1. Are education, exercise and diet interventions a cost-effective treatment to manage hip and knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review
- Author
-
Tolulope T. Sajobi, J.H. Abbott, Darren R. Mazzei, Deborah A. Marshall, Kevin A. Hildebrand, and Ayoola Ademola
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Diet therapy ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Biomedical Engineering ,Psychological intervention ,MEDLINE ,Osteoarthritis, Hip ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Patient Education as Topic ,Rheumatology ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,health care economics and organizations ,030203 arthritis & rheumatology ,business.industry ,Cost-effectiveness analysis ,Osteoarthritis, Knee ,Exercise Therapy ,Weight Reduction Programs ,030104 developmental biology ,Economic evaluation ,Physical therapy ,Health education ,business ,Diet Therapy ,Patient education - Abstract
Summary Objective To identify research gaps and inform implementation we systematically reviewed the literature evaluating cost-effectiveness of recommended treatments (education, exercise and diet) for the management of hip and/or knee OA. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database, and EconLit from inception to November 2019 for trial-based economic evaluations investigating hip and/or knee OA core treatments. Two investigators screened relevant publications, extracted data and synthesized results. Risk of bias was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. Results Two cost-minimization, five cost-effectiveness and 16 cost-utility analyses evaluated core treatments in six health systems. Exercise therapy with and without education or diet was cost-effective or cost-saving compared to education or physician-delivered usual care at conventional willingness to pay (WTP) thresholds in 15 out of 16 publications. Exercise interventions were cost-effective compared to physiotherapist-delivered usual care in three studies at conventional WTP thresholds. Education interventions were not cost-effective compared to usual care or placebo at conventional WTP thresholds in three out of four publications. Conclusions Structured core treatment programs were clinically effective and cost-effective, compared to physician-delivered usual care, in five health care systems. Providing education about core treatments was not consistently cost-effective. Implementing structured core treatment programs into funded clinical pathways would likely be an efficient use of health system resources and enhance physician-delivered usual primary care.
- Published
- 2021