Search

Introduction: Traditional transcutaneous oxygen (tcPO2) measurements are affected by measurement drift, limiting accuracy and usability. The new potentially drift-free oxygen fluorescence quenching technique has been combined in a single sensor with conventional transcutaneous carbon dioxide (tcPCO2) monitoring. This study aimed to validate optical tcPO2 and conventional tcPCO2 against arterial blood gas samples in preterm neonates and determine measurement drift. Methods: In this prospective observational study, during regular care, transcutaneous measurements were paired to arterial blood gases from preterm neonates aged 24–31 weeks of gestational age (GA) with an arterial catheter. Samples were included based on stability criteria and stratified for sepsis status. Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. Measurement drift per hour was calculated. Results: Sixty-eight premature neonates were included {median (interquartile range [IQR]) GA of 26 4/7 [25 3/7–27 5/7] weeks}, resulting in 216 stable paired samples. Agreement of stable samples in neonates without sepsis (n = 38) and with suspected sepsis (n = 112) was acceptable for tcPO2 and good for tcPCO2. However, in stable samples of neonates with sepsis (n = 66), tcPO2 agreement (bias and 95% limits of agreement) was −32.6 (−97.0 to 31.8) mm Hg and tcPCO2 agreement was 4.2 (−10.5 to 18.9) mm Hg. The median (IQR) absolute drift values were 0.058 (0.0231–0.1013) mm Hg/h for tcPO2 and 0.30 (0.11–0.64) mm Hg/h for tcPCO2. Conclusion: The accuracy of optical tcPO2 in premature neonates was acceptable without sepsis, while electrochemically measured tcPCO2 remained accurate under all circumstances. Measurement drift was negligible for tcPO2 and highly acceptable for tcPCO2.

Background: Heart rate (HR) detection in premature infants using electrocardiography (ECG) is challenging due to a low signal amplitude and the fragility of the premature skin. Recently, the dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique has been miniaturized, allowing noninvasive HR measurements with a single sensor. Objective: The aim was to determine the accuracy of DLS for HR measurement in infants, compared to ECG-derived HR. Methods: Stable infants with a gestational age of ≥26 weeks, monitored with ECG, were eligible for inclusion. HR was measured with the DLS sensor at 5 different sites for 15 min each. We recorded every 10th second of the DLS-derived HR and the DLS signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the ECG-derived HR was extracted for analysis. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In the first group, the optimal SNR cut-off value was determined and then applied to the second group to assess agreement. Results: HR measurements from 31 infants were analyzed. ECG-DLS paired data points were collected at the forehead, an upper extremity, the thorax, a lower extremity, and the abdomen. When applying the international accuracy standard for HR detection, DLS accuracy in the first group (n = 15) was optimal at the forehead (SNR cut-off 1.66). Application of this cut-off to the second group (n = 16) showed good agreement between DLS-derived HR and ECG-derived HR (bias –0.73 bpm; 95% limits of agreement –15.46 and 14.00 bpm) at the forehead with approximately 80% (i.e., 1,066/1,310) of all data pairs remaining. Conclusion: The investigated DLS sensor was sensitive to movement, overall providing less accurate HR measurements than ECG and pulse oximetry. In this study population, specific measurement sites provided excellent signal quality and good agreement with ECG-derived HR.