1. Neurological Instability in Ischemic Stroke: Relation with Outcome, Latency Time, and Molecular Markers
- Author
-
Elena Maqueda, José Manuel Pumar, Ana Estany-Gestal, Andrés da Silva-Candal, Tomás Sobrino, Francisco Campos, Manuel Rodríguez-Yáñez, Paulo Ávila-Gómez, Uxía Regueiro, José Castillo, Pablo Hervella, and Ramón Iglesias-Rey
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Neurology ,Ischemia ,Gastroenterology ,Brain Ischemia ,Glutamates ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Latency (engineering) ,Stroke ,Ischemic Stroke ,Interleukin-6 ,business.industry ,General Neuroscience ,Penumbra ,Retrospective cohort study ,medicine.disease ,Treatment Outcome ,Ischemic stroke ,Neurology (clinical) ,Neurosurgery ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Biomarkers - Abstract
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is commonly used to evaluate stroke neurological deficits and to predict the patient’s outcome. Neurological instability (NI), defined as the variation of the NIHSS in the first 48 h, is a simple clinical metric that reflects dynamic changes in the area of the brain affected by the ischemia. We hypothesize that NI may represent areas of cerebral instability known as penumbra, which could expand or reduce brain injury and its associated neurological sequels. In this work, our aim was to analyze the association of NI with the functional outcome at 3 months and to study clinical biomarkers associated to NI as surrogate biomarkers of ischemic and inflammatory penumbrae in ischemic stroke (IS) patients. We included 663 IS patients in a retrospective observational study. Neutral NI was defined as a variation in the NI scale between − 5 and 5% (37.1%). Positive NI is attributed to patients with an improvement of > 5% NI after 48 h (48.9%), while negative NI is assigned to patients values lower than − 5% (14.0%). Poor outcome was assigned to patients with mRS ≥ 3 at 3 months. We observed an inverse association of poor outcome with positive NI (OR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.18–0.67; p = 0.002) and a direct association with negative NI (OR, 6.30; 95%CI, 2.12–18.65; p = 0.001). Negative NI showed a higher association with poor outcome than most clinical markers. Regarding good functional outcome, positive NI was the marker with the higher association (19.31; CI 95%, 9.03–41.28; p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF