Search

PURPOSE: The purpose of this planning study was to develop an acceptable technique for highly hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB-hHF-RT) for nonmetastatic National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created SIB-hHF-RT plans for 14 nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients with MRI-detectable intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) and without intestines locating close to the seminal vesicle and prostate. We prescribed 57Gy for IPLs and 54Gy for the remainder of planning target volume (PTV) in 15 fractions. The IPLs were contoured based on magnetic resonance imaging, and PTV was generated by adding 6-8-mm margins to the clinical target volume. For the dose-volume constraints of organs at risk (OARs), the same constraints as 54Gy plans were used so as not to increase the toxicity. RESULTS: All created plans fulfilled the dose-volume constraints of all targets and OARs. The median estimated beam-on time was 108.5s. For patient-specific quality assurance, the global gamma passing rates (3%/2mm) with 10% dose threshold criteria were greater than 93% in all cases and greater than 95% in 11 cases. CONCLUSION: SIB-hHF-RT plans were developed that fulfill the acceptable dose-volume constraints and pass patient-specific quality assurance. We believe these plans can be applied to selected patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Background and purpose: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may benefit from the MR-Linac for target definition, patient setup, and motion monitoring. In this planning study, we investigated whether prone or supine position is dosimetrically beneficial for APBI on an MR-Linac and we evaluated patient comfort. Materials and methods: Twenty-patients (9 postoperative, 11 preoperative) with a DCIS or breast tumor

Purpose To investigate the dosimetric accuracy of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images generated by a clinically-ready voxel-based MRI simulation package, and to develop a simple and feasible method to improve the accuracy. Methods 20 patients with brain tumor were selected to undergo CT and MRI simulation. sCT images were generated by a clinical MRI simulation package. The discrepancy between planning CT and sCT in CT number and body contour were evaluated. To resolve the discrepancies, an sCT specific CT-relative electron density (RED) calibration curve was used, and a layer of pseudo-skin was created on the sCT. The dosimetric impact of these discrepancies, and the improvement brought about by the modifications, were evaluated by a planning study. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans for each patient were created and optimized on the planning CT, which were then transferred to the original sCT and the modified-sCT for dose re-calculation. Dosimetric comparisons and gamma analysis between the calculated doses in different images were performed. Results The average gamma passing rate with 1%/1 mm criteria was only 70.8% for the comparison of dose distribution between planning CT and original sCT. The mean dose difference between the planning CT and the original sCT were −1.2% for PTV D95 and −1.7% for PTV Dmax, while the mean dose difference was within 0.7 Gy for all relevant OARs. After applying the modifications on the sCT, the average gamma passing rate was increased to 92.2%. Mean dose difference in PTV D95 and Dmax were reduced to −0.1% and −0.3% respectively. The mean dose difference was within 0.2 Gy for all OAR structures and no statistically significant difference were found. Conclusions The modified-sCT demonstrated improved dosimetric agreement with the planning CT. These results indicated the overall dosimetric accuracy and practicality of this improved MR-based treatment planning method.

Introduction: Limited evidence exists showing the benefit of magnetic resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy treatment planning for anal and rectal cancers. This study aims to assess the impact of MR-only planning on target volumes (TVs) and treatment plan doses to organs at risks (OARs) for anal and rectal cancers versus a computed tomography (CT)-only pathway. Materials and methods: Forty-six patients (29 rectum and 17 anus) undergoing preoperative or radical external beam radiotherapy received CT and T2 MR simulation. TV and OARs were delineated on CT and MR, and volumetric arc therapy treatment plans were optimized independently (53.2 Gy/28 fractions for anus, 45 Gy/25 fractions for rectum). Further treatment plans assessed gross tumor volume (GTV) dose escalation. Differences in TV volumes and OAR doses, in terms of Vx Gy (organ volume (%) receiving x dose (Gy)), were assessed. Results: MR GTV and primary planning TV (PTV) volumes systematically reduced by 13 cc and 98 cc (anus) and 44 cc and 109 cc (rectum) respectively compared to CT volumes. Statistically significant OAR dose reductions versus CT were found for bladder and uterus (rectum) and bladder, penile bulb, and genitalia (anus). With GTV boosting, statistically significant dose reductions were found for sigmoid, small bowel, vagina, and penile bulb (rectum) and vagina (anus). Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence that the introduction of MR (whether through MR-only or CT-MR pathways) to radiotherapy treatment planning for anal and rectal cancers has the potential to improve treatments. MR-related OAR dose reductions may translate into less treatment-related toxicity for patients or greater ability to dose escalate.

Background: Routinely, patient’s planning scans are acquired after administration of iodinized contrast media but they will be treated in the absence of that. Similarly, high energy photons have a better penetrating power, while low energy photons will result in tighter dose distribution and negligible neutron contamination. The aim of the study was to investigate a suitable photon beam energy in the presence of intravenous contrast medium. Materials and methods: An indigenously made original-contrast (OC) phantom was mentioned as virtual-contrast (VC) and virtual-without-contrast (VWC) phantom were generated by assigning the Hounsfield Units (HU) to different structures. Intensity-modulated (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated-arc (VMAT) plans were generated as per criteria of the TG-119 protocol. Results: It was observed that the maximum dose to the spinal cord was better with 6 mega-voltage (MV) in IMRT. The coverage of Prostate PTV (PR PTV) was similar with all the photon energies and was comparable with TG-119, except for original-contrast (OC) phantom using the VMAT technique. Homogeneity-index (HI) was comparatively better for VMAT plans. Conclusion: The contrast CT images lower the dose to targets. IMRT or VMAT plans, generated on such CT images will be delivered with higher doses than evaluated. However, the overdose remains non-significant

We aimed to predict the minimum distance between a tumor and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that can satisfy the dose constraint by creating simulation plans with carbon-ion (C-ion) radiotherapy (RT) and photon RT for each case assuming insertion of virtual spacers of various thicknesses. We enrolled 55 patients with a pelvic tumor adjacent to the GI tract. Virtual spacers were defined as the overlap volume between the GI tract and the volume expanded 7–17 mm from the gross tumor volume (GTV). Simulation plans (70 Gy in 35 fractions for at least 95% of the planning target volume [PTV]) were created with the lowest possible dose to the GI tract under conditions that meet the dose constraints of the PTV. We defined the minimum thickness of virtual spacers meeting D2 cc of the GI tract

Aims Twenty per cent of patients with non-small cell lung cancer present with stage III locally advanced disease. Precision radiotherapy with pencil beam scanning (PBS) protons may improve outcomes. However, stage III is a heterogeneous group and accounting for complex tumour motion is challenging. As yet, it remains unclear as to whom will benefit. In our retrospective planning study, we explored if patients with superior sulcus tumours (SSTs) are a select cohort who might benefit from this treatment. Materials and methods Patients with SSTs treated with radical radiotherapy using four-dimensional planning computed tomography between 2010 and 2015 were identified. Tumour motion was assessed and excluded if greater than 5 mm. Photon volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and PBS proton single-field optimisation plans, with and without inhomogeneity corrections, were generated retrospectively. Robustness analysis was assessed for VMAT and PBS plans involving: (i) 5 mm geometric uncertainty, with an additional 3.5% range uncertainty for proton plans; (ii) verification plans at maximal inhalation and exhalation. Comparative dosimetric and robustness analyses were carried out. Results Ten patients were suitable. The mean clinical target volume D95 was 98.1% ± 0.4 (97.5–98.8) and 98.4% ± 0.2 (98.1–98.9) for PBS and VMAT plans, respectively. All normal tissue tolerances were achieved. The same four PBS and VMAT plans failed robustness assessment. Inhomogeneity corrections minimally impacted proton plan robustness and made it worse in one case. The most important factor affecting target coverage and robustness was the clinical target volume entering the spinal canal. Proton plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose (by 21.9%), lung V5, V10, V20 (by 47.9%, 36.4%, 12.1%, respectively), mean heart dose (by 21.4%) and thoracic vertebra dose (by 29.2%) (P, Highlights • Robust scanning proton plans are feasible in patients with superior sulcus tumours. • Target coverage is comparable to volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans. • Considerable dose reduction to the thoracic vertebra, lungs and heart is possible. • Using an inhomogeneity correction did not improve robustness. • The same proton and photon plans failed robustness assessment.

Background/aim We aimed to investigate the dosimetric effects of a spacer placed between the pancreas and surrounding gastrointestinal structures in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning to provide more effective radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients and methods Treatment planning was performed for six patients with LAPC based on computed tomography images without spacers and with 5-mm or 10-mm spacers virtually inserted under the supervision of a hepatobiliary pancreatic surgeon. The prescription dose was 63 Gy in 28 fractions. Results With the exception of one case of pancreatic head cancer, planning target volume receiving ≥95% of the prescribed dose (PTV V95) was achieved by 90% or more by inserting a spacer, and by 95% or more in all 3 cases of pancreatic body and tail cancer by inserting a 10-mm spacer. Conclusion IMRT with appropriate spacer placement may help provide high-dose treatment for LAPC and improve associated patient outcomes.

Background To compare the dosimetric differences between helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans for inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods Ten patients with inoperable MPM were retrospectively planned with the HT and VMAT techniques, and the dose-volume histogram (DVH)-based parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared. Results Compared with the VMAT plans, the target homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of the HT plans were significantly better (HI: 1.04±0.01 vs. 1.11±0.03, CI: 0.80±0.07 vs. 0.71±0.12, respectively) (P5, 10, 20, and 30 Gy, respectively) of the ipsilateral lung and V5, V10, and V20 of the contralateral lung were statistically significant (P=0.031, P=0.030, P=0.021, P=0.003, respectively). However, there was no significant differences between HT plans and VMAT plans, regarding the V5, V10 and V20 of the ipsilateral lung, V3 of the contralateral lung, V5 and Dmean of the heart, and Dmax of the cord. The treatment delivery time of the VMAT was significantly shorter than that of the HT (mean delivery time: 3.27±1.65 vs. 11.11±3.75 min, respectively) (P

Purpose: This planning study compared the various dosimetric parameters of different types of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Treatment of 22 left-sided breast cases was planned using two IMRT and VMAT techniques for the prescription of 40 Gy in 15 fractions. For tangential IMRT (Tan_IMRT), five beams were placed as conventional tangential beams. For equally spaced IMRT (Equi_IMRT), six beams were placed equidistantly at 40° interval from 300° to 140°. For tangential VMAT (Tan_VMAT), two arcs were used with the avoidance sector in such a way that the beam covered like tangential fields. For full-arc VMAT (Full_VMAT), similar arcs as Tan_VMAT were used, without avoidance sector. All treatment plans were generated using Eclipse planning system for TrueBeam STx linear accelerator. For planning target volume (PTV), dose parameters including D95%, D99%, V105% homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) were analyzed. Different dose parameters for the left lung, heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), right lung, and right breast were also analyzed. In addition, low-dose spillage in the normal tissues and the number of monitor units (MUs) required for the treatment were compared. Results: IMRT technique exhibited superior D95% and D99% for PTV compared with VMAT techniques. VMAT plans provided more V105% (6%) compared with that of IMRT plans (approximately 1%). HI was better in IMRT plans (Tan_IMRT, 0.085 ± 0.015; Equi_IMRT, 0.094 ± 0.011) than in VMAT plans. CI was better in VMAT plans. The mean lung dose (7.7 Gy ± 1.788 Gy) and V5Gy (34.99% ± 6.799%) were better achieved in Tan_IMRT plan than other plans. Right lung, heart, and right breast sparing were better achieved in Tan_IMRT plan. Moreover, low-dose spillage was very less in the Tan_IMRT compared with all other techniques. Conclusion: Dosimetric comparison in this study showed that tangential IMRT technique is superior in terms of target coverage, sparing of lung, heart, and right breast, and low-dose spillage control in the left-sided breast-only radiotherapy.

This paper describes the developed MATPLAN - a probability-based production costing tool that treats renewable energy sources as candidates in a power system expansion planning study. Similar to the structure of the well-known Wien Automatic System Planning (WASP) package, MATPLAN comprises six modules: LOAD-CALC, EXIST-GEN, CANDI-GEN, CONFIG, OPTIMIZE and ELCC. MATPLAN takes into account the variable nature of renewable energy sources, including both solar and wind farms, and allows a user to consider renewable energy as options for expansion planning using a probability-based model. In contrast to the current practice that treats renewable energy sources as negative loads, MATPLAN enables system planners to take renewable sources as normal options for generation expansion planning problems, which can directly determine the optimal expansion policy and ELCC analysis of a system with high renewable penetration. MATPLAN is also designed as an open access software package which academics and practitioners can adapt to their specific situations and run many case studies as a screening tool. In the case studies, the tool was validated by comparing its resulting optimal expansion planning plan against that of the well-known WASP package and further tested using realistic field data. The complete MATPLAN code repository has been released under open-source licenses for public access, URL: https://github.com/wasp2019/MATPLAN . MATPLAN Wiki is also available, providing MATPLAN overview, features, user guides and developer resources.

Highlights • SBRT may provide a non-invasive treatment option for recurrent prostate cancer. • MR-Linac single fraction 19 Gy treatment of recurrent prostate cancer is feasible. • MR-Linac dose distributions for the target were comparable to HDR-brachytherapy. • Real-time intrafraction adaptation techniques are needed for clinical introduction., Background and Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (FS-HDR-BT) is one of the treatment options for radiorecurrent localized prostate cancer. However, due to the invasive nature of the treatment, not all patients are eligible. Magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac) systems open up new treatment possibilities and could potentially replace FS-HDR-BT treatment. We conducted a planning study to investigate the feasibility of delivering a single 19 Gy dose to the recurrent lesion using a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac system. Materials and Methods Thirty patients who underwent FS-HDR-BT were included. The clinical target volume (CTV) encompassed the visible lesion plus a 5 mm margin. Treatment plans were created for a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac system using a 1 mm planning target volume (PTV) margin. A dose of 19 Gy was prescribed to ≥ 95% of the PTV. In case this target could not be reached, i.e. when organs-at-risk (OAR) constraints were violated, a dose of ≥ 17 Gy to ≥ 90% of the PTV was accepted. MR-Linac plans were compared to clinical FS-HDR-BT plans. Results Target dose coverage was achieved in 14/30 (47%) FS-HDR-BT plans and 17/30 (57%) MR-Linac plans, with comparable median D95% and D90%. In FS-HDR-BT plans, a larger volume reached ≥ 150% of the prescribed dose. Urethra D10%, rectum D1cm3, and rectum D2cm3 were lower in the FS-HDR-BT plans, while bladder dose was comparable for both modalities. Conclusion Single fraction treatment of recurrent prostate cancer lesions may be feasible using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on a MR-Linac system.

Purpose To investigate the impact of interfractional anatomical changes and setup correction methods on dose distributions in pancreatic cancer patients under breath‐hold conditions. Methods Three intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans with different beam arrangements and one volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan prescribing 54 Gy in 30 fractions were created for 10 patients who underwent three additional CT scans performed at an interval of 1–2 weeks. The additional CT sets were rigidly registered to the simulation CT set using both bone‐matching (BM) and organ‐matching (OM) methods in each patient. Recalculated dose distributions and dose–volume indices on the additional CT sets using either the BM or the OM method were compared with the simulation values. Results Differences in the gross tumor volume D98% value from the simulation sets ranged from −0.8 to −5.9% on average. In addition, the variations were larger with OM compared with BM for two IMPT plans. Meanwhile, differences in the D98% value in the region isotropically enlarged by 5 mm from the gross tumor volume were significantly improved with OM on two IMPT plans and the VMAT plan. Among the organs at risk, the dose–volume indices were significantly improved with OM only in the duodenum on all plans. Conclusion Organ‐matching may be a better setup correction technique than BM for both photon therapy and IMPT plans. However, in some beam arrangements of IMPT, the dose distribution may be somewhat worse using OM, due to interfractional anatomical variation. Therefore, it is important to choose beam angles that are less likely to be influenced by changes in the gastrointestinal gas volume, especially in IMPT plans.

In this work, the feasibility of using flattening filter free (FFF) beams in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) treatment planning to decrease protracted beam‐on times for these treatments was investigated. In addition, a methodology was developed to generate standardized VMAT TBI treatment plans based on patient physical dimensions to eliminate plan optimization time. A planning study cohort of 47 TBI patients previously treated with optimized VMAT ARC 6 MV beams was retrospectively examined. These patients were sorted into six categories depending on height and anteroposterior (AP) width at the umbilicus. Using Varian Eclipse, clinical 40 cm × 10 cm open field arcs were substituted with 6 MV FFF. Mid‐plane lateral dose profiles in conjunction with relative arc output factors (RAOF) yielded how far a given multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf must move in order to achieve a mid‐plane 100% isodose for a specific control point. Linear interpolation gave the dynamic MLC aperture for the entire arc for each patient AP width category, which was subsequently applied through Python scripting. All FFF VMAT TBI plans were then evaluated by two radiation oncologists and deemed clinically acceptable. The FFF and clinical VMAT TBI plans had similar Body–5 mm D98% distributions, but overall the FFF plans had statistically significantly increased or broader Body–5 mm D2% and mean lung dose distributions. These differences are not considered clinically significant. Median beam‐on times for the FFF and clinical VMAT TBI plans were 11.07 and 18.06 min, respectively, and planning time for the FFF VMAT TBI plans was reduced by 34.1 min. In conclusion, use of FFF beams in VMAT TBI treatment planning resulted in dose homogeneity similar to our current VMAT TBI technique. Clinical dosimetric criteria were achieved for a majority of patients while planning and calculated beam‐on times were reduced, offering the possibility of improved patient experience.

ObjectiveAssess the safety and feasibility of shortened hypo-fractionated high dose palliative lung radiotherapy in a retrospective planning study.MethodsFifteen palliative lung radiotherapy patients previously treated with the standard 36 Gy in 12 fractions (12F) schedule were non-randomly selected to achieve a representative distribution of tumour sizes, volumes, locations and staging. Plans were produced using 30 Gy in 5 fractions (5F) and 30 Gy in 6 fractions (6F) using a 6MV FFF co-planar VMAT technique. These plans were optimised to meet dose constraints for both PTVs and OARs where established OAR constraints were expressed as BED. The potential safety of the delivery of these plans was assessed using these BEDs and also with reductions of 10% and 20% to account for effects of chemotherapy or surgery.ResultsFor all 5F and 6F plans the mandatory constraints using the full BED were met, as with all 6F plans with 10% BED reductions, but reduced to 6 patients using 5F. Three of 15 5F and 6 of 15 6F plans met the 20% BED reductions.ConclusionIt is potentially safe and feasible to deliver high dose palliative radiotherapy using the 5F or 6F regimes described, when carefully planned to comparable OAR BEDs as for 12F standard. It appears that the toxicity from either of these regimes should be within acceptable limits provided that the dose constraints described can be adhered to. A Phase II study would be required to fully assess the safety and feasibility. The outcomes from such a study could potentially reduce the number of patient hospital visits for radiotherapy, thus benefiting the patient and the clinical service by optimising resource utilisation.Advances in KnowledgeShortened hypo-fractionated high dose palliative lung radiotherapy is technically feasible provided OAR constraints are respected.

Objective: To evaluate different VMAT planning techniques for a multi-leaf collimator (MLC)providing maximum aperture of 21 × 16 cm². Methods: A VMAT planning study of nine prostate and nine head-and-neck cancer patients was carried out. The patients were previously treated with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) technique during 2014-15, at radiation oncology SanBortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. Three VMAT plans for each of prostate and head-and-neck cancer patient were optimized using Pinnacle treatment planning system for 6MV photon beam from ElektaSynergyS®Linac system. Single arc, dual arc and combined two independent-single-arcs were optimized for collimator angle 45°. VMAT treatment planning comparison was made among single-arc dual-arc and combined two independent-single-arcs. The student’s t-test (two-sided) with p ? 0.05 was applied for significant difference between dose volume indices of plans. Results: All VMAT techniques produced clinically acceptable plans for prostate, while for head-and-neck, DA and ISAs significantly improved target coverage compared to SA. Single arc is sufficient for prostate, while inefficient in case of head-and-neck dose-planning. In spite of having different VMAT optimization approach dual arc and two combined independent-single-arcs provided very similar target coverage, while dual arc improved sparing of organs-at-risk. Similar treatment delivery times were observed for DA and ISAs VMAT techniques. Conclusion: Single arc is sufficient for prostate, while inefficient in case of head-and-neck dose-planning.Dual arc and two combined independent-single-arcs provided similar PTV coverage, while DA provided better sparing of organs at risk. Continuous...

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare carbon-ion (C-ion), proton and photon radiotherapy (RT) plans with regard to dose reduction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by using a greater omentum spacer (GO spacer). Methods We retrospectively retrieved data for ten patients who received the GO spacer as surgical spacer placement for abdominal and pelvic tumors. Simulation plans were created on pre-spacer Computed Tomography (CT) and post-spacer CT for C-ion RT, proton RT and photon RT to compare the dose of the GI tract. The plans were normalized so that at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness equivalent) delivered in 35 fractions. All plans were created with the lowest possible dose to the GI tract under conditions that meet the dose constraints for the PTV and spinal cord (maximum dose Results D2 cc and V10–70 of the GI tract were significantly lower on post-spacer plans than on pre-spacer plans for all three RT modalities. Regarding post-spacer plans, D2 cc of the GI tract was significantly lower on C-ion RT plans and proton RT plans than on photon RT plans (C-ion vs photon p = 0.001, proton vs photon p = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference between C-ion RT plans and proton RT plans for D2 cc of the GI tract (C-ion vs proton p = 0.992). In the photon RT plan for one patient, D2 cc of the GI tract did not meet Conclusions The GO spacer shows a significant dose reduction effect on the GI tract.

Five dose calculation algorithms commonly used in lung SBRT planning are evaluated for their dosimetric impact on planning target volume (PTV) and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. Treatment plans for thirty lung SBRT patients were included in this multi-institutional planning study. Lung SBRT plans were initially generated using BrainLab Pencil Beam (PB) convolution algorithm to deliver 50 Gy in 5 fractions to PTV (PB_OP plans). Plans were recalculated using BrainLab Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm with the same beam parameters, field settings, and MUs (MC_NO plans) to investigate accuracy limits of PB plans. Next, these plans were re-optimized via MU scaling in MC algorithm while keeping original beam parameters and settings (MC_OP). Further, with these new MUs, all patient plans were recalculated with Pinnacle collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCC), Eclipse anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA), and Eclipse Acuros XB (AXB) algorithms, and are referred to as AP_NO, AAA_NO, and AXB_NO plans, respectively. DVH of PTV and OARs were used to calculate dosimetric parameters for comparison with MC_OP plans. Patient plans were compared based on PTV size as well as the location in the lung: island targets, adjacent to the ribs/chest wall, or mixed. Lung SBRT plans using PB dose algorithm overestimated target doses by 10–20% of prescribed dose and these differences were highlighted mainly in the target periphery/dose-buildup region as seen in Dmin and D90. Compared with MC, both Pinnacle and AAA plans overestimated PTV dose in the penumbra region, whereas Acuros plans were in good agreement with MC plans. PTV dose differences ranged 3–5% among Pinnacle, AAA, and Acuros. In general, Acuros AXB performed well for adjacent and mixed targets near the ribs and chest wall, whereas Pinnacle CCC was favored for island targets. OAR Dmax and lung V20 were better reproduced in Pinnacle, whereas Dmean were comparable among all TPS. Knowing the strengths and limitations of clinical treatment planning system allows more consistent and accurate dose comparison for patients enrolled in protocol studies.

A new irradiation technique, volumetric-modulated Dynamic WaveArc therapy (VMDWAT), based on sequential non-coplanar trajectories, can be performed using the Vero4DRT. This planning study compared the dose distribution and treatment time between single-isocenter volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with multiple straight non-coplanar arcs and single-isocenter VMDWAT in patients with two brain metastases. Twenty patients with two planning target volumes exceeding 2.0 cm3 were included. Both VMAT and VMDWAT plans were created with single isocenter and a prescribed dose of 28 Gy delivered in five fractions. Target conformity was evaluated using indices modified from the RTOG-CI (mRTOG-CI) and IP-CI (mIP-CI). VMDWAT significantly improved both mRTOG-CI and mIP-CI and reduced the volume of normal brain tissue receiving 25 and 28 Gy compared to VMAT. The two modalities did not significantly differ in terms of the volume of normal brain tissue receiving 5, 10, 12, 15, and 20 Gy. The mean treatment time was significantly shorter in the VMDWAT group. VMDWAT significantly improved dose distribution in a shorter treatment time compared to VMAT in patients treated for two brain metastases. Single-isocenter VMDWAT may thus be a promising treatment for two brain metastases.

Background The aim of this study was to compare the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (MRI-based-IMRT) with the MRIdian Linac system to that of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with the TrueBeam STx system for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Methods A total of 22 patients with tumors located in the lower lobe were retrospectively selected for the study. For each patient, both the MRI-based-IMRT and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and identical structures with the exception of the planning target volume (PTV). The PTVs of the MRI-based-IMRT were generated by adding an isotropic margin of 3 mm from the gross tumor volume, whereas those of VMAT were generated by adding an isotropic margin of 5 mm from the internal target volume. For both the MRI-based-IMRT and VMAT, the prescription doses to the PTVs were 60 Gy in four fractions. Results The average PTV volume of the MRI-based-IMRT was approximately 4-times smaller than that of VMAT (p

To evaluate, in a multi-institutional context, the role of Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) sharing in order to achieve higher plan quality, to harmonize prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) plans and to assess if the planner's experience in SBRT could lead to lower dose at organs at risk (OARs).During the first phase five patients enrolled for prostate SBRT were planned by multiple physicists according to common protocol. The prescription dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, modulation index (MIt), plan parameters, and planner experience level (EL) were statistically analyzed. During the second phase median DVHs from all centers were shared and physicists replanned one patient of the five, aiming at inter-planner harmonization and further OARs sparing. Data were summarized by Spearman-correlogram (p 0.05) and boxplots. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the re-plans to the original plans.Seventy-eight SBRT plans from 13 centers were evaluated. EL correlated with modulation of plan parameters and reduction of OARs doses, such as volume receiving 28 Gy of rectum (rectum-V28Gy), rectum-V32Gy, and bladder-V30Gy. The re-plans showed significant reduced variability in rectum-V28Gy and increased PTV dose homogeneity. No significant difference in plan complexity metrics and plan parameters between plans and re-plans were obtained.Planner's experience in prostate SBRT was correlated with dosimetric parameters. Sharing median DVHs reduced variability among centers whilst keeping the same level of plan complexity. SBRT planning skills can benefit from a replanning phase after sharing DVHs from multiple centers, improving plan quality and concordance among centers.

Purpose At present, commercially available treatment planning systems (TPS) only offer manual planning functionality for cone‐based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) leading to labor intensive treatment planning. Our objective was to reduce treatment planning time through development of a simple inverse TPS for cone‐based SRS. Methods The iCONE TPS was developed using MATLAB (R2015a, The MathWorks Inc.) and serves as an inverse planning adjunct to a commercially available TPS. Simulated annealing is used to determine optimal table angle, gantry start and stop angles, and cone sizes for a user‐defined number of non‐coplanar arcs relative to user‐defined dose objectives. iCONE and clinically generated plans were compared through a retrospective planning study of 60 patients treated for 1–3 brain metastases (total of 100 lesions). Results Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was enforced for all plans through normalization. PTV maximum dose was constrained to be within 120%–135% of the prescription dose. The median conformity index for iCONE plans was 1.35, 1.33, and 1.32 for 1, 2, and 3‐target cases respectively corresponding to a median increase of 0.05 (range = −0.1 to 0.5, P 0.05) relative to the clinical plans. No clinically significant differences were found with respect to the dose to organs‐at‐risk. Median iCONE planning times were approximately a factor of five lower than consensus estimates for manual planning provided by local experienced SRS planners. Conclusions A simple inverse TPS for cone‐based SRS was developed. Plan quality was found to be similar to manually generated plans; however, degradation was observed in some cases highlighting the need for continued oversight and manual adjustment by experienced planners if implemented in the clinic. A factor of five reduction in treatment planning time was estimated.

Background Although there have been many attempts to increase the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALToma), only a few planning studies have reported the efficacy of the modern radiotherapy technique till date. Therefore, we performed the dosimetric comparison among 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans, using deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) or free-breathing (FB) techniques, to determine the most optimal plan for gastric MALToma. Methods We evaluated 9 patients with gastric MALToma for whom 3D-CRT, step-and-shoot IMRT (SIMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and tomotherapy plans with identical prescribed doses were generated using DIBH or FB computed tomography (CT). Planning target volume (PTV) coverage and non-target doses were calculated for each plan and compared with plan quality metric (PQM) scores. Results All 72 plans of 9 patients satisfied our dosimetric goals, and the IMRT plans and 3D-CRT plans had similarly good conformity index values with no differences related to respiratory movement. IMRT plans yielded significantly better doses to the organs-at-risk, and DIBH plans yielded significantly lower liver, heart, and lung Dmean and spinal cord Dmax with smaller irradiated volumes compared to FB plans. For the mean PQM scores, VMAT-DIBH and SIMRT-DIBH yielded the best scores, whereas 3D plans provided reduced beam monitor unit values. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that modern RT technologies (DIBH with VMAT or SIMRT) could potentially provide excellent target coverage for gastric MALToma while reducing doses to organs-at-risk. However, the relevance of the most optimal plan considering clinical outcomes should be confirmed further in a larger patient cohort. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1263-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose To compare the dose distributions produced in patients (pts) treated for thymic tumours with spot-scanning proton beam therapy (PBT) implemented with single-field uniform dose (SFUD), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal photon-beam based radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Methods Twelve pts, treated with 3D-CRT, were included. Alternative IMRT and SFUD plans were constructed. The IMRT plans were created using a setup with beams incident from 5 to 6 different angles. For the SFUD plans, a field-specific planning target volume (PTV) was created for each patient and a clinical target volume (CTV)-based robust optimization was performed. A robustness evaluation was performed for the CTV for all SFUD plans. A dosimetric evaluation was conducted for the doses to the CTV and organs at risk (OARs) for all plans. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), for different endpoints, was calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB)-model and compared between plans. Results SFUD was associated with significantly lower mean doses to the oesophagus, the heart, the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), lungs and breasts compared to 3D-CRT and IMRT. The maximum dose given to the spinal cord was significantly lower with SFUD. The risks for pneumonitis, esophagitis and myelopathy were significantly reduced in the SFUD plans. Conclusions The present study showed dosimetric advantages of using scanned-beam PBT for the treatment of thymic tumours, as compared to 3D-CRT and IMRT, especially in regard to lower doses to the oesophagus and lungs. The risk of toxicity was reduced with SFUD.

Background There are no guidelines on clinical target volume (CTV) delineation for cT2 rectal cancer treated with organ preservation. Materials and methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the extent of distal mesorectal (DMS) and distal intramural spread (DIS), the risk of lateral lymph node (LLN) metastases in pT2 tumours, and regional recurrence pattern after organ preservation. Results The rate of DMS > 1 cm was 1.9% (95% CI: 0.4–5.4%), maximum extent: 1.3 cm. The rate of DIS > 0.5 cm was 4.7% (95% CI: 1.3–11.5%), maximum extent: 0.8 cm. The rate of LLN metastases was 8.2% (95% CI: 6.7–9.9%) for tumours below or at peritoneal reflexion and 0% for higher tumours. Regional nodal recurrences alone were recorded in 1.0% (95% CI: 0.5–1.7%) of patients after watch-and-wait and in 2.1% (95% CI: 1.2–3.4%) after preoperative radiotherapy and local excision. Thus, the following rules for CTV delineation are proposed: caudal border 1.5 cm from the tumour to account for DMS or 1 cm to account for DIS, whichever is more caudal; cranial border at S2/S3 interspace; inclusion of LLN for tumours at or below peritoneal reflexion. A planning study was performed in eight patients to compare dose–volume parameters obtained using these rules to that obtained using current guidelines for advanced cancers. The proposed rules led to a mean 18% relative reduction of planning target volume, which resulted in better sparing of organs-at-risk. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests a smaller CTV for cT2 tumours than the current guidelines designed for advanced cancers.

External beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer can result in urinary, sexual, and rectal side effects, often impairing quality of life. A polyethylene glycol‐based product, SpaceOAR© hydrogel (SOH), implanted into the connective tissue between the prostate gland and rectum can significantly reduce the dose received by the rectum and hence risk of rectal toxicity. The optimal way to manage the hydrogel and rectal structures for plan optimization is therefore of interest. In 13 patients, computerized tomography (CT) scans were taken pre‐ and post‐SpaceOAR© implant. A prescription of 60 Gy in 20 fractions was planned on both scans. Six treatment plans were produced per anonymized dataset using either a structure of rectum plus the hydrogel, termed composite rectum wall (CRW), or rectal wall (RW) as an inverse optimization structure and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) as a treatment technique. Dose‐volume histogram metrics were compared between plans to determine which optimization structure and treatment technique offered the maximum rectal dose sparing. RW structures offered a statistically significant decrease in rectal dose over CRW structures, whereas the treatment technique (IMRT vs VMAT) did not significantly affect the rectal dose. There was improvement seen in bladder and penile bulb dose when VMAT was used as a treatment technique. Overall, treatment plans using the RW optimization structure offered the lowest rectal dose while VMAT treatment technique offered the lowest bladder and penile bulb dose.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to conduct a 9-month pilot Internet randomized controlled trial (RCT) of cherry extract and diet modification in gout to assess the feasibility of an Internet study and obtain effect estimates. METHODS After providing online informed consent in response to Internet advertisements and social media or clinic flyers, 84 people with physician-confirmed gout were randomized to either cherry extract 3,600 mg/d (n = 41) or dietitian-assisted diet modification for gout (n = 43). All study outcomes were collected via Internet and phone calls. The primary objective was the feasibility of an Internet study, and secondary objectives were to obtain effect estimates for gout flares, functional ability assessed with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and adverse events (AEs) for future trials. RESULTS Of the 84 people randomized, overall completion rates were more than 80% for most study procedures up to 6 months and similar for the 2 active comparators. Improvements were seen in gout flares and HAQ scores in cherry extract and diet modification groups at 9 months compared with baseline: gout flares per month, 0.22 versus 0.36 (p = 0.049) and 0.28 versus 0.31 (p = 0.76); proportion with any gout flare, 56% versus 98% (p < 0.0001) and 65% versus 98% (p = 0.0002); and mean ± standard deviation HAQ score, 0.28 ± 0.54 versus 0.55 ± 0.68 (p = 0.001) and 0.23 ± 0.40 versus 0.48 ± 0.61 (p = 0.06), respectively. Any AEs and gastrointestinal symptoms/AEs at 9 months in cherry extract and diet modification groups were 3% versus 0% and 28% versus 27%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS An Internet gout RCT is feasible for nonpharmacological gout treatments. A hypothesis-testing, large Internet RCT of cherry extract versus placebo is needed.

