenosis ,Hemodynamics ,Myocardial Perfusion Imaging ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
To determine the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomography (CT)–based modalities including coronary CT angiography (CTA), stress myocardial CT perfusion (stress CTP), computer simulation of fractional flow reserve by CT (FFRCT), and transluminal attenuation gradients (TAG), for the diagnosis of hemodynamic significant coronary artery disease (CAD), using invasive fractional flow reserve as the reference standard. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for original articles until July 2018. Diagnostic accuracy results were pooled at per-patient and per-vessel level using random effect models. Fifty articles were included in the meta-analysis (3024 subjects). The per-patient analysis per imaging modality demonstrated a pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 1.78 (95% confidence interval CI 1.49–2.11), 4.58 (95% CI 3.54–5.91), and 3.45 (95% CI 2.38–5.00) for CTA, stress CTP, and FFRCT respectively. Per-patient specificity of stress CTP (82%, 95% CI 76–86) and FFRCT (72%, 95% CI 68–76) were higher than for CTA (48%, 95% CI 44–51). At the vessel level, PLR was 2.42 (95% CI 1.93–3.02), 7.72 (95% CI 5.50–10.83), 3.50 (95% CI 2.73–4.78), 1.97 (95% CI 1.32–2.93) for CTA, stress CTP, FFRCT, and TAG respectively. With improved PLR and specificity, stress CTP and FFRCT have incremental value over CTA for the detection of functionally significant CAD. • New functional CT imaging techniques, such as stress CTP and FFRCT, improve diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA to predict hemodynamically relevant stenosis. • TAG yields poor diagnostic performance. • Combination of CTA and some functional CT techniques (stress CTP and FFRCT) might become a “must” to improve diagnostic accuracy of CAD and to reduce unnecessary invasive coronary angiography.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF