Search

PURPOSE: Patients with pneumonia often present to the emergency department and require prompt diagnosis and treatment. Clinical decision support systems for the diagnosis and management of pneumonia are commonly utilized in emergency departments to improve patient care. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a deep learning model for detecting radiographic pneumonia and pleural effusions can improve functionality of a clinical decision support system for pneumonia management (ePNa) operating in 20 emergency departments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a dataset of 7,434 prior chest radiographic studies from 6,551 emergency department patients was used to develop and validate a deep learning model to identify radiographic pneumonia, pleural effusions, and evidence of multilobar pneumonia. Model performance was evaluated against three radiologists’ adjudicated interpretation and compared to performance of the natural language processing of radiology reports used by ePNa. RESULTS: The deep learning model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.833 (95% CI 0.795, 0.868) for detecting radiographic pneumonia, 0.939 (95% CI 0.911, 0.962) for detecting pleural effusions, and 0.847 (95% CI 0.800, 0.890) for identifying multilobar pneumonia. On all three tasks, the model achieved higher agreement with the adjudicated radiologist interpretation compared to ePNa. CONCLUSIONS: A deep learning model demonstrated higher agreement with radiologists than the ePNa clinical decision support system in detecting radiographic pneumonia and related findings. Incorporating deep learning models into pneumonia clinical decision support systems could enhance diagnostic performance and improve pneumonia management.

Pneumonia causes a significant burden of disease worldwide. Although all populations are at risk of pneumonia, those at extremes of age and those with immunosuppressive disorders, underlying respiratory disease, and critical illness are particularly vulnerable. Although clinical practice guidelines addressing the management and treatment of pneumonia exist, few of the supporting studies focus on the crucial contributions of the host in pneumonia pathogenesis and recovery. Such essential considerations include the host risk factors that lead to susceptibility to lung infections; biomarkers reflecting the host response and the means to pursue host-directed pneumonia therapy; systemic effects of pneumonia on the host; and long-term health outcomes after pneumonia. To address these gaps, the Pneumonia Working Group of the Assembly on Pulmonary Infection and Tuberculosis led a workshop held at the American Thoracic Society meeting in May 2018 with overarching objectives to foster attention, stimulate research, and promote funding for short-term and long-term investigations into the host contributions to pneumonia. The workshop involved participants from various disciplines with expertise in lung infection, pneumonia, sepsis, immunocompromised patients, translational biology, data science, genomics, systems biology, and clinical trials. This workshop report summarizes the presentations and discussions and important recommendations for future clinical pneumonia studies. These recommendations include establishing consensus disease and outcome definitions, improved phenotyping, development of clinical study networks, standardized data and biospecimen collection and protocols, and development of innovative trial designs.

Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines have improved the treatment and outcomes of patients with CAP, primarily by standardization of initial empirical therapy. But current society-published guidelines exclude immunocompromised patients. Research Question There is no consensus regarding the initial treatment of immunocompromised patients with suspected CAP. Study Design and Methods This consensus document was created by a multidisciplinary panel of 45 physicians with experience in the treatment of CAP in immunocompromised patients. The Delphi survey methodology was used to reach consensus. Results The panel focused on 21 questions addressing initial management strategies. The panel achieved consensus in defining the population, site of care, likely pathogens, microbiologic workup, general principles of empirical therapy, and empirical therapy for specific pathogens. Interpretation This document offers general suggestions for the initial treatment of the immunocompromised patient who arrives at the hospital with pneumonia.

Background: This document provides evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the management of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel conducted pragmatic systematic reviews of the relevant research and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology for clinical recommendations. Results: The panel addressed 16 specific areas for recommendations spanning questions of diagnostic testing, determination of site of care, selection of initial empiric antibiotic therapy, and subsequent management decisions. Although some recommendations remain unchanged from the 2007 guideline, the availability of results from new therapeutic trials and epidemiological investigations led to revised recommendations for empiric treatment strategies and additional management decisions. Conclusions: The panel formulated and provided the rationale for recommendations on selected diagnostic and treatment strategies for adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Our purpose is to describe aspiration pneumonia/pneumonitis as a spectrum of infectious/noninfectious diseases affecting the lung. We summarize diagnosis, risk factors, treatment, and strategies for prevention of aspiration.Aspiration is present in normal individuals, and disease manifestation depends on the chemical characteristics, frequency, and volume of inoculum. Anaerobes, though present, are no longer the predominant microbes isolated in aspiration pneumonia. Targets for preventing aspiration including improved oral hygiene and positional feeding have had mixed results. Patients diagnosed by clinicians with aspiration pneumonia experience greater morbidity and mortality than patients with community-acquired pneumonia.Aspiration pneumonia and pneumonitis are part of the pneumonia continuum and share similarities in pathophysiology, microbiology, and treatment. Modern microbiology demonstrates that the lung is not sterile, and isolates in aspiration pneumonia frequently include aerobes or mixed cultures. Treatment for aspiration pneumonia should include antibiotic coverage for oral anaerobes, aerobes associated with community-acquired pneumonia, and resistant organisms depending on appropriate clinical context. Additional studies targeting prevention of aspiration and investigating the increased morbidity and mortality associated with aspiration pneumonia are warranted.

Rationale: Computerized severity assessment for community-acquired pneumonia could improve consistency and reduce clinician burden. Objectives: To develop and compare 30-day mortality-prediction mo...

PURPOSE: Electronic clinical decision support (CDS) for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (ePNa) is associated with improved guideline adherence and decreased mortality. How rural providers respond to CDS developed for urban hospitals could shed light on extending CDS to resource-limited settings. METHODS: ePNa was deployed into 10 rural and critical access hospital emergency departments (EDs) in Utah and Idaho in 2018. We reviewed pneumonia cases identified through ICD-10 codes after local deployment to measure ePNa utilization and guideline adherence. ED providers were surveyed to assess quantitative and qualitative aspects of satisfaction. FINDINGS: ePNa was used in 109/301 patients with pneumonia (36%, range 0%−67% across hospitals) and was associated with appropriate antibiotic selection (93% vs 65%, P < .001). Fifty percent of survey recipients responded, 87% were physicians, 87% were men, and the median ED experience was 10 years. Mean satisfaction with ePNa was 3.3 (range 1.7–4.8) on a 5-point Likert scale. Providers with a favorable opinion of ePNa were more likely to favor implementation of additional CDS (P = .005). Satisfaction was not associated with provider type, age, years of experience or experience with ePNa. Ninety percent of respondents provided qualitative feedback. The most common theme in high and low utilization hospitals was concern about usability. Compared to high utilization hospitals, low utilization hospitals more frequently identified concerns about adaptation for local needs. CONCLUSIONS: ePNa deployment to rural and critical access EDs was moderately successful and associated with improved antibiotic use. Concerns about usability and adapting ePNa for local use predominated the qualitative feedback.

Introduction: The ATS/IDSA severe community acquired pneumonia minor criteria (sCAP) predict mortality and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. (AJRCCM 2019 200:7 e45) Though recommended in guidelines, use of sCAP to guide emergency department (ED) physicians with disposition has not been studied. Objectives: Evaluate whether sCAP-based guidance within electronic clinical decision support (ePNa) improves 30-day mortality and decreases inappropriate disposition (≥3 criteria admitted to general ward or Methods: Secondary analysis of 2864 patients admitted to 4 urban hospitals in Utah, USA from 2009-2015 identified by ICD-9 codes for pneumonia with imaging confirmation. Those needing vasopressors or mechanical ventilation on admission were excluded. sCAP guided disposition became available in 2011. Mortality and disposition were adjusted for risk by logistic regression; length of stay (LOS) and cost by linear regression. Results: 30-day mortality was 64/684 (9.3%) vs 205/2180 (9.4%) after sCAP; inappropriate disposition to ICU was 39/684 (5.7%) vs 184/2180 (8.4%). Inappropriate disposition to hospital ward did not change 30/685 (4.4%) vs 95/2180 (4.4%). Adjusted change in composite endpoint was not significant (p=0.136). ePNa use was associated with lower total cost (p=0.015) and shorter LOS (p=0.008). Conclusions: In 4 Utah hospitals, sCAP score within ePNa was not associated with improved 30-day mortality and disposition, and inappropriate disposition to the ICU slightly increased. ePNa use may contribute to decreased cost and shorter LOS.

Introduction: ePNa open loop, electronic clinical decision support improved mortality and disposition for emergency department (ED) community-acquired pneumonia patients in 4 intervention hospitals vs 3 usual care hospitals (Annals EM 2015 66:511). ePNa provides ED clinicians with support for diagnosis and objective severity measurement, then disposition and antibiotic recommendations based on the DRIP score. We rolled out ePNa across 16 additional Intermountain Healthcare (Utah, USA) Hospitals beginning 2018 in a stepwise implementation trial. Objectives: Evaluate whether ePNa might improve clinical outcomes in a diverse group of non-teaching hospitals. Methods: 7293 ED patients >18 years 2017 to 2019 with complete data were identified electronically by ICD-10 codes; patients without confirmatory chest imaging (CheXED, Stanford AI model) were excluded. Results: Median age was 67 (IQR 52-79) years, 48% female. ePNa: use by clinicians averaged 47.4% after rollout but varied from 10% to 92% by month and hospital. Intention to treat analysis showed 30-day mortality of 5% (146/3101) vs 10% (417/4192) before rollout; outpatient disposition increased from 21% vs 48%. 7-day secondary hospitalization was 1% vs 3% after rollout. 30-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower after severity adjustment (electronicCURB, age, PaO2/FiO2, pleural effusion, HCAP, gender) by logistic regression (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46,0.69, p Conclusions: Rollout of ePNa clinical decision support into 16 hospital ED was associated with decreased mortality and hospital admission among pneumonia patients. We plan further interventions to increase ePNa use by ED clinicians.

Pneumonia continues to be a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality. Implementation of health information technology (HIT) can lead to cost savings and improved care. In this review, we examine the literature on the use of HIT in the management of community-acquired pneumonia. We also discuss barriers to adoption of technology in managing pneumonia, the reliability and quality of electronic health data in pneumonia research, how technology has assisted pneumonia diagnosis and outcomes research. The goal of using HIT is to develop and deploy generalizable, real-time, computerized clinical decision support integrated into usual pneumonia care. A friendly user interface that does not disrupt efficiency and demonstrates improved clinical outcomes should result in widespread adoption.

Introduction: Chest imaging is required for diagnosis and treatment of emergency department (ED) patients with pneumonia. However, radiologist interpretations are often delayed and don’t identify key findings needed by clinicians. Natural language processing (NLP) of radiology reports caused frequent errors within our electronic clinical decision support tool (ePNa;Dean JAMA IM 2013). We hypothesized that real-time electronic interpretation of digital chest images using artificial intelligence would overcome these limitations. Methods: A deep learning algorithm developed using 188,000 chest studies from Stanford (CheXpert; Irvin AAAI 2019) was fine-tuned on 7,000 and validated on 352 Utah ED chest images. The comparator was studies interpreted by practicing radiologists categorized by 3 clinicians as likely/possible/unlikely for pneumonia and other elements. Simple agreement between clinicians was only 0.85 to 0.9, illustrating the limitations of radiologist reports. Results: Study population of the validation set was 54.8% female, median age 57.0 +/- SD 19.7; 39.2% had pneumonia. Algorithm area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for radiographic pneumonia was 0.90, multi-lobar 0.79, pleural effusion 0.88. NLP of radiology reports performed similarly, with sensitivity and specificity for pneumonia (0.91, 0.64), multi-lobar (0.85, 0.59), and effusion (0.64, 0.93) lying on or near the corresponding model ROC curves. Conclusion: CheXpert image interpretation showed good correlation with categorized radiology reports in ED patients suspected of pneumonia, and will likely improve both ED pneumonia care and ePNa performance.

Guidelines recommend a switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics once patients who are hospitalized with pneumonia achieve clinical stability. However, little evidence guides the selection of an oral antibiotic for patients with health care-associated pneumonia, especially where no microbiological diagnosis is made.To compare outcomes between patients who were transitioned to broad- versus narrow-spectrum oral antibiotics after initially receiving broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic coverage.We performed a secondary analysis of an existing database of adults with community-onset pneumonia admitted to seven Utah hospitals. We identified 220 inpatients with microbiology-negative health care-associated pneumonia from 2010 to 2012. After excluding inpatient deaths and treatment failures, 173 patients remained in which broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were transitioned to an oral regimen. We classified oral regimens as broad-spectrum (fluoroquinolone) versus narrow-spectrum (usually a β-lactam). We compared demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. Using a multivariable regression model, we adjusted outcomes by severity (electronically calculated CURB-65), comorbidity (Charlson Index), time to clinical stability, and length of intravenous therapy.Age, severity, comorbidity, length of intravenous therapy, and clinical response were similar between the two groups. Observed 30-day readmission (11.9 vs. 21.4%; P = 0.26) and 30-day all-cause mortality (2.3 vs. 5.3%; P = 0.68) were also similar between the narrow and broad oral antibiotic groups. In multivariable analysis, we found no statistically significant differences for adjusted odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-5.2; P = 0.61) or 30-day all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-1.6; P = 0.26) between narrow and broad oral antibiotic groups.On the basis of analysis of a limited number of patients observed retrospectively, our findings suggest that it may be safe to switch from broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic coverage to a narrow-spectrum oral antibiotic once clinical stability is achieved for hospitalized patients with health care-associated pneumonia when no microbiological diagnosis is made. A larger retrospective study with propensity matching or regression-adjusted test of equivalence or ideally a prospective comparative effectiveness study will be necessary to confirm our observations.

The health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) criteria have a limited ability to predict pneumonia caused by drug-resistant bacteria and favor the overutilization of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We aimed to derive and validate a clinical prediction score with an improved ability to predict the risk of pneumonia due to drug-resistant pathogens compared to that of HCAP criteria. A derivation cohort of 200 microbiologically confirmed pneumonia cases in 2011 and 2012 was identified retrospectively. Risk factors for pneumonia due to drug-resistant pathogens were evaluated by logistic regression, and a novel prediction score (the drug resistance in pneumonia [DRIP] score) was derived. The score was then validated in a prospective, observational cohort of 200 microbiologically confirmed cases of pneumonia at four U.S. centers in 2013 and 2014. The DRIP score (area under the receiver operator curve [AUROC], 0.88 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.82 to 0.93]) performed significantly better ( P = 0.02) than the HCAP criteria (AUROC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.79]). At a threshold of ≥4 points, the DRIP score demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.87), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.78), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93). By comparison, the performance of HCAP criteria was less favorable: sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.88), specificity was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.73), PPV was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.63), and NPV was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.92). The overall accuracy of the HCAP criteria was 69.5% (95% CI, 62.5 to 75.7%), whereas that of the DRIP score was 81.5% (95% CI, 74.2 to 85.6%) ( P = 0.005). Unnecessary extended-spectrum antibiotics were recommended 46% less frequently by applying the DRIP score (25/200, 12.5%) than by use of HCAP criteria (47/200, 23.5%) ( P = 0.004), without increasing the rate at which inadequate treatment recommendations were made. The DRIP score was more predictive of the risk of pneumonia due to drug-resistant pathogens than HCAP criteria and may have the potential to decrease antibiotic overutilization in patients with pneumonia. Validation in larger cohorts of patients with pneumonia due to all causes is necessary.

Successful treatment of life-threatening community-acquired pneumonia requires appropriate empiric antibiotic coverage. But using conventional diagnostic techniques, a microbiological diagnosis is often not achieved. The diagnostic usefulness of tracheal aspirate at the time of intubation in patients with severe pneumonia has not been well studied.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of tracheal aspirate culture in identifying pneumonia pathogens.We identified all patients older than 18 years of age with International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes and radiographic evidence of pneumonia seen in the emergency departments at 2 university-affiliated Utah hospitals from December 2009 to November 2010 and from December 2011 to November 2012. Patients intubated within 24 hours of arrival were then identified electronically. Postintubation orders instructed respiratory therapists to obtain tracheal aspirate for culture. All culture results were reviewed individually and defined as positive if a pneumonia pathogen was identified. Results of other microbiology studies were obtained from the electronic medical record.Of 2,011 patients with pneumonia, 94 were intubated and 84 had a tracheal aspirate obtained. Of these 84 patients, 47 (56%) had a pulmonary pathogen identified by tracheal aspirate culture, 80 also had blood cultures, and 71 underwent Pneumococcal and Legionella urinary antigen testing. A microbiological diagnosis was made in 55 patients (65.5%) by any diagnostic method. In 39% of patients (32 of 82), the tracheal aspirate culture was the only positive test, resulting in a unique microbiological diagnosis in patients who would have otherwise been classified as "culture negative."Tracheal aspirate cultures obtained as part of routine care identified a plausible pneumonia pathogen in more than one-half of emergency department adult patients with severe pneumonia requiring intubation. Tracheal aspirate culture offers important additive diagnostic value to other routine tests.

QuestionIs broad-spectrum antibiotic use associated with poor outcomes in community-onset pneumonia after adjusting for confounders?MethodsWe performed a retrospective, observational cohort study of 1995 adults with pneumonia admitted from four US hospital emergency departments. We used multivariable regressions to investigate the effect of broad-spectrum antibiotics on 30-day mortality, length of stay, cost and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). To address indication bias, we developed a propensity score using multilevel (individual provider) generalised linear mixed models to perform inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to estimate the average treatment effect in the treated. We also manually reviewed a sample of mortality cases for antibiotic-associated adverse events.Results39.7% of patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics, but drug-resistant pathogens were recovered in only 3%. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were associated with increased mortality in both the unweighted multivariable model (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.5–5.9; pConclusionBroad-spectrum antibiotics appear to be associated with increased mortality and other poor outcomes in community-onset pneumonia.

To guide rational antibiotic selection in community-onset pneumonia, we previously derived and validated a novel prediction tool, the Drug-Resistance in Pneumonia (DRIP) score. In 2015, the DRIP score was integrated into an existing electronic pneumonia clinical decision support tool (ePNa).We conducted a quasi-experimental, pre-post implementation study of ePNa with DRIP score (2015) vs ePNa with health-care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) logic (2012) in ED patients admitted with community-onset pneumonia to four US hospitals. Using generalized linear models, we used the difference-in-differences method to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated with respect to ePNa with DRIP score on broad-spectrum antibiotic use, mortality, hospital stay, and cost, adjusting for available patient-level confounders.We analyzed 2,169 adult admissions: 1,122 in 2012 and 1,047 in 2015. A drug-resistant pathogen was recovered in 3.2% of patients in 2012 and 2.8% in 2015; inadequate initial empirical antibiotics were prescribed in 1.1% and 0.5%, respectively (P = .12). A broad-spectrum antibiotic was administered in 40.1% of admissions in 2012 and 33.0% in 2015 (P .001). Vancomycin days of therapy per 1,000 patient days in 2012 were 287.3 compared with 238.8 in 2015 (P .001). In the primary analysis, the average treatment effect among patients using the DRIP score was a reduction in broad-spectrum antibiotic use (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98; P = .039). However, the average effects for ePNa with DRIP on mortality, length of stay, and cost were not statistically significant.Electronic calculation of the DRIP score was more effective than HCAP criteria for guiding appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic use in community-onset pneumonia.

Background Local implementation of guidelines for pneumonia care is strongly recommended, but the context of care that affects implementation is poorly understood. In a learning health care system, computerized clinical decision support (CDS) provides an opportunity to both improve and track practice, providing insights into the implementation process. Objectives This article examines physician interactions with a CDS to identify reasons for rejection of guideline recommendations. Methods We implemented a multicenter bedside CDS for the emergency department management of pneumonia that integrated patient data with guideline-based recommendations. We examined the frequency of adoption versus rejection of recommendations for site-of-care and antibiotic selection. We analyzed free-text responses provided by physicians explaining their clinical reasoning for rejection, using concept mapping and thematic analysis. Results Among 1,722 patient episodes, physicians rejected recommendations to send a patient home in 24%, leaving text in 53%; reasons for rejection of the recommendations included additional or alternative diagnoses beyond pneumonia, and comorbidities or signs of physiologic derangement contributing to risk of outpatient failure that were not processed by the CDS. Physicians rejected broad-spectrum antibiotic recommendations in 10%, leaving text in 76%; differences in pathogen risk assessment, additional patient information, concern about antibiotic properties, and admitting physician preferences were given as reasons for rejection. Conclusion While adoption of CDS recommendations for pneumonia was high, physicians rejecting recommendations frequently provided feedback, reporting alternative diagnoses, additional individual patient characteristics, and provider preferences as major reasons for rejection. CDS that collects user feedback is feasible and can contribute to a learning health system.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Objectives: Low tidal volume (= tidal volume ≤ 6 mL/kg, predicted body weight) ventilation using volume control benefits patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Airway pressure release ventilation is an alternative to low tidal volume-volume control ventilation, but the release breaths generated are variable and can exceed tidal volume breaths of low tidal volume-volume control. We evaluate the application of a low tidal volume-compatible airway pressure release ventilation protocol that manages release volumes on both clinical and feasibility endpoints. Design: We designed a prospective randomized trial in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We randomized patients to low tidal volume-volume control, low tidal volume-airway pressure release ventilation, and traditional airway pressure release ventilation with a planned enrollment of 246 patients. The study was stopped early because of low enrollment and inability to consistently achieve tidal volumes less than 6.5 mL/kg in the low tidal volume-airway pressure release ventilation arm. Although the primary clinical study endpoint was Pao2/Fio2 on study day 3, we highlight the feasibility outcomes related to tidal volumes in both arms. Setting: Four Intermountain Healthcare tertiary ICUs. Patients: Adult ICU patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure anticipated to require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Interventions: Low tidal volume-volume control, airway pressure release ventilation, and low tidal volume-airway pressure release ventilation. Measurements and Main Results: We observed wide variability and higher tidal (release for airway pressure release ventilation) volumes in both airway pressure release ventilation (8.6 mL/kg; 95% CI, 7.8–9.6) and low tidal volume-airway pressure release ventilation (8.0; 95% CI, 7.3–8.9) than volume control (6.8; 95% CI, 6.2–7.5; p = 0.005) with no difference between airway pressure release ventilation and low tidal volume-airway pressure release ventilation (p = 0.58). Recognizing the limitations of small sample size, we observed no difference in 52 patients in day 3 Pao2/ Fio2 (p = 0.92). We also observed no significant difference between arms in sedation, vasoactive medications, or occurrence of pneumothorax. Conclusions: Airway pressure release ventilation resulted in release volumes often exceeding 12 mL/kg despite a protocol designed to target low tidal volume ventilation. Current airway pressure release ventilation protocols are unable to achieve consistent and reproducible delivery of low tidal volume ventilation goals. A large-scale efficacy trial of low tidal volume-airway pressure release ventilation is not feasible at this time in the absence of an explicit, generalizable, and reproducible low tidal volume-airway pressure release ventilation protocol.

Background Community-acquired extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL) infections are an evolving public health problem. Identifying predictive risk factors may improve patient management. Methods We identified 251 adult inpatients admitted to a 22-hospital system with an ESBL urinary tract infection (UTI) between 2001 and 2016. Cases were matched 1:1 with controls who had a UTI at admission with non-ESBL Enterobacteriaceae. Cases with a history of ESBL infections or hospitalization within 3 months of index admission were excluded. Univariate and multiple logistic regression were used to identify risk factors associated with ESBL UTIs. Results In univariate analysis, history of repeated UTIs, neurogenic bladder, urinary catheter presence at admission, and exposure to outpatient third-generation cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones within 3 months were associated with higher risk of ESBL UTIs. When controlling for severity of illness and comorbid conditions, history of repeated UTIs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.42–12.66; P < .001), presence of urinary catheter at admission (aOR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.15–4.98; P < .05), and prior antibiotic exposure (aOR, 7.98; 95% CI, 2.92–28.19; P < .001) remained associated with risk of ESBL infection. Conclusions Patients in the community with indwelling urinary catheters, history of recurrent UTIs, or recent antimicrobial use are at higher risk for de novo ESBL Enterobacteriaceae UTIs.

Study objective Despite evidence that guideline adherence improves clinical outcomes, management of pneumonia patients varies in emergency departments (EDs). We study the effect of a real-time, ED, electronic clinical decision support tool that provides clinicians with guideline-recommended decision support for diagnosis, severity assessment, disposition, and antibiotic selection. Methods This was a prospective, controlled, quasi-experimental trial in 7 Intermountain Healthcare hospital EDs in Utah's urban corridor. We studied adults with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and radiographic evidence for pneumonia during 2 periods: baseline (December 2009 through November 2010) and post–tool deployment (December 2011 through November 2012). The tool was deployed at 4 intervention EDs in May 2011, leaving 3 as usual care controls. We compared 30-day, all-cause mortality adjusted for illness severity, using a mixed-effect, logistic regression model. Results The study population comprised 4,758 ED pneumonia patients; 14% had health care–associated pneumonia. Median age was 58 years, 53% were female patients, and 59% were admitted to the hospital. Physicians applied the tool for 62.6% of intervention ED study patients. There was no difference overall in severity-adjusted mortality between intervention and usual care EDs post–tool deployment (odds ratio [OR]=0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 1.16). Post hoc analysis showed that patients with community-acquired pneumonia experienced significantly lower mortality (OR=0.53; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.99), whereas mortality was unchanged among patients with health care–associated pneumonia (OR=1.12; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.8). Patient disposition from the ED postdeployment adhered more to tool recommendations. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility and potential benefit of real-time electronic clinical decision support for ED pneumonia patients.

Background and objective Assessment of oxygenation in patients with community-acquired pneumonia is critical for treatment. The accuracy of percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) determined by pulse oximetry is uncertain, and it has limited value in patients receiving supplemental oxygen. We hypothesized that calculation of partial arterial oxygen concentration/inspired oxygen faction (PaO2/FiO2) from SpO2 by the Ellis or Rice equations might adequately correlate with PaO2/FiO2 measured by arterial blood gases. Methods We studied 1004 patients with pneumonia in the emergency department with simultaneous measurement of SpO2 and PaO2 from two cohorts from Valencia, Spain and Utah, USA. We compared SpO2 with measured SaO2, compared the equations' accuracy in calculating PaO2/FiO2 and determined how often patients would be misclassified at clinically important thresholds. We compared estimated PaO2/FiO2 to measured PaO2/FiO2 using the Spearman correlation. Results Pairwise correlation of SpO2 with SaO2 was moderate (rho = 0.66; P

The relationship between air pollution and pneumonia is poorly understood.To examine relationships between short-term air pollution exposure and number and severity of pneumonia cases along the Wasatch Front in Utah, a region with periodic high levels of outdoor air pollution.We applied time-stratified case-crossover analyses with distributed lag to patients presenting to seven emergency departments with pneumonia over a 2-year period. We compared levels of particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone at patient residences with emergency department cases, hospitalizations, objectively defined severe pneumonia, and mortality. We calculated direct cost impacts of particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter reduction.We evaluated 4,336 pneumonia cases in seven hospitals. Among adults aged 65 years and older, we found consistently positive associations between particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter within 6 days of presentation and instances of pneumonia (Lag Day 1 adjusted odds ratio, 1.35 per 10 μg/mAmong older adults, short-term ambient particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter exposure is associated with more emergency department visits and hospitalizations for pneumonia, severe pneumonia, increased mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Nitrogen dioxide and ozone modestly increase pneumonia risk and illness severity.

Background Aspiration pneumonia is a common disease, although less well characterized than other pneumonia syndromes.

Introduction Use of HCAP criteria for predicting drug-resistance in community-onset pneumonia results in overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We derived and validated an alternative prediction tool (DRIP) (Webb AAC 2016) and integrated it into an electronic decision support tool used in 4 U.S. hospitals. Aims Compare DRIP to HCAP for prediction of drug-resistance and evaluate antibiotic usage and outcomes in a prospective implementation study. Methods Physician use of the electronic tool and calculation of DRIP was optional. For DRIP ≥4 anti-pseudomonal, vancomycin and azithromycin therapy was recommended. We identified two concurrent cohorts from 11/2014 to 10/2015: 1) cases where DRIP was calculated and 2) usual care. We compared observed rates of antibiotic use between groups and used logistic regression to severity adjust outcomes. Results DRIP and usual care comprised 894 and 324 inpatients. Drug resistance incidence was 2.4% and 4%. Severity was higher for usual care. Compared to HCAP, DRIP demonstrated equivalent sensitivity but better specificity. Inadequate therapy was p p = 0.063). Conclusion DRIP use was associated with reduced unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use and LOS, without increased inadequate therapy or mortality.

Introduction: In order to reduce unnecessary clinical variation in pneumonia care, we developed an electronic clinical decision support tool (ePneumonia) to guide diagnosis and management. ePneumonia was deployed in 4 U.S. emergency departments in 2011 (Dean, AnnalsEM 2015). We revised the tool in 2014, replacing HCAP with DRIP (Webb AAC 2016) for risk of antibiotic resistance and changed admission recommendations for equivocal parapneumonic effusion and altitude adjusted PaO2:FiO2. Aims: To evaluate the impact of revised ePneumonia on outcomes in adults with community-onset pneumonia. Methods: Three cohorts were identified by ICD-9 and radiographic review: before ePneumonia (2010), after initial deployment (2012) and post revision, 2015. Regression analyses were used to measure the effect of the initial and revised versions of ePneumonia on in-hospital mortality, length of stay and cost of care after adjusting for demographics, severity and secular trends. Results: 4029 patients were included. Tool usage rate was 62% in 2012 and 60.3% in 2015. ePneumonia was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality either in 2012 (OR 0.55, p=0.065) or 2015 (OR 0.70, p=0.13). ePneumonia was associated with decreased length of stay in both 2012 (coeff 0.065; 95% CI 0.078 to 0.051; p p p p =0.034). Conclusion: Use of the ePneumonia tool was associated with significant reductions in length of stay and cost in patients with community-onset pneumonia.

Aspiration pneumonia is a common syndrome, although less well characterized than other pneumonia syndromes. We describe a large population of patients with aspiration pneumonia.In this retrospective population study, we queried the electronic medical records at a tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital from 1996 to 2006. Patients were initially identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 507.x; subsequent physician chart review excluded patients with aspiration pneumonitis and those without a confirmatory radiograph. Patients with community-acquired aspiration pneumonia were compared to a contemporaneous population of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients. We compared CURB-65 (a clinical prediction rule based on Confusion, Uremia, Respiratory rate, Blood Pressure, and age)-predicted mortality with actual 30-day mortality.We identified 628 patients with aspiration pneumonia, of which 510 were community-acquired. Median age was 77 years, with 30-day mortality of 21%. Compared to CAP patients, patients with community-acquired aspiration pneumonia had more frequent inpatient admission (99% vs 58%) and intensive care unit admission (38% vs 14%), higher Charlson comorbidity index (3 vs 1), and higher prevalence of do not resuscitate/intubate orders (24% vs 11%). CURB-65 predicted mortality poorly in aspiration pneumonia patients (area under the curve, 0.66).Patients with community-acquired aspiration pneumonia are older, have more comorbidities, and demonstrate higher mortality than CAP patients, even after adjustment for age and comorbidities. CURB-65 poorly predicts mortality in this population.

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) combined with influenza is the eighth leading cause of death in the United States. This article examines the literature to understand and describe whether technology implementation has impacted the outcomes of patients with CAP. We conducted an electronic search of PubMed and scanned references of articles meeting inclusion criteria. Twenty-six articles were included in this review. We surveyed this literature for answers to the following questions: Can technology be used to improve quality of care and guideline compliance in CAP? How can we overcome the behavioral bottleneck that prevents adoption of computerized decision support systems? How reliable are our data in the era of electronic medical records? What are the risks associated with technology implementation? No articles demonstrated that technology implementation improves outcomes in the care of patients with CAP.

Study objective We examine variability among emergency physicians in rate of hospitalization for patients with pneumonia and the effect of variability on clinical outcomes. Methods We studied 2,069 LDS Hospital emergency department (ED) patients with community-acquired pneumonia who were aged 18 years or older during 1996 to 2006, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding and compatible chest radiographs. We extracted vital signs, laboratory and radiographic results, hospitalization, and outcomes from the electronic medical record. We defined "low severity" as PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio greater than or equal to 280 mm Hg, predicted mortality less than 5% by an electronic version of CURB-65 that uses continuous and weighted elements (eCURB), and less than 3 Infectious Disease Society of America-American Thoracic Society 2007 severe pneumonia minor criteria. We adjusted hospitalization decisions and outcomes for illness severity and patient demographics. Results Initial hospitalization rate was 58%; 10.7% of patients initially treated as outpatients were secondarily hospitalized within 7 days. Median age of admitted patients was 63 years; median eCURB predicted mortality was 2.65% (mean 6.8%) versus 46 years and 0.93% for outpatients. The 18 emergency physicians (average age 44.9 [standard deviation 7.6] years; years in practice 8.4 [standard deviation 6.9]) objectively calculated and documented illness severity in 2.7% of patients. Observed 30-day mortality for inpatients was 6.8% (outpatient mortality 0.34%) and decreased over time. Individual physician admission rates ranged from 38% to 79%, with variability not explained by illness severity, time of day, day of week, resident care in conjunction with an attending physician, or patient or physician demographics. Higher hospitalization rates were not associated with reduced mortality or fewer secondary hospital admissions. Conclusion We observed a 2-fold difference in pneumonia hospitalization rates among emergency physicians, unexplained by objective data.

Accurate severity assessment is crucial to the initial management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, BP, age ≥ 65 years) score contains data that are entered routinely in electronic medical records and are, thus, electronically calculable. The aim of this study was to determine whether an electronically generated severity estimate using CURB-65 elements as continuous and weighted variables better predicts 30-day mortality than the traditional CURB-65.In a retrospective cohort study at a US university-affiliated community teaching hospital, we identified 2,069 patients aged 18 years or older with CAP confirmed by radiographic findings in the ED. CURB-65 elements were extracted from the electronic medical record, and 30-day mortality was identified with the Utah Population Database. Performance of a severity prediction model using continuous and weighted CURB-65 variables was compared with the traditional CURB-65 in the US derivation population and validated in the original 1,048 patients from the CURB-65 international derivation study.The traditional, binary CURB-65 score predicted mortality in the US cohort with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. Our severity prediction model generated from continuous, weighted CURB-65 elements was superior to the traditional CURB-65, with an out-of-bag AUC of 0.86 (P.001). This finding was validated in the international database, with an AUC of 0.85 for the electronic model compared with 0.80 for the traditional CURB-65 (P = .01).Using CURB-65 elements as continuous and weighted data improved prediction of 30-day mortality and could be used as a real-time, electronic decision support tool or to adjust outcomes by severity when comparing processes of care.

Patients with acute lung injury have impaired function of the lung surfactant system. Prior clinical trials have shown that treatment with exogenous recombinant surfactant protein C (rSP-C)-based surfactant results in improvement in blood oxygenation and have suggested that treatment of patients with severe direct lung injury may decrease mortality.Determine the clinical benefit of administering an rSP-C-based synthetic surfactant to patients with severe direct lung injury due to pneumonia or aspiration.A prospective randomized blinded study was performed at 161 centers in 22 countries. Patients were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus up to eight doses of rSP-C surfactant administered over 96 hours (n = 419) or only usual care (n = 424).Mortality to 28 days after treatment, the requirement for mechanical ventilation, and the number of nonpulmonary organ failure-free days were not different between study groups. In contrast to prior studies, there was no improvement in oxygenation in patients receiving surfactant compared with the usual care group. Investigation of the possible reasons underlying the lack of efficacy suggested a partial inactivation of rSP-C surfactant caused by a step of the resuspension process that was introduced with this study.In this study, rSP-C-based surfactant was of no clinical benefit to patients with severe direct lung injury. The unexpected lack of improvement in oxygenation, coupled with the results of in vitro tests, suggest that the administered suspension may have had insufficient surface activity to achieve clinical benefit.

Purpose Strategies to optimally use fluoroquinolones in the hospital setting are reviewed. Summary Fluoroquinolones possess broad-spectrum antimicrobial coverage and are widely used to treat a variety of infections including some serious, life-threatening conditions. Overuse and inappropriate use of fluoroquinolones has led to rapid emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms as well as multidrug-resistant pathogens. Preserving the fluoroquinolone class is important, especially given the lack of new antibiotics currently in clinical development. Maintaining the fluoroquinolone class as a therapeutic option requires the successful implementation of guidelines to promote appropriate, optimal use of these agents. Among many recommendations to control the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship programs offer the most comprehensive solution to gain appropriate antimicrobial prescribing. Effective programs include selection of the most effective agents, specific dosages, frequency of administration, routes of administration, and duration of therapy. Additionally, a dual fluoroquinolone formulary, which typically incorporates one respiratory fluoroquinolone and ciprofloxacin, has been employed to increase the diversity of fluoroquinolone treatment and thus reduce the selective antimicrobial pressure. A combination of antimicrobial stewardship programs and a dual formulary option has been demonstrated to be a good approach to optimize the use of fluoroquinolones in the hospital. Two successful experiences in applying such strategies have been reported; in both cases the empiric fluoroquinolone prescribing was reduced. Conclusion Implementation of aggressive optimization strategies such as the combined use of antimicrobial stewardship programs and a dual fluoroquinolone formulary may maintain the efficacy of fluoroquinolones and preserve their utility for future patients.

Novel 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection has significantly affected ICUs. We sought to characterize our region's clinical findings and demographic associations with ICU admission due to novel A(H1N1).We conducted an observational study from May 19, 2009, to June 30, 2009, of descriptive clinical course, inpatient mortality, financial data, and demographic characteristics of an ICU cohort. A case-control study was used to compare the ICU cohort to Salt Lake County residents.The ICU cohort of 47 influenza patients had a median age of 34 years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 21, and BMI of 35 kg/m2. Mortality was 17% (8/47). All eight deaths occurred among the 64% of patients (n = 30) with ARDS, 26 (87%) of whom also developed multiorgan failure. Compared with the Salt Lake County population, patients with novel A(H1N1) were more likely to be obese (22% vs 74%; P.001), medically uninsured (14% vs 45%; P.001), and Hispanic (13% vs 23%; P.01) or Pacific Islander (1% vs 26%; P.001). Observed ICU admissions were 15-fold greater than expected for those with BMIor = 40 kg/m2 (standardized morbidity ratio 15.8, 95% CI, 8.3-23.4) and 1.5-fold greater than expected among those with BMI of 30 to 39 kg/m(2) for age-adjusted and sex-adjusted rates for Salt Lake County.Severe ARDS with multiorgan dysfunction in the absence of bacterial infection was a common clinical presentation. In this cohort, young nonwhites without medical insurance were disproportionately likely to require ICU care. Obese patients were particularly susceptible to critical illness due to novel A(H1N1) infection.

Summary Aims: Review of the current guidelines for the use of respiratory fluoroquinolones in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods: Data were collected from recent clinical trials on fluoroquinolone therapy in patients with CAP and from updated recommendations of antimicrobial therapy in managing CAP, with a focus on current North American guidelines. Results: Randomised clinical trials of respiratory fluoroquinones (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and gemifloxacin) in the treatment of CAP were identified and analysed. The bacteriology of CAP, and susceptibility rates, resistance rates and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of fluoroquinolones against causative pathogens in CAP, and adverse event profiles of these agents were described. Respiratory fluoroquinones have broad-spectrum antibacterial activities against common causative pathogens in CAP and provide an important treatment option as monotherapy for outpatients with comorbidities and inpatients who are not admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), including those with risk factors of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. For treatment of ICU patients with severe CAP, it is recommended that fluoroquinolones be used in combination with a β-lactam. Recent studies also demonstrated a more rapid resolution of clinical symptoms with the use of highly potent respiratory fluoroquinolones. Discussion: Appropriate use of fluoroquinolone agents may shorten the duration of antimicrobial therapy and the length of hospital stay and contribute to the decreased development of resistance in patients with CAP. Adverse event profiles of these agents should be considered to facilitate the selection of an appropriate fluoroquinolone for appropriate CAP patients. Conclusion: The fluoroquinolone class, specifically those with adequate activity against respiratory pathogens, represents an important and convenient treatment option for patients with CAP.

Purpose of reveiw Empiric antibiotic selection in community-onset pneumonia is complicated by uncertainty regarding risk of drug-resistant pathogens (DRPs). The healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) criteria have limited predictive value and lead to unnecessary antibiotic use. Better methods of predicting risk of DRP and selecting empiric antibiotics are needed. Here we give an update on risk factors for DRP, available risk prediction models, and treatment strategy in patients with pneumonia. Recent findings Evidence supporting factors that contribute to risk of DRP has improved since the advent of HCAP. Many of these risk factors have been reproducibly identified in heterogeneous populations. Newer methods of predicting DRP based on these factors demonstrate better performance than HCAP. Recent innovations include the potential to discriminate between risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other DRP, and use of severity as a modifier of treatment threshold. However, there is wide variation in included predictor variables, and at proposed thresholds most scores still favor overtreatment. Summary Until reliable molecular diagnostics are available, additional development and validation of decision support models integrating local resistance rates, estimated DRP risk, severity, and threshold for anti-DRP antibiotics are needed. Once optimized models are identified, implementation studies will be needed to confirm safety and efficacy.

Pleural effusions are present in 15% to 44% of hospitalized patients with pneumonia. It is unknown whether effusions at first presentation to the ED influence outcomes or should be managed differently.We studied patients in seven hospital EDs with International Statistical Classification of Disease and Health Related Problems-Version 9 codes for pneumonia, or empyema, sepsis, or respiratory failure with secondary pneumonia. Patients with no confirmatory findings on chest imaging were excluded. Pleural effusions were identified with the use of radiographic imaging.Over 24 months, 4,771 of 458,837 adult ED patients fulfilled entry criteria. Among the 690 (14.5%) patients with pleural effusions, their median age was 68 years, and 46% were male. Patients with higher Elixhauser comorbidity scores (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.09-1.18]; P .001), brain natriuretic peptide levels (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.12-1.28]; P .001), bilirubin levels (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.00-1.15]; P = .04), and age (OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.09-1.21]; P .001) were more likely to have parapneumonic effusions. In patients without effusion, electronic version of CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, BP, age ≥ 65 years accurately predicted mortality (4.7% predicted vs 5.0% actual). However, eCURB underestimated mortality in those with effusions (predicted 7.0% vs actual 14.0%; P .001). Patients with effusions were more likely to be admitted (77% vs 57%; P .001) and had a longer hospital stay (median, 2.8 vs 1.3 days; P .001). After severity adjustment, the likelihood of 30-day mortality was greater among patients with effusions (OR, 2.6 [CI, 2.0-3.5]; P .001), and hospital stay was disproportionately longer (coefficient, 0.22 [CI, 0.14-0.29]; P .001).Patients with pneumonia and pleural effusions at ED presentation in this study were more likely to die, be admitted, and had longer hospital stays. Why parapneumonic effusions are associated with adverse outcomes, and whether different management of these patients might improve outcome, needs urgent investigation.

Lionel A. Mandell, Richard G. Wunderink, Antonio Anzueto, John G. Bartlett, G. Douglas Campbell, Nathan C. Dean, Scott F. Dowell, Thomas M. File, Jr. Daniel M. Musher, Michael S. Niederman, Antonio Torres, and Cynthia G. Whitney McMaster University Medical School, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; University of Texas Health Science Center and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, and Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, LDS Hospital, and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown, and Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio; State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, and Department of Medicine, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York; and Cap de Servei de Pneumologia i Allergia Respiratoria, Institut Clinic del Torax, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, CIBER CB06/06/0028, Barcelona, Spain.

Background We previously reported decreased mortality following implementation of a community-acquired pneumonia guideline derived from specialty society recommendations. However, patients with respiratory failure and sepsis from pneumonia were not included, adjustment for comorbidities was limited, and no guideline compliance data were available. We also questioned whether decreased mortality continued after 1997. Methods We utilized Utah data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid from 1993 to 2003 to determine if pneumonia guideline implementation was associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. We adjusted outcomes by age, gender, Deyo comorbidity score, prior hospitalizations, and race. Guideline compliance was measured by initial default guideline antibiotic administration. We included patients ≥ 66 years old with primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 480.0–483.9, 485.0–486.9, 487.0, 507.0 or 518.81, and 038.x with secondary code pneumonia. We excluded patients with prior hospitalization within 10 days, patients with HIV infection or transplant recipients, and patients not treated by physicians closely affiliated with study hospitals. Results Mean (± SD) age of 17,728 pneumonia patients admitted to the hospital was 72.3 ± 12.0 years, 55.2% were female, and 96.0% were white. Within Intermountain Healthcare hospitals, a 1-SD increase (10%) in guideline compliance (range, 61 to 100%) was associated with mortality odds ratio (OR) of 0.92 (95% confidence interval[CI], 0.87 to 0.98; p = 0.007). Mortality OR at 16 Intermountain Healthcare hospitals was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.97; p = 0.007) compared with 19 other Utah hospitals. This mortality difference corresponds to approximately 20 lives saved yearly. The readmission rate was also lower. Conclusion Improved clinical outcomes were associated with pneumonia guideline utilization.

A previously healthy 28-yr-old Caucasian female presented to the emergency department with a 1-week history of generalised body swelling that was followed by pleuritic chest pain radiating to the patient’s back. She had mild shortness of breath, cough and palpitations, but no fever, chills, nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea. No medications were taken except oral contraceptives. She denied any history of tobacco or alcohol use, recent travel or sick contacts. The patient’s vital signs were as follows: 1) blood pressure 135/94 mmHg; 2) body temperature 39.4°C; 3) respiratory rate 16 breaths·min-1; 4) pulse 105 beats·min-1; and 5) oxygen saturation 95%, while breathing room air. Her physical examination was remarkable for decreased breath sounds diffuse with minimal crackles, as well as facial swelling and pitting oedema of the lower extremities. Pertinent laboratory results of the blood tests performed on admission are shown in table 1⇓. View this table: Table 1— Laboratory results of the blood tests After significant respiratory distress, requiring noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit and was started empirically on i.v. ceftriaxone, azithromycin and furosamide. Over the next few days, she remained febrile with worsening hypoxaemia. Her white blood cell count dropped to 2.2×109 cells·L-1 with a haemoglobin level of 90 g·L-1 and platelet count of 82×109 cells·L-1. …

The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy and the impact of 5 different claims-based pneumonia definitions. Three International Classification of Diseases, Version 9, (ICD-9), and 2 diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based case identification algorithms were compared against an independent, clinical pneumonia reference standard. Among 10748 patients, 272 (2.5%) had pneumonia verified by the reference standard. The sensitivity of claims-based algorithms ranged from 47.8% to 66.2%. The positive predictive values ranged from 72.6% to 80.8%. Patient-related variables were not significantly different from the reference standard among the 3 ICD-9-based algorithms. DRG-based algorithms had significantly lower hospital admission rates (57% and 65% vs 73.2%), lower 30-day mortality (5.0% and 5.8% vs 10.7%), shorter length of stay (3.9 and 4.1 days vs 5.6 days), and lower costs (USD $4543 and USD $5159 vs USD $8585). Claims-based identification algorithms for defining pneumonia in administrative databases are imprecise. ICD-9-based algorithms did not influence patient variables in our population. Identifying pneumonia patients with DRG codes is significantly less precise.

Published outcome studies mostly report a positive effect of successfully implemented pneumonia guidelines. Confirmatory studies are needed that use randomized, parallel groups with precisely defined treatments, however. Further research also is needed to develop methodology for more easily providing guideline logic to clinicians at the point of care.