Purpose We evaluate the feasibility of the elective nodal irradiation strategy in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer. Methods Three simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)‐SBRT plans (Boost1, Boost2, and Boost3) were retrospectively generated for each of 20 different patients. Boost1 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV2, respectively. Boost2 delivered 40, 33, and 25 Gy to boostCTV, PTV1, and PTV2, respectively. Boost3 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV3, respectively. PTV1 covered the initial standard SBRT plan (InitPlan) gross tumor volume (GTV). PTV2 covered CTVgeom which was created by a 10‐mm expansion (15 mm posterior) of GTV. PTV3 covered CTVprop which included elective nodal regions. The boostCTV included GTV as well as involved vasculature. The planning feasibility in each scenario and dose–volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and compared with the InitPlan (delivered 33 Gy only to PTV1) by paired t‐test. Next, a novel DVH prediction model was developed and its performance was evaluated according to the prediction accuracy (AC) of planning violations. Then, the model was used to simulate the impacts of GTV‐to‐organs at risk (OAR) distance and gastrointestinal (GI) OAR volume variations on planning feasibility. Results Significant dose increases were observed in GI‐OARs in SIB‐SBRT plans when compared with InitPlan. All dose constraints were met in 63% of cases in InitPlan, Boost1, and Boost2, whereas Boost3 developed DVH violations in all cases. Utilizing previous patient anatomy, the novel DVH prediction model achieved a high AC in the prediction of violations for GI‐OARs; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AC were 66%, 90%, and 84%, respectively. Experiments with the model demonstrated that the larger proximity volume of GI‐OAR at the shorter distance substantially impacted on planning violations. Conclusions SIB‐SBRT plan with geometrically defined prophylactic areas can be dosimetrically feasible, but including all nodal areas with 25 Gy in five fractions appears to be unrealistic.

Background: Previous planning studies in radiotherapy (RT) for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma have been based on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images, which do not contain information on the respiratory motion of the stomach. Therefore, we compared the plan quality between 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for gastric MALT lymphoma using four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT).Methods: Three different treatment plans of four-field 3D-CRT, seven-field IMRT, and double arc VMAT were created based on 4D-CT images of seven patients with gastric MALT lymphoma. An RT dose of 30 Gy was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) in 20 fractions. We calculated the minimum dose coverage for 95% of the PTV (D95), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) of the PTV, and organs at risk (OARs) doses for the liver, kidneys, spinal cord, and small bowel. Plan quality metric (PQM) scores were also calculated for a comprehensive and objective assessment.Results: There was no significant difference among the three plans in D95 of PTV. HI of PTV for the IMRT plan was significantly better than that of the VMAT (p = 0.047) and 3D-CRT (p = 0.047) plans. HI of PTV for the VMAT plan was significantly better than that of the 3D-CRT plan (p = 0.047). CIs of PTV for the IMRT and VMAT plans were significantly better than that of the 3D-CRT plan (p = 0.047 and p = 0.047, respectively). Dmean of the liver for 3D-CRT was significantly higher than that for the IMRT (p = 0.047) and VMAT (p = 0.047) plans. The PQM scores of the VMAT and IMRT plans were significantly higher than that of the 3D-CRT plan (p = 0.047 and p = 0.047, respectively). The PQM score of the IMRT plan was significantly higher than that of the VMAT plan (p = 0.047).Conclusions: The IMRT plan yields the best plan quality for gastric MALT lymphoma. In terms of plan quality, as opposed to the 3D-CRT plan, we recommend the IMRT and VMAT plans.

Advanced rectal cancers are treated with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy followed by surgery, but 5–10% experience locoregional recurrence after initial treatment. Radical (R0) salvage surgery is ...

Background Unbiased analysis of the impact of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is necessary to evaluate dosimetric benefit and optimize clinics’ workflows. The aim of the study was to assess the need for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients using an automatic planning tool in a retrospective planning study. Materials and methods Thirty H&N patients treated with adaptive radiotherapy were analysed. Patients had a CT scan for treatment planning and a verification CT during treatment according to the clinic’s protocol. Considering these images, three plans were retrospectively generated using the iCycle tool to simulate the scenarios with and without adaptation: 1) the optimized plan based on the planning CT; 2) the optimized plan based on the verification CT (ART-plan); 3) the plan obtained by considering treatment plan 1 re-calculated in the verification CT (non-ART plan). The dosimetric endpoints for both target volumes and OAR were compared between scenarios 2 and 3 and the SPIDERplan used to evaluate plan quality. Results The most significant impact of ART was found for the PTVs, which demonstrated decreased D98% in the non-ART plan. A general increase in the dose was observed for the OAR but only the spinal cord showed a statistical significance. The SPIDERplan analysis indicated an overall loss of plan quality in the absence of ART. Conclusion These results confirm the advantages of ART in H&N patients, especially for the coverage of target volumes. The usage of an automatic planning tool reduces planner-induced bias in the results, guaranteeing that the observed changes derive from the application of ART.

