1. Negative Results of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Practice May Vary among Six Molecular Assays in Patients with COVID-19
- Author
-
Ataru Moriya, Ayano Motohashi, Hitoshi Oki, Norio Ohmagari, Kazuhisa Mezaki, Erina Isaka, Satoshi Ide, Keiji Nakamura, Honami Ando, Ayaka Usami, Masami Kurokawa, Hidetoshi Nomoto, Takahito Nakamoto, and Kei Yamamoto
- Subjects
Microbiology (medical) ,Infectivity ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,Concordance ,COVID-19 ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease_cause ,Molecular diagnostics ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Virology ,Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ,Infectious Diseases ,medicine ,Nucleic acid ,Humans ,Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests ,business ,Negative Results ,Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques ,Viral load ,Coronavirus - Abstract
Several commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed. We used six kits available in Japan in 13 NAAT-positive specimens with crossing point values >36 and 7 NAAT-negative specimens from patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19); their results were compared. Specimens positive in ≥2 assays were considered true positive and examined for concordance with specimen results. The SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kit -Multi- (Toyobo M) (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) using extracted RNA had the highest concordance (κ 1.00). This was followed by the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 (Cobas) (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) (κ 0.79). There was a weak correlation between number of negative results for each kit and days between onset and testing (Spearman rank correlation: ρ= 0.44; p
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF