Search

Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer, characterized by rapid progression and high mortality. Persistence of tumor-initiating cells (TICs, or cancer stem cells) after cytotoxic drug treatment is responsible for tumor relapse, and represents one of the main reasons for the poor prognosis of mesothelioma. In fact, identification of the molecules affecting TIC viability is still a significant challenge. Methods TIC-enriched cultures were obtained from 10 human malignant pleural mesotheliomas and cultured in vitro. Three fully characterized tumorigenic cultures, named MM1, MM3, and MM4, were selected and used to assess antiproliferative effects of the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib. Cell viability was investigated by MTT assay, and cell cycle analysis as well as induction of apoptosis were determined by flow cytometry. Western blotting was performed to reveal the modulation of protein expression and the phosphorylation status of pathways associated with sorafenib treatment. Results We analyzed the molecular mechanisms of the antiproliferative effects of sorafenib in mesothelioma TIC cultures. Sorafenib inhibited cell cycle progression in all cultures, but only in MM3 and MM4 cells was this effect associated with Mcl-1-dependent apoptosis. To investigate the mechanisms of sorafenib-mediated antiproliferative activity, TICs were treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) or basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) causing, in MM3 and MM4 cells, MEK, ERK1/2, Akt, and STAT3 phosphorylation. These effects were abolished by sorafenib only in bFGF-treated cells, while a modest inhibition occurred after EGF stimulation, suggesting that sorafenib effects are mainly due to FGF receptor (FGFR) inhibition. Indeed, FGFR1 phosphorylation was inhibited by sorafenib. Moreover, in MM1 cells, which release high levels of bFGF and showed autocrine activation of FGFR1 and constitutive phosphorylation/activation of MEK-ERK1/2, sorafenib induced a more effective antiproliferative response, confirming that the main target of the drug is the inhibition of FGFR1 activity. Conclusions These results suggest that, in malignant pleural mesothelioma TICs, bFGF signaling is the main target of the antiproliferative response of sorafenib, acting directly on the FGFR1 activation. Patients with constitutive FGFR1 activation via an autocrine loop may be more sensitive to sorafenib treatment and the analysis of this possibility warrants further clinical investigation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13287-017-0573-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Over the past decades, a plethora of cytotoxic agents, administered alone or in combinations, have been prescribed for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but improvements regarding patient outcome remain disappointing. Therefore, additional therapeutic strategies are urgently required to increase response rate and survival. By the time researchers had begun to understand the processes involved in NSCLC development, the genetic aetiology of lung cancer had been progressively defined. The constitutive activation of receptor tyrosine kinases and their downstream signalling pathways has opened encouraging avenues of investigation for NSCLC treatment. Several new targeted compounds have evolved from preclinical to clinical settings to affect growth factor pathways of NSCLC, and their therapeutic implications will be reviewed and discussed here.

The incidence of human malignant pleural mesothelioma (hMPM) is still increasing worldwide. hMPM prognosis is poor even if the median survival time has been slightly improved after the introduction of the up-to-date chemotherapy. Nevertheless, large phase II/III trials support the combination of platinum derivatives and pemetrexed or raltitrexed, as preferred first-line schedule. Better understanding of the molecular machinery of hMPM will lead to the design and synthesis of novel compounds targeted against pathways identified as crucial for hMPM cell proliferation and spreading. Among them, several receptors tyrosine kinase show altered activity in subsets of hMPM. This observation suggests that these kinases might represent novel therapeutic targets in this chemotherapy-resistant disease. Over these foundations, several promising studies are ongoing at preclinical level and novel molecules are currently under evaluation as well. Yet, established tumour cell lines, used for decades to investigate the efficacy of anticancer agents, although still the main source of drug efficacy studies, after long-term cultures tend to biologically diverge from the original tumour, limiting the predictive potential of in vivo efficacy. Cancer stem cells (CSCs), a subpopulation of malignant cells capable of self-renewal and multilineage differentiation, are believed to play an essential role in cancer initiation, growth, metastasization and relapse, being responsible of chemo- and radiotherapy refractoriness. According to the current carcinogenesis theory, CSCs represent the tumour-initiating cell (TIC) fraction, the only clonogenic subpopulation able to originate a tumour mass. Consequently, the recently described isolation of TICs from hMPM, the proposed main pharmacological target for novel antitumoural drugs, may contribute to better dissect the biology and multidrug resistance pathways controlling hMPM growth.

Purpose: Platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ), frequently activated in malignant mesothelioma, is a promising cancer therapeutic target. Imatinib mesylate (STI571; Glivec) is a selective inhibitor of tyrosine kinases as bcr-abl, c-kit, c-fms, and PDGFRβ and enhances tumor drug uptake by reducing the interstitial fluid pressure. We previously showed that imatinib mesylate synergizes with gemcitabine and pemetrexed in PDGFRβ-positive mesothelioma cells. Here, we aimed at investigating these combined treatments in a novel mesothelioma model.Experimental Design: REN mesothelioma cells, infected with a lentiviral vector carrying the luciferase gene, were injected in the peritoneum of severe combined immunodeficient mice. This model allowed imaging of live animals treated with pemetrexed or gemcitabine chemotherapeutics, or with imatinib mesylate alone, as well as with a combination of gemcitabine and imatinib mesylate.Results: We show here that, consistent with our previous in vitro studies, gemcitabine inhibited tumor growth, whereas pemetrexed was ineffective, even at the highest dosage tested. Compared with monotreatment, the combination of gemcitabine with imatinib mesylate led to a further tumor growth inhibition and improved mice survival, by a decrease rate of tumor cell proliferation and an increase in number of apoptotic tumor cells.Conclusions: Imatinib mesylate enhances the therapeutic response to gemcitabine, in accordance with our previous in vitro data. These in vivo results validate imatinib mesylate and gemcitabine as a combination treatment of malignant mesothelioma, also in view of its known positive effects on tumor drug uptake. These evidences provide the rationale for the currently ongoing clinical trials.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive chemotherapy-resistant cancer. Up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in MPM development and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may represent novel therapeutic options. We tested the effects of the EGFR TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib and TKIs targeted to other growth factors (VEGFR and PDGFR), in comparison to standard antineoplastic agents, in two human MPM cell lines, IST-Mes2 and ZL55. All drugs showed IC(50) values in the micromolar range: TKIs induced cytostatic effects at concentrations up to the IC(50,) while conventional drug growth-inhibitory activity was mainly cytotoxic. Moreover, the treatment of IST-Mes2 with TKIs (gefitinib and imatinib mesylate) in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine did not show additivity. Focusing on the molecular mechanisms underlying the antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of EGFR-TKIs, we observed that gefitinib induced the formation and stabilization of inactive EGFR homodimers, even in absence of EGF, as demonstrated by EGFR B(max) and number of sites/cell. The analysis of downstream effectors of EGFR signaling demonstrated that EGF-induced proliferation, reverted by gefitinib, involved ERK1/2 activation, independently from Akt pathway. Gefitinib inhibits MPM cell growth and survival, preventing EGF-dependent activation of ERK1/2 pathway by blocking EGFR-TK phosphorylation and stabilizing inactive EGFR dimers. Along with the molecular definition of TKIs pharmacological efficacy in vitro, these results may contribute to delve deep into the promising but still controversial role for targeted and conventional drugs in the therapy of MPM.

Human malignant pleural mesothelioma (hMPM) is an aggressive asbestos-associated cancer, the incidence of which is increasing and which, despite progress in diagnosis and therapy, continues to have a poor prognosis. Asbestos fibers induce aberrant cell signaling, leading to proto-oncogene activation and chemoresistance. In this review, we discuss the evolution of pharmacological management of hMPM up to the most recent advances. Monotherapy with single cytotoxic drugs achieves modest objective response rates, seldom reaching 30%. However, combination regimens using novel drugs and standard molecules are showing gradually improving responses and clinical benefits. Phase II/III studies have identified pemetrexed, a multitarget folate pathway inhibitor in combination with platinum derivatives, and the cisplatin/gemcitabine association as front-line chemotherapy for hMPM. Detailed knowledge of molecular mechanisms of signal transduction and neoangiogenesis in hMPM should aid in the design and screening of other promising compounds such as more efficacious receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Malignant mesothelioma is a cancer which is refractory to current treatments. Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of tyrosine kinases such as bcr-abl, c-Kit, c-Fms and platelet derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRbeta). PDGFRbeta is often overexpressed in mesothelioma cells and is a therapeutic target for imatinib in some solid tumours. A study was undertaken to assess whether imatinib alone or combined with chemotherapeutic agents may be effective for treating mesothelioma.Cultures from mesothelioma MMP, REN and ISTMES2 cell lines were treated with imatinib alone or in combination with a chemotherapeutic agent.Imatinib induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis selectively on PDGFRbeta positive mesothelioma cells via blockade of receptor phosphorylation and interference with the Akt pathway. Of the chemotherapeutic agents tested in combination with imatinib, a synergistic effect was obtained with gemcitabine and pemetrexed.This study provides a rationale for a novel translational approach to the treatment of mesothelioma which relies on enhancement of tumour chemosensitivity by inhibition of Akt.

The purpose of this study was to examine the antiproliferative potentialities of a pool of new generation compounds (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, Gemcitabine, Topotecan, SN-38) together with fenretinide, a synthetic derivative of retinoic acid, in comparison with the current first choice treatment cisplatin molecule, on a pool of human malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines derived from either bioptic and pleural effusions samples. To evaluate the chemosensitivity features of malignant mesothelioma cells in vitro, we resorted to a rapid and reproducible colorimetric assay, a useful widely recognized tool for preclinical drug screening. In addition, by DNA content analysis and cellular morphologic assessment, we focused on the apoptosis as a potential mechanism of drug activity. The main results clearly indicate that, in all the models of malignant mesothelioma we handled in vitro, each tested antineoplastic agent is more powerful than cisplatin in inhibiting cell proliferation. Moreover, on experimental evidences basis, we can assume that the cytotoxic activity of tested compounds could be related, at least partially, to the drug-induced programmed cell death. This experimental study gives substance to the expected pharmacologic worth of the second generation antineoplastic drugs even if, in order to afford the most satisfactory biopharmacological approach, allowing to bypass the refractoriness to chemotherapy of this highly lethal tumour, further investigations at preclinical level are required.

Integration of chemotherapy and radiation is the standard practice in the management of locally advanced inoperable NSCLC. To assess the biological interaction between third generation chemotherapeutic agents and radiation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in vitro, we tested a number of different drugs (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, topotecan, SN-38 and cisplatin) combined with radiation, in lung cancer cell lines. Cellular chemosensitivity was determined, using the semi-automated colorimetric MTT assay, after 48, 72 and 96 h of exposure to increasing drug concentrations, (0.001-100 microM) and radiation doses (100-400 cGy). Cell lines used were the adenocarcinoma (ADK), A-549, and the squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC), LX-1. Cells were pre-treated with anticancer agents at 24, 12 and 0 h before irradiation. Cytofluorimetric cell cycle analysis was performed. A significant S-phase block or a G(2)/M block was seen with gemcitabine and topotecan or paclitaxel pre-treatment, respectively. Apoptosis was seen only after paclitaxel exposure in the A-549 cell line. Despite a similar pattern of cell-kinetic changes induced by chemotherapy pre-treatment in all cell lines, the adenocarcinoma A-549 cell line was not radiosensitized by any of the anticancer agents tested, whereas synergism was observed in the LX-1 squamous carcinoma cell line, when exposed to gemcitabine, SN-38, topotecan and cisplatin. Paclitaxel, despite a favourable cell cycle effect, was not found to be synergistic with radiotherapy in our experimental model. In conclusion, the observed synergism appears to be dose- and timing-independent and seems to be related to the histological subtype being present in SCC only. Favourable perturbation of the cell cycle is evident with all the new agents tested in both cell types, but was not sufficient to produce synergism with radiation.

Endogenous sex hormones, such as oestrogens, control the development and growth of breast carcinoma. Blocking the binding between the steroid hormone and its receptor using anti-oestrogenic compounds is one of the possible ways of impeding the action of oestrogens at the level of their target tissues. The nonsteroidal, triphenylethylenic, anti-oestrogen tamoxifen has so far been the standard compound for endocrine treatment of breast cancer. Nevertheless, it forms a complex with the oestrogen receptor which gives rise to a range of biopharmacological events, ranging from full oestrogen antagonism to partial agonism. Moreover, its use is limited by the possible onset of drug resistance in many patients. In spite of these restrictions, tamoxifen has proved to be very helpful as a starting point for the development of new, more efficacious compounds. In this article, Roberto Favoni and Alessandra de Cupis review and discuss tamoxifen, several of its derivatives and the steroidal-like anti-oestrogens in terms of laboratory development, pharmacology and clinical evaluation.

Breast cancer cells express receptors for and are sensitive to a variety of steroids, polypeptide hormones and growth factors; the blocking of and/or the interference with their biochemical pathways could represent a new approach to breast tumour therapy. Antioestrogens achieve such a goal by competing with oestradiol for binding to the oestrogen receptors through which intracellular effects of the hormone are mediated. Tamoxifen has undergone the most extensive clinical evaluations and represents the treatment of choice for the endocrine management of breast cancer. Nevertheless, it is well known that tamoxifen retains agonist activity both in vitro and in vivo . To circumvent this disadvantage, new molecules with steroid-like structure, represented by ICI 164,384 and ICI 182,780, have been synthesized. In this review, Alessandra de Cupis and Roberto Favoni review data about the cross-talk between the two major families of breast cancer growth regulators: oestrogens and growth factors, focusing on the use of nonsteroidal antioestrogens and the new generation of steroidal antioestrogens as possible specifically targeted inhibitors of breast tumour proliferation.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is one of the deadliest and most heterogeneous tumors, highly refractory to multimodal therapeutic approach, including surgery, chemo- and radiotherapy. Preclinical and clinical studies exploring the efficacy of drugs targeting tyrosine kinases, angiogenesis and histone deacetylases, did not fulfil the expected clinical benefits. Thus, novel molecular targets should be identified from a definite knowledge of the unique biology and most relevant transduction pathways of MPM cells. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a subset of malignant precursors responsible for initiation, progression, resistance to cytotoxic drugs, recurrence and metastatic diffusion of tumor cells. CSCs are putative driving factors for MPM development and contribute to its clinical and biological heterogeneity; hence, targeted eradication of CSCs represents an ineludible goal to counteract MPM aggressiveness. In this context, innovative preclinical models could be exploited to identify novel intracellular pathway inhibitors able to target CSC viability. Novel drug targets have been identified among key factors responsible for the oncogenic transformation of mesothelial cells, often directly induced by asbestos. These include mitogenic and anti-apoptotic signaling that may also be activated by autocrine and paracrine cytokine pathways controlling cell plasticity. Both signaling pathways affecting proto-oncogene and transcription factor expression, or genetic and epigenetic alterations, such as mutations in cell cycle genes and silencing of tumor suppressor genes, represent promising disease-specific targets. In this review we describe current knowledge of MPM cell biology, focusing on potential targets to be tested in pharmacological studies, and highlighting results and challenges of clinical translation.