The purpose of this study was to compare hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (Hybrid IMRT/VMAT), with non-coplanar (nc) IMRT and nc-VMAT treatment plans for unresectable olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB). Hybrid IMRT/VMAT, nc-IMRT and nc-VMAT plans were optimized for 12 patients with modified Kadish C stage ONB. Dose prescription was 65 Gy in 26 fractions. Dose–volume histogram parameters, conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI), integral dose and monitor units (MUs) delivered per fraction were assessed. Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) based on the EUD model (NTCPLogit) and the Lyman–Kutcher–Burman model (NTCPLKB) were also evaluated. We found that the Hybrid IMRT/VMAT plan significantly improved the CN for clinical target volume (CTV) and planning treatment volume (PTV) compared with the nc-VMAT plan. In general, sparing of organs at risk (OARs) is similar with the three techniques, although the Hybrid IMRT/VMAT plan resulted in a significantly reduced Dmax to contralateral (C/L) optic nerve compared with the nc-IMRT plan. The Hybrid IMRT/VMAT plan significantly reduce EUD to the ipsilateral (I/L) and C/L optic nerve in comparison with the nc-IMRT plan and nc-VMAT plan, but the difference in NTCP between the three technique was

Highlights • MRI reveals shrinkage of primary tumours during long-course chemoradiotherapy. • Intra-fraction motion was assessed by 1.5 T MR-Linac. • Adaptive MR-guided boost to GTV with reduced margin revealed better rectum sparing., Purpose To compare treatment plans of two different rectal boost strategies: up-front versus adaptive boost at the 1.5 T MR-Linac. Methods Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) underwent standard neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. T2-weighted MRI prior and after the treatment session were acquired to contour gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and organs at risk (OARs). The datasets were used to simulate four different boost strategies (all with 15 Gy/5 fractions in addition to 50.4 Gy): up-front boost (5 daily fractions in the first week of treatment) and an adaptive boost (one boost fraction per week). Both strategies were planned using standard and reduced PTV margins. Intra-fraction motion was assessed by pre- and post-treatment MRI-based contours. Results Five patients were included and a total of 44 MRI sets were evaluated. The median PTV volumes of the adaptive boost were significantly smaller than for the up-front boost (81.4 cm3 vs 44.4 cm3 for PTV with standard margins; 31.2 cm3 vs 15 cm3 for PTV with reduced margins; p = 0.031). With reduced margins the rectum was significantly better spared with an adaptive boost rather than with an up-front boost: V60Gy and V65Gy were 41.2% and 24.8% compared with 59% and 29.9%, respectively (p = 0.031). Median GTV intra-fractional motion was 2 mm (range 0–8 mm). Conclusions The data suggest that the adaptive boost strategy exploiting tumor-shrinkage and reduced margin might result in better sparing of rectum and anal canal. Individual margin assessment, motion management and real-time adaptive radiotherapy appear attractive applications of the 1.5 T MR-Linac for further testing of individualized and safe dose escalation in patients with rectal cancer.

To determine the advantages of inverse planning using a prerelease version of Leksell Gamma Knife® (LGK) Lightning (Elekta AB, Sweden) compared to manual forward planning.Thirty-eight patients with metastases (MET, n = 15), vestibular schwannomas (VS, n = 11) and meningiomas (MEN, n = 12), treated with LGK Icon™ at our institution, were analyzed retrospectively. For each case, an inverse (inv) and inverse full coverage (fc) treatment plan was generated using LGK Lightning and compared to the clinical plans. Several dosimetry and efficiency characteristics were compared for each indication. The mean, median difference and interquartile range were reported and the significance was assessed with a paired-sample Wilcoxon test (significance level 0.05). Further, the inter operator variability was analyzed for multiple users.Inv and fc treatment plans show improved target coverage (up to 3.6%) for all analyzed paradigms. For inv plans, the selectivity is enhanced (MET: 2.9%; VS: 1.8%; MEN: 1%) and the organ at risk doses are significantly reduced (VS: up to 4.5%; MEN: up to 17.5%). For inv and fc plans, the beam on time (BOT) is shortened (MET: up to 7.9%; benign tumors: 49.5%). The inter operator variability analysis shows similar treatment plan quality with small differences in plan efficiency (difference in BOT: 1-3.3 min).LGK Lightning allows to generate improved LGK treatment plans regarding plan quality with reduced BOT compared to manual forward plans. The inter operator variability showed that multiple users with different experiences can generate similar treatment plan quality using LGK Lightning.

Dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) has been known as the most common local recurrence site of prostate cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to DIL with CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (CK-SBRT). We selected 15 patients with prostate cancer and visible DIL and compared 3 plans for each patient: 1) No boost plan of 35 Gy to prostate, 2) DIL_40 plan of SIB 40 Gy to DIL and 35 Gy to prostate, and 3) DIL_45 plan with 45 Gy to DIL and 35 Gy to the prostate in 5 fractions. All targets satisfied with the prescription coverage per protocol. However, some patients failed to meet the Dmax of the rectum in DIL_40 plans (n = 4), and DIL_45 plans (n = 6). Violations of bladder constraints occurred in four DIL_45 plans. Consequently, the DIL boost with SBRT was possible in 73% of patients with DIL_40 plans, and 60% of patients with DIL_45 plans without any violation of normal organ constraints. All patients who experienced constraint violations had DILs in posterior segments. DIL boost using CK-SBRT could be an option for localized prostate cancer patients. For patients who had DIL in posterior segments, a moderate dose escalation of 40 Gy seemed appropriate.

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated SRS (fSRS) are effective options for the treatment of brain metastases. When treating multiple metastases with a linear accelerator-based approach, a single isocenter allows for efficient treatment delivery. In this study, we present our findings comparing dosimetric parameters of Brainlab (Munich, Germany) Elements™ Multiple Brain Mets SRS (MME) software (version 1.5 versus version 2.0) for a variety of scenarios and patients. The impact of multileaf collimator design and function on plan quality within the software was also evaluated. Materials and methods Twenty previously treated patients with a total of 58 lesions (from one to seven lesions each) were replanned with an updated version of the multiple brain Mets software solution. For each plan, the mean conformity index (CI), mean gradient index (GI), the volume of normal brain receiving 12 Gy (V12), and mean brain dose were evaluated. Additionally, all v2.0 plans were further evaluated with jaw tracking for by Elekta (Stockholm, Sweden) and HD120™ multileaf collimator by Varian Medical Systems (Palo Alto, USA). Results The new software version demonstrated improvements for CI, GI and V12 (p

Cochlea sparing can reduce late ototoxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy. In this situation, a mean cochlear dose (MCD) constraint of 10 Gy has been suggested by others based on the dose–effect relationship of clinical data. We aimed to investigate whether this is feasible for primary and postoperative radiochemotherapy in locoregionally advanced tumors without compromising target coverage. Ten patients treated with definitive and ten patients treated with adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy were investigated. The cochleae and a planning risk volume (PRV) with a 3 mm margin were newly delineated, whereas target volumes and other organs at risk were not changed. The initial plan was recalculated with a constraint of 10 Gy (MCD) on the low-risk side. The quality of the resulting plan was evaluated using the difference in the equivalent uniform dose (EUD). A unilateral MCD of below 10 Gy could be achieved in every patient. The mean MCD was 6.8 Gy in the adjuvant cohort and 7.6 Gy in the definitive cohort, while the non-spared side showed a mean MCD of 18.7 and 30.3 Gy, respectively. The mean PRV doses were 7.8 and 8.4 Gy for the spared side and 18.5 and 29.8 Gy for the non-spared side, respectively. The mean EUD values of the initial and recalculated plans were identical. Target volume was not compromised. Unilateral cochlea sparing with an MCD of less than 10 Gy is feasible without compromising the target volume or dose coverage in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with IMRT. A prospective evaluation of the clinical benefit of this approach as well as further investigation of the dose–response relationship for future treatment modification appears promising.

BackgroundIntensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is one of the most reported techniques for head and neck cancer treatment, as it allows a good coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) while sparing the surrounding organs at risk (OAR) better than conventional conformal radiotherapy. The objective of this work is to optimise an IMRT technique for the simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) treatment of larynx cancer delivering a total dose of 69·96 Gy to the boost volume and 54·45 Gy to the elective volume in 33 fractions.MethodsThree IMRT techniques, each using seven equally spaced beams, were planned for a sample of 10 patients. The first two techniques (IMRT-0 and IMRT-26) differ only for the starting angle of the seven beams, whereas the third (IMRT-CT) combines both these techniques by delivering IMRT-0 in the first half of treatment, and IMRT-26 in the second half, thus taking advantage of using 14 beams in total while using seven at a time only. The planning results were compared according to the dose coverage, homogeneity and conformity of the two PTVs, as well as to the dose to OARs, that is, spinal cord, parotids, mandible, brainstem and healthy tissue (defined as the body volume minus the sum of PTVs).ResultsBasically the PTV coverage resulted acceptable and comparable with all the three techniques. Concerning OARs, statistically better results are obtained in IMRT-CT when compared with IMRT-26 and IMRT-0.ConclusionThe IMRT-CT technique, combining two different seven-beam setups, delivered in two treatment phases, improves dose distribution without increasing delivery time.

Background and purpose: Prognosis of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer remains poor despite chemoradiation. This planning study evaluated a stereotactic boost after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (30 × 2 Gy) to improve local control. The maximum achievable boost directed to radioresistant primary tumor subvolumes based on pre-treatment fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) (pre-treatment-PET) and on early response monitoring 18F-FDG-PET/CT (ERM-PET) was compared. Materials and methods: For ten patients, a stereotactic boost (VMAT) was planned on ERM-PET (PTVboost;ERM) and on pre-treatment-PET (PTVboost;pre-treatment), using a 70% SUVmax threshold with 7 mm margin to segmentate radioresistant subvolumes. Dose was escalated till organ at risk (OAR) constraints were met, aiming to plan at least 18 Gy in 3 fractions (EQD2 84 Gy/BED 100.8 Gy). Results: In five patients, PTVboost;ERM was 9–40% smaller relative to PTVboost;pre-treatment. Overlap of PTVboost;ERM with OARs decreased also compared to overlap of PTVboost;pre-treatment with OARs. However, any overlap with OAR remained in 4/5 patients resulting in minimal differences between planned dose before and during treatment. Median dose (EQD2) covering 99% and 95% of PTVboost;ERM were 15 Gy and 18 Gy respectively. Median boost volume receiving a physical dose of ≥ 18 Gy (V18) was 88%. V18 was ≥ 80% for PTVboost in six patients. Conclusions: A significant stereotactic boost to volumes with high initial or persistent 18F-FDG-uptake could be planned above 60 Gy chemoradiation. Differences between planned dose before and during treatment were minimal. However, as an ERM-PET also monitors changes in tumor position, we recommend to plan the boost on the ERM-PET. Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, Early response monitoring fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET), Stereotactic radiation boost

We evaluated the effectiveness of visual feedback (VF) on radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-holding (DIBH), and reviewed the dose for organs at risk (OARs). Respiratory motions during DIBH for 15 s were monitored during planning computed tomography (CT)-scanning and simulation for 40 patients after breast-conserving surgery from June 2007 to February 2008. For 22 of 40 patients, a goggle-type liquid crystal display monitor was used for VF. The opposing tangential field was planned. The prescribed dose was 50.0 Gy in 25 fractions. The mean differences of the chest wall respiratory movement in DIBH between planning CT-scanning and simulation were 4.7 ± 2.6 mm for the patients without VF and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm for those with VF (p

Background and purpose: The amino-acid positron emission tomography (PET) tracer 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F] fluoro-l-phenylalanine (18F-DOPA) has increased sensitivity for detecting regions of biologically aggressive tumors compared to T1 contrast-enhanced (T1-CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed dosimetric evaluation of treatment plans prepared with and without inclusion of 18F-DOPA-based biological target volume (BTV) evaluating its role in guiding radiotherapy of grade III/IV gliomas. Materials and methods: Eight patients (five T1-CE, three non-contrast-enhancing [NCE]) were included in our study. MRI only-guided anatomic plans and MRI+18FDOPA-PET-guided biologic plans were prepared for each patient, and dosimetric data for target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were compared. High-dose BTV60Gy was defined as regions with tumor to normal brain (T/N) >2.0, while low-dose BTV51Gy was initially based on T/N >1.3, but refined per Nuclear Medicine expert. Results: For T1-CE tumors, planning target volumes (PTV) were larger than MRI-only anatomic target volumes. Despite increases in size of both gross target volumes and PTV, with volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning, no increase of dose to OAR was observed while maintaining similar target dose coverage. For NCE tumors, MRI+18F-DOPA PET biologic imaging identified a sub-region of the large, T2-FLAIR abnormal signal which may allow a smaller volume to receive the high dose (60 Gy) radiation. Conclusions: For T1-CE tumors, PTVs were larger than MRI-only anatomic target volumes with no increase of dose to OARs. Therefore, MRI+18F-DOPA PET-based biologic treatment planning appears feasible in patients with high-grade gliomas. Keywords: 18F-DOPA PET, PET-guided radiation therapy, Planning study, Amino acid PET

Aims: Unilateral sparing of the dominant (left) hippocampus during whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) could mitigate cognitive decline, especially verbal memory, similar to the widely investigated bilateral hippocampus avoidance (HA-WBRT). The aim of this planning study is dosimetrical comparison of HA-WBRT with only left hippocampus sparing (LHA-WBRT) plans. Methods: HA-WBRT plans for 10 patients were prepared in accordance with RTOG 0933 trial and served as baseline for comparisons with several LHA-WBRT plans prepared with an effort: 1) to maintain the same left hippocampus dosimetry ("BEST PTV") and 2) to maintain same dosimetry in planning target volume as in HA-WBRT ("BEST LH"). Results: All HA-WBRT plans met RTOG 0933 protocol criteria with a mean Conformity index 1.09 and mean Homogeneity index (HI) 0.21. Mean right and left hippocampal D100% was 7.8 Gy and 8.5 Gy and mean Dmax 14.0 Gy and 13.8 Gy, respectively. "BEST PTV" plans reduced HI by 31.2% (P=0.005) which is mirrored by lower PTV_D2% (-0.8 Gy, P=0.005) and higher PTV_D98% (+1.3 Gy, P=0.005) as well as decreased optic pathway's Dmax by 1 Gy. In "BEST LH", mean D100% and Dmax for the left hippocampus were significantly reduced by 11.2% (P=0.005) and 10.9% (P=0.005) respectively. Conclusions: LHA-WBRT could improve target coverage and/or further decrease in dose to spared hippocampus. Future clinical trials must confirm whether statistically significant reduction in left hippocampal dose is also clinically significant.