Search

The objectives of the study were: a) to identify osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures in a large consecutive series of patients; b) to identify radiographic fracture patterns among osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures; and c) to calculate intra- and inter-observer reliability of assessment of osteoporosis and of radiographic fracture patterns.This was a prospective observational study of patients admitted to the emergency department affected by a proximal humerus fracture between June 2014 and June 2016. Three researchers evaluated demographic data and comorbidities, x-rays and CT-scans. A new evaluation method for assessment of osteoporosis was proposed; 7 radiographic fracture patterns were studied. Reliabilities between intra- and inter-tester evaluations, and correlations between the presence of osteoporosis and the 7 radiologic fracture patterns were calculated.Two hundred twenty-five patients with a humeral fracture were recruited. Their mean (26-95, 32) age was 58. Of those, 163 (72.4%) were identified as osteoporotic. Among the three raters, the intra- and inter-observer agreement using the proposed methods were high or excellent. Significant correlations with diagnosis of osteoporosis were found with Codman-Lego type 12(p = 0.041), metaphyseal comminution(p 0.001), impaction of fragments(p = 0.023), comminution of tuberosities(p = 0.037), inferior subluxation(p = 0.029). Intra- and inter-tester reliability of evaluation of these osteoporotic fracture patterns were high.Osteoporosis of the proximal humerus was identified in 72% of patients during a two year period; most of these patients were elderly females sustaining low energy trauma. These fractures showed to have specific radiographic patterns, as comminution of metaphysis and tuberosities, impaction of fragments, and inferior subluxation of the humeral head. These patterns can be assessed with the simple observation of a 2-plan view of a radiograph, without the use of specific software.

The objectives of this study are to propose a reliable radiologic method for detecting static inferior subluxation of humeral head, to calculate the relative intra- and inter-observer reliability, and to evaluate its presence pre- and post-surgery. This is a retrospective observational study of patients surgically treated for a fracture of the proximal humerus. Fractures were classified using Codman-Lego criteria (radiographic, CT images), osteoporosis was assessed. To identify inferior subluxation, an original method is proposed. This measurement was done pre-operatively, at three and 12 month post-operatively. Clinical evaluation was recorded at final follow-up using Constant Score. One hundred fifty fractures surgically treated were studied. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were excellent and high, respectively. In pre-operative x-rays, a significant inferior subluxation was noted in 17/150 cases (11.3%), with significant correlation with fracture pattern (p=0.045), female sex (p=0.038), age older than 70 (p=0.003), obesity (BMI>30, p=0.03), and local osteoporosis (p=0.002). At three month of follow-up, 22 cases (14.6%) had inferior subluxation, with significant correlation with female sex (p=0.04), age older than 70 (p=0.002), obesity (p=0.02), pin or screw articular surface perforation (p

Background Infection is one of the main reasons for failure of orthopedic implants. Antibacterial coatings may prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, according to various preclinical studies. The aim of the present study is to report the first clinical trial on an antibiotic-loaded fast-resorbable hydrogel coating (Defensive Antibacterial Coating, DAC®) to prevent surgical site infection, in patients undergoing internal osteosynthesis for closed fractures. Materials and methods In this multicenter randomized controlled prospective study, a total of 256 patients in five European orthopedic centers who were scheduled to receive osteosynthesis for a closed fracture, were randomly assigned to receive antibiotic-loaded DAC or to a control group (without coating). Pre- and postoperative assessment of laboratory tests, wound healing, clinical scores and X-rays were performed at fixed time intervals. Results Overall, 253 patients were available with a mean follow-up of 18.1 ± 4.5 months (range 12–30). On average, wound healing, clinical scores, laboratory tests and radiographic findings did not show any significant difference between the two groups. Six surgical site infections (4.6%) were observed in the control group compared to none in the treated group